It’s manifestly obvious to anyone paying any amount of attention to Scottish politics that the current Holyrood chamber is stuffed to the gills with otherwise-unemployable dum-dums. When we recently had cause to go through the entire roster of 129, the number who leapt out as either vaguely honourable or even just halfway-competent didn’t require us to take our shoes off to count.
(Indeed, speaking as a professional Scottish politics website about a thousand times more interested in this stuff than normal people, the number of expenses-guzzling seatwarmers we’d never even heard of was more than a little disturbing.)
So these figures from a Panelbase poll this month – which was conducted BEFORE the grim scenes around the SNP’s Gender Recognition Reform bill – can only be explained in two ways: either people have become accustomed to very low standards, or (more likely) people don’t pay that much attention to politics.
But there’s a much more interesting story in the numbers.
Religious figures normally restrict their political commentary to matters within their obvious remit, such as poverty and inequality, for which they can cite plentiful scripture about rich men and the eyes of needles and whatnot. We’re unaware of any passages in the Bible relating to the constitutional implications of the Scotland Act 1998.
Moderator in the Church Of Scotland is a ceremonial role lasting only 12 months, but Dr Iain Greenshields has attempted to put his stamp on it (one for the folks at home, there) by opining that a UK general election – and he was quite specific about meaning a UK one – is not an appropriate means of achieving Scotland’s independence.
From his quoted comments in the Times piece it’s not clear whether he’s some sort of ecumenical Kenny Farquharson who just wants Scots to shut up and vote Labour again, or a radical Yes supporter attempting to subtly influence the SNP towards a Holyrood plebiscite instead. But either way, for such a traditionally-neutral figure to come out with such an unexpectedly blunt political opinion is perhaps a sign of just what a terrible idea using a Westminster election to decide Scotland’s future is.
The newest Panelbase poll, which shows a narrow lead for independence, was an “omnibus” one with questions provided by multiple clients, including Wings and the Sunday Times. The questions we’re about to show you were asked by the ST rather than ourselves, but their results are deeply disturbing on multiple levels.
The first one is perhaps predictable but still unsettling. (Click all pics to enlarge.)
A huge 2:1 majority of Scots believe the Scottish Government’s proposed new “gender recognition” laws pose a safety risk to women. Tory voters think so by almost 9:1, Lib Dem voters by almost 6:1, and Labour voters by nearly 2:1.
That can only partly be explained away by partisan party loyalty – Labour and the Liberal Democrats both support the bill, but their own voters are still strongly against. More noteworthy is the fact that (excluding Don’t Knows) even slavishly loyal SNP voters agree with the statement by a smaller but still clear 12-point margin, 56 to 44.
So let’s say it unambiguously: most SNP voters think the SNP’s gender reforms pose a danger to women’s safety.
The National must have been enormously proud when it successfully fought off all the other newspapers to secure this stunning exclusive today.
We must admit, when we had a good look in the “Pete Wishart Victories” section of our extensive archives we drew a blank. So we were excited to read on and find out.
So it’s now official: in Scotland the words “sex” and “gender” mean the same thing, except when they don’t, and if you give a man a piece of paper because he’s asked for one, with no sort of checks whatsoever, then it literally turns him into a woman, except when it doesn’t, unless it does.
Or put more concisely: the word “sex” in Scotland now has no meaning at all.
We’re calling it now, folks. The SNP will not conduct the next general election as a de facto referendum. There’s a reason they’re stalling. They know they’re going to have to let you down gently. The softening-up starts here.
It remains to be seen whether the figures represent a short blip of anger over the Supreme Court decision, a more sustained but still temporary period of Yes support like that of summer 2020 – spring 2021, or a permanent shift in public opinion.
So as such they’re actually relatively uninteresting, although the SNP’s plan to do absolutely nothing to take advantage of any momentum that might exist, and to wait several months before even having a strategy conference, remains disturbing.
But what actually caught our eye about the poll were a couple of questions nobody else has reported on.
The party is now primarily a vehicle for processing cash and funnelling it to carefully selected and ideologically vetted activists, mostly from the fundamentalist youth wing, who are given well-paid jobs working for MPs and MSPs or parachuted into council seats in return for their unquestioning loyalty to Nicola Sturgeon.
And at this, it must be admitted, the SNP is still a highly effective operation. Which is fortunate, because without UK government money it would be bankrupt.
Above are the Electoral Commission’s donation figures for the third quarter of 2022. They note that 100% of the SNP’s reportable income for that period came from the UK government’s coffers – a trait shared with Plaid Cymru, the SDLP and the DUP.
Given that three of those four parties are nationalists committed to removing various constituent parts of the UK, one might almost be tempted to commend Westminster’s generosity. But perhaps it knows exactly what it’s doing.
Word reaches us, readers, that Nicola Sturgeon was “furious” when she joined the most recent meeting of the SNP’s Westminster group by Skype. Her rage was driven by the suggestion that the party should trigger a Holyrood election to act as a de facto independence referendum, a policy we’re reliably told is supported by a number of MPs who are too scared of being browbeaten by Sturgeon in front of their colleagues to actually speak out in favour of it.
(We won’t mention their names at this point.)
Our source mentioned to us that they seemed to remember an interview in which the First Minister had revealed a possible reason for her extreme antipathy to the idea – one for the BBC’s extensive and rather good three-part documentary “Yes/No – Inside The Indyref”, which was broadcast in August 2019 and never seen again.
It’s not available on iPlayer or YouTube, but fortunately we happened to still have the show recorded on our Sky+ box, so we went to check, and lo and behold our source’s recollection was correct. Apologies for the slightly wonky quality of this video, as we had to record it off the TV screen.
It’s more than two years now since we published this article, but it’s worth quickly going over it again, because there’s nothing on Earth more tedious than boneheads on social media going “Oh, you slag off the SNP but what’s YOUR plan if you’re so clever?”, who haven’t bothered to read any of the dozen times we’ve already answered that question since 25 months ago.
This is it. This is our plan. Try listening this time, thickos.
The SNP have been all over the place since Wednesday’s judgement of the Supreme Court. Astonishingly, the party hadn’t prepared an agreed line in the event of the Court ruling against it, with the result that various party figures had popped up with all sorts of different versions of what a supposed plebiscite election would mean.
James Che on The Slowest Dawning: “I bet the National and BBC never cover the story that the SNP are in the Westminster Foundation for Democracy…” Aug 29, 11:47
TURABDIN on The Slowest Dawning: “TIME FOR SWINNEY to swim with the fishes.” Aug 29, 11:46
James Che on The Slowest Dawning: “J Robertson, Scotland is a mess, But then we have to accept for now that the SNP run it under…” Aug 29, 11:30
James Che on The Slowest Dawning: “Gordon Brown thinks Scotland better get used to its voluntary union with England, which Scotland was relieved from all obligations…” Aug 29, 11:21
Mark Beggan on The Slowest Dawning: “You will be pleased to know that the British military now consists of a Drag Queen show played by women…” Aug 29, 11:21
Northcode on The Slowest Dawning: ““Ye ken ma pal, Kenny, don’t ye?” Wee Frankie said. “Dis he no come fae the Raploch oot Stirlin’ way?”…” Aug 29, 11:19
Hatey McHateface on The Slowest Dawning: “You forgot one. Why are Scots still being oppressed with colonially imposed question marks.” Aug 29, 11:17
Hatey McHateface on The Slowest Dawning: “Still though, Mark, his absence is noteworthy. Hope he hasn’t found himself at ground zero of a positive feed back…” Aug 29, 11:13
Hatey McHateface on The Slowest Dawning: ““Don’t the Brits just love engaging their military” Too right. Only just the other week they deployed masked and hooded…” Aug 29, 11:02
James Che on The Slowest Dawning: “At some point Scotland has to ask questions, what do we meed a referendum for, What would we declare UDI…” Aug 29, 11:01
Hatey McHateface on The Slowest Dawning: ““Vote overwhelmingly” I must have missed that.” Aug 29, 10:58
J Robertson on The Slowest Dawning: “As mentioned by other posters – how on earth with the shambolic nature of Scotland’s economy and public finances is…” Aug 29, 10:45
willie on The Slowest Dawning: “oh and one other thing about clunking fist Brown declaring that Scots irrespective of their political wishes will just have…” Aug 29, 10:40
willie on The Slowest Dawning: “Here’s quotes that the democrat not Great Gordon Brown has just made in the Guardian to coincide with his new…” Aug 29, 10:33
MaryB on The Slowest Dawning: “100% Yes 6.09pm You just fell into the ‘divide and rule’ trap.” Aug 29, 10:30
James Che on The Slowest Dawning: “The agenda of the SNP, and most political parties in GB is the same belief think tanks. Captured governments that…” Aug 29, 10:26
Mark Beggan on The Slowest Dawning: “It’s the only platform that Fanny has if you don’t count Cambridge and that went tits up. Think of it…” Aug 29, 10:24
ALANM on The Slowest Dawning: “Agent Sturgeon’s mission is almost complete. All that remains for Swinney is formalising a merger with the Greens paving the…” Aug 29, 10:22
James Che on The Slowest Dawning: “Just need to google Westminster foundation for democracy to realise why Scotland would not be seen as a security risk…” Aug 29, 10:10
100%Yes on The Slowest Dawning: “The SNP is calling for the Scotland office to be abolished Swinney already knows the Scotland office is going to…” Aug 29, 10:07
100%Yes on The Slowest Dawning: “The SNP stating quite clearly don’t vote for the SNP we can’t delivery a referendum unless its in the form…” Aug 29, 10:04
James Che on The Slowest Dawning: “I believe Lynsey Hoyle is its patron or was at the time. And the SNP are part of that Westminster…” Aug 29, 09:57
Bilbo on The Slowest Dawning: “I’ve got a feeling that Online presence for SNP meetings won’t be solely for islanders but also for the young…” Aug 29, 09:52
James Che on The Slowest Dawning: “I believe Lynsey Hoyle is its patron or was at the time.” Aug 29, 09:52
James Che on The Slowest Dawning: “The security of Westminsters Great Britain parliament. Which Scotland has never entered into a treaty with, we only ever held…” Aug 29, 09:46
James Che on The Slowest Dawning: “Stu, Better together is still as strong as it ever was and the SNP are in it. The Scottish national…” Aug 29, 09:34
Hatey McHateface on The Slowest Dawning: “Near 60 comments on this thread. If nobody else is going to step up, looks like it falls to me…” Aug 29, 09:30
Hatey McHateface on The Slowest Dawning: “Good spot, Bilbo. Peter Murrell too. Even if you question his commitment to law and order, you have to commend…” Aug 29, 09:24
Hatey McHateface on The Slowest Dawning: ““Kenya, the Caribbean, Ireland the method of holding colonies is well rehearsed” Odd. Why would they continue to rehearse a…” Aug 29, 09:19
Hatey McHateface on The Slowest Dawning: “Don’t think the devil buys sole. It doesn’t keep in the heat.” Aug 29, 09:13