The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Faces In Sand

Posted on October 17, 2026 by

Ladies and gentlemen, the next leader of the SNP.

To be scrupulously fair to the huffing dolt-child, we suppose in grey, chilly Aberdeen there could be some confusion on the matter. But remarkably, the above isn’t even nearly the dumbest thing that’s happened (so far) at this year’s SNP conference.

It’s probably not even this.

Though the “debate” (not a single person spoke against the motion) on reviving the SNP’s insanely dangerous “conversion practices” bill was undoubtedly moronic. (Don’t forget, the party controls the conference agenda and it wouldn’t let members debate independence strategy, but gave this stage time.)

Nor was it the embarrassing AI drivel the party used to front its farcical new idea of a “survey” of 1.5m voters. (Translation: some leaflets.)

“Choose Scotland” as opposed to what? Both of those paths are plainly in the same country, and neither of them visibly lead anywhere. What a metaphor.

No, the single most cretinous moment was probably the passing of this resolution.

It is now official SNP – and Scottish Government – policy.

Even for the party it’s a move of jaw-slackening stupidity, based solely on the Twitler Youth having been engaged in a(nother) screaming foot-stamping tantrum ever since Elon Musk took over the platform in 2022 and decided to allow a range of political viewpoints on it, not just theirs.

(Although their incandescent, petulant fury did lead to us coming out of retirement, so it did accidentally contribute to a widening of Scottish political commentary.)

Their preferred alternative, the paedophile-infested BlueSky, reaches barely 8% as many Scots as Twitter.

But because the party chose to put it on the agenda and a couple of hundred woke activists at conference voted for it, every government-controlled public body in Scotland will now be removed from the platform where they can be most easily held accountable and answerable to the public.

Meanwhile, a party that haemorrhaged 800,000 votes at the last election and has lost more than 60% of its own membership since 2021 will lock itself tighter into the airtight echo chamber in which it increasingly lives, simply refusing to hear the voices of voters at all and telling itself that if you can’t HEAR any criticism, everyone must love you.

Perhaps the most startling thing about this week’s YouGov poll was the finding that just 41% of Scots were clear about what the SNP stood for. Just a few years ago, that figure would surely have been close to 100%. Even people who disagreed with the party knew that its purpose was independence.

But this year’s conference, denying members the chance to discuss its supposed goal and instead obsessing over identity politics and censorship of dissent – let’s take a moment here to raise an eyebrow at the fact that the resolution demanded Twitter/X be banned in the whole UK, not just Scotland – shows that voters are right to be mystified about what the SNP’s purpose is in 2026.

The truth is simple: the SNP exists for power’s sake alone. As long as it can keep funnelling fat salaries into the pockets of incompetent imbeciles and providing the increasingly bloated First Minister with lavish first-class jollies, nothing else matters.

The SNP of 2026 has two faces: one buried in the trough, the other in the sand.

0 to “Faces In Sand”

  1. twathater says:

    We can only hope that the Alex Salmond trial and the EXPOSURE of the vile , despicable actions of Sturgeon and her cabal of grossly incompetent deviants and perverts lead to the DESTRUCTION of these LUNATICS

    I see the fuckwit Jasus Kelly is engaging in his usual grovelling prostrated actions again trying to ingratiate himself in the trough of Scum Nonce Party politics

    Reply
  2. twathater says:

    The smugness emanating from that FAT BALDHEADED TWAT is almost bile inducing

    Reply
  3. Alison says:

    Nothing about this surprises me except that Facebook has a 70% reach.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,990 Posts, 1,252,677 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Alison on Faces In Sand: “Nothing about this surprises me except that Facebook has a 70% reach.” Oct 17, 16:51
    • twathater on Faces In Sand: “The smugness emanating from that FAT BALDHEADED TWAT is almost bile inducing” Oct 17, 16:46
    • twathater on Faces In Sand: “We can only hope that the Alex Salmond trial and the EXPOSURE of the vile , despicable actions of Sturgeon…” Oct 17, 16:40
    • Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “My word, some horrendous imagery coming out of France right now, the place seems to be on fire. Tsk, all…” Oct 17, 15:42
    • James on The fight about to come: ““….hurled at those whose ability to construct a coherent, cogent, written statement…” Site Prick. When’s that happening then, wee man?…” Oct 17, 14:54
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““The talent is there” Where? Serious question. Where are they hiding? Help me out here. Name 20 talented Scots capable…” Oct 17, 14:15
    • sarah on The fight about to come: “SSRG 2026 Saturday 17th October on youtube is working well today. Please watch. Sensible, principled people talking constructively. They are…” Oct 17, 13:49
    • Wally Jumblatt on The fight about to come: “Your perseverance with the moribund SNP is praiseworthy, but I’m sure we are all way past the point where we…” Oct 17, 13:36
    • Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “” What glass house pray am i supposed to inhabit” Well, son, “if you have to ask” and all of…” Oct 17, 12:17
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “@James says: 17 October, 2026 at 10:21 am “Prick”? Naw, James, that ane hasnae been devalued. Its meaning remains clear,…” Oct 17, 11:23
    • Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: ““Still read the rag though” Me too, the online version. Some good journalism occasionally, although hell will freeze over before…” Oct 17, 11:13
    • Southernbystander on Still Time To Save Her: “Yeah, got some sympathy with this, the way what are not unreasonable calls for at least recognition of past crimes,…” Oct 17, 10:32
    • James on The fight about to come: ““Prick”?” Oct 17, 10:21
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “Many Scots who are related to the descendants of the thieving, genociding Scottish colonisers of the Canadian province of Alberta…” Oct 17, 09:54
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““turn German into inhuman gibberish” In our own time, we see the same (quite successful) attempts to turn English into…” Oct 17, 09:04
    • Willie on The fight about to come: “Small diversion on a Saturday evening. Now we know budgets are tight and we know that transport for some children…” Oct 16, 22:44
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The fight about to come: “« The Nazis were only too anxious to secure the lustre of Thomas Mann’s presence and the prestige that mere…” Oct 16, 21:00
    • sam on The fight about to come: “I should have added that GERS is produced independently of Scottish ministers.” Oct 16, 19:37
    • sam on The fight about to come: “Who knows Mr Swinney’s feelings? Margaret Cuthbert was on the panel responding to that Committee inquiry into GERS. Here is…” Oct 16, 19:33
    • TURABDIN on The fight about to come: “What glass house pray am i supposed to inhabit? A purely rhetorical matter forsooth. & All depends on the provenance…” Oct 16, 19:00
    • TURABDIN on The fight about to come: “Indeed you are quite confused, confused. Jesus was a Jew, orthodox by today’s standards. Perhaps you are a Marcionist and…” Oct 16, 18:49
    • Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “Wasn’t he that bloke who was considerably to the left of Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell?” Oct 16, 18:38
    • factchecker on The fight about to come: “A good question, Sarah. Possibly one factor is because John Swinney remembers this Holyrood committee meeting where he was sitting…” Oct 16, 18:06
    • Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “Ah! But of course, wilfully blind, crass hypocrisy comes as standard with these permanently affronted “types”. Expecting moral consistency is…” Oct 16, 17:56
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “I bet you’ve suspected for years that yer Dad’s nae yer real Dad. False flags, eh?” Oct 16, 17:44
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““you do seem a cohort of embittered personages eyes reddened by a surfeit of prejudice” Seriously? Yet you have nothing…” Oct 16, 17:41
    • Lorncal on The fight about to come: “Indeed, Northcode, I agree with you on your use of anomaly as it applied to Mr Salmond, the person, not…” Oct 16, 17:22
    • sarah on The fight about to come: “Happily the SSRG Conference is on youtube so we can listen to some very sensible, intelligent, informed people speaking. The…” Oct 16, 17:18
    • J Robertson on The fight about to come: “Really ? what could possibly go wrong ?” Oct 16, 16:48
    • Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “Meh. Well, your garden’s looking a tad shite from where I’m standing TURABDIN. Glass houses and all that. 😀” Oct 16, 16:25
  • A tall tale



↑ Top