The final result of our Twitter poll from yesterday was pretty conclusive.
(It was also by a distance the biggest response we can ever remember getting for one – normally our Twitter polls get around 3,000 votes.)
But of course Twitter polls aren’t scientific – they’re self-selecting and they draw from a biased sample, in this case people who follow Wings and are more likely to agree with us on most things. So we need a bit more data for a better picture.
The recently-restored Wings Twitter account has a little over 56,000 followers, the vast bulk of them accumulated at a time when this site had far less reason to criticise the SNP or the Scottish Government. So while this poll isn’t scientific, the indy-friendly nature of the respondent base makes it pretty interesting.
Those numbers closely mirror what every actual proper poll tells us about Scottish people’s opinion of the GRR itself – they oppose it by margins of between 3:1 and 4:1. So if the Scottish Government is counting on the UK’s intervention to increase support for independence, frankly it looks like they’re onto a massive loser.
…by which we mean “IQs in the history of the Scottish Parliament”.
Put a cushion on your desk before you start listening to this, gang, or you might hurt your jaw. Because surely nobody quite as paralysingly, catastrophically thick as this clueless, bumbling, deranged and dangerous imbecile has ever been allowed to make the laws of Scotland before. We wouldn’t let her make orange squash, to be honest.
And yes, we’re including Kezia Dugdale and Jamie Greene in that reckoning.
(The largest number that said No, around 118,000, didn’t tick the boxes of either transwoman, transman or non-binary, nor wrote in their own. An unknown number of these may have been rejecting “gender” altogether. 30,000 ticked “non-binary” and 18,000 wrote in a gender because they were REALLY special.)
But, as we’ve been told times out of number, we must accept what people say about themselves. So 48,000 transwomen it is. So few. So vulnerable. And that number got me thinking.
Alert readers of Wings will know that I have a fondness for sweet and fruity things, and a particular favourite of mine are Tropical Vibes still lemonades. (NB Other drinks are available, this site is in no way sponsored by or financially affiliated to Tropical Vibes.)
I especially like their Ocean Blue variety, a deliciously sharp and tangy refresher which contains real blueberry juice.
(Although we’re not sure how “new followers” is being calculated there. We actually have more than 500 extra followers since 8pm – we can only assume that it’s only counting those who right-clicked and followed from that specific tweet.)
And part of the reason is that it’s plain that almost nobody knew about the report, even though it came out three months ago (when Wings was still in retirement). We had to dig deep to find any media coverage of it at all, and what there was was cursory at best, and sometimes a lot worse.
As a journalist, readers, sometimes you want to pep a story up a bit. From time to time, it’s perfectly legitimate to sensationalise a relatively minor aspect of something in order to draw attention to a worthwhile but intrinsically dull subject.
At other times, you find yourself in the strange position of having to talk a subject down as much as you can, because if you simply report the facts calmly and neutrally it’ll sound so outrageous and ridiculous and deranged that everyone will think you’ve gone full-on, tinfoil-hat, pencils-up-the-nose insane.
(We haven’t had any contact from Twitter about it, people just noticed the account was live again last night and told us about it, so we don’t know what the reason was.)
It’s still quite a shocking read even half a decade down the line.
We’ve only actually had 93 posts on trans issues in those five years, or an average of about one every three weeks. We know it feels like more. And we know that some of you thought we’d gone mad when we started warning about it.
But hopefully some of you have realised just what’s at stake, and even if you don’t care about that, how much it might cost the cause of independence. We really hope we can stop talking about it soon, if only so we don’t keep getting banned from Twitter.
It was already quite bold/crass to equate “letting rapists change their legal sex so their victim has to refer to them as ‘she’ in court” with the life’s work of Nelson Mandela.
But the punchline was still a chef’s kiss to treasure.
I’ll be honest, readers, I’m so exhausted from despising the sickening nonce-panderers of the SNP this week that I can’t summon the energy to write any more about them. So I’m going to hand over to some other people.
All pics are links so that you can read full threads, see context and access any linked articles, and all these people are worth following.
The last few days have been perhaps the most turbulent in the entire history of the modern Scottish Parliament. Proceedings have been suspended repeatedly, members of the public thrown out and threatened with arrest, filibusters attempted, carol services cancelled, tempers frayed and sittings going on until the wee small hours.
All of this has happened in the service of the policy that the SNP has made its flagship priority for the last two years and more – the destruction not only of women’s rights, but of the very CONCEPT of a woman.
So you’d imagine the party would have been tweeting about it constantly, keeping its supporters informed about all the dramatic events and the progress of the bill, if only to reassure them that they were determined to get it passed before the Christmas break come what may.
And yet strangely, up until it retweeted a tweet from The National about the bill finally passing a few minutes ago, the SNP Twitter account had not made a single mention of the Gender Recognition Reform Bill in the entirety of the last week.
It certainly hadn’t been quiet – it’s been churning out scores and scores of tweets on subjects from the NHS to Rwanda deportations, the COP15 summit, Brexit, early learning, FMQs, winter fuel payments, International Human Solidarity Day, train fares, independence polls, the Jewish holiday of Chanukah, free school meals, income tax, drugs, net zero, industrial disputes, the cost of living and dozens more.
One of the most memorable lectures I had as an undergraduate student at university was on Eugene Ionesco’s play “Rhinoceros”, a defining work of the Theatre Of The Absurd genre. It is both a timeless and timely text, on a par with 1984 or The Crucible.
During the opening scene, the everyman protagonist Berenger sits having coffee with a friend. Midway through their conversation, a rhino charges past the café. Berenger is startled and concerned but his friend seems unperturbed, in denial that they even saw a rhinoceros.
Throughout the rest of the play, Berenger watches in incredulity and terror as, one by one, every person around him, colleagues and friends, transform into rhinoceroses, the cause seemingly being part-infection, part-capitulation.
In the final scene, he stands at his window looking out over the carnage, and in a moment of desperation, tries to force himself to transform into a rhinoceros. Despite his efforts, he is unable to and upon regaining his senses, vows in a hopeless frenzy that he will never capitulate.
Alf Baird on No Money Back, No Guarantee: ““NOT estranged when the thefts were carried out” Likewise, Scotland and England are not exactly ‘estranged’, the former held tighter…” May 27, 10:28
Socrates MacSporran on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “It is a clear demonstration of how thick Starmer and the Labour Government are, that they are not rushing to…” May 27, 10:04
agentx on No Money Back, No Guarantee: ““Murrell, who is Nicola Sturgeon’s estranged husband, pled guilty to embezzling £400,310.65 from the SNP over a 12-year period.” ——————————————————-…” May 27, 09:47
agentx on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “Murrell’s escalating thefts 2010: £537 2011: £706 2012: £1083 2013: £1,518 2014: £3,425 2015: £5,520 2016: £46,284 2017: £43,724 2018:…” May 27, 09:40
Tinto Chiel on Off-topic: “@sarah: glad you both enjoyed it. My friend remembered his dad singing it to him at bath-time when he was…” May 27, 09:30
Aidan on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “£85,000 a year is about £56,000 after tax (but before pension contributions, and fixed costs like housing). So the £400k…” May 27, 09:28
DavidT on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “I am not making excuses for her, but it’s reasonable to assume that if he had an annual income of…” May 27, 09:01
Willie on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “Definition of stupidity the promotion of two votes SNP it is not young Lochinvar. Rather it is the definition of…” May 27, 08:34
Hatey McHateface on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “BBC is reporting that Murrell bought “a bottle of Loctite super glue (£3.50)”. I wonder, as a bit of a…” May 27, 08:33
Hatey McHateface on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “Here you go YL. This is what is really going on in the world: https://unherd.com/2025/10/military-drones-will-upend-the-world/?ref=refinnar The people controlling the supply…” May 27, 08:06
Hatey McHateface on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “Drop a few hints and she might get a copy of Sturgeon’s Collected Speeches for you.” May 27, 07:15
James on The Final Robbery: “I salute wings, always a top notch read and putting the rest to shame. Well done sir!” May 27, 06:58
Young Lochinvar on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “Anyone else just sitting idly assessing this whole mess, and the whole mother of all messes down in London, and…” May 27, 04:19
gm on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/05/26/sturgeon-husband-murrell-crimes-jewellery/” May 27, 02:26
GM on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “Click on the pictures above. Also Telegraph, Sun, Reptile, even the BBC (who backed her to the hilt whilst hounding…” May 27, 02:23
Young Lochinvar on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “GM Link please? Ye know, that’s 2/3rds of the party leaders/ seniors during the independence debates have either been described…” May 27, 02:03
Young Lochinvar on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “Frank According to reports on the BBC ££where££ then a fair old percentage of purchases were from what you would…” May 27, 01:46
A2 on Woman buys thing with own money: “Who’d a thunk I’d remember about this post after all this time? (Is that first line an edit?)” May 27, 00:29
Mark Beggan on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “When is the Police auction? I fancy a nice set of Salt n Pepper grinders. Maybe get a designer bag…” May 27, 00:16
GM on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “It appears that Nicola Sturgeon is finally being called out by the MSM. ‘Sturgeon claims never to have seen..yet we…” May 26, 23:59
Skip_NC on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “Not as such, I don’t think. He didn’t steal pound notes. He took it in kind. There was the sale…” May 26, 23:20
Skip_NC on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “The amount of Short Money is not unknown. It may be hidden in the SNP financial statements but it is…” May 26, 23:11
sarah on Off-topic: “You’re a lucky man, TC, with your wildlife – especially the goldcrest. I’ve only seen one once in all my…” May 26, 23:03
Frank Waring on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “I don’t find it at all implausible that Ms Sturgeon was completely in ignorance of Murrell’s appetite for bling: on…” May 26, 22:26
PRJ on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “There was an article written prior to the referendum that implied that three SNP members had close links to unionists…” May 26, 22:03
Wally Jumblatt on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “They reckon that since they didn’t have any clue how much money they had left in the kitty (for 5…” May 26, 21:30
Andrea on The Final Robbery: “I came here to ask that very question. Do we know what happened to that “loan” and why it was…” May 26, 21:20
Tinto Chiel on Off-topic: “@sarah: the tinies are now obsessed with slaters (“wood lice”) and green-veined white butterflies. I heard a goldcrest singing today,…” May 26, 21:07