The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland



Results just in 308

Posted on August 25, 2014 by

totcarn

Alistair Darling Lie Bingo 138

Posted on August 25, 2014 by

We’ve been so busy with the Wee Blue Book for the past week or so that we only just got round to listening to last Tuesday’s interview with Alistair Darling on Good Morning Scotland in time, before it vanished from the iPlayer. The former Chancellor gets a quite uncomfortable ride from presenter Gary Robertson, and flaps angrily for much of the ten-and-a-half minutes trying to turn every question into one on currency.

soundwave2

Mr Darling also makes some startlingly and empirically false statements throughout the interview, and we thought it’d be worth noting a few of them and seeing if they crop up on tonight’s BBC1 debate with the First Minister.

Read the rest of this entry →

Fleeing the field 165

Posted on August 17, 2014 by

The media coverage of the first TV debate between Alex Salmond and Alistair Darling was a classic, but transparent, stitch-up. A poll which had a majority Unionist sample before the debate began duly reported a “victory” for Darling, even though among the sample’s small number of undecideds most thought Salmond had won.

But that crooked measurement was enough to justify a week-long frenzy of front pages portraying the debate as a fatal disaster for the First Minister and an epic, decisive triumph for the angry former Chancellor. Inconveniently, two new polls this weekend both showing a swing to Yes and a single-figure No lead somewhat undermine that narrative, but the No campaign is nevertheless desperate to quit while it’s ahead.

Read the rest of this entry →

The only stat that matters 391

Posted on August 05, 2014 by

As so insightfully predicted by Lallands Peat Worrier yesterday, the media has raced to proclaim victory for Alistair Darling in tonight’s STV debate. For our money, the only winners were the people who watched something else.

The debate was a mess – not quite as shambolic as Nicola Sturgeon and Johann Lamont’s effort on the same channel a few months back, but none of the lessons from that trainwreck were learned. Darling was angry and personal from the start, while Salmond was off-form and the strategy he adopted for dealing with the only subject Darling wanted to talk about – currency – was absolutely dreadful.

angryal

We warned back in February that Yes couldn’t just keep flatly saying “There will be a currency union” for seven months, even if it’s true, and the studio audience was deeply and audibly unimpressed with Salmond’s evasion of Darling’s repeated question, even if the tactic got old and tired when the No man was still using it an hour later.

But we’re not going to get into too much spin, because our view is partisan. The main evidence used for the hasty declarations of a “triumph” for Darling was a snap poll conducted immediately afterwards by ICM for the Guardian. But on even a cursory examination, the poll actually found the opposite of what the media said it did.

Read the rest of this entry →

Any card except THAT one 286

Posted on June 25, 2014 by

Sorry, readers, we’re getting addicted to these.

“Better Together” spokesman, 27 September 2013:

“David Cameron does not have a vote in this referendum. Alistair Darling does. He is ready to debate Alex Salmond any time and any place.”

Letter from Danny Alexander MP to Alex Salmond, 30 Jan 2014:

“Alistair Darling, leader of the Better Together campaign, has said he is willing to debate with you, as leader of the pro-independence campaign, anytime, anywhere.”

The Herald, 25 June 2014:

“Better Together, the pro-UK campaign led by Mr Darling, reacted angrily after STV indicated it was willing to change the date at the request of the First Minister. A senior Better Together source said Mr Darling would take part on July 16, as agreed, but not at a later time to suit Mr Salmond.”

(Our emphases in all cases.)

Read the rest of this entry →

Not quite anytime 118

Posted on June 24, 2014 by

“Better Together” spokesman, 27 September 2013:

“David Cameron does not have a vote in this referendum. Alistair Darling does. He is ready to debate Alex Salmond any time and any place.”

Letter from Danny Alexander MP to Alex Salmond, 30 Jan 2014:

“Alistair Darling, leader of the Better Together campaign, has said he is willing to debate with you, as leader of the pro-independence campaign, anytime, anywhere.”

The Telegraph, 23 June 2014:

The pro-UK Better Together campaign withdrew from the contest, complaining that STV was allowing the First Minister to dictate when the show would be broadcast.”

So, just “anywhere”, then.

Unsolvable paradox solved 97

Posted on June 24, 2014 by

Here’s “Better Together” communications director Rob Shorthouse this morning:

bungalowdebate

And here’s the Telegraph this evening (our emphasis):

“Plans for the first proposed Scottish independence TV debate between Alex Salmond and Alistair Darling have collapsed in acrimony following a row over the date.

The pro-UK Better Together campaign withdrew from the contest, complaining that STV was allowing the First Minister to dictate when the show would be broadcast.”

We’re always willing to believe that “Better Together” are lying, because they usually are. We’re always willing to believe the Telegraph is lying, because it usually is. But on this occasion, ONE of them must be telling the truth. Frankly, readers, we have no idea what to think.

Read the rest of this entry →

The people’s champion 165

Posted on June 17, 2014 by

We know only a few of you sit through these long video clips, but for the benefit of those who do this is a slightly unusual debate organised by the Prospect trade union and chaired by Magnus Gardham of the Herald, which took place at the union’s conference in Glasgow last month and saw Anas Sarwar and Nicola Sturgeon quizzed on some quite specific topics by various representatives of civic Scotland.

Readers can, as ever, come to their own conclusions as to which of the two gave the most convincing and honest answers, but one line from early on did leap out at us.

Read the rest of this entry →

A circular argument 155

Posted on April 30, 2014 by

You can’t make this stuff up.

circledunc

Yes Glasgow has been inviting No speakers to take part in this Thursday’s event for literally months. They’ve contacted every single MP and MSP from a Unionist party representing a Glasgow seat, asking them to participate. They offered from the very beginning to let “Better Together” co-organise and co-host the debate, which will be chaired by the neutral Electoral Reform Society Scotland.

The only reason that “everyone on the platform is a Yes supporter” is because nobody from the No side is prepared to face the Glasgow public and put their case. The opportunity is still there. We confess ourselves perplexed that they seem determined to refuse it, and then to complain bitterly that the debate is one-sided.

Read the rest of this entry →

Frightened rabbits 205

Posted on April 29, 2014 by

ers1 Read the rest of this entry →

A period of silence 141

Posted on April 15, 2014 by

We’ve just been watching the latest of the BBC’s big independence referendum debates, and we’d like the hour of our life we wasted back, please.

shoutingmatch

It wasn’t as though it was the worst we’ve seen by a long chalk. It was, if nothing else, relatively even-tempered, helped by some firm moderation by James Cook. Lesley Riddoch was as reliable, sensible and on top of the facts as she always is (although even we’re starting to get fed up of hearing her go on about Norway all the time). And while Brian Wilson is a dishonest and bilious wee nyaff, he does have the one huge saving grace that he isn’t Anas Sarwar.

But tell us this, readers – what was the point of it all?

Read the rest of this entry →

Priorities in order 53

Posted on March 21, 2014 by

Rob Shorthouse is the Head of Communications for “Better Together”. This week he took part in a debate in Dunoon. The paper’s account of the event, published today, is fascinating and unusually candid, but this bit stood out for us in particular.

dunoon

We think that’s his coded way of saying he’ll be voting Yes. Would explain a lot.

  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,933 Posts, 1,245,305 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Young Lochinvar on The End Of Law: “Beggars Unfortunately that myth has been doing the rounds for a bit now. If true, it remains to be proven.…Jun 22, 19:38
    • Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “MI6 will include that in their daily synopsis of Wings BTL posts. It hits his desk 9:00 AM daily and…Jun 22, 19:19
    • Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “Wheesht, Lorncal. Nae cant wants to hear how Scotland was much better in many ways before the HR circus came…Jun 22, 19:13
    • TURABDIN on The End Of Law: “Non sequitor of the moment «Andy Burnham ‘understands Scotland because he’s from northern England» Glasgow South West MP Zubir AHMAD.Jun 22, 19:10
    • Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “Ah’m ganging tae dae fit Wally W says. Check him oot! Wi such wit, wisdom and erudeeshun at Indy’s beck…Jun 22, 19:06
    • 100%Yes on The End Of Law: “I’m wanting to go on the record I support Keir Starmer becoming the ambassador to America.Jun 22, 18:06
    • James on The End Of Law: “Here’s the half wit boyfriend appeared….Jun 22, 17:58
    • Lorncal on The End Of Law: “I love the Tartan Army, but I had to laugh when I saw some of them cleaning up a public…Jun 22, 17:50
    • Captain Caveman on The End Of Law: “What’s the difference between “James” and a walrus? Well, one has great rolls of gelatinous, wet, glistening blubber, has great…Jun 22, 17:34
    • James on The End Of Law: “Erm…how should I phrase it so you can comprehend…. oh aye, I know; “away and take a flying fuck to…Jun 22, 17:13
    • Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “Wally Walrus W resents being unmasked as a closet royalist. For such a lardy blubbermass, Wally, you’ve been very sleekit…Jun 22, 16:39
    • Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: ““behavioural determinism” What, like a genetic predisposition to sit about greeting into our drams? It’s not difficult to find places…Jun 22, 16:23
    • Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “And this from the Executive Summary section: “We do not intend to reach conclusions any time soon. We demand, as…Jun 22, 16:08
    • Mark Beggan on The End Of Law: “You are now trying to cover your tracks with gov.UK. Too late! you let your mask slip. No going back.…Jun 22, 16:02
    • Mark Beggan on The End Of Law: ““O friends, no more of these sounds! Let us sing more cheerful songs, More songs full of joy! Joy! Joy!…Jun 22, 15:22
    • sam on The End Of Law: “Aidan is projecting again. He insists, without evidence, that Dr Cockbain is engaging in sophistry- plausible but fallacious argument. Below…Jun 22, 15:13
    • Mark Beggan on The End Of Law: “All we need now is Mrs Starmer to divorce the sausage.Jun 22, 14:55
    • James on The End Of Law: “Too late.Jun 22, 14:47
    • Mark Beggan on The End Of Law: “Are these villages earmarked for mass immigration?Jun 22, 14:44
    • James on The End Of Law: “Piss aff.Jun 22, 14:41
    • Mark Beggan on The End Of Law: “The Order of the Knights Templar played No role in the battle of Culloden.Jun 22, 14:35
    • Lorncal on The End Of Law: “It is not a foreign institution, Onlooker, so long as we are part of the UK, then, one supposes, we…Jun 22, 14:31
    • Lorncal on The End Of Law: “Jay, while I agree with much of what you say, I also agree with H McH and I cannot read…Jun 22, 14:16
    • Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “Posh toff titled scum. Bet they all believed Bronze Age blethers too. These boys would have ridden their horses over…Jun 22, 14:15
    • Mark Beggan on The End Of Law: “Andy for King! Twenty five thousand votes can get you a country. No plan! No Money! What could possibly go…Jun 22, 14:13
    • Mark Beggan on The End Of Law: “Even less acknowledged is the vital part the The Order of the Knights Templar played in tipping the balance of…Jun 22, 13:57
    • Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “Why shouldn’t they be, Wally W? The likes of you are republican socialists. What’s your latest pig-ignorant wheeze? Claim hereditary…Jun 22, 13:52
    • Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “Is it true he intends to be known as Prime Minister Andy Burn? Seemingly he’s been advised the “ham” bit…Jun 22, 13:46
    • James Barr Gardner on The End Of Law: “O/T Wargame Sky Tv WTF !!!!!!!Jun 22, 13:43
    • Captain Caveman on The End Of Law: ““I do not trust people who, in the face of what is probably the worst cover up scandal in British…Jun 22, 13:33
  • A tall tale



↑ Top