It was already quite bold/crass to equate “letting rapists change their legal sex so their victim has to refer to them as ‘she’ in court” with the life’s work of Nelson Mandela.
But the punchline was still a chef’s kiss to treasure.
I’ll be honest, readers, I’m so exhausted from despising the sickening nonce-panderers of the SNP this week that I can’t summon the energy to write any more about them. So I’m going to hand over to some other people.
All pics are links so that you can read full threads, see context and access any linked articles, and all these people are worth following.
The last few days have been perhaps the most turbulent in the entire history of the modern Scottish Parliament. Proceedings have been suspended repeatedly, members of the public thrown out and threatened with arrest, filibusters attempted, carol services cancelled, tempers frayed and sittings going on until the wee small hours.
All of this has happened in the service of the policy that the SNP has made its flagship priority for the last two years and more – the destruction not only of women’s rights, but of the very CONCEPT of a woman.
So you’d imagine the party would have been tweeting about it constantly, keeping its supporters informed about all the dramatic events and the progress of the bill, if only to reassure them that they were determined to get it passed before the Christmas break come what may.
And yet strangely, up until it retweeted a tweet from The National about the bill finally passing a few minutes ago, the SNP Twitter account had not made a single mention of the Gender Recognition Reform Bill in the entirety of the last week.
It certainly hadn’t been quiet – it’s been churning out scores and scores of tweets on subjects from the NHS to Rwanda deportations, the COP15 summit, Brexit, early learning, FMQs, winter fuel payments, International Human Solidarity Day, train fares, independence polls, the Jewish holiday of Chanukah, free school meals, income tax, drugs, net zero, industrial disputes, the cost of living and dozens more.
One of the most memorable lectures I had as an undergraduate student at university was on Eugene Ionesco’s play “Rhinoceros”, a defining work of the Theatre Of The Absurd genre. It is both a timeless and timely text, on a par with 1984 or The Crucible.
During the opening scene, the everyman protagonist Berenger sits having coffee with a friend. Midway through their conversation, a rhino charges past the café. Berenger is startled and concerned but his friend seems unperturbed, in denial that they even saw a rhinoceros.
Throughout the rest of the play, Berenger watches in incredulity and terror as, one by one, every person around him, colleagues and friends, transform into rhinoceroses, the cause seemingly being part-infection, part-capitulation.
In the final scene, he stands at his window looking out over the carnage, and in a moment of desperation, tries to force himself to transform into a rhinoceros. Despite his efforts, he is unable to and upon regaining his senses, vows in a hopeless frenzy that he will never capitulate.
The newest Panelbase poll, which shows a narrow lead for independence, was an “omnibus” one with questions provided by multiple clients, including Wings and the Sunday Times. The questions we’re about to show you were asked by the ST rather than ourselves, but their results are deeply disturbing on multiple levels.
The first one is perhaps predictable but still unsettling. (Click all pics to enlarge.)
A huge 2:1 majority of Scots believe the Scottish Government’s proposed new “gender recognition” laws pose a safety risk to women. Tory voters think so by almost 9:1, Lib Dem voters by almost 6:1, and Labour voters by nearly 2:1.
That can only partly be explained away by partisan party loyalty – Labour and the Liberal Democrats both support the bill, but their own voters are still strongly against. More noteworthy is the fact that (excluding Don’t Knows) even slavishly loyal SNP voters agree with the statement by a smaller but still clear 12-point margin, 56 to 44.
So let’s say it unambiguously: most SNP voters think the SNP’s gender reforms pose a danger to women’s safety.
Next week MSPs will vote on the Gender Recognition Reform (GRR) Bill which will grant GRCs on the basis of self-identification, with no diagnosis, checks or safeguards of any kind, and thereby enable any male to claim he is female and should thus have access to female single-sex services and spaces. The bill is expected to pass comfortably due to the support of Labour, the Greens and the Lib Dems.
So it’s now official: in Scotland the words “sex” and “gender” mean the same thing, except when they don’t, and if you give a man a piece of paper because he’s asked for one, with no sort of checks whatsoever, then it literally turns him into a woman, except when it doesn’t, unless it does.
Or put more concisely: the word “sex” in Scotland now has no meaning at all.
To its eternal disgrace, the University Of Edinburgh is trying to prevent this excellent film from being shown in Scotland, as part of a systematic campaign of suppression and censorship that starts from the highest offices of the Scottish Government and works its way down through academia, the arts and the civic sector.
Yesterday we watched the first day’s proceedings of For Women Scotland taking the Scottish Government to court over its definition of what a woman is.
The topic is really very niche but will affect us all if the judge rules for the government (we won’t know the outcome for at least a month or two), so here’s the short version of what it’s all about.
In the 2021 Scottish Parliament election, the Scottish Greens received just 4.7% of all the votes cast. (255,314 of 5,419,544). The SNP got 44% – almost 10 times as many.
So we’re not sure how the Greens – a party that well over 90% of Scots don’t support – suddenly appear to be in charge.
Nor, perhaps more to the point, do we understand why.
For anyone with the slightest remaining grip on their critical faculties, the cat was truly let out of the bag on the day of the First Minister’s infamous “broom cupboard” video last January, in which she abjectly grovelled at the feet of a tiny handful of adolescent transactivists who’d left the party in a loud and choreographed public tantrum because it still hadn’t burned Joanna Cherry at the stake for believing in human biology.
One of those she was abasing herself to that day was the repulsive and now mercifully deceased drug dealer and abusive racist misogynist Leeze Lawrence (above, left), but he was only the tip of a filthy iceberg.
Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The fight about to come: “SALVO digital newsletter: ‘Territorial Alienation’ https://indd.adobe.com/view/713e7419-f745-461a-b79e-a061397e7638” Oct 15, 23:31
Northcode on The fight about to come: “I’m with the Captain on this one – Turabdin’s (I don’t do all-caps words or names unless I’m shouting at…” Oct 15, 23:07
Northcode on The fight about to come: “anomaly (noun) something that deviates from what is standard, normal, or expected. I’d say the intelligent, well-read, erudite, honest and…” Oct 15, 22:50
Northcode on The fight about to come: ““…surely you’d agree the Scots electorate cannot simply throw its collective hands up in the air and take no responsibility…”…” Oct 15, 22:31
Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “Pfft. These bloody kids today 😀 We were a bunch of penniless, roughneck council estate kids in Essex back in…” Oct 15, 22:28
TURABDIN on The fight about to come: “@Captain Caveman «Les fausses opinions ressemblent à la fausse monnaie qui est frappée d’abord par de grands coupables, et dépensée…” Oct 15, 21:46
sam on The fight about to come: “One good reason why England will want to bind Scotland fast is this. https://www.navylookout.com/why-relocating-trident-away-from-scotland-is-virtually-impossible/ If or when Scotland decides it…” Oct 15, 21:14
sam on The fight about to come: “Excellent piece on Alex Salmond’s contribution to Scottish political life. A perception of competent government from 2007 allowed him to…” Oct 15, 21:02
Lorncal on The fight about to come: “I don’t think that Mr Salmond was an anomaly, Northcode. He was exceptional, that is what he was. He was…” Oct 15, 20:19
Bilbo on The fight about to come: “I had come across a phrase that is used by Hatey’s Middle East friends which is Freier and is a…” Oct 15, 20:16
Northcode on The fight about to come: “The fallacy where a future is anticipated on the assumption that present circumstances will remain unchanged — even when change…” Oct 15, 19:28
Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “Dinna fash, MH, I’m in no position to draw my lines on the map and then enforce my partition edicts.…” Oct 15, 18:47
Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “I completely agree with you Aidan. Let no one kid themselves that in the event of an independent Scotland tomorrow,…” Oct 15, 18:24
Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “Well, you evidently don’t like him, TURABDIN, so I’d say he’s off to a flying start on a proforma basis…” Oct 15, 17:27
TURABDIN on The fight about to come: “@Captain Caveman Joseph de Maistre, a rather recondite reference. Make your choice, on the left the gallows, on the right…” Oct 15, 16:53
TURABDIN on The fight about to come: “The SNP circus and its exclusive troop of flying pigs. Scotland on front line of «war economy», oh look everybody,…” Oct 15, 16:23
Aidan on The fight about to come: “Also I’d suggest at least with the status quo there’s enough reasonable competent people in various places in the system…” Oct 15, 16:00
Frank Gillougley on The fight about to come: “Every year, and every time they trot out the same old shite and expect the proletariat to lap it up…” Oct 15, 15:50
Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “@Hatey Yes indeed, I’ll take Joseph de Maistre over our oft-mentioned friends Frantz Fanon and Aimé Césaire any day of…” Oct 15, 14:55
Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “I can see where you’re coming from in a lot of what you say there, Northy, but surely you’d agree…” Oct 15, 14:51
Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “@Northcode When you have an electorate containing a majority that can’t or won’t stand for being told truths, the professional…” Oct 15, 14:42
Minceheid on The fight about to come: “Hatey McHateface says: 15 October, 2026 at 1:57 pm There never was anything but force joining the disparate peoples of…” Oct 15, 14:40
Northcode on The fight about to come: ““…there is a school of argument that suggests the SNP and their ilk do not have to be any good…”…” Oct 15, 14:11
Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “Good post, CC. Tribalism is a far more plausible explanation for Scotland’s current woes than colonialism will ever be. But…” Oct 15, 13:57
Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “I don’t disagree per se. However, there is a school of argument that suggests the SNP and their ilk do…” Oct 15, 12:55
MaryB on The fight about to come: “Interesting that the SNP conference in Aberdeen is the same weekend as the SSRG conference in Dunfermline, discussing ideas for…” Oct 15, 12:42
Northcode on The fight about to come: ““Better to admit your faults than dress them in borrowed competence.” — attributed to Bea Lurt. Bea Lurt is often…” Oct 15, 11:54
Northcode on The fight about to come: “If we’re using fighting metaphors then the real, most obvious and most urgent, fight facing independence-seeking Scots is the one…” Oct 15, 11:01
Minceheid on The fight about to come: “I’m nae ower bothered about the beer because I have been abstinent for the past twenty years, but I’d be…” Oct 15, 09:34