It’s manifestly obvious to anyone paying any amount of attention to Scottish politics that the current Holyrood chamber is stuffed to the gills with otherwise-unemployable dum-dums. When we recently had cause to go through the entire roster of 129, the number who leapt out as either vaguely honourable or even just halfway-competent didn’t require us to take our shoes off to count.
(Indeed, speaking as a professional Scottish politics website about a thousand times more interested in this stuff than normal people, the number of expenses-guzzling seatwarmers we’d never even heard of was more than a little disturbing.)
So these figures from a Panelbase poll this month – which was conducted BEFORE the grim scenes around the SNP’s Gender Recognition Reform bill – can only be explained in two ways: either people have become accustomed to very low standards, or (more likely) people don’t pay that much attention to politics.
But there’s a much more interesting story in the numbers.
Religious figures normally restrict their political commentary to matters within their obvious remit, such as poverty and inequality, for which they can cite plentiful scripture about rich men and the eyes of needles and whatnot. We’re unaware of any passages in the Bible relating to the constitutional implications of the Scotland Act 1998.
Moderator in the Church Of Scotland is a ceremonial role lasting only 12 months, but Dr Iain Greenshields has attempted to put his stamp on it (one for the folks at home, there) by opining that a UK general election – and he was quite specific about meaning a UK one – is not an appropriate means of achieving Scotland’s independence.
From his quoted comments in the Times piece it’s not clear whether he’s some sort of ecumenical Kenny Farquharson who just wants Scots to shut up and vote Labour again, or a radical Yes supporter attempting to subtly influence the SNP towards a Holyrood plebiscite instead. But either way, for such a traditionally-neutral figure to come out with such an unexpectedly blunt political opinion is perhaps a sign of just what a terrible idea using a Westminster election to decide Scotland’s future is.
The newest Panelbase poll, which shows a narrow lead for independence, was an “omnibus” one with questions provided by multiple clients, including Wings and the Sunday Times. The questions we’re about to show you were asked by the ST rather than ourselves, but their results are deeply disturbing on multiple levels.
The first one is perhaps predictable but still unsettling. (Click all pics to enlarge.)
A huge 2:1 majority of Scots believe the Scottish Government’s proposed new “gender recognition” laws pose a safety risk to women. Tory voters think so by almost 9:1, Lib Dem voters by almost 6:1, and Labour voters by nearly 2:1.
That can only partly be explained away by partisan party loyalty – Labour and the Liberal Democrats both support the bill, but their own voters are still strongly against. More noteworthy is the fact that (excluding Don’t Knows) even slavishly loyal SNP voters agree with the statement by a smaller but still clear 12-point margin, 56 to 44.
So let’s say it unambiguously: most SNP voters think the SNP’s gender reforms pose a danger to women’s safety.
The National must have been enormously proud when it successfully fought off all the other newspapers to secure this stunning exclusive today.
We must admit, when we had a good look in the “Pete Wishart Victories” section of our extensive archives we drew a blank. So we were excited to read on and find out.
So it’s now official: in Scotland the words “sex” and “gender” mean the same thing, except when they don’t, and if you give a man a piece of paper because he’s asked for one, with no sort of checks whatsoever, then it literally turns him into a woman, except when it doesn’t, unless it does.
Or put more concisely: the word “sex” in Scotland now has no meaning at all.
We’re calling it now, folks. The SNP will not conduct the next general election as a de facto referendum. There’s a reason they’re stalling. They know they’re going to have to let you down gently. The softening-up starts here.
It remains to be seen whether the figures represent a short blip of anger over the Supreme Court decision, a more sustained but still temporary period of Yes support like that of summer 2020 – spring 2021, or a permanent shift in public opinion.
So as such they’re actually relatively uninteresting, although the SNP’s plan to do absolutely nothing to take advantage of any momentum that might exist, and to wait several months before even having a strategy conference, remains disturbing.
But what actually caught our eye about the poll were a couple of questions nobody else has reported on.
The party is now primarily a vehicle for processing cash and funnelling it to carefully selected and ideologically vetted activists, mostly from the fundamentalist youth wing, who are given well-paid jobs working for MPs and MSPs or parachuted into council seats in return for their unquestioning loyalty to Nicola Sturgeon.
And at this, it must be admitted, the SNP is still a highly effective operation. Which is fortunate, because without UK government money it would be bankrupt.
Above are the Electoral Commission’s donation figures for the third quarter of 2022. They note that 100% of the SNP’s reportable income for that period came from the UK government’s coffers – a trait shared with Plaid Cymru, the SDLP and the DUP.
Given that three of those four parties are nationalists committed to removing various constituent parts of the UK, one might almost be tempted to commend Westminster’s generosity. But perhaps it knows exactly what it’s doing.
Word reaches us, readers, that Nicola Sturgeon was “furious” when she joined the most recent meeting of the SNP’s Westminster group by Skype. Her rage was driven by the suggestion that the party should trigger a Holyrood election to act as a de facto independence referendum, a policy we’re reliably told is supported by a number of MPs who are too scared of being browbeaten by Sturgeon in front of their colleagues to actually speak out in favour of it.
(We won’t mention their names at this point.)
Our source mentioned to us that they seemed to remember an interview in which the First Minister had revealed a possible reason for her extreme antipathy to the idea – one for the BBC’s extensive and rather good three-part documentary “Yes/No – Inside The Indyref”, which was broadcast in August 2019 and never seen again.
It’s not available on iPlayer or YouTube, but fortunately we happened to still have the show recorded on our Sky+ box, so we went to check, and lo and behold our source’s recollection was correct. Apologies for the slightly wonky quality of this video, as we had to record it off the TV screen.
It’s more than two years now since we published this article, but it’s worth quickly going over it again, because there’s nothing on Earth more tedious than boneheads on social media going “Oh, you slag off the SNP but what’s YOUR plan if you’re so clever?”, who haven’t bothered to read any of the dozen times we’ve already answered that question since 25 months ago.
This is it. This is our plan. Try listening this time, thickos.
The SNP have been all over the place since Wednesday’s judgement of the Supreme Court. Astonishingly, the party hadn’t prepared an agreed line in the event of the Court ruling against it, with the result that various party figures had popped up with all sorts of different versions of what a supposed plebiscite election would mean.
Young Lochinvar on The Unstoppable Lie Machine: “Ld Pal Val might have something to say about that!! 🙂 Anyway, it’s widely held that she doesnae like the…” Jul 14, 16:08
Rev. Stuart Campbell on Blue In The Face: “You sure? They’re usually out in August.” Jul 14, 16:05
Rev. Stuart Campbell on Blue In The Face: “I haven’t deleted any comments on this thread.” Jul 14, 16:03
Rev. Stuart Campbell on Blue In The Face: “I have of course already drafted an FOI to that effect 🙂” Jul 14, 16:01
Rev. Stuart Campbell on Blue In The Face: “I think Ian means US holding a fundraiser to bring a judicial review, not the SNP doing one.” Jul 14, 16:01
Northcode on The Unstoppable Lie Machine: “Those chickens have grown wings and flown off to Portugal, or some similar sunny place, never to return to their…” Jul 14, 15:56
Young Lochinvar on Step One: “Pastor Fagat Meant to say, in reference to one of your other sermons in defence of the infamous “franchise” that…” Jul 14, 15:48
Captain Caveman on The Unstoppable Lie Machine: “The phrase “chickens coming home to roost” springs to mind now though.” Jul 14, 15:35
Skip_NC on Blue In The Face: “Are they overdue or just not published by the Electoral Commission? In the past they have tried to publish the…” Jul 14, 15:35
Young Lochinvar on Step One: “Pastor Fagat Many thanks, interesting stuff- at last! So basically the Scottish 2014 franchise was one of the widest, loosest…” Jul 14, 15:19
Ian Smith on Blue In The Face: “It would be worth establishing at what point police became aware the money was spent on general operations, and if…” Jul 14, 15:16
Alastair on Blue In The Face: “SNP 2025 Accounts now one week overdue” Jul 14, 15:13
Ian on Blue In The Face: “I think it very much depends on who is running the fundraiser. If Rev Stu, for this purpose, I’d be…” Jul 14, 15:12
Skip_NC on Blue In The Face: “A short course on the true meaning of the Declaration of Arbroath should be required of all public servants, whether…” Jul 14, 14:54
Mark Beggan on Blue In The Face: “I bet wee McGarry is as sick as a parrot. She only nicked 25 thousand smackaroonies and got dragged in…” Jul 14, 14:54
Northcode on Blue In The Face: “What a bore… I wish Alf Baird would post some interesting stuff about colonialism and how none of the corruption…” Jul 14, 14:51
Mark Beggan on Blue In The Face: “They are still trying to get the first fundraiser back. Don’t you think asking people for money right now is…” Jul 14, 14:45
Kevin Doran on Blue In The Face: “My reading of this is.. we knew this when we did the original investigation, which looked at it, and we…” Jul 14, 14:43
Chris on Blue In The Face: “Could you let me know please why my comment was deleted.” Jul 14, 14:41
Sean Duffy on Blue In The Face: “What DCC Houston does say is that the police passed on the findings of their investigation to COPFS for ‘advice…” Jul 14, 14:22
Chris on Blue In The Face: “It is now looking increasingly obvious that Police Scotland are as corrupt as the SNP. What do they have to…” Jul 14, 14:21
A2 on Blue In The Face: “I’d rather think the important words were. “All of the circimstances were reported to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal…” Jul 14, 14:08
Brotyboy on Blue In The Face: “It just gets worse.” Jul 14, 14:07
Ian on Blue In The Face: “Surely the next step has to be a fundraiser for a judicial review.” Jul 14, 14:06
Martin on Blue In The Face: “The Investigation team need to reveal the date that they discovered that the “ring fenced” funds had been spent and…” Jul 14, 14:01
Cynicus on Blue In The Face: “Don’t! you are performing a great public service and being a good citizen. It is a disgrace the way the…” Jul 14, 13:52
Andy Ellis on The Unstoppable Lie Machine: “Stu, as has been observed before while your patience does you credit there are times when liberal use of hammers…” Jul 14, 13:51
Mark Beggan on Blue In The Face: “That’s the nicest Fuck Off I have ever read.” Jul 14, 13:44
Wally Jumblatt on Blue In The Face: “Temporary Deputy Chief Constable -and he’s been temporary since 2024 -and there are at least 3 of them ……… -maybe…” Jul 14, 13:37