The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Archive for the ‘reference’


Crunching the numbers 151

Posted on January 15, 2016 by

For ages now it’s been nagging at us that there wasn’t a quick and easy reference point for all the opinion polls we’ve commissioned, listing all the subjects covered by each poll and linking to both our own analyses of the figures and the raw data tables for people who wanted to go delving in amongst the stats themselves.

pollsmaybe

So now there is – it’s here. (And in future you can easily locate it under “Polls” in the menu bar running across the top of the front page.) We’re off for a bit of a lie down.

We are four 236

Posted on November 07, 2015 by

So, it’s our birthday. It was exactly four years ago today, on the 7th of November 2011, that Wings Over Scotland published the first post of what was supposed to be a pretty insignificant spare-time blog picking out interesting politics stories in the day’s Scottish media and challenging any inaccuracies in them.

4yearstats

It got a bit out of control, frankly.

Read the rest of this entry →

The limitations of GERS 297

Posted on November 06, 2015 by

Last week the BBC treated viewers to a Question Time hosted in Edinburgh, where a right-wing economics journalist from MoneyWeek magazine called Merryn Somerset Webb explained to a somewhat disgruntled Scottish audience why the government were right to bail out the bankers, but not steel workers.

It capped off an interesting week but to see why we’ll have to rewind a few days and revisit the work of an amateur Unionist blogger of our unwelcome acquaintance.

petshopboys

The amateur blogger in question has been garnering a fair amount of attention lately from straw-clutching Unionist hacks for his “analysis” of the Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (GERS) figures, in which he purports to show a sizeable deficit in the economy of an independent or “full fiscal autonomy” Scotland.

In essence, the analysis amounts to dumping all the GERS summary tables into a Microsoft Excel graph, adding the Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecast for oil revenue, and pointing to a resulting £9.1bn gap between Scotland’s public spending and its total revenue.

This, he asserts, is in addition to Scotland’s share of the hefty deficit the UK currently runs. His conclusion, shouted loudly and often by every angry Unionist on Twitter, is that the government of an independent Scotland – which tellingly they always assume to be an SNP one – would either have to drastically cut public services or raise taxes to fill this “black hole”.

It’s an interesting piece of analysis. Or it would be, if it wasn’t total nonsense.

Read the rest of this entry →

Indyref finances at a glance 291

Posted on September 14, 2015 by

As we were poking around with this, we thought it’d be useful to have all the basic donations and spending information about the referendum in one place. It’s normally scattered around different places and hard to access easily, and it’s quite interesting.

loadsamoney

Read the rest of this entry →

The sweet spot 168

Posted on August 25, 2015 by

Stat-pummelled readers will be glad to know that this is the last article we plan to write about the vagaries of the AMS electoral system, and how it might apply to next year’s Scottish Parliament election, for some time. This one also shouldn’t be full of tables and figures, so strap yourself in and let’s get this job finished.

sweetgolf2

Read the rest of this entry →

The narcissism of small differences 196

Posted on August 24, 2015 by

We’ve only ourselves to blame, we’d be the first to admit. When we titled yesterday’s piece “AMS for lazy people” it was pretty much an invitation for people to get us to do their research for them, and so it proved.

Even as we slumped exhausted over a red-hot calculator, several readers wasted no time demanding a breakdown of how the mechanisms of the electoral system had affected last year’s European elections, in which UKIP defied some expectations (and delighted the Unionist parties and media) by taking a seat in Scotland.

davidcoburn8

So we suppose we might as well.

Read the rest of this entry →

AMS for lazy people 297

Posted on August 23, 2015 by

The email we’ve had more than any other since the 8th of May is this one:

“Please can you explain how the Scottish election system works, and whether it’s a good idea for me as an SNP voter to give my list vote to someone else so as to ensure the maximum number of pro-Yes MSPs in Holyrood?”

We’d planned to leave that question until much nearer the relevant time, but to be honest we’re getting fed up of reading them, so let’s see if we can sort it out now.

Read the rest of this entry →

Stop or we’ll say stop again 224

Posted on July 03, 2015 by

We’ll never tire of documenting the Daily Record’s increasingly panicked attempts to get David Cameron to enact the Record’s dodgy promise of last September and save it from having to answer for the pup it sold Scotland.

vowpish3

Read the rest of this entry →

The side of the thugs 129

Posted on May 04, 2015 by

Amazingly enough, the Scottish press today ISN’T wall-to-wall with stories about Baron McConnell of Glenscorrodale, UK peer and lawmaker, endorsing the “f***ing booting” of Conservative supporters at the weekend, in a striking contrast to when a young SNP candidate said similar but less offensive things some months ago.

(Lord McConnell’s friends were talking in the future tense about something they would do. Mhairi Black was talking in the past tense, about things which she HADN’T done.)

sunjack

As far as we’ve seen, the small piece above in the Scottish Sun is the only coverage. (The Daily Record, as well as not reporting the McConnell comments at all, actually has another go at Mhairi Black instead.)

But we were having trouble recalling any “hate-filled violent mobs” (McConnell’s actual full quote) on the Yes/SNP side. And so was an alert reader who had a dig through the papers from the last couple of years.

Read the rest of this entry →

The weight of evidence 157

Posted on March 31, 2015 by

Like some sort of out-of-control, unstoppable lying machine, Scottish Labour keep telling the electorate that the party with the most seats in a hung parliament is the one that forms the government, and that the only way to prevent the Conservatives from returning to power is for Labour to be the biggest party.

asimplefact

They’ve been saying it for weeks. They say it over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again, almost as if it’s all they’ve got.

The trouble is that an awful lot of people seem to disagree with them.

Read the rest of this entry →

Ducking and diving 154

Posted on March 31, 2015 by

Credit is due to those of the Scottish media who have taken up this site’s challenge to ask Labour the key question of the 2015 election debate in Scotland – “Are Labour prepared to form a government if they’re not the largest party in a hung parliament?”

(Because if the answer is yes then Labour’s entire Scottish election strategy – “Vote SNP get Tories!” – crumbles to dust, and if it’s no then Labour is saying that it’d be prepared to abandon not just Scotland but the whole UK to another five years of Conservative government purely out of spite against the SNP.)

Three of the party’s elected representatives have now been asked the question on air – James Kelly MSP by John Mackay of Scotland Tonight a week ago, branch office leader Jim Murphy by BBC Scotland’s Gary Robertson yesterday, and the shadow Scottish Secretary Margaret Curran last night (below), again by STV’s John Mackay.

As you can see, Scotland’s voters still await an answer. But on this page we’ll keep track of all the swerves, evasions and dodges until we get one, if we ever do.

Read the rest of this entry →

History written by losers 114

Posted on March 31, 2015 by

Because we took a short break over the weekend, we sadly missed Labour’s solemn commemorations of the 1979 confidence vote, and as a result we don’t know whether anyone actually did don a black armband or lay a wreath to remember the miners that Labour didn’t support when they went on strike a few years later.

But an alert reader did find this for us.

blairmaggie

It’s an extract from BBC reporter John Sergeant’s book “Maggie: Margaret Thatcher – Her Fatal Legacy” and you can read more of it below.

Read the rest of this entry →

  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,756 Posts, 1,217,843 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Aidan on The Blindness Of Hatred: “@Xaracen – you are arguing in direct opposition to both the historical record and the explicit language of the treaty,…May 16, 10:59
    • Geri on Some Attention For James: “English water has just had a £3 billion bail out too & the fleecing is allegedly to pay bonuses. Welcome…May 16, 10:22
    • ScottieDog on Some Attention For James: “Right/wrong, ANY vote for the SNP is simply as wasted indy vote. The flip side of the very welcome self-destruction…May 16, 10:06
    • Vivian O’Blivion on Some Attention For James: “I would advise entering the pitchfork retail market. The Boss of the body which is supposed to regulate Scottish Water…May 16, 08:50
    • joolz on Some Attention For James: “Kelly will never debate you. Your recent piece debunking him was well researched and details the truth. All Kelly has…May 16, 08:29
    • Geri on Some Attention For James: “That was a terrible move by Roddy & given his past differences & open irritation to Salvo I don’t think…May 16, 03:21
    • Geri on Some Attention For James: “Message for James Kelly SNP 1 & 2 delivers Unionists. If SNP is set to win the constituency vote then…May 16, 03:10
    • Geri on Some Attention For James: “You do know that the reason they got a state in the first place was because the other side was…May 16, 02:54
    • Geri on Some Attention For James: “They play woke games because Westminster stripped Holyrood of powers after indyref & then again after & during Brexshit. That…May 16, 02:42
    • Geri on Some Attention For James: “Salmond should’ve had that ‘gentleman’s agreement’ in writing from Dewar & Sturgeon should’ve had the Smith one written in stone…May 16, 02:28
    • Geri on Some Attention For James: “The only comments btl that I’ve seen that support Isr are yoons/ paid trolls. I take issue too with the…May 16, 02:10
    • Big Jock on Some Attention For James: “The trouble with James is that he has always been an SNP cheerleader. Sure he did dabble with Alba, but…May 16, 00:51
    • sarah on Some Attention For James: “100% Yes: para 5 typo – Roddy and others have organised Liberate Scotland as an umbrella grouping for candidates in…May 15, 23:52
    • Owen Mullions on Some Attention For James: “Now that the ‘debate’ is over, will you be going back on James’ blacklist? He doesn’t like to be questioned…May 15, 23:33
    • Mark Beggan on Some Attention For James: “Ye jeez wizz.May 15, 23:02
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell on Some Attention For James: “So, not so much constructive suggestions as moaning about stuff I did or didn’t do in the past?May 15, 22:41
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell on Some Attention For James: “Well, that was more insane than I ever dared to fear. Christ.May 15, 22:40
    • Jondigsby85 on Some Attention For James: “I went into this with an open mind. I had read the articles on both sides and thought it was…May 15, 21:59
    • Skip_NC on Some Attention For James: “Did he? Because if he did, that would have been the most serious violation of the Alba Party’s constitution and…May 15, 21:37
    • Oneliner on Some Attention For James: “According to Jim McColl ‘Calmac didn’t want it’. (untested hybrid technology) But what does that matter when a Civil Service…May 15, 21:24
    • Wullie B on Some Attention For James: “Bella isnt ny better with Mike Small being the one you are probably thinking about, another who like Kelly doesnt…May 15, 21:15
    • Anthem on The Undertaker: “Most independence supporters understand that completely!May 15, 20:57
    • 100%Yes on Some Attention For James: “I’m glad he has. Until we rid ourselves of the SNP, Scotland not going anywhere soon.May 15, 20:36
    • Hatey McHateface on Some Attention For James: “Your comment reads as if you are unaware that Scottish devolution and the Hollyrood parliament were set up expressly to…May 15, 20:27
    • Hatey McHateface on Some Attention For James: “It’s taxpayer’s money, x. There’s effectively an infinite supply of the stuff, so the people with control of the firehoses…May 15, 20:16
    • Hatey McHateface on Some Attention For James: “@Lorn That’s a great post.May 15, 20:04
    • Muscleguy on Some Attention For James: “Exactly, I gave up on him ages ago. As for trying to use his page to comment, it’s practically impossible…May 15, 19:56
    • Alf Baird on Some Attention For James: “James Kelly also advocated SNP 1 & 2 prior to the 2021 Holyrood election which resulted in 40+ colonialist party…May 15, 19:53
    • Dan on Some Attention For James: “Always with the dismissive and destructive negativity eh Stu. I just think with your exceptional skill set there are way…May 15, 19:50
    • agent x on Some Attention For James: ““Speaking at FMQs, the Scottish Labour leader said: “We are rapidly approaching half a billion pounds of public money on…May 15, 19:49
  • A tall tale



↑ Top