The quality of mercy
Let’s just deal with this quickly.
Because the truth is that we should all be quietly sending BBC Scotland bouquets in appreciation for doing the independence movement a favour for once.
Belief in an independent Scotland IS as strong as ever, which is to say it’s pretty much where it’s been since 2014 – two or three points either side of 50%. But while true, that fact certainly WASN’T demonstrated by last Saturday’s pathetic march and cursory “rally”, which at the very, very highest estimate was attended by something less than a twentieth as many people as used to regularly show up at such events.
“We are the 45”, a performer sang at one point to a crowd which numbered only slightly more than that.
“With strength in numbers, Scotland shall prevail”, he continued, leading any rational observer to conclude that Scotland’s chances of prevailing must be roughly on a par with those of our capturing the World Cup in America this summer.
The march was the latest in a series of similar embarrassments, which would have attracted nothing but mockery and pity if broadcast on the evening news. What it demonstrated was that the roughly 50% of people who support independence are as actively committed to making it happen as the roughly 50% of people who want to bring back hanging and the roughly 50% who want to get rid of Trident, two things which are just as far away from the current political agenda.
This is an extraordinary misunderstanding of news values from someone who used to be the editor of a national newspaper. The march was announced seven months ago, has been relentlessly promoted since then, was officially supported by the SNP (which the 100,000+ AUOB marches never were), took place in the runup to an election and featured the First Minister as its headline speaker AND STILL ALMOST NOBODY BOTHERED TURNING UP.
That’s the only thing even remotely and tentatively approaching being a news story here: Widely Promoted Event About Supposedly Incredibly Vital And Urgent Subject Supported By Half The Population And Government Party Who Will Win Imminent General Election Attracts Comically Low Attendance.
We should be weeping with gratitude that the BBC didn’t run that story. Even the march organiser didn’t show up, and nor did most of the SNP, who were focused on keeping their members on the gravy bus come May.
Breaking: 3,000 people mooching down the High Street for an hour and half of them climbing Calton Hill to listen to a desultory handful of awful speeches for another 45 minutes is NOT, in fact, “more than enough” to end the British state’s 300-year control of Scotland. (If it was, obviously, we’d have been independent by Monday.)
Once again: if it had really had the potential to do that, why didn’t more people turn up? At least 1.6 million Scots support independence. Yet fewer than two out of every thousand of them could be arsed with getting a bus or train to the nation’s capital on a bright sunny day to register their interest and have a nice social day out.
Not even SNP supporters think independence is on the political agenda.
And nor do they much care. Independence is not even in SNP voters’ top three priorities, because even people so dumb they’re still voting SNP know that the SNP have neither a strategy nor any motivation for achieving independence. The SNP’s interests lie entirely in maintaining the status quo, as the party’s last former CEO accidentally pointed out in The Courier this week.
And even if the SNP did want independence, we know how it goes by now.
[SNP wins election]
SNP: “We demand another referendum!”
UK GOVERNMENT: “No.”
SNP: “Okay then! See you in another five years!”
More to the point, Richard Walker knows that too. In the article, he just comes right out and says “We should deploy this strategy even though we know it won’t work and when it doesn’t work everything will be over”.
For the sake of brevity we’ll draw a veil over some of the more farcically ludicrous passages in the article. But the line below merits a brief mention, because it’s either a breathtakingly audacious lie or self-delusion on level that in less enlightened times would have seen someone put in a jacket whose arms fastened round the back:
Because on the evidence of last Saturday, the biggest favour UK media can possibly do the independence movement right now is to not draw attention to what a pitiful, withered, irrelevant and impotent state it’s in.
Richard Walker and co are are entirely deluded and have been totally deceived by the myth making primary independence industry vehicle of Make Believe in Scotland.
It’s not winning the World cup that matters it’s taking part in the tournament.
The might have beens, The could have dones, The if onlys, Did you see that Ref! Then the celebration of being knocked out.
Wouldn’t miss it for the World.
Mark Beggan @ 13.24.
The World Cup is sport, Mark, so it’s arguable that it’s not winning or losing, but how we play the game. Or even, just being there.
Independence for the country of our birth or choice affects every aspect of our lives and those of our children. Just look at how well our country was run (within the limits imposed by a devolved administration) during the period 2007-2014. No wonder there was such a mood of optimism and belief in ourselves as we realised that with a competent and decent administration we’re not too wee, too failing, too lacking in natural enterprise and resources to successfully take care of ourselves.
Spot on!
There was a time when we could be confident that the leadership believed in Scotland and worked for the country and its people rather than just taking a ride on the gravy train. It all slipped away when Alex Salmond resigned.
Just to be there. Oh yes. Just to be there.
2007-2014. They all resigned knowing what they were leaving Scotland with. Woke Globalisation, post colonial, gender bender lefty rant. And they’re still screaming like bitches on heat. Not good coming from men. Not good at all.
Trump changed all that.
I agree, it’s good to see them consistently supporting the cause. It’s interesting how that level of backing has remained fairly steady over the years.
The evidence shows that the 1 . 6 million people whom support Scottish independence are not attached to the political parties or main stream routes, knowing that they are all promises of carrots for breakfast dinner and tea,
1.6 million out of such a small Country of people with no actual leader for independence are actually good statistics.
It depends how the stats are viewed. Or dismissed.
As far as I can ascertain from your post and stats it relays the information that the independence movement is and alway will come from the people first and foremost, and that mainstream political parties are not in sync with the people of Scotland.
As was always the case,
After over three hundred years of false hoods and politics the minds of those awake in Scotland are not going to change and have not changed.
Inspiring people of Scotland to realise instead they are free and remained free and independent since 1707 and documented records is the truth that should be asserted. To improve the grass movement attendence,
The Greeks remember the part Scottish George Gordon Byron as the man who made them take the idea of independence from the Ottomans seriously.
It may need something of the kind to get the Scots to think seriously about the matter.
Amateurism in politics is like a blunt knife in a kitchen, pointless.
Byron was English. He spent some of his early years in Aberdeenshire.
We are getting there though, to a starting point, that is. As soon as this generation of SNP Politicians are out of the way, including their anodyne inbred successors, then just maybe a start can begin with engaging the Scottish public.
These politicians really are all seriously delusional though, when turn-outs are compared with that of approximately two million people in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania in 1989 formed the “Baltic Way” (or Baltic Chain), a 675-kilometer human chain connecting Tallinn, Riga, and Vilnius to protest Soviet occupation. TWO FUCKING MILLION PEOPLE! That’s the bar. Thats about 1 in 3 people! And these arseholes are shouting about 1 in 500! Get in the sea!
Spot on!
There was a time when we could be confident that the leadership believed in Scotland and worked for the people and the betterment of the country rather than a personal seat on the gravy train.
It all went south (literally) after Alex Salmond resigned. The damage done since to people’s expectations of what leadership should be and any hopes on statehood restored to Scotland is immeasureable.
“Control” over events and marches has been wrested from grassroots’ enthusiasm and organisation and turned into a business and personal promotion venture.
Why would the BBC report on a Indy march? The BBC knows the SNP and believe in Scotland have no interest in Scottish Independence at all, its just a con.
I went on my fair share of AUOB marches and foreign media used to report on these marches, they just don’t do it anymore, WHY? Because the SNP isn’t seeking Independence not now not after the election and certainly not in 2031 or beyond.
The SNP doesn’t want Independence the party isn’t even bothered about the people of Scotland their not even bothered about the values the SNP used to hold dear. But what the SNP will say is two votes for the SNP will win Independence and will allow us to go to Westminster and ask the PM for a section 30 order which he can’t deny, Yes he will and by voting SNP 1 and 2 will allow Reform to win over 20+ seats which will result in the closure of Holyrood so the SNP isn’t even bothered about devolution either because if they where they wouldn’t be telly you to vote for the SNP with your second vote and they are and they also know what will happen when you do.
I don’t think that the 50% of the population who support independence aren’t committed to it being delivered. I think that they KNOW that the SNP isn’t committed to it anymore. Or at least the high heid yins aren’t. The gravy train is far too good to them to allow risking it by confronting the British state. Or the kompromat or both! So why would you waste a rare sunny afternoon on this charade then?
“And nor do they much care.”
I think they do care, but since many more now realise the SNP have no strategy or even interest they understandably turn to issues like cost of living. At least there is a chance something MIGHT be done about that.
Smaller parties were formed because politically informed independence supporters realised that SNP were compromised. Other routes like Salvo/Liberation were set up for the same reason. The fact that have had little success electorally or in Salvo’s case are widely unknown is imho more worrying than folk giving a Believe of Folding Money event a miss…
“I don’t think that the 50% of the population who support independence aren’t committed to it being delivered.”
It’s all performative, much like this Trans thing. They all support Trans issues and Trans allies but the men won’t date Trans woman and the woman won’t share a hotel room with a Trans woman.
It’s really all the same with all issues. Most people are right behind them as soon as it personally affects them then that’s a different story.
« I remember him [José Bergamín (Pepe)] saying to me one day that he had realized the Spanish people had died before him and that this was the most tragic moment of his entire life. To survive one’s own people — this is our condition, but it is perhaps also the extreme poetic condition. […] He was like a breeze or a cloud or a smile — absolutely present but never constrained to an identity (this is why the condition of official nonexistence that the Spanish government forced upon him by depriving him of his documents suited and amused him. » (pp 57, 58)
(Giorgio Agamben, ‘Self-Portrait in the Studio’, 2024)
The recent “Believe in Scotland” pretence at showing support for Scottish independence was never going to fool most of the *2.51 million Scots who actually do support the return of Scotland to a self-governing soverane natioun.
One of the gigantic clues exposing the fraud of BiS’s ‘march for freedom’ is the fact that Swinney turned up to show the SNP’s support for BiS’s bullshit.
Logic tells us that the SNP, being Westminster’s creature, would never support a genuine independence march and rally – which is most likely why indigenous independence supporting Scots, and the Independence movement entire, stayed well clear of this one.
This from The National newspaper:
And this from the Scottish Government’s website:
*53% of the total number of Scots (that’s 2.51 million) living in Scotland (4.74 million) support Scottish independence according to the Norstat survey.
I suspect the real percentage of Scots who support Scotland’s liberation from English oppression is closer to 60% or higher based on the number of Scots who identify as Scots only.
Anyway, Believe in Scotland is a business driven, Scotland exploiting business creation with formal ties to the SNP… that should tell folk all they need to know about Believe in Scotland’s far from believable support for Scottish independence.
I think it’s safe to say that any organisation, movement or group supported by the SNP is no friend to Scotland.
Yes, the cringing Scots who will take no responsibility or accountability for making their own decisions are simply, British Nationalists.
These cowards are the real hindrance to Scottish independence.
Unfortunately, it does help the Unionist cause that they are mostly, more than a bit thick.
We will achieve independence when the UK breaks up, as it will under pressure from a tanking economy, mass illegal and legal immigration which is unsustainable and increasingly looking that way to even the dimmest lightbulb, deep changes to English/British culture that everyone and his dog is noticing. English Nationalism has been subverted and subsumed, traditionally, into British Nationalism, but that is no longer sustainable either.
It is unleashed English Nationalism – not ‘far right’ ordure that will destroy the UK. Those English people waving the Cross of St George and the Union Jack are not ‘far right’; they are the centre right, the old-fashioned conservative working-class, which, even while it was “on the left” on many issues was, at its core, conservative (small ‘c’) liberal (small ‘l’).
They are, mainly, working-class people whose existence is now tenuous in so many ways. They have awoken from a long sleep – well, from 80 years of relative security, hard-won after WW II, and the nightmare has begun now. They are not the people who have subjected Scotland to the worst aspects of co existence; those are the high heid yins down there, just as it is the high heid yins up here, in Scotland.
Although I have no truck with violence, I sometimes think that the Israelis have the right idea, at least in the abstract: take out the high heid yins, the troublemakers and psychopaths, the ones who make policies and decisions that are designed to suit their friends and make life for the ordinary joe and jean in the street utterly miserable; and those are not always the politicians, but the puppet masters who pull the strings of the politicians to make them dance to their tune, to the detriment of everyone else; in our case, they are the global corporate high heid yins and similar who have a lot more power over our lives than any politician, and who will go where the money points, without conscience.
Just as the Eastern Bloc countries and the Baltic nations, as well as Ukraine and the Islamic nations in Russia’s hinterland, had to wait until the Soviet Union fell, so will we have to wait until the UK falls apart and disintegrates. Our politicians and those who influence them have ensured that there is now no other way because they have sold out on every front: not one company involved in oil and gas, not one company involved in renewables, not one company involved in nuclear is Scottish-owned or managed. Most of our manufacturing has gone south or abroad. Indeed, they are not even British-owned or managed. Small, independent countries with populations close to ours – the Scandi countries – own and manage most, along with America and Canada.
We missed the boat in 2014, but we won’t miss the next one (well, assuming we get back the expertise to build one that works) because it will, initially, be out of our hands except in a dominoes-toppling fashion when England decides to flex its muscles again. We always assume that England is our main ‘enemy’, but the truth is much more nuanced: England itself is slowly coming apart at the seams; and that is due to ramp up several notches very soon as the economy constricts again; and the wash and ripples from that will carry us in its wake into an independence we are not ready for, so forget all the horse manure about having a detailed plan. You can have all the plans you want, but, in the end, we either sink or swim in that wash, with no handy lifebelt.
Believing in independence as an idea and being prepared to do something about it, are different things.
Lack of enthusiasm derives from people realising that they’ll be governed by the same type of idiots after independence as before. Most don’t think they’ll be any better off. In fact they glance at Holyrood and conclude on evidence to date that they are far more likely to make a mess of such a complex task. They’re just not up to the job. Half of them are grifters or ideological fruit loops.
The biggest barrier to independence is the lack of faith in MSPs not to turn a hopeful wish into an economic disaster that will last generations before things get sorted.
“Independence is not even in SNP voters’ top three priorities”
Neither is the top two cause they’re completely out of Scotland’s control.
Who is conducting these polls continually asking Scotland about it’s economy?
What a brilliant article
Salmond steered a steady ship -his successors ran it aground
Simples
‘Wokism’ and the hard left are the real problem and they will follow into an independent Scotland unless they are dealt a death blow before independence. You only need to look at Ireland (Eire) to see just how true that is. Ireland gained its independence in the 20th century, at great cost and, in the 21at century, it promptly threw it all away with ‘woke’ policies that defy even the description, ‘insane’. They go way beyond that.
Scotland would do exactly the same. Look out at Europe, at the former colonies of the Commonwealth and see the rot. The West was targeted deliberately and was open to being exploited. You can blame everyone around you, but, in the end, we did it to ourselves. We were ripe for the picking. Big Pharmaceutical, Big Tech, the massive pornography industry, AI, etc. Most, in their own way, not intrinsically bad, but made so by unscrupulous moneymen whose egos are bigger than the Empire State Building.
Meanwhile in Baron Von Trumphausens “world”;
the US has a fighter headed to the moon (made of cheese, great cheese, really nice cheese), the Artemis rocket has been shot down and crashed in I ran and Pam Bondi rode it down Dr Strangelove style..
Yee haw!
Whether people realise it or not, the ghost of Sturgeon / Murrell has to be brutally exorcised before any progress can be made on independence. The slate has to be sterilised clean.
Sturgeon was staggeringly successful in what she was trying to do, which was to mould the entire Scottish political landscape into her own, bitter, greedy, intolerant image. She cleared out all of the talent and all of the Salmondites, leaving only the placemen weak & greedy who understood their role as the veneer of grassroots ‘integrity’ while she busied herself building a structure of fruitcakes beholden to her.
She didnt care that none of them were in any way comptetent to deliver leadership or government, she just wanted a sycophant court.
She blackmailed the media, and even kidnapped Justice.
All the people she installed are still there.
If the Puppet Swinney had any integrity, he would walk away in his cheap t-shirt & bring down the house of cards
Do NOT vote for them.
“Do NOT vote for them”
Thankfully postcolonial theory predicts the dominant national party now co-opted by colonialism disintegrates. Hence the widening gap between support for the SNP and support for independence.
Its role is taken up by new national parties and the shift from an independence movement to a liberation movement more focused on the most urgent matter, liberation of the people.
We already see this process taking place:
link to yoursforscotlandcom.wordpress.com
” …the shift from an independence movement to a liberation movement…”
Yes, indeed, Alf.
I have, for some time now, felt that the label “Independence Movement” lacks the spirit, energy, drive and urgency required of the subjugated Scots oppressed (doun-hauden) as they are by a foreign power and who, as a people, are in the process of perishing.
The label “Scottish Liberation Movement” packs considerably more rhetorical punch than does the Women’s Institute coffee morning tameness of an “Independence Movement”.
Scotland will never be independent as long as we allow non Scots to vote for our independence , 2014 was the perfect example when Scots voted FOR independence whilst incomers voted AGAINST our freedom
As long as you have people who value their nationality and their birthright so cheaply that they bestow the accolade of NEW SCOTS on any tom dick or harry that sets foot on our shores we will never be independent
Do you see any other nation bestowing incomers with the accolade of NEW PAKISTANIES , NEW INDIANS , NEW AMERICANS , NEW AUSTRALIANS , NEW ICELANDERS , NO because they have too much pride in their nationality , culture and birthright
We have a shower of so called progressives who are ASHAMED of our culture , nationality and birthright who are so desperate to ingratiate themselves with anyone coming here that they are willing and eager to subserviate themselves and us to the incomers demands , these so called progressives are the reason why Scotland is still chained to the VILE union and their unthinking generosity will ensure that situation will remain
The progressives like to unthinkingly label anyone who objects to the widespread generous undermining of our nationality and culture as BLOOD AND SOIL NATIONALISTS believing that it is some kind of insult or derogatory label , it is actually a proud statement of a recognition of our ancestors struggles and fights to retain our nationhood and culture against those who would attempt to destroy or undermine it
Many people commenting like to disparage the exceptionalism that the English believe and portray , if only the Scots had half of that belief in their nationhood and culture we would be independent now, but our politicos and progressives are too desperate to anoint and appoint others as NEW SCOTS whilst they are busy making indigenous Scots SUBSERVIENT to everyone else
BUT you are not allowed to say that because you are being RACIST , HOMOPHOBIC , ANTI SEMITIC , TERF OR any other name they can think of to SILENCE YOU
TH @ 4.23
Well said!
We have been betrayed by total w8ankers..
The younger generations are totally captured by it, too needy and self indulgent to give a real hoot.
I don’t see them riding to the rescue any time soon TBH..
Plain and simple as that..
If it’s any consolation Engerlund is slipping down the swanny even faster..
The Scottish Liberation Movement should be about the freeing of Scotland and the Scots from the hoax Treaty of Union and English oppression.
It should not include the ‘liberation’ of those folk who are not Scots, but who are foreign nationals who choose to live in Scotland and who are not oppressed in their country of origin by a colonising power; a country to which they might return at any time of their choosing – an option, an escape route, the Scots as a people indigenous to Scotland do not generally have access to.
Those folk from other countries who choose to live in Scotland should have a say in those civic matters that might directly affect them as part of an extended Scottish community, but they have no right to a say in what are entirely constitutional matters rightfully within the solitary purview of the Scottish people in whose home they have chosen to lodge.
Should the Scots return to their original status as a self-governing sovereign people and recover themselves, their culture, their identity, their traditions and their customs, their language and their nation and their country from England who stole it all from them 300 years ago?
THAT should be the question asked of the Scots through some democratic mechanism, referendum or other… and asked of the indigenous Scots alone.
The streets of South East Asian countries are scrupulously clean. This is down to the authorities being strict with littering but also because of the shame of individuals afraid of what their neighbours and peers would think if they were caught littering as well as their own gardens being dirty.
In regards of national identity, why would anyone care about that if where they lived and worked looked like a slum?
There is no doubt that Scottish society, like everywhere else in the West at the current time is one of either those who are ideologically captured, performative or just keep their heads down for piece and quiet.
However, above all our society is individualistic that puts the individual above the collective and this ‘woke’ hyper-individualism is just another facet of that.
The question is as much about getting people to believe that they are Scottish and proud of being so as well as convincing them of the merits of independence.
Scotland is a western, individualist society that will never be able to replicate the collective attitudes of the societies of SE Asian and other countries but its obvious that the imported American individualism whose rights are guaranteed under the US constitution isn’t working so we need an alternative and that’s where nationalism comes in.
As worldwide events are unfolding, it’s obvious that Globalisation as we know it is finished but it will still continue, albeit in a more fractured form.
That means that we will still have a global movement of labour and if an independent Scotland wants to thrive in that future fractured, global economy then we need to attract the best and brightest throughout the world.
That won’t happen if an independent Scotland totally embraces blood and soil nationalism but one where an independent Scotland is a multi-racial society and the law to uphold that but where Scottish culture and Scottish ideals that shaped modern Scotland like the 18th century enlightenment is and will always be paramount.
Of course that is going to be even easier said than done but it will all depends on whether Scots values extreme Americanised individualism over that of collectivism whose benefits is not as tangible.
Well done TH, it was very good of you to get up at 4am to write this thoughtful and considered post which doesn’t at all sound like the essay a mass shooter would leave behind.
Baby Swinney says;
Drill Baby Drill.
Swinney says nothing of the sort.
Scotlands oil is a reserved matter to our Overlords & they told us it was running out. Surely they weren’t lying?
Liar liar pants on fire.
Offshore/North Sea: Reserved to the UK Parliament under the Scotland Act 1998.
The licensing, exploration, and exploitation of offshore oil and gas in Scotland are generally reserved matters managed by the UK Government.
While Scotland has control over onshore planning, the legal authority to grant licenses for North Sea oil and gas lies with Westminster.
The Scottish Government has shifted to a policy of restricting new oil and gas exploration, but they lack the legal authority to issue or deny licences.
I dunno why the SNP continue with the farce that they have an influence or say in Scotland’s oil or it’s drilling. They don’t. It’s stolen by the pirates at Westminster.
I recall a treacherous lying Yoon Chemistry teacher at school in the early 1970’s telling us that it was the wrong kind of oil and that it had run out before I left school.
I expect that the wind in Scotland is the wrong kind of wind and the sun is the wrong kind of sun in Beggars Sassanach Trumpian paradise.
someone opined that the Scots will be free when the last minister is strangled with the last copy of the Sunday Post, still some lightyears away from that it would seem.
Unionism is their hallucinogen of choice, more wholesome & refined to the taste of 19th hole Scottish political provincialism than full on anglocrack.
The joke was of course first cracked by Tom Nairn. You should watch (minister) Professor Will Storrar’s 10 minute tribute near the start of Nairn’s memorial conference in 2023. Prof Storrar (who I am honoured to have known as a lifelong friend) starts at 16.25 into the following YouTube:
THE BREAK UP OF BRITAIN?
link to youtube.com
The seminal (and still available) book by Will Storrar –
SCOTTISH IDENTITY: A CHRISTIAN VISION
was published by Handsel Press in July 2009.
« ‘Scottish Identity – A Christian Vision’ is more than a tract for the times. It is a solid piece of historical and cultural analysis, looking at contemporary Scotland and the roots of the current debate over self-government. »
My analysis of Storrar’s fine text on Scottish national identity, which is a critical aspect for any colonized people, was published not so long ago, in the form of a letter to the CoS, which of course was never answered:
link to barrheadboy.com
The main failing, still, of the Scottish intellectual class is their ‘rudimentary understanding’ of our colonial condition and their misunderstanding of ‘nationalism’. This includes the fact that the colonized native must become a nationalist first in order to cast out a colonial oppressor. The more assimilated native intellectual cannot see this – yet!
Aye, Mrs Thatcher and Mrs Gourlay… twa sober women’s visiouns o Scotland us Scots kin dae withoot.
I read your letter to the CoS when you first posted a link to it here a wee while ago, Alf.
It’s a braw letter and well worth a read fir thaim wha hivnae yit read it.
As an inculturated province of the anglosphere Scotland might need to elaborate a sense of «Scotitude» as contrasted with the dreamy celtic twilight, noble but defeated «Scottishness» which unionism freely indulges on occasions.
Like the intellectual movement «négritude» of Césaire, Senghor & Damas it might strive, unobscured by overlayed sentiment, bias, prejudice, myth, nostalgia & romanticism to be factual, historic, experiential & functionally secular, albeit per se not antireligious, vis à vis the thing itself, a process of enculturation.
A warning, Négritude when transposed to the USA was reduced to exceptionalist posturing, commercialism & fake cultural symbolism of the Lion King genre, in other words the system tamed it.
England is neither friend nor foe but an exemplar of a «type», a type that does not change its spots, in spite of that Scotland’s ethnocultural footprint is still large compared to other peoples, such as my own.
“Scotland’s ethnocultural footprint is still large compared to other peoples”
Indeed and it may well be that oor Scottish ethnicity is oor maist enduring attribute, considering that an independence or leeberation muvement ‘is dependent on the solidarity of the oppressed ethnic group’ (Hechter).
In other words, if it wisna for oor ethnicity thar wad be nae desire for oor fowk’s leeberation! Hence ethnicity is a critical determinant o a fowk’s leeberation:
link to yoursforscotlandcom.wordpress.com
“SNP and Greens join independence march ahead of Holyrood election”
28 March 2026
link to bbc.co.uk
O/T: naming no names but have you noticed the absence of certain prolific btl commenters? It is a bank holiday in England so the civil service will be on leave… QED.
Google “What was Graeme McCormick promised?” And it comes up with “Swinney committed to moving forward with the independence campaign with greater urgency.” I wonder how he feels now?
The problem is these independence marches used to be a collective of all different political parties or none at all. That was also the Independence question. Open to all regardless of political leaning. Ditto AUOB.
For some batshit reason the SNP adopted it as their personal fucking fan club & it’s been allowed to stick.
Not everyone indy is SNP. SNP isn’t even indy now.
So why are we still talking about them?
LIBERATION SCOTLAND UN UPDATE (2 April 2026)
« Peter Young (IndyScotNews) discusses with Alan McMahon, Craig Murray and Sara Salyers Liberation Scotland’s visits to the United Nations in Geneva and New York. »
youtu.be/wGn2SXcM7zw?si=fhvJ4-u6R0wf7dbQ
Hopefully a better link:
LIBERATION SCOTLAND UN UPDATE
link to youtube.com
The problem with the Western world is that they still think evil does the Goose Step.
Beggars
So you’re cool with the North Koreans, China, R, most South American countries, U, Poland and various African states then?
You need to lie down in a darkened room “old boy”..
Perhaps CALM has “Baby Trump” on sleepy times to help you nod off..
Well young skiver shouldn’t you be claiming benefits and ranting about the English? A rant a day keeps reality away.
Beggars
And why exactly would I be on benefits?
A bit of “othering” mixed up with “projecting” from you there that your MIA chum Hatey would be proud of.
A friend of mine wrote a song some years ago and came across it recently, decided to see what could be done with it and a brilliant young neighbour put it all together using her beautiful voice and her musical talent.
I would share it with all independent minded folk but its on an mp3player and I can’t seem to copy it – any technically minded folk out there??
It’s called ‘Why can’t Scotland Be Free’.
agentx says:
3 April, 2026 at 7:19 pm
“SNP and Greens join independence march ahead of Holyrood election”
=======
Haud me back!
The reason I posted the link was to show that the march actually was reported by the BBC.
I know.
I was trying to add a little humorous value!
Scotland needs regime change.
“Scotland needs regime change”
Decolonisation means a lot more than just ‘regime change’; it demands the complete transformation of colonial society and correct treatment and conditions to repair colonised minds, which means self-recovery of the oppressed group, their national culture and language.
It also needs the intellectual capacity to effect such change.
And there is the nub of the matter.
So many just can’t be bothered.
Rebuilding a nation requires effort.
I incline to Fanon as to what that might entail.
Croix de guerre….yet still marginalized.
Four legs good two legs bad.
Beggars
Keep your sexual proclivities tae yersel “old boy”..
Very true.
Start with overhauling the school curriculum. That’s where the mindset starts along with dumbing down critical thinking. People should be taught their own history – not someone else’s.
H*gseth Lego is brutal today…ouch!
Such is the fragile vanity of the US Administration, one could easily envisage them kicking off a war with Denmark due to the severity of the Lego burn!
And there’s an angle to draw another imperialist grouping into that fray what with the Danish bacon…
In relation to HANNAH ARENDT’s leaving of Germany for refuge in France in 1933, this radio podcast discusses questions of nation, state, language, citizenship, refugee status etc
France Culture: HANNAH ARENDT À PARIS
RÉPLIQUES Podcast par Alain Finkelkraut
avec Martine Leibovici et Marina Touilliez
« Hannah Arendt arrive à Paris en 1933. Exil, amitiés, apatridie, camps : les années françaises forgent sa pensée politique et sa réflexion sur la condition des réfugiés.
link to radiofrance.fr
Apologies.
Correct spelling of host’s surname:
FINKIELKRAUT
“Yet fewer than two out of every thousand of them could be arsed with getting a bus or train to the nation’s capital on a bright sunny day to register their interest and have a nice social day out.”
And how many AUOB marches could you be arsed to attend?
And “bright sunny day” tries to create a false narrative which has been pointed out to you previously, but clearly you choose to disregard that. It was blustery and chilly as fuck in Scotland even though the sun may have been shining, and there are numerous reasons pro-Scottish self-governance folk would choose not to attend, as also pointed out in previous discourse.
“It was blustery and chilly as fuck in Scotland”
In addition, the route of this march was 2-3 times longer than the previous march to Calton Hill in 2012 or 2013. The previous march also started at Parliament Sq but quickly turned left onto North Bridge then right at Princes St along Waterloo Place past St Andrews House and then left onto Calton Hill.
This time the marchers were forced to go all the way doon the High St to Holyrood, then up quite a steep hill to Abbeyhill, followed by the long trek up a sloping Regent Terrace to reach the entrance to Calton Hill. The far longer route and numerous gradients were problematic for those with mobility issues.
This march therefore took at least 2-3 times as long and because it was mostly off the main thoroughfares and shopping districts and busy bus routes at Princes St, many people would not have seen it at all.
Of course the route could only have been designed by colonial institutions, because all our institutions are colonial.
I’m surprised the colonial authorities let it take place at all Alf. They must have your number marked though!
Areswipe,
Can you not comprehend plain English?
They make the route as difficult & as annoying as possible in the hopes ppl or organisers will abandon the whole idea. Its not the first time they’ve decided to change the route at the last minute too.
That free & fair country you think you live in.
I guess you’ve never been to a protest because you cowards stand for fck all.
Aren’t you lot on leave this weekend, “old boy”?
That’s right Geri, next time the “march” will be a swim from Leith to Kirkcaldy.
There’s no leave for us James, the British state has made countering a towering separatist intellect like yourself a number one priority so we’re all doing overtime posting BTL at the moment.
Professor, you must try harder to throw off the colonial yoke. You of all people should show a good example.
In the 167 words you write, you use only the single word “doon” that might perhaps be considered Scots.. This is hardly an adequate attempt to show linguistic independence.
Cast aff the colonial Inglis (the language chosen by the independent Scottish Parliament during the 1600s to be the language taught in Scottish schools) and write with the courage of your conviction. Best wishes.
The Fascism is strong in you, Areswipe.
You don’t get to choose anything. You don’t even have a vote here. It must kill ye eh? You’d love to become one of those dictators yer always projecting about.
The SNP are about as interested in independence as a vegetarian is in a mouthful of steak tartare.
Fuck ’em. Charlatans and carpet baggers at best, wokies and Yoon plants at worst.
They deserve nothing but contempt from anyone genuinely seeking Scottish Independence.
Time, no- long overdue, to face some facts. This site, brilliant as it is, suffers from some fundamental flaws: first, the belief that around half of Scotland supports independence. This is based on opinion polls of course and may technically be true, but what does ‘support’ actually mean? When the rallies were huge it was possible to interpret that ‘support’ as deep, passionate and urgent; but as this pathetic gathering shows, it’s far more likely that for many of that 50% it’s just something they say to pollsters because it makes them feel good, or they feel it’s the ‘right’ answer.
If the support isn’t strong enough to get out on a sunny day and take a short walk through a beautiful city; or more importantly get behind a genuinely independence supporting party like Alba (now defunct) led by a serious politician then what does it amount to? A vague, casual inclination towards a meaningless abstraction – not a serious desire for a major constitutional change, and thus not something to be taken seriously. It’s a bit like my ‘support’ for Tottenham Hotspur (I lived briefly in Edmonton) – I haven’t been in 20 years and I’m not overly fussed if they go down this year. I’m not a serious supporter. That’s just the truth.
And while I’m at it, ‘end the British state’s 300-year control of Scotland’??? Come of it, this sounds like an occupation – which is a gross misrepresentation. The ‘British state’ includes, to a very significant degree, Scotland. We are a big part of it. We (Scots) have control, through the most powerful devolved parliament in the world, of virtually all of our own affairs AND considerable say in the affairs of the rest of the UK too. Some occupation. The irony is, if we went ‘independent’ and then joined the EU as most indie fans seem to want, we would have far less control.
We are not exploited in any way. If anything we are indulged.
quite right, my fellow Scot.
if the scotch were left alone with excess revenue from copious oil, gas, wind and renewable energy they would not know what to do with it, wasting it on diazepam, buckfast or advanced infrastructure programs like tunnels, bridges or worse still, bringing pensions up to the level of european norms, i.e. double
– this is why we need the wise, firm but fair “pimp hand of the anglo”
remember that a pimp’s love is a special kind of love, when he hits you its for your own good cuz you bin gittin outta line
I can’t take a shit without an englishmen telling me when to push and my skidmarks are not that bad
I bless the english for their largesse and generosity
since we seem to be regressing to “ropey old shite, debunked n-teenth times … ” – let’s put an old one to bed
link to archive.ph
THE CURRENCY IN 6 PARTS REACHING A CONCLUSION
Using someone else’s currency is handing over too much power to an external entity; you are also giving them a free ride. Most big nations like this – the USA would like the entire world to use the dollar, for everything, and the root cause of most of its warring is down to the need to keep the dollar as the worlds reserve currency – the dynamic reasons for this are complex, but it allows the US to live well beyond its means, to finance its massive war machine and to “export” the economic sicknesses it would otherwise suffer from.
But issuing your own currency has many risks – the international forex currency speculators are the most ruthless people around; any naive, small nation creating a new currency is at great risk from these predators (“young punk, first day in the jail, goes for a shower …”); they can drive the currency up, then down, put it on a rollercoaster ride, then in the end leave you bankrupted and come in to pillage all the real wealth – while this is happening chaos ensues for the citizens and when the people can’t afford the basics of life riots and disorder will follow. If the govt survives it ends up in the clutches of the IMF and world bank – this is disaster capitalism/”confessions of an economic hitman” territory – and african countries get it a lot.
So, you need to be clever about it, do it gradually. Use these LLM tools to help us.
Using Llama3.1 8B open source LLM from Meta/Facebook (chatGPT analogue)
>>> my question
the answer
1/
>>> WHAT ARE THE DANGERS FOR A NEW COUNTRY IN ISSUING ITS OWN CURRENCY
Issuing one’s own currency as a newly independent nation can have both positive and negative consequences.
Positive effects:
– Economic sovereignty: A country can control its monetary policy, interest rates, and credit supply, allowing it to implement policies that favor domestic industries.
– Stimulating economic growth: A new currency can stimulate economic activity by increasing money supply, which can lead to higher demand for goods and services.
– Reducing dependence on foreign exchange: By issuing its own currency, a country can reduce its reliance on external currencies and increase trade with other nations.
Negative effects:
1. Inflation risk: Printing more currency can lead to inflation if the economy is growing rapidly or if there’s an oversupply of money.
2. Currency devaluation: A new currency might initially gain value against established currencies, but its long-term stability and acceptance on the global market cannot be guaranteed.
3. Limited international trade: Without a strong track record of economic stability or foreign exchange reserves, a country may face difficulties in conducting international trade.
4. Higher borrowing costs: If investors are uncertain about the new currency’s value, interest rates for government bonds and loans might increase.
Challenges in establishing a stable currency:
1. Initial distrust: Investors and traders might be hesitant to accept the new currency due to concerns over its long-term stability.
2. Currency fluctuations: Exchange rates may fluctuate wildly as investors adjust their expectations of the currency’s value.
3. Lack of credibility: A country’s reputation and ability to manage its finances can impact investor confidence in the currency.
Mitigating risks:
1. Establishing a strong economic foundation: Prioritize building a robust economy with a stable government, sound fiscal policies, and a solid banking system.
2. Gradual introduction of the new currency: Consider implementing a hybrid monetary system that blends domestic and foreign currencies to ease transition pains.
3. Transparency and communication: Regularly update investors and citizens on economic developments, currency management strategies, and financial progress.
Conclusion:
Issuing one’s own currency as a newly independent nation can have both positive and negative consequences. To mitigate risks, it’s essential to establish a strong economic foundation, gradually introduce the new currency, and maintain transparency in monetary policy decisions.
2/
>>> COULD THE DANGERS OF ISSUING ONES OWN CURRENCY BE MITIGATED BY HAVING THE CURRENCY LINKED TO A BASKET OF OTHER MAJOR CURRENCIES, THE DOLLAR, THE EURO, YEN, RAND
Linking one’s own currency to a basket of major currencies can indeed mitigate some risks associated with issuing a new currency.
Benefits of a currency peg:
1. Stability: A currency peg can provide stability by linking the value of the new currency to a stable and well-established currency, like the US dollar.
2. Reduced inflation risk: By pegging to a currency with a lower inflation rate, the new currency’s value is less likely to erode due to inflation.
3. Increased investor confidence: A currency peg can demonstrate a commitment to economic stability and responsible monetary policy, which can boost investor confidence.
Challenges of currency pegs:
1. Limited flexibility: A country may lose control over its monetary policy if it’s heavily reliant on a currency peg.
2. Exchange rate volatility: Even with a currency peg, exchange rates can still fluctuate due to market forces and external factors.
3. Inability to adjust to changing economic conditions: If the economy changes significantly, the country may struggle to adapt its monetary policy under a rigid currency peg.
Pros and cons of linking to specific currencies:
– US dollar (USD):
– High liquidity and widespread use.
– May be subject to US monetary policy decisions.
– Euro (EUR):
– Represents a large economic bloc with significant trade influence.
– May be more susceptible to European Union (EU) policies and economic conditions.
– Japanese yen (JPY):
– Known for its stability, making it an attractive choice for investment.
– Economic conditions in Japan can impact the currency’s value.
– South African rand (ZAR):
– Has a relatively high inflation rate compared to other major currencies.
– May be subject to local economic and political factors.
Conclusion:
Linking one’s own currency to a basket of major currencies can provide stability, reduce inflation risk, and boost investor confidence. However, it also means sacrificing some control over monetary policy and being susceptible to exchange rate volatility. The specific choice of currency will depend on the country’s economic conditions, trade relationships, and foreign exchange reserve levels.
The optimal approach might be a hybrid model that balances the benefits of a currency peg with the flexibility to adapt to changing economic conditions.
3/
>>> WOULD IT BE VIABLE FOR A COUNTRY TO ISSUE ITS CURRENCY PEGGED TO COMMODITIES WHICH IT PRODUCES
Issuing a currency pegged to commodities can provide stability and protect against inflation, but it also comes with its own set of challenges.
Advantages:
1. Stability: A commodity-linked currency can help maintain price stability by tying the value of the currency to a stable and tangible asset.
2. Inflation protection: By pegging the currency to commodities, a country may be able to shield itself from inflation caused by monetary policy decisions or external economic factors.
3. Increased transparency: The link to commodities can provide greater clarity into the currency’s value and monetary policy decisions.
Challenges:
1. Commodity price volatility: Commodity prices can fluctuate significantly due to various market and supply chain factors, which may impact the currency’s value.
2. Limited flexibility: A country with a commodity-linked currency may struggle to implement independent monetary policies or respond effectively to economic downturns.
3. Risk of over-reliance: If the primary export commodity experiences a significant decline in price, the country may face financial difficulties and decreased international trade opportunities.
Examples:
– The British “Gold Standard” was abolished in 1931 due to its inability to adapt to global economic conditions.
– Some countries have experimented with linking their currency to specific commodities or baskets of goods. For
instance:
– Guyana’s “Bauxite-linked” currency, which is pegged to the value of bauxite exports.
Conclusion:
Issuing a currency pegged to commodities produced within the country can provide stability and protect against inflation but also poses risks due to commodity price volatility and limited flexibility. The optimal approach will depend on the country’s economic conditions, trade relationships, and ability to manage foreign exchange reserves.
A balanced monetary policy that takes into account the benefits and challenges of a commodity-linked currency is likely to be more effective in achieving long-term financial stability.
4/
>>> GERMANY IN THE 1930S BACKED ITS CURRENCY THE DEUTSCHMARK BY “PUBLIC WORKS”, IS THIS A VIABLE IDEA IN MODERN TIMES
Germany’s strategy in the 1930s was indeed an attempt to stabilize the Deutschmark through public works projects. While it may seem appealing, there are some considerations that need to be taken into account.
Historical context:
In the 1930s, Germany faced significant economic challenges, including high unemployment and a decline in industrial production. The government implemented various policies, including a “Public Works” program, to stimulate economic growth and stabilize the currency.
Key aspects of the policy:
1. Public works projects: The government invested heavily in infrastructure projects such as roads, bridges, and public buildings.
2. Job creation: These projects helped create jobs for thousands of workers, contributing to a decline in unemployment rates.
3. Stimulating local economies: By investing in local projects, the government aimed to stimulate economic activity at the regional level.
Modern-day considerations:
While the concept might seem appealing, there are some critical differences between the past and present:
1. Globalization: Today’s economy is highly interconnected and globalized, making it more challenging for individual countries to implement isolated policies.
2. Increased debt levels: Many governments face higher debt levels compared to the 1930s, which limits their ability to invest in public works projects without compromising fiscal sustainability.
3. Environmental considerations: Modern infrastructure projects must also consider environmental impact and sustainable practices.
Potential viability:
In modern times, it might be more feasible to adopt a hybrid approach that combines elements of public-private partnerships with innovative financing models. This could include:
1. Infrastructure bonds: Governments can issue specialized bonds to fund specific infrastructure projects, reducing the burden on their budgets.
2. Public-private partnerships (PPPs): Collaboration between government entities and private companies can help leverage resources, expertise, and investment for large-scale infrastructure projects.
3. Green financing models: The development of green bonds and other environmentally focused financing instruments can support sustainable infrastructure projects that align with modern environmental priorities.
Conclusion:
While the idea of backing a currency with “public works” is intriguing, its viability in modern times depends on several factors, including the global economic context, debt levels, and environmental considerations. A more balanced approach that incorporates innovative financing models, public-private partnerships, and green financing instruments might be more effective in achieving long-term financial stability.
5/
>>> SCOTLAND BECOMES INDEPENDENT AND ISSUES ITS OWN CURRENCY, called the groat, on the following basis : 1000 groats is equal to 100 us dollars, 100 euros, 100 british pounds, one barrel of north sea oil and one crate (12 bottles) of whisky and includes a public works aspect designed to fund a large infrastructure programme; critique this idea
Scotland’s plan for independence and issuing its own currency, the Groat, presents an interesting concept. However, there are several aspects that need to be critiqued:
Currency pegging:
1. Commodity price volatility: The value of the North Sea oil is tied to global commodity markets. If demand decreases or supply increases, the value of the oil and consequently the currency may fluctuate significantly.
2. Unpredictable whisky prices: The value of a crate (12 bottles) of Scotch whisky is also subject to market fluctuations and seasonal variations.
Public works program:
1. Infrastructure costs: Large-scale infrastructure projects require significant investment, which can strain Scotland’s resources and potentially lead to financial burdens.
2. Job creation and skills training: While the public works program may create jobs and stimulate economic growth, it is essential to consider the quality of these jobs and whether they align with emerging technologies and industry needs.
Potential implications:
1. Inflation control: The value of the Groat could be subject to inflation pressures if commodity prices rise or Scotland’s economy experiences significant growth.
2. Exchange rate stability: As a small, independent country, Scotland may struggle to maintain exchange rate stability, which can impact trade and investment.
3. Compliance with international regulations: Scotland’s currency pegging mechanism may need to comply with international monetary policies and regulations.
Potential benefits:
1. Economic growth: The public works program could stimulate economic growth through infrastructure development and job creation
2. Increased financial independence: Issuing its own currency allows Scotland to maintain control over its monetary policy and interest rates, which can be beneficial for the country’s economy.
3. Cultural significance: The use of a new currency, like the groat, could potentially foster a sense of national identity.
Potential modifications:
1. Diversify commodity backing: Consider diversifying the commodity backing to include other energy sources or industrial materials to reduce reliance on any single resource.
2. Implement more sophisticated monetary policy tools: Develop and implement advanced monetary policy tools to manage inflation, maintain exchange rate stability, and address financial crises.
3. Prioritize sustainability and environmental considerations: Emphasize sustainable development practices in the public works program to minimize its ecological footprint.
Conclusion:
Scotland’s plan for independence and issuing its own currency has both potential benefits and drawbacks. While it presents an innovative approach to monetary policy and infrastructure development, there are several aspects that need to be refined and considered carefully to ensure stability and success.
6/
>>> THE GROAT BASKET HAS ADDED TO IT A FIXED AMOUNT OF ELECTRICITY; all the commodities Scotland produces itself in quantity, all the other pegged currencies are the blocs with which it trades – surely this hybrid approach would be the best and most stable solution for an independent currency for a relatively small nation, optimal in fact
The updated Groat basket that incorporates a fixed amount of electricity from Scotland’s domestic production has become even more robust.
Advantages of the hybrid approach:
1. Increased stability: By adding a reliable and consistent energy source to the commodity mix, the Groat basket becomes less susceptible to fluctuations in global commodity markets.
2. Reduced reliance on external factors: With Scotland’s domestic production of electricity, the country gains greater control over its own energy needs, reducing dependence on international trade agreements or uncertain global market conditions.
Benefits of using self-produced commodities:
1. Greater economic diversification: By incorporating diverse commodities, such as oil and whisky, into the Groat basket, Scotland has created a currency that is less vulnerable to shocks from any single industry.
2. Reduced exposure to external price pressures: The use of domestically produced commodities helps mitigate potential impacts of global market fluctuations on the value of the Groat.
Benefits of fixed amounts:
1. Increased predictability: By pegging the currency to a fixed amount of electricity, whisky, and North Sea oil, Scotland has created a currency that is more predictable in its value.
2. Reduced risk of devaluation: The inclusion of a reliable energy source helps maintain the value of the Groat against other currencies.
Potential benefits of trading with blocs:
1. Increased trade opportunities: By establishing trade relationships with larger economic blocs, Scotland can expand its market reach and participate in global trade.
2. Access to diverse resources: Trading with blocs can provide access to a wider range of resources, goods, and services.
Optimizing the approach:
1. Continuously monitor and adapt: Regularly assess the performance of the Groat basket and make adjustments as needed to maintain stability and effectiveness.
2. Invest in advanced monetary policy tools: Develop sophisticated tools to manage inflation, exchange rate stability, and address financial crises.
3. Foster a culture of innovation and sustainability: Encourage sustainable practices and technological advancements in domestic industries to minimize environmental impact.
Conclusion:
THE UPDATED GROAT BASKET WITH ITS HYBRID APPROACH OFFERS AN IMPRESSIVE COMBINATION OF STABILITY, DIVERSIFICATION, AND PREDICTABILITY. By leveraging Scotland’s domestic production of electricity and incorporating diverse commodities, the country has created a currency that is well-suited for independent nations, making it optimal indeed.
– note how the LLM understands context and can build on the previous session inputs/outputs – when I altered the groat composition for example, it could deal with that.
bonus track :
>>> AI DATACENTRES have high demands for cooling and cheap electricity – would Scotland which has cheap energy and water resources, be a good place for siting these installations
Scotland’s abundance of renewable energy sources and access to water resources make it an attractive location for
hosting AI data centers. The country’s:
1. Renewable energy supply: Scotland is home to significant wind farms, hydroelectric power plants, and solar panels, providing a stable and clean source of electricity.
2. Cooling requirements: With its proximity to the North Sea, Scotland enjoys mild temperatures compared to other European countries, reducing the need for extensive cooling systems in data centers.
3. Water resources: Scotland has access to abundant water supplies from rivers, lakes, and reservoirs, which can be utilized for cooling purposes.
Economic benefits:
1. Reduced energy costs: By leveraging Scotland’s cheap renewable energy sources, data center operators can minimize their electricity bills, making the country an attractive location for investment.
2. Job creation and economic growth: The construction and operation of AI data centers can create new job opportunities in various sectors, contributing to Scotland’s economic growth.
3. Increased tax revenue: As a result of these investments, Scotland can generate increased tax revenue from both the companies operating the data centers and their employees.
Environmental benefits:
1. Reduced carbon footprint: By utilizing renewable energy sources, AI data centers in Scotland can significantly reduce their carbon emissions, contributing to Scotland’s goal of becoming net-zero by 2045.
2. Minimized environmental impact: The country’s strict environmental regulations and emphasis on sustainability make it an ideal location for companies prioritizing environmentally responsible practices.
Infrastructure benefits:
1. Existing infrastructure: Scotland has developed its IT sector over the years, providing existing infrastructure such as high-speed internet connectivity and data centers.
2. Favorable business environment: The country offers a favorable business climate, including tax incentives and support for companies in the IT sector.
Potential challenges:
1. Distance from major markets: Scotland’s location might make it less appealing to companies requiring immediate access to significant markets.
2. Skills development: As AI data centers grow in number, there may be a need for local talent with relevant skills and training in areas such as data analytics and cybersecurity.
Conclusion:
SCOTLAND APPEARS TO BE AN EXCELLENT CANDIDATE FOR HOSTING AI DATA CENTERS due to its abundance of cheap renewable energy sources and access to water resources. The country’s favorable business environment and existing infrastructure make it attractive for investment and job creation.
Overall, these answers aren’t bad – and this is only the smallest model, and there are many other models including the more famous chatGPT4 – but the point is this amount of material was produced in about 30 minutes, the biggest wait was for the answers on my tiny wee machine.
– if you need an answer, and someone else has the answer, then just cheat.
NB, at all times remember LLMs are not infallible and you should see their outputs as “sketches” of answers, but not final. It was impressive, going on about the currency how it managed to answer when I changed the composition of the “groat”. It’s pretty sexy. And if we don’t use it, our enemies are. Right now some MI5 fucker is running a dozen full strength LLMs on 50000 GPUs bashing in questions like :
“how does the UK destroy the Scottish Independence movement forever”?
– but you don’t need an LLM to answer that one.
You are going to have problems getting all that on just on banner.
Well, that’s “Phil” shot down in flames…..
But Adrian’s working through the holidays….
Things have got so bad that we’ve had to deploy our secret weapon “James Cheyne” to bore and distract everyone until they give up, you’ll see how effective it is below.
Yahweh help the Is Rye Ale Ees if the I rans find the downed US pilot first.
It’s a Vietnam neurotic thing of course, Uncle Sam loves unleashing Armageddon on the brown Untermenschen (in their exchange rate opinions)and dishing out annihilation by the bucketload from a very safe distance but get a whiff (a la Durant/ Mogadishu) of one of theirs in chains in a rough video and they keich themselves, every single time..
Whoever the pilot is he holds Is Rye Ales little Empire building experiment in a stranglehold, one, just one video and they’ll be back on their own again as Uncle Sam pulls out yet again in a blue funk panic..
Big boys games, big boys rules..
Total amateurs..
Rev Stu,
Thanks for inserting two of my old comments in your new post first of all,
It can be shown that there are enough people in Scotland that support Scotlands independence even today and since 2014,
This has stayed steady even although, with many retiring, many of those passing away, and others moving on to newer countries,
So there is evidence that the old supporters have been replaced by new ones.
I remember Boris Jonstone making the comment on TV, that after investigations the 2014 Scottish referendum had been interferred with in 2014.
Knowing this had the potential for Scotlands referendum results to be inaccurate results.
The referendum was not re- run.
Probably out of fear by Westminster parliament. To for comfort,
That is the problem with someone outwith controlling our elections, it is also the Hole in our boat, or rather the white elephant in the room that the SNP make great use of, The result will always say NAY. the asking for a referendum will always say Nay, or now is not the time.
But here is the catch clause for Westminster parliament…
If the Hoax 1707 treaty of union is being up held by the old parliament of England as the only other party to the treaty besides Scotland,
Then the Great Britain parliament does not need to be asked at all.
Scotland has, nor ever did , hold a treaty of union with the parliament of GB,
The GB parliament no longer has any connection with the old Scottish parliament that it dissolved from the parliament of Great Britain in 1707. The monarch of England gave her assent to this dissolving.
With no Scottish parliament in or after the 1707 bench mark, the GB parliament it could not legally take forward Scotland into the Anglo / Irish parliament of the United kingdom in 1801 and 1802,
The Scottish and English parliaments treaty was ended in the year 1707 and could not continue once ended, finalised and breached by the Westminster parliament of England that wrongly imposed the Scotland Act,
For one to stand, the first has to be legally live.
The Treaty between the 1707 parliament of England and the1707 parliament of Scotland ,for Great Britain cannot exist as a “State Country” or a united kingdom that includes Scotland if only one has been dissolved.
Englands parliament, for ( that is what remains ) cannot refuse Scotland or request it follows any particular criteria for voting other than Scotlands own choice in its own Country.
Unless it admits to Colonisation of Scotland since 1707.
“Colonisation of Scotland since 1707”
According to the UN colonialism is a scourge and a crime against humanity, which must be ended; which means the annexation and colonisation of Scots was done by criminals and is being maintained by criminals.
A simple internet search shows that
“As of March 2026, the UN General Assembly has not formally declared colonialism in toto a “crime against humanity,” but it overwhelmingly passed a resolution on March 25, 2026, recognizing the transatlantic slave trade—a primary component of colonialism—as the “gravest crime against humanity”. This action recognizes the deep, lasting impacts of colonial-era exploitation and systemic racism”.
That would make the esteemed Professor’s claim simply untrue. The resolution concerned the slave trade, in which Scots were complicit. And as he is well informed in all things to do with colonialism and the UN, it must be a deliberate misrepresentation and therefore a lie. Shame on you, Professor.
“As of March 2026, the UN General Assembly has not formally declared colonialism IN TOTO a crime against humanity,…”
I see your sneaky “in toto” in your comment.
IN TOTO: meaning ‘as a whole’.
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514.
“The United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514 (1960), also known as the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, explicitly condemns colonialism as a violation of human rights and affirms the right of all peoples to self-determination”.
Presumably ‘all peoples’ includes the Scots.
Is the violation of human rights a crime under international law?
“Yes, the violation of human rights is considered a crime under international law. International criminal law provides a framework for holding individuals accountable for crimes against humanity, war crimes, and acts of aggression.”
Wrong yet again, factchecker, or Dances with Lies… to use your ethnic moniker.
Northy; didn’t you know; according to Yoon Trolls like “factchecker” -who have never “checked” a “fact” in their entire existence- “all peoples” does not include us Scots.
“…The resolution concerned the slave trade, in which Scots were complicit…”|
In which SOME Scots were complicit as opposed to ALL Scots as you would have us believe in yet another twisted take of the facts.
Actually quite a few folk of different nationalities were directly involved in the African slave trade… not least the Africans themselves, apparently.
Facts… sometimes they can be a real pain in the ass for those folk trying to sell us all their bullshit instead of the truth, eh, factchecker?
And what are you going to do about it?
Let me tell you.
Nothing.
You can’t even stand a candidate for the Scottish elections.
You are in no position to demand anything. Repeating this is not political strategy it’s mental health.
There are corners and legal jams one can bring upon ones self through greed and Colonialism.
Westminster parliament of the United kingdom of England and Ireland have succeeded in doing this
Which one shows mercy, which one should go their sweet way now they know they were dissolved of any obligation to a voided spent and exempt 1707 treaty
That would give the SNP the required boot out of Scotland.
When talk & reason fail.
Frantz FANON’s Perspective on Violence
The Role of Violence in Decolonization
Frantz Fanon, a prominent figure in post-colonial thought, argued that violence is an essential aspect of the decolonization process. He believed that:
* Violence as a Response: For the colonized, violence serves as a necessary reaction to the oppression they face. It is a means to reclaim dignity and self-respect.
* Cathartic Effect: Fanon posited that engaging in violence can be cathartic for the oppressed, helping them to overcome feelings of inferiority instilled by colonial rule.
Violence and Power Dynamics
Fanon’s analysis highlights the relationship between violence and power:
* Struggle Against Oppression: He viewed decolonization as a violent struggle to dismantle the existing power structures that favor colonizers.
* Transformative Nature: The act of violence is not merely destructive; it can transform the oppressed into active participants in their liberation, altering their self-perception and societal roles.
Implications of Fanon’s Views
Fanon’s ideas have significant implications for understanding the dynamics of colonialism and resistance:
* Historical Context: His views were shaped by his experiences during the Algerian War of Independence, where he witnessed firsthand the impact of colonial violence.
* Legacy: Fanon’s thoughts on violence continue to influence contemporary discussions on resistance movements and the psychological effects of colonialism.
Fanon’s work emphasizes that violence, while tragic, can be a powerful tool for those seeking liberation from oppressive systems.
(AI generated)
“Jesus of Nazareth” or “Jesus, son of Joseph” or “Christ Jesus” or “Jesus The Christ” or just that familiar plain old Christian/surname combo of “Jesus Christ”… was a Scotsman, and there is documentary evidence to prove it.
Various religious groups around the world would have us all believe that The Christ was born in West Asia, but the discovery of an ancient artifact buried deep in the dungeons of BBC archives tells a different Christ origin story.
40 years ago Bill Brydon, head of drama for BBC Scotland at that time, was rummaging aboot in BBC’s basement looking for stuff he could nick and sell at Glesga Barras for some extra cash when he stumbled upon an ancient ‘text’ in the form of a dust-caked film reel.
Brydon, his curiosity piqued, scraped off a corner of the dusty reel to reveal a hand-written label that read, “The Holy City”.
A further search by Brydon finds a device on which the artifact’s contents can be viewed.
To Brydon’s amazement the artifact reveals the real Easter story and proclaims “The Man” as the true Christ.
Although the artifact tells a similar story to the gospels, “The Man” (A Christ) shown in Brydon’s visual artifact is a political figure, speaking out against the colonisation and assault of His nation, Scotland… an assault He highlights by pointing to Scotland’s empty factories and deserted shipyards.
At one point in the film a character delivers a moving monologue on the evils of colonialism.
The artifact also tells of sinister police characters and British state Anglo-agents who plot The Man’s downfall and who are portrayed as bigoted and boorish (characteristics common to many English) who refer to the Scots as “Jocks”.
The ‘documentary’ begins with the The Last Fish Supper before telling the story of The Man’s betrayal at The People’s Palace and Winter Gardens, His trials at the unclean hands of Scotland’s corrupt courts, His crucifixion by ‘Scotland’s’ MSM, His burial in the classified pages, and ultimately His resurrection.
Set in the Glasgow of 1985 The Holy City tells the real story of “The Man’s” resurrection.
Cooperation with British Colonialism in India, an Overview
During the British colonial period in India, many Indians, especially from the elite classes, played a significant role in supporting British rule. This cooperation was essential for the establishment and maintenance of British governance in the region.
Key Points of Cooperation
* Social Status Preservation: Elite Indians often benefited from British policies, allowing them to maintain their social status and land ownership.
* Economic Interests: Many local leaders and landowners collaborated with the British to secure their economic interests, which included trade and land revenue.
* Political Collaboration: Some Indian elites participated in the British administrative system, which helped legitimize British authority and governance.
Impact of Cooperation
The collaboration between British authorities and Indian elites facilitated the British Empire’s expansion and control over India. This relationship was complex, as it involved both exploitation and mutual benefit, shaping the socio-political landscape of India during colonial rule.
In summary, the cooperation of certain Indian classes with British colonialism was a crucial factor in the establishment and longevity of British rule in India.
(AI generated)
A similar power structure continues to function in Scotland, as yet unchallenged.
Dr Shashi Tharoor – Looking Back at the British Raj in India (Edinburgh University 2017)
link to youtube.com
INDIA still wrestles as to the appropriateness of English dress and language in law courts. The Chief Justice of Kolkata recently wore a full wig and red gown at his installation.
As the official working language of India’s élite continues to be British English small wonder.
The residue of colonialism has deep roots.
“The residue of colonialism has deep roots”
Yes, so long as the colonized native elite crave the colonizers culture and language, they will also tend to assume the colonizers values, and the people will remain oppressed despite the country being independent.
India, Ireland and many other former colonies have similarly suffered and still do. Scots need to avoid the same outcome.
And yet here you are Alf, indulging in the oppressive language of the coloniser and therefore condemning your fellow Scot to continued oppression and subjugation.
How “GERS” worked in India.
link to yoursforscotlandcom.wordpress.com
HAIL THE CONQUERING HERO
G.F. Handel arr. J. Caponegro: Hail The Conquering Hero, from Judas Maccabaeus, HWV 63
First performance took place on 1 April 1747 at the Royal Opera House in London
« Handel, born in Germany, made London his home base for much of his professional career. Hence many of his major works were written in English and created at the behest of the royal court. In allegorical fashion, the oratorio Judas Maccabaeus celebrates the victory of Prince WILLIAM AUGUSTUS, DUKE OF CUMBERLAND over the JACOBITES at the 1746 BATTLE OF CULLODEN, by telling the story of Jewish victory in the Maccabean Revolt against the Seleucid Empire in the 2nd century BCE—the story at the heart of Hanukkah.
« The celebratory chorus “See, the Conqu’ring Hero Comes!” has been re-used and re-texted many times: Beethoven composed a set of variations on it for cello and piano; Germans sing it as the Advent song ‘Tochter Zion, freue dich’; the French text ‘À toi la gloire, O Ressuscité!’, and its English translation ‘Thine Be the Glory’ are used as Easter hymns; and the Hebrew version ‘Hava Narima’ is sung in Hanukkah celebrations across the globe. »
link to youtube.com
Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh says:
5 April, 2026 at 1:14 pm
HAIL THE CONQUERING HERO
G.F. Handel arr. J. Caponegro: Hail The Conquering Hero, from Judas Maccabaeus, HWV 63
First performance took place on 1 April 1747 at the Royal Opera House in London
=========
Obviously Handel is a great composer and the oratorio is a serious composition.
Is that a more acceptable, less anti-Scots piece than the slightly earlier version of the National Anthem’ s notorious verse?
Yes, this one:
“ Lord grant that Marshal Wade,
May by thy mighty aid,
Victory bring.
May he sedition hush,
And like a torrent rush,
Rebellious Scots to crush.
God save the King!”
Happy Easter.
I was playing the Smiths debut album the other night. Classic.
Then today one of my neighbours said he heard it and automatically assumed I was a Lefty like him.
Can you imagine the disappointment.
Evening Mr.Beggan. For decades there has been a ridiculous useage of the terms ‘Left’, ‘Right’ and ‘Centre’ which are rarely backed by any indication of the actual policies aimed for by the persons or parties to whom the terms are applied (by self or other).
The only reliable political application for the terms above-mentioned is to be found in late 18th or maybe early 19th century France. Users of the terms nowadays simply cannot be taken seriously as is patently clear if one listens (for example) to BBC broadcasts where the terms are used. It is open to question as to whether users really know what they are talking about.
Can you imagine the disappointment for me when I read your comments (and maybe others) in a website where serious discussion of Scots independence should occur. Maybe if you played ‘Land of Hope and Glory’ then your neighbour would have had a better idea.
That’s very interesting Jay you lunatic.
Jay
Good luck getting a coherent non-nazi reply..
If you don’t understand the meaning of the terms “left” and/or “right” in a political sense, maybe pick up a dictionary (or use “Google”). This public display of wilful, crass ignorance on your part is most unedifying, and doesn’t cast you in a favourable light, your obnoxious (wholly unjustified) smugness notwithstanding.
Wilma;
“Hello, pot? Kettle here…..”
AMERICA & allies have a rather big problem….and it’s not located in west Asia.
What a collection toadies those allies are.
I was trying to remember when I last walked up Carlton Hill in support of Scottish Independence. I have landed on 1981. I could be a few months out. I was a member of the SNP at the time. 45 years ago. Nothing changes by voting SNP.
1981. The Tartan Tories was what they were called then.
“Tartan Tories”
Wasn’t that the invention created by “Scotch” Labour to hide the fact it was THE Labour Party that actually did for James Callaghan’s government in the (Westminster) vote of no confidence as recorded in detail in his own written memoirs?
No??
You really need some history lessons “old boy”..
Not that bright are you eh 🙂
Beggars
Calm down “old boy”!!
No need to rant 🙂
You appear to be dragging a disproportionate amount of Oswald Mosley British League of Fascists baggage behind you..
Yet you still seem to be pro Is Rye Ayle?
Right..
A little bit too much of the dodgy Hagunah and Stern gang 1930s/40s dodgy ME Fascist reach around mindset to change now eh?
Ooh errr..
And, “old boy”, you do seem to get so upset being reminded about real Scottish/ English history!
Not teach you that in private schooling in Oxfordshire then eh?
Thought not.
Inbred spongers..
Not your fault I suppose BUT you could educate yourself?
Or too late?
Thank you for the ‘good luck’ comment, Young Lochinvar. Regrettably, I lack your knowledge of M. Beggan and what I see is really dismal stuff, as with Caveman.
What sort of mentality underlies selection (and presumptuousness) of the elevated rank other than ridiculous arrogance or alliterative ambition?
What is the purpose of Beggan and Caveman in participating in WoS? Perhaps I have missed something but wonder whether there has ever been any contribution (or intention to contribute) to the cause of independence or even national self-preservation in Scotland?
Caveman’s response to my comment on ‘left-right’ labels shows his crude assumption: it s not logically valid to suggest that I am unaware of how the terms are (and have been) used.
His suggestion of smugness on my part shows a pitiful, ‘thin-skinned’ vulnerability suggesting poor self-esteem.
If anyone demonstrates crass ignorance, then it is Caveman. His selection of nom de plume really is inappropriate, an insult to our ancestors.
Heh. If there’s one thing I couldn’t been accused of, mate, it’s “poor self esteem”… much to the annoyance of “pseuds” [Private Eye reference, obvs.] like you, generally speaking.
That you care to align yourself with unpleasant, barely literate non-entities speaks volumes, ironically enough displaying the rather sad “neediness” you accuse others of with your obvious projection. A man is judged by the company he keeps and all that.
As for why am I doing here, it’s a fair question. “Exercising my right of free speech”, I daresay, which no doubt gets up the nose of you odious little cappuccino commie types.
Purpose here?
Distract, divide, dereail. Rinse, Repeat.
And he/she/it thinks everyone is his/her/it’s “mate”.
When in reality I don’t expect he/she/it has any.
A know it all who knows nothing. The pub bore.
“Lord grant that Marshal Wade,
May by thy mighty aid,
Victory bring.
May he sedition hush,
And like a torrent rush,
Rebellious Scots to crush.
God save the King!”
The Westminster machine is certainly doing that now. Every aspect of Scotland is under attack. The flooding of the country with English immigration, the denigrating of the Scots Law, the locus of Brit assets into all aspects of governance, the plunder of Scottish resources now to include renewable generation, it goes on apace.
The Scot like the American Indian heads to extinction.
So let us all sing this old verse of OUR national anthem. Let us celebrate humiliation like the proud people we are not.
“Let us celebrate humiliation”
Deid richt, Willie, the assimilated colonized aye celebrate their oppressor, e’en raise statues tae thaim, name streets efter thaim, an gie thaim oor launds an a’thing o wirth.
Stupid really, but then the myths of colonialism are ‘based on psychology’ (Cesaire), and the associated pathology runs deep, even to the extent where the more assimilated natives reject thair ain leeberation, and themselves become ‘unionists’, i.e. colonialists, and therefater haud doun thair ain fowk an kintra:
link to yoursforscotlandcom.wordpress.com
A hae writ doun a new vers fir thon rideeculous, agin-the-Scots, hatesome Inglis naconal anthem pish tae pit in the pless o the auld oreeginal shite yin:
Lord grant Professor Baird,
Mey by thy michty swerd,
Scots fredome bring.
Mey he the Scottis praise,
And set thair herts ablaze,
Rebellious Scots tae raise.
God dae yer thing.
A wunner if Ingland’s king will appruive o hit.
I asked the internet this question:
Do colonised elites appease their oppressor?
And the internet said this:
“In summary, while colonized elites may attempt to appease their oppressors, the process is fraught with challenges and often results in a fractured colonial psyche. The colonizer’s gaze remains a constant reminder of the colonized’s inferiority, reinforcing colonial power and the need for decolonization.
I remember weans at school wanderin aboot aw subservient like and suckin up tae the bullies.
It seems they were the kind of wean that wid grow up tae be a Scottish politician or wan o Scotland’s First Ministers or suchlike.
Or mibbe they had ideas beyond the power of their intellects tae process and ended up as part of the Scottish bourgeoisie… suckin up tae the Inglish fir reasons yont ma ken.
Those weans at ma schuil wir juist maistly feart o gettin a beatin… ithers wantit tae be juist like the bullies.
Either way they seemed to me to be maistly feart… the fear dripped aff thaim like sweat, fuckin fannies.
I’m not here to talk / debate / discuss with the hotpot-eaters, but merely to piss on them, from a great height
– they are part of the problem and cannot ever be part of the solution
the english are the worst people on earth (apart from that other lot – but there is a connection, a story for another time), responsible for most of the bad-shit that has happened in the past 1000 years, and we have been siamese-twinned to them for the past 300 (previous to that we acted as a brake on their excesses). When we “signed up” / got press ganged to their “empire”, their criminal enterprise, it became the most successful in history (nazism by contrast was a sad wannabe)
You look at almost any country in the world which is fucked-up in some way and I bet the english were there in the past. It’s not a coincidence.
The english have been booted out of around 65 countries and no one ever wanted them back (and some of these places are shitholes, mainly because the english were there)
Why was Ireland poor – because the english were there; why is it rich now? Because the english aren’t.
Why is Norway rich? Because they never had to put up with having their oil wealth stolen by the city of london.
English history, which you have had rammed down you since you were a baby, is almost exlusively, lying fucking bullshit – winner’s history – that portrays the english as history’s principal actors, always the good guys, acting in the best interests of the world, any “bad things” incidental, which happened, were never made to happen (a recent book by an oxford professor blames the british empire on the spanish!). And it all comes from a position of ethno racial supremacism, that the english are the master race and “to be born an englishman is to have won the lottery of life” – empire, white man’s burden, all that shite
Why would anyone with a grain of self respect want these little englanders to rule over you?
THESE ARE THE PEOPLE WHOSE COCK YOU WANT TO SUCK
give me your money, and I will come over and fuck your wife in front of you
– you can watch, over in the corner
BETTER TOGETHER, POOLING AND SHARING
the anglo is thieving-scum at the genetic level and needs to go; it’s not just indy, that’s the start, we need total de-anglification of Scotland, anything they have touched (i.e. fucked with) needs eradicated.
We need out, because we deserve a rest, but more than that – england is on the brink of becoming a shithole itself, principally down to a lot of stupid crap the english did to themselves – but they would make us their lifeboat and, yet again, use our land and resources, and our people, as a means to save their own arse (- they drag us into everything). Not this time. They are on their own, and I hope islam absolutely fucking destroys them, one millisecond after we escape the union, which is not a union, it’s a prison.
Scotland could be the richest nation on earth, with the highest quality of life, and with a population of 10M or more Scots, actual native Scots, not new Scots or fake Scots – but some people want to be shackled to this corpse-state, destined for oblivion.
anglos when thinking about our hydrocarbons, is like …
– paedos walking past a primary school, mouth open, breathless, hand in the pocket having a crafty one
link to archive.ph
link to archive.ph
link to archive.ph
“wherever wood floats, you will find an englishman stealing all he can”
an independent Scotland with the worst government imaginable is still preferrable to being in the UK with a government of enlightened humanitarian geniuses … why?
– because the UK is basically England, which is basically the South East, which is basically London, which is basically, the City (the masonic vatican of bankers, a state within a state) – and all must go through them, is run for them and by them, because : all politicians need a job after politics.
So our country will always be run in the interests of another people. And let’s face it – the UK government is not and never was and never will be – “enlightened humanitarian geniuses” – they are the masters of corruption, lying fucking scum, with an incompetent bureaucracy that can’t do anything (apart from write a smooth memo), all serving people who are simply, evil : Dante put the bankers in the 8th circle of Hell (along with the paedophiles) and Tolkien had as his “fount of all evil” a lidless eye on top of a pyramid.
– that is who rules you, who you are living for, and your purpose is to provide them with a “yield”.
The problem with Holyrood is that it has become a “mini me” of Westminster, so the idea that some people have of “putting indy on hold” so as to “solve some other problem”, is either dumb, or playing games; it is not an either or. And if you hate “wokism” the best way to deal with that is as an independent country because if you are directly ruled by the anglo/american/EU axis, you will have it imposed upon via “human rights” legislation and economic sanctions.
Remember, if indy, you can always get rid of the bastards; this never applies to westminster : you get what england wants
The last UK leader who was an approximation of a human being, with a good brain and notion of the common good, was Harold Wilson – and he almost got done in by the establishment for his actions, it was a lot closer to a coup than people think; so much for having a “good guy” in charge. Labour has never worked for the people for many, many decades and all the tories and shades of tory – they are a conspiracy against the people, to destroy the nation, while lining their pockets.
– sure, the SNP post Salmond have been operating as a lobby group for sexual perverts, but it’s not unique; consider Starmer, who as the top law man “ran interference” for Jimmy Savile, and has his own yookie rent boy problems and likely has so much dirt on him, that he lives in constant fear, an empty coat, there to do others biddings.
There is no “fixing” the UK, it needs pulled down.
DROOL BRITANNIA
BRITANNIAS IN THE GRAVE
BRITONS ALWAYS WILL BE SLAVES
I totally agree word for word, more and more people agree with it but the process needs speeding up for more folk in Scotland to it too !
Agreed!
I’m also so over the eejits who constantly think we need to fix this & that before Indy. England will always have drama because they fckn invent & thrive on drama. It’s called Colonialism.
Scotland & her resources are constantly drained to bail out those satanic warhawks latest Colonial enterprise. They’ve already squandered nearly fifty years worth of oil during boom times – now they’re opening up new fields to rob even more.
Absolutely Geri – it’s one of the most important lessons we can learn from great military generals, major construction projects and even other countries who have achieved independence: don’t do any planning or have any strategy in advance, just jump into whatever it is and as long as you believe fanatically enough, all the “challenges” and “issues” will sort themselves out.
It’s amazing that we have people walking around who think that, but then it is so clearly and obviously a mad view which sits entirely 180 degrees to the totality of human experience, that nobody with any proximity to power is going to indulge it, thankfully for Scotland.
I’m amazed that little Engurlund doesn’t have every country in the entire world signing up to one of these fabulous Unions they offer. Even when finally booted out – not a single one cried & wanted them back. They celebrated & thrived. They coped just grand instead.
How do the other 195 countries manage eh, Serf boy?… It must keep you awake at night worrying how they’ll cope without the English Eppy class selflessly looking out for their best interests.
Get down off yer cross. You’re rather shite at running a country. Our resources & wealth have been mismanaged for centuries. They even had to stop recording accounts from Scotland because it was fckn embarrassing we that we were a wealthy country more than capable of running our own affairs.
Instead of being a parasite on here to indy supporters – your time would be better spent looking for the benefits of remaining cause you’ll not win the next ref.
The U.K. does not offer “unions” with any other country though does it.
The point is that Scotland is much wealthier and offers a better standard of living compared to almost every other country on earth. So people are right not to want to take major decisions with no plan or strategy in place as to how it might be implemented or managed. You ask how other countries have “managed”, well many of those who’ve sought independence without a proper strategy and competent leadership have ended up with terrible economic performance, a fractured and corrupted society and in loads of debt. Contrast the fortunes of somewhere like Zimbabwe compared to Singapore. Which do you think is doing better and why?
That right, aye?
Back to barracks?
CONSTITUTIONAL STATUS of CHURCH OF ENGLAND and CHURCH OF SCOTLAND.
When Elizabeth was Queen the royal website carried the following:
« THE QUEEN AND THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND
« The Sovereign holds the title ‘Defender of the Faith and Supreme Governor of the Church of England’. These titles date back to the reign of King Henry VIII, who was initially granted the title ‘Defender of the Faith’ in 1521 by Pope Leo X. When Henry VIII renounced the spiritual authority of the Papacy in 1534 he was proclaimed ‘supreme head on earth’ of the Church of England. This was repealed by Queen Mary I but reinstated during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, who was proclaimed ‘Supreme Governor’ of the Church of England.
« The Monarch’s relationship with the Church of England is symbolised at the Coronation when the Sovereign is anointed by the Archbishop of Canterbury and takes an oath to “maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England”.
« On the advice of the Prime Minister The Queen appoints Archbishops, Bishops and Deans of the Church of England, who then swear an oath of allegiance and pay homage to Her Majesty. Church of England deacons and parish priests also swear an oath of allegiance to the Sovereign. »
«THE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND
« The Church of Scotland is a Presbyterian church and recognises only Jesus Christ as ‘King and Head of the Church’. The King therefore does not hold the title ‘Supreme Governor’ of the Church of Scotland; when attending Church services in Scotland His Majesty does so as an ordinary member. »
NOW UNDER CHARLES, the Church of Scotland entry has been extended. It still reiterates that:
« when attending Church services in Scotland His Majesty does so as an ordinary member. »
BUT then to my mind it rather obfuscates this “everyday punter” status by implying that the monarch is not so “ordinary” after all:
« The Sovereign is represented at the General Assembly by the Lord High Commissioner, who attends as an observer and is appointed by His Majesty on the advice of the Prime Minister. The Lord High Commissioner makes opening and closing addresses to the General Assembly and reports to His Majesty on its proceedings. Members of the Royal Family have acted as Lord High Commissioners. »
link to royal.uk
From WIKI:
«The earliest use of the term appears in 1507, when King James IV of Scotland was granted the title of “Protector and Defender of the Christian Faith” by Pope Julius II. The title was conferred on James IV by the papal legate Robert Bellenden in a lavish ceremony in Holyrood Abbey»
@Fearghas
Agreed people don’t understand the Constitutional implications of King Charles not fulfilling the Union treaty to the Church of Scotland. If he gives up on that commitment then de facto the Union is dissolved. I was at the last General Assembly, some long theatrical paper was dropped from the Lord High Commissioner area. I was totally unimpressed. Now commentators have suggested the X38 bus route from Falkirk to Edinburgh is a prime route for terrorist action based on the numbers housed in Falkirk. I put that out there before attacks on Church of Scotland premises happen. Intelligence sources confirm our vulnerability. Now I know why the last Census includes a question of who is ex military for the first time in my lifetime.
To hate someone takes a lot of energy. Energy that could be better spent and used more constructively. Hate by its very nature is destructive. To hate an entire nation over a period of ten years rips the soul from a man or woman.
Beggars
Then stop dissing all things Scotland “old boy”!
By your own acknowledgement ye’ll feel so much better for it 🙂
Next..
Beggars
Quoting Hitler (one on from the derivative Main Kampf here)..
You’ve graduated from Moseley it seems..
Not a good look “old boy”..
Not a good look at all..
Have a rest then seek help, not healthy and yer clearly very confused..
Think Dambusters!
Break out of it man!!!
“Hate by its very nature is destructive. To hate an entire nation over a period of ten years rips the soul from a man or woman.”
Yes, its nae wunner colonialism is defined as “hateful racism” (Cesaire), and three hunner year+ is a gey lang time tae endure such a scourge, whit leaves verra deep wounds in a fowk, thair cultur, thair psyche an naition itsel.
“It is thus necessary that the individual should finally realise that his own ego is of no importance in comparison with the existence of the nation.”
‘Volksgemeinschaft’.
Adolf Hitler.
It’s more than ten years & I hate to break it to you but it’s GLOBAL.
England has perpetual grudges. It’s malignant narcissism. It’s why they’re constantly paranoid around the globe & always marching to war, either openly or hiding in the shadows directing death & distruction of others, & the rest of have to foot the bill.
Time we cut you lot loose for good. Stand on yer own two feet & stop being so cowardly & clingy. No one likes you lot as evidenced at the UN on a daily basis.
Why Aye Man.
‘We had no way of staying afloat
We had to leave on the ferry boat
Economic refugees
On the run to Germany
We had the back of Maggie’s hand
Times were tough in Geordieland
We got our tools and working gear
And humped it all from Newcastle to here
Why aye man, why aye, why aye man
Why aye man, why aye, why aye man
Why aye man, why aye, why aye man
Why aye man, why aye, why aye man
We’re the nomad tribes, travelling boys
In the dust and dirt and the racket and the noise
Drills and hammers, diggers and picks
Mixing concrete, laying bricks
There’s English, Irish, Scots, the Lot
United nation’s what we’ve got
Brickies, chippies, every trade
German building, British-made
Why aye man, why aye, why aye man
Why aye man, why aye, why aye man
Why aye man, why aye, why aye man
Why aye man, why aye, why aye man
Nae more work on Maggie’s farm
Hadaway down the autobahn
Mine’s a portacabin bed
Or a bunk in a nissen hut instead
There’s plenty Deutschmarks here to earn
And German tarts are wunderschoen
German beer is chemical-free
Germany’s alreet with me
Sometimes I miss my river Tyne
But you’re my pretty fraulein
Tonight we’ll drink the old town dry
Keep our spirit levels high
Why aye man, why aye, why aye man
Why aye man, why aye, why aye man
Why aye man, why aye, why aye man
Why aye man, why aye, why aye man’.
I’m just betting it wasn’t either of Ms Sturgeon’s “Clyde Built” Ferry boats with painted on windows, Mark. You’d be waiting a long time for one of those SNP disasters !
Why Aye man.
Beggars
Spend much time on the tools in West Germany or BAOR holding back Ivan??
No? Thought not.
I did.
Or did you just watch auf weidershen pet??
Couch potato political commentariat..
“Crawling behind a Saracens hull from the safety of your living room chair”..
I served in Operation Lionheart. Auf vedersein pet! Was the golden age of British television. Never missed it. Yes Deutsch Chics Were Vunderbar and their streets were spotless.
Beggars
Mobilise your air cadets unit then did they?
Well I suppose we should be grateful that at least back then that we would be reinforced for a whole month during all those years facing off Ivan in BAOR..
Is anyone a tad worried by the actions of our great bestie to the west?
Or indeed the fact we are complicit in an illegal war whose ‘ General’ is now boasting of committing war crimes?
The take off of B52’s from our shores is documented.
Artemis be damned Armageddon here we come.
DB
Yup.
Uncle Sam was late for the last two world wars and is just determined to be there in first place for the start of the next one/ end of days..
They’ve always committed war crimes.
It’s in their DNA. They just didn’t gob off about it like the fake Don Trumpioni.
They’re boasting they’re going to wipe out a whole civilisation. Why? Cause they won’t bend the knee & hand over all of their resources to a puppet.
I dunno why the world doesn’t hold these bastards to account. They destroy science, innovation, technology, free thinkers cause the thick bastards can’t complete in the ‘Free world’ that is anything but free with these Colonial fckers about & that other great con they peddle “The free markets” which are anything but free too. They’re manipulated & they have to Monopolise everything so they can have complete domination & weaken a country of their choosing through sanctions & blockades.
Along with orchestrating G*za. They’re currently persecuting Cubans. What’s the latest yarn on why they’re being cleansed?
Geri
I suspect Baby Trump was handed Uncle Sam’s “Book Of Grudges” by “them and those” knowing he was flaky enough to act on them (Bigly) all..
FACT!
Hint:
Venezuela down;
let’s see what western hemisphere oil producing country Baby Trump and his goose steppers will target next??
I think (personally) that he’s playing the market..
Mind you, what would Biden and Camilla have done?
LGBTQ..d them into indolence, depravity and surrender?
Probably..
but, but …
link to archive.ph
– I thought it was an
ENGINE OF WEALTH CREATION
the cognitive dissonance is strong in this one – still got a hardon for our stuff
link to archive.ph
and yet
link to archive.ph
according to GERS figures : a phantasmagorical document where – the thieves who robbed you, TELL YOU HOW POOR HOW ARE
GER is as reliable about a future Scotland’s finances as Harry Potter books are about ww2
let’s get into money, though, real money and deep reasons …
that england was really strapped for cash was the real reason for union, but they made it out we dun it to ourselves
link to archive.ph
– there is some later comedy on this; some decades on they were really really strapped for cash and so had the bright idea to “make the colonies pay”, one of which was … America
and they had other ideas.
“they were really really strapped for cash and so had the bright idea to “make the colonies pay””
Yes, colonialism is primarily about ‘economic plunder’ (Memmi). According to Thomas Paine (‘Rights of Man’), prior to the ‘union’ hoax it had been impossible to ‘dragoon the English’ into paying the excess of taxes required to pay “for England’s constant quest for foreign wars and foreign dominion”.
Plundering Scotland was therefore vital to England. Hence whilst an impoverished English parliament could only raise taxes of £1.8 million in 1666, by annexing Scotland and other colonies this had increased to £17 million by 1791, according to Paine.
All because the SNP has sold out on independence and become the administrators of the british state.
All, or nearly all of them have been compromised in some way.
THE QUALITY OF MERDE
Scots have the right to decide their own future….waffle, waffle, another ref, waffle, waffle
link to snp.org
England scampers, seemingly willingly, towards Daily Mail anglofascism & leader of Scotlands pack is scarred of breaking a nail.
CASH NEEDED. To get new candidates/parties known to the voters, there must at least be a leaflet to every address in Scotland.
Alliance to Liberate Scotland has a crowdfunder.co.uk “Alliance to Liberate Scotland Holyrood 2026”. They need at least £10,000 – so far they’ve got £6960.
ALSP and ISP candidates also have individual crowdfunders going.
To get MSPs who will focus on regaining Scotland as a nation outwith the UK, we MUST put our money where are mouths are. If we don’t, it will leave the SNP and Greens in place.
These supposedly dedicated independence fighters with the grit and determination to reclaim the nation can’t somehow pull together £1600 each for a leaflet? Instead they’re 2/3rds of the way through their fundraising target a month away from the election.
Just one long grift. Rinse and repeat.
“A fool and his money” etc.
Oh aye CC, although not parted fast enough apparently as they’re £3k short!
Their own website doesn’t even contain a list of candidates (donate button is there though, in a very prominent position) so I don’t hold out much hope for this leaflet. Maybe they could get Geri to write something for them, I’m sure that would drum up some interest!
Same could be said of any political party. At least they’re registered in Scotland eh?
Westminster politicians are always with the begging bowl too though they’re never honest about their donations.
Brexshit was drowning in dark money. Did we ever get to the bottom of that episode?
So super duper patriotic are the English that they’ll even take it from foreigners by the bagful. Sell seats & life time privileges in HoL. Sell questions.
This one is a beezer – They so patriotic they even get to choose the UK Prime Minister from ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD. Just register & don’t forget the foldy stuff.
A Foreign Press too & foreign lobbyists inflicting their foreign policy with no parliamentary debate. From wars to gender ideology. Just name yer price.
Actually, it makes one wonder, is there anything actually fucking English in Westminster or have they sold it all to the highest bidder so they can squirrel it away in their offshore accounts that even Queenie was cashing in on..
You eejits are so full of hypocrisy. You’ve zero self awareness.
Here’s the misfit and the pub bore back on shift.*yawn*
Saw your drivel and thought of this, dunno why…
Quote; “Scotland could be the richest nation on earth, with the highest quality of life, and with a population of 10M or more Scots, actual native Scots, not new Scots or fake Scots – but some people want to be shackled to this corpse-state, destined for oblivion.
anglos when thinking about our hydrocarbons, is like …
– paedos walking past a primary school, mouth open, breathless, hand in the pocket having a crafty one…”
You two w*nkers are made for each other.
Aidan
You are being something of a contrarian here.
As I told you recently it’s fairly easy to find out who IS sitting in your area.
Your writings are simply mendacious diversions.
Do you hate your country that much; or is that a long long story?
Or is your country not ours such as spoiler Wilma Flintstone on here?
Or do I miscry?
Please explain if so..
Gaun..
@James I realise you are extremely dense and credulous and have the same reaction to facts as you do to healthy food, but as I have explained before oil and gas does not equal unbelievable wealth. The entirety of North Sea oil and gas extraction (including that off the coast of Lincolnshire) was worth around 2% of Scottish GDP in tax revenue last year. Go and look at the top 20 oil producing countries, GDP per capita is lower than Scotland in almost all of them.
I’ve just come back from Azerbaijan, which at one point was producing half of the world’s oil and is still a major oil producing country. They also extract oil from right outside the main city, not from technically difficult and expensive deep water drilling in the North Sea. Yet their GDP per capita is about 13% of the UK’s.
@YL – I am well aware of who the Liberate candidates are, but I don’t know if you know this but in a campaign candidates are supposed to promote themselves to the electorate, not sit back and hope they electorate find out who they are through doing their own research. I believe you or TH characterised them as “dedicated independence fighters” recently, an odd description for a group who apparently refuse to commit any of their time or money to the cause. At least gravybus Sally had some leaflets printed before getting caught nicking disability.
link to wingsoverscotland.com
@Aidan
An interesting question to pose to your (ahem) “detractors”, Fatso, Rambo and “Geri” (in whatever applicable currency in his case, because it sure as hell ain’t GBP):
“How much have you lot donated to this latest fundraiser, hmmm?”
Rhetorical of course. That’ll be “bugger all”, then. Great at hurling incoherent nonsense impotently into the void (usually c.4am from some muddy towpath or park bench), soiling this otherwise highly interesting blog in the process (repeatedly and without constraint), but doing anything useful or constructive?
Not so much.
“UK” “government” giving oil drilling licences out for free then?
F*** off the pair of you. Supercillious charlatans.
Oh dear. “Eight Ace” is triggered again. 😀
@James – don’t start having a massive tantrum because you’ve been made to look stupid by your own lack of knowledge. I didn’t make you write all that, you’ve only got yourself to blame. For those reading, licenses cover the costs of the North Sea Transition Authority. The fees are modest, about £160k a year for a production license. The total income from licensing fees is about £40m a year.
@CC – that is an excellent question. Amazingly nobody is proudly rushing to answer how much they contributed to these dedicated independence fighters. Is it down to lack of means, or is it a tactic acknowledgement that deep down they know the money won’t be well spent? Or are they just too embarrassed?
“Is it down to lack of means, or is it a tactic acknowledgement that deep down they know the money won’t be well spent? Or are they just too embarrassed?”
All of the former simultaneously, I should think. However, in terms of the latter, embarrassment requires at least some degree of self awareness – which is surely wholly absent. (At least, I hope so for their sake).
“According to 2013 figures from Fraser Of Allander Institute economist Brian Ashcroft – husband of former Scottish Labour leader Wendy Alexander and a committed Unionist – an independent Scotland would have more than balanced its books from 1980 until the present day and currently be sitting on an oil fund of tens of billions of pounds to cushion the blow of current low revenues.”
Wilma & Adrian; Read it and weep.
Oh wait. It’s the wrong kind of oil, right?
Worthless unless it’s British?
Well, I guess you had better start rummaging that amongst that great big steaming pile of unwashed kecks, empty beer cans, piss-stained vests and Snickers wrappers for a Time Machine, Fatso.
You can’t miss it: it’s made of solid brass, it’s got a plush red velour padded seat, a couple of diamond handles, a backlit calendar display and big spinning disc at the back. 🙂
Do you have a link to those figures “James”, since I can’t find them anywhere. What I can find is a report written in 2015 by someone called “Brian Ashcroft” titled “ The GERS report indicates that Scotland’s finances are in dire shape”. It’s not a long report so you should be able to understand it, but within it is the following analysis:
“But as Figure 2 shows the deficit is invariably larger than for the UK as a whole. What is evident from Figure 2 is that in only 4 of the 16 years was the net fiscal balance in Scotland better than in the UK. (I have included data labels only for the largest deficit, Scotland or UK in each of the years.) What that means is that in 12 of the 16 years if Scotland had been independent, or had ‘enjoyed’ full fiscal economy, with other things remaining equal, it would have had to have higher taxes, lower public spending or both than the UK.”
link to blogs.lse.ac.uk
The floor is yours James.
Ooh, an lse report… oh aye, this had been done to death long before Johnny come lately Aidan turned up.
The guy that knows so much but can’t click a link.
That will be the same lse that hides stuff…
link to grousebeater.wordpress.com
Well if it’s all been done before, why are you so utterly clueless about it and posting (in that last case) entirely unrelated links?
A’ve aye felt ther is sum secret magic roond and aboot Scotland and the Scots.
And sae it wid seem did thon poet, MacDiarmid:
For we ha’e faith in Scotland’s hidden poo’ers,
The present’s theirs, but a’ the past and future’s oors.
from “Gairmscoile” by Hugh MacDiarmid
Three centuries isnae aw that lang in the warld o magical peoples… e’en sae a’m thinkin it’s time the Scots, wha as a people hiv growed thowless ower the centuries, waukent fae thair dover fir tae pit sum vigour intae recouerin thair leeberty.
I mentioned a song I’d like to share , now I find that it is on youtube music . It’s called Scotland the Free – words by a friend called Mitchel , written 60 years ago and set to music recently by a very talented young lady called Eden Power .
Go listen and if you like it pass it on!
So oil has hit $150 a barrel.
“Iain More says:
7 April, 2026 at 10:32 pm
So oil has hit $150 a barrel.”
Nope !
You’re talking pish again, Iain !
“As of April 7, 2026, oil prices are high and volatile due to supply concerns, with global benchmark Brent Crude trading around $110–$119 per barrel. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) is also trading near $110–$114 per barrel. Physical prices for some crude grades have hit even higher, nearing $150 a barrel in some instances with some physical oil prices for immediate delivery exceeding $146 per barrel.”
Go sit down.
Spot the Quizzer
Our thieving southern neighbours started taking the piss as soon as the stuff was discovered.
“An oilfield? In Scotch waters? Spiffing! What shall we call it?”
“Brent, of course.”
The river Brent flows from north of London towards the river Thames. Just like the oil revenues.
@ james
“Shell initially named all of its UK oil fields after seabirds in alphabetical order by discovery – Auk, Brent, Cormorant, Dunlin, Eider, Fulmar and so on. Brent refers to the brent goose, and in turn gave its initials to the geologic subdivisions of the Middle Jurassic-age Brent Group that make up the field: Broom, Rannoch, Etive, Ness and Tarbert formations, with each name representing a loch in the Scottish Highlands.”
Apt coincidence though, eh? Doncha think, “Agent”?
““As of April 7, 2026, oil prices are high and volatile due to supply concerns, with global benchmark Brent Crude trading around $110–$119 per barrel. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) is also trading near $110–$114 per barrel. Physical prices for some crude grades have hit even higher, nearing $150 a barrel in some instances with some physical oil prices for immediate delivery exceeding $146 per barrel.”
Go sit down.”
Specious nonsense. The price of Brent crude is as listed on the relevant Index (ICE), currently $94/barrel btw. That is the correct and appropriate benchmark, not some (supposedly) premium “physical oil” and/or enhanced grade product via third party entities.
You might as well claim the USD/GBP exchange rate is parity, because some shite exchange rate in an airport lounge ATM.
The usual disingenuous, ill informed drivel from you.
Names are names, colonial plunder is colonial plunder.
Whaur’s oor oil money, an for aw else tae, ower the past three hunner year an mair?
Whit is the ‘cost of colonialism’ for Scots?
£150+ billion a year!
Imagine whit an independent Scotland could look like?
link to yoursforscotlandcom.wordpress.com
Cave dweller
“The usual disingenuous, ill informed drivel from you.”
Google AI – dickhead. Why don’t you go get a job with them? Tell them where they’re going wrong. Yer talents are wasted on here eh?
TACO
McCRONE REPORT – Scotland’s Hidden Oil Wealth
« In 1974 the Tory government under Edward Heath commissioned a report by Treasury department civil servant Gavin McCrone, asking him to look into the economic viability of an independent Scotland. His findings were incendiary, and after Heath left office the McCrone Report was classified as secret by the incoming Labour government under Callaghan. »
Extract from The McCrone Report (1975):
« “It must be concluded therefore that large revenues and balance of payments gains would indeed accrue to a Scottish Government in the event of independence…Undoubtedly this would banish any anxieties the Government might have had about its budgetary position or its balance of payments. The country would tend to be in chronic surplus to a quite embarrassing degree and its currency would become the hardest in Europe, with the exception perhaps of the Norwegian kroner.” »
link to youtube.com
PDF of full McCrone Report here:
link to oilofscotland.org
BANNED DOCUMENTARY ON SCOTTISH OIL (The McCrone Report)
« Tha paipeirean oifigeil a bha dìomhair ach a-nis air am fosgladh, a’ toirt sealladh air an dòigh anns an robh diofar riaghaltasan (Làbarach agus Tòraidheach) suas chun na seachadan a’ dèiligeadh air cùl gnothaich leis an iomairt airson fèin-riaghladh do dh’Alba. »
« The story of how successive Labour and Conservative governments up until the 1970s worked behind the scenes to discredit the Home Rule movement and the SNP – as revealed through once secret papers now available from official archives. »
DÌOMHAIR (JEE-vir) = Confidential/Secret
The modern campaign for Scottish independence and the methods used by the British State to oppose it…
link to youtube.com
they just won’t give it a fucking rest, will they – frog face weighing in
link to archive.ph
– but, but – this is the cunt who will tell you “the city” is an “engine of wealth creation” and the taxes of the south east are what everyone else is living off …
– and – he claims he will create an “economic boom” by city “deregulation” and getting rid of “red tape” which strangles business (and we open the doors to any shady foreigner with lots of cash obtained by unclear methods)
– so why, nige, does the oil matter? It’s almost as if you are being disingenuous about what is really bankrolling the UK
as an aside, just an indicator of how totally financially illiterate nige is (a failed metals trader) – he wants to “deregulate”; the markets have already done this to a large extent, there are these “dark pools” of liquidity, essentially off the books private stock markets where anything goes … and here is the kicker … many (actual) experts believe the next big crash is going to come from these UNREGULATED markets which are a threat to the stability of the whole system; this is what nige the spiv, the 2 bit “plonker” wants to do when he gets in – he wants to setup another CRASH
Farage should be in a sheepskin coat smoking a cigar telling the voters “just think, this time next year, we could all be MILLIONAIRES”
the people are just rubes, they will fall for anything : thatcher absolutely pumped the oil like fuck (you can see it in the comparative depletion curves of the UK and Norwegian sectors) then claimed it was the city and the “big bang” which created the “boom” (in the south east)
Farage, a thatcher fanboy, who got indoctrinated at one of maggie’s “special schools”, is going to try to do the same.
Never mind the oil. The world sees Scotland as a Lady Boy. A country of very confused, weak and deranged morons.
Mark Beggan @ 14.11.
Mot a country of deranged morons … more a devolved administration of deranged morons elected under possibly the worst voting system going, the closed list D’Hondt.
Three hunner year o colonial oppression does result in a certain pathology, Sven, whereby theday almost half o Scots still reject thair ain leeberation, and ‘crave dependency’ on anither cultur an fowk.
The colonial mindset is ‘a disease of the mind’, ye ken, wi anely ane remedy, leeberation:
link to yoursforscotlandcom.wordpress.com
Hence the Alliance to Liberate Scotland Party standing at this election means the people are finally beginning to understand their colonial ‘condition’.
The very same system that allows the worst in our society to sneak in and spread their poison. Progressives are people who hate our country and our way of life. Women haters in general.
Alf Baird says:”Hence the Alliance to Liberate Scotland Party standing at this election means the people are finally beginning to understand their colonial ‘condition’.”
———————————————-
Standing at election is completely different to having support.
Best to await the outcome of their performance before making assumptions.
“…the people are finally beginning to understand their colonial ‘condition’.”
Frantz Fanon said “Once a people realize they have been colonized, their liberty becomes their overriding priority.”
Perhaps the Scots as a people are not all that far away from thinking of their nation’s independence as their overriding priority.
A few more blatant and contemptuous anti-Scot exhibitions of imperial England’s total disregard for Scotland might just push the Scots beyond the limit of their tolerance for abuse.
“Best to await the outcome of their performance before making assumptions.”
Best to just have a referendum eh?
Y’know, what Scotland has repeatedly voted for over the last 12 years.
Because at the moment the Yoons /UK are looking awfully undemocratic to the majority who want Independence. It seems as if Scotland’s elections don’t matter at all. That’s untenable. Especially in this climate where Colonialism has finally reached its end.
Reality check time.
The only relevant benchmark for Scotland’s ECONOMIC POTENTIAL is with our small nation peers, most of whom are in EFTA.
Ireland (no oil), Norway (oil), Switzerland (banking) have GDPs in the range of 600-800B USD. Ours is 200B USD. Liechtenstein and Iceland are much smaller than us but have incredible GDP per capita.
Last years profit (the annual profit, not the worth) on the Norway Sovereign Wealth Fund was larger than our GDP and over 3 times our annual budget.
This is not “better together” it is – seriously fucked. Either way you look at it :
– either Scotland and its people are being looted massively
or
– our economy is chronically underdeveloped due to the UK’s London/South East/Golden Triangle obsession.
i.e. we are dealing with Grand Theft Scotland or utter incompetence. Pick one, but there is no argument for the union in each.
Most foreigners think we are insane to be a “member” of this union, this r4pe pretending to be a love affair.
as for England, well …
England doesn’t make anything anymore (Thatcher, remember?) – it imports things.
Because they are cheap.
This includes 44% of its food. Not just cheap shit from amazon, made in china.
Things are “cheap” because the currency, the pound, is “strong”.
Far stronger than it should be, for some reason. Many reasons will be given for this, all except the right reason.
– it is a de-facto “oil backed” currency. Like the dollar. But there is no comparison between the US and UK in global power.
UK – Scotland = England without a pot to piss in, no seat on the security council and a currency which should more rightly be about 80 cents to the dollar. Such a vicious devaluation of the pound (if we have our own currency) would likely lead to massive social unrest in England, boo fucking hoo. It is not enough that we succeed, others must fail. Indy is great, but England needs to go down in the process.
All paper needs collateral; only “real wealth” matters, not “claims on wealth” = paper we can print at will. Consider the americans – what do they do when they smash up a country? Do they grab the regime’s old banknotes? No, they seize the oil fields and the gold bullion in the central bank. That has value, “paper” doesn’t.
Gordon Brown sold the gold, so what is left?
oh the anglos want it WANT IT
link to archive.ph
want it so much …
money
link to archive.ph
there are only 3 currencies that matter, the pound is not one of them and is much stronger than it should be. The oil provides, at base, the collateral for the whole “financial services” house of cards to hang from, otherwise London provides nothing more than a collection of scams, the clever alchemy being this ability to print paper and make people believe it is worth something.
Do you want to be poor forever, shackled to this lot? – the backend of a pantomime horse, getting constantly farted on?!
and time for a national water grid, eh
link to archive.ph
– my better together, pooling and sharing, shared history, broad shoulders, chums – note how the english are so fucking smart they find themselves simultaneously threatened by flooding and water shortages; and these are the people who are in charge, who rule you, fool you, eat for you, spend your money for you
Has the penny dropped yet? Get rid of this fucking shower, get them all to fuck.
The water shortage headline reads “Britain” then the article reads “England”. Funny that, eh?
Oh, and aren’t house Yoons Wilma & Adrian getting a right old spanking today? Played off the park, the clowns.
But they’ll be back tomorrow. *sigh*
“Ireland (no oil), Norway (oil), Switzerland (banking) have GDPs in the range of 600-800B USD. Ours is 200B USD. Liechtenstein and Iceland are much smaller than us but have incredible GDP per capita.”
Yes indeed, an under-developed Scotland’s lowly GDP is clearly a colonial GDP, made so by long term plunder by oor colonizer neighbour, now the despicable rump of a violent English empire.
Colonialism is costing Scots £150bn+ every year:
link to yoursforscotlandcom.wordpress.com
When did this recession occur which knocked 30% off the value of the Scottish economy to give a $200bn dollar GDP?
Nae ither folk bar the Scots thersels hae the nous, the knawledge or the experiens o mony generaciouns, tae unnerstaun the Scots.
Ither peoples leuk upo the warks and creautions o Scots and are befundered… thay cannae reconcile the Scot’s gret capacitie fir genius wi thair whiplashed psyche.
Professor Gregory Smith cawd hit the Caledonian Antisyzygy; the notion o quarrellin polarities athin singil entities; the tendency o Scots tae embrace conterdictions and opposits in thair thoct and in hou thae expresse thersels in thair leeteratur and art; the duality o the Scot’s chairacter as obsarved by Robert Louis Stevenson in exaggeratit form wi his Jeckyll and Hyde
Hits athin the settynge o colonialism that sic psychological pathology micht fynd hits oreegins in the mynds o the Scots.
The Scots; an entire people strack doun by rude imperialism; victims o anither people… a people creeminal in dispositioun and imbutit wi a veecious naitur; a people unwirthy o bein a neighbour tae the Scots.
Due to the proliferation of mindless, illiterate and ill-informed pish scribbled doun in this place by colonialists (unionists if preferred… same thing) it seems appropriate to remind those liberty-seeking Scots wha wander roond here of this:
Ther scarce be a wird pit doun here fae colonialists (unyonists if preferryd… baith be alike) that’s onythin’ ither than abuise, threit, lie, errure, afftak, diveesion, diversioun, distractioun, logicale fallace, or hatesome antiScot rethorik.
Here it is again in the lesser Inglis toung
There’s barely a comment posted here by colonialists (unionists if preferred… same thing) that is anything other than insult, threat, lies, error, mockery, division, diversion, distraction, logical fallacy, or hateful anti-Scots rhetoric.
TURABDIN says:
6 April, 2026 at 4:56 pm
From WIKI:?«The earliest use of the term appears in 1507, when King James IV of Scotland was granted the title of “Protector and Defender of the Christian Faith” by Pope Julius II. ‘
=======
It is highly appropriate that King James, Scotland’s great renaissance prince, should receive this title from a pontiff of the high renaissance, the warrior pope, Julius II.
It is, fittingly, a grander accolade than (the later) Fidei Defensorgifted to his thuggish brother-in-law, Henry VIII of England for putting his name to a ghost-written tract against Martin Luther.
James was by far the far more gifted monarch, whose patronage ranged from naval strategy, art and architecture to the expansion of tertiary education and surgery. He was fluent in many European languages. He was moreover the last Gaelic-speaking monarch, able to converse with Maclean of Duart, Macleod of Stornoway or the dispossessed John II of Islay in their mother tongue.
The great contemporary scholar, Erasmus, said of James, ´He had wonderful powers of mind, an astonishing knowledge of everything, an unconquerable magnanimity and the most abundant generosity.’
That last quality was arguably James’ Achilles heel: an over -developed sense of honour and loyalty to the Auld Alliance led to the military and social disaster of Flodden.
There should be a campaign to locate his embalmed body and liberate it from an English cellar to rest among his ancient ancestors on Iona.
C
Amen to that!
However even though they found Dick da Turds corpse in a Leicester municipal car park, they at least had a monastery’s graveyard prompt to follow..
The dirty English sh1tes didn’t even gie the man a decent burial as the pope had excommunicated James on behalf of fat Hal and his German sponsors.
So probably ended up in a sh1tty English charnel pit sometime long long after.
Aye, real previous on treating their opponents with zero respect while expecting it themselves the English..
Jimmy boy should have trashed the English as they turned up piecemeal at Flodden as opposed to gentlemanly waiting for those in the area to form up.
Or better, should have just liberated Berwick on Tweed..
C
Meant to respond, aye, the auld alliance had its ups and downs but it was big French aid to us that meant the English comprehensively lost the 1540s/ 1550s “Battle for Britain” and sent England into protectorate turmoil and political and further religious upheaval.
Another war they ignominiously lost; again..
Doubts are cast on whether the Auld alliance was ever legally terminated; the English commissioners at the 1706/7 treaty negotiations certainly overlooked it completely in the midst of their bribery fuelled take over glee..
Vive Le France! ??
YL – Excellent stuff.
Certainly the French assumed the Alliance was still in place, with English ships being charged port duties while the Scots retained their auld privelidges after 1707.
De Gaulle, of course travelled north to make his famous speech in front od free french House in Edinburgh in 1942. He was a firm believer that the gallic nations with Scotland, Wales and Ireland should combine form a coalition against English arrogance.
Vive la France!
From Siobhan Talbott’s Thesis
“AN ALLIANCE ENDED? :
FRANCO-SCOTTISH COMMERCIAL RELATIONS, 1560-
1713″ [available online]
*Scottish merchants continued to pursue trade with France throughout the international conflicts of the seventeenth century, whether under a Stuart, Orange or Hanoverian
regime. Moreover, while some clandestine tactics were adopted many merchants traded openly with their ‘enemy’…”
“…Lewis Innes was apparently correct
when he informed Nathaniel Hooke in 1707 that ‘the said privileges’ the Scots enjoyed in France were ‘still in vigour’”
MUSICK FYNE: JAMES IV, ROBERT CARVER
« Thirteen years into the sixteenth century, King James, the fourth Stewart of that name to rule over the Scots, crossed the River Tweed into neighboring England at the head of the largest and most splendid army ever raised in Scotland. The glittering company in their prestigious French white plate armour included all the dignitaries of the nation — bishops, earls, a host of knights and a contingent of loyal Highlanders. The entire country had supplied soldiers for this long-awaited assault on an arrogant and increasingly overweening ’auld enemy’, seemingly bent on destabilising a Europe in urgent need of unity. The inexorable political spiral which had induced James IV to invade England reveals much about sixteenth century Scotland. »
« As an independent kingdom with a long and distinguished history, Scotland commanded a position of considerable respect in Europe, with a political influence frequently far in excess of its limited resources. This International status was due almost entirely to the efforts of the Stewart dynasty which had held the Scottish crown since the late fourteenth century — a series of extraordinary monarchs working from a restricted power base, who employed a blend of opportunism and natural talent to rein the wilful groupings and factions of the ’Three Estaites’ of Scotland into the mainstream of European affairs: and after an unpromising start, they enjoyed considerable success. »
— From Intro: ‘MUSICK FYNE: ROBERT CARVER AND THE ART OF MUSIC IN SIXTEENTH CENTURY SCOTLAND’ by D. James Ross (The Mercat Press, Edinburgh, 1993)
———
ROBERT CARVER (Scottish 1485-1568):
SCOTTISH RENAISSANCE POLYPHONY:
L’HOMME ARMÉ / PATER CREATOR OMNIUM, ETC:
link to youtube.com
DUM SACRUM MYSTERIUM:
link to youtube.com
A lovely poignant 16th Century Scottish song —
REMEMBER ME MY DEIR (Amarcord – Harmonia Mundi)
link to gobha-uisge.blogspot.com
My thanks, Fearghas, for bringing Robert Carver to our notice.
Pace James MacMillan et al. , Robert Carver remains our foremost classical composer. The tradition was cut short by the hostility to music by the post-Reformation church, especially after 1689
.
The omission of Carver in my praise of James IV is inexcusable; all the more so since I heard some of the first public performances of his work in over 400 years by Capella Nova. Mea Culpa.
Cynicus says: 8 April, 2026 at 10:43 am
Trump is employing Madman theory:
link to en.wikipedia.org
The problem is how does Trump acting crazy work when his adversary is genuinely crazy due to getting their backs put to the wall by his actions?
When informed that the notoriously uncommunicative president, Calvin Coolidge had died, Dorothy Parker famously remarked, “How could they tell?
Would she not give the same response today to any claim that the current, famously loquacious president was ACTING the madman?
Trump is touted by his supporters as a business President untouched by the grubbiness of the Washington political machine.
The problem is that in a business capacity this is how Trump has always acted and should never be involved in politics, never mind in charge of the world’s richest democracy.
It does put into perspective all those who say that the answer to the problems we face in politics is to involve people outside of it.
To an extent that is true but in the case of Trump, he may be good at a certain type of business that has made him rich and given him plenty of influence but he is absolutely bad in politics.
Also, as Geri said, he is nothing but a puppet. With so little experience in the political sphere, the power brokers in the smoke filled rooms have him dancing to their tune and he is totally unaware how much he is being played.
Trump maybe a shark in the real estate business and his other business interests but there are far bigger and far more smarter sharks out there.
Bilbo says:
“Trump….. may be good at a certain type of business that has made him rich….”
===========
Not true.
Before he got elected, Trump boasted of business success that made him rich. In truth, Trump was a business failure . He inherited $200 million from the estate of his father. By 2016 his net worth would have been double his actual fortune had he left that money in a passive investment fund.
Instead, his real estate, casinos and other business dealings were investment flops, relative to how his money would have grown with such a passive strategy.
Ironically, he has made a mega-fortune as a politician NOT a businessman. Being POTUS has given him access to billionaires’ honeypots in return for political favours. Only last week there were also reports of insider trading on markets ahead of political decisions that affected share and commodity prices.
And international operators are falling over each other to present him with gifts – in return , unspoken, for favours down the track.
It’s all pantomime. He’s just a puppet to distract the plebs until the organ grinders rearm & think of their next move.
We have recent polls suggesting that the SNP is going to get a outright majority or the SNP is going to get 63 and Greens 17 making the Greens the second biggest party, so what!
My thoughts on those polls aren’t that good for the SNP because it might make people think, I won’t go out and vote, in the election I’ll just stay at home because the SNP is going to get a majority anyway.
If the SNP after election is the biggest party and the greens are the second biggest party, this is disastrous for the Independence movement and its disastrous for Scotland, we all know that if the result isn’t a outright majority the Union wins and the SNP has conned us all again.
We are heading down a road were the public and even Indy supporters no longer believe in the SNP and greens on the constitutional question and the next time we’ll have an option to vote again will be in 2031. Where we all know its going to be the same old story all over again with the same people advocating SNP 1 and 2 backup by The National newspaper and believe in Scotland.
At some point the movement is going to finally grasp that they have been conned not only by the SNP and Greens but also by certain bloggers, The National newspaper and Believe in Scotland. The question is who long is it going to take and what damage will have been done during this period to Scotland and its people who just aren’t surviving with the income they have, and how long will it take to get another party to where the SNP are now.
Now I’m not advocating for people on here to vote for this party all I’m asking is you have a listen to what they have to say, I’ve enclosed a couple of videos you might want to watch if you have nothing else to do. I personally found the information within these video’s very interesting.
these are YouTube videos, sorry I may have post them with the HTTP:.
/@WorkersPartyofBritain/videos
/watch?v=H3u_IQh8DQI
/watch?v=EYEEZ2DtY_c
/watch?v=KB8o9XYbkI8
/watch?v=hFrvpdqrlYs&pp=0gcJCdoKAYcqIYzv
/watch?v=HGl83AoljjM
%er
I don’t actually think the National comic and BIS have really that much influence on the majority ie Joe Public.
The Greens will always get their …… vote (fill in the blanks to suit)
But I reckon the SNP could be polling as they aren’t “not for independence” allegedly or any legacy of competence but because the opposition is so dismally bad.
Labour: is there anything more boring than listening to Sarwars non-speak?
Tories: Who? Do they still even exist anymore:-)
Reform: Protest vote. These come and go..
Lib Dem’s: the unthinking teacher and college lecturers choice no matter what policies they have.
Give alternative Independence parties/ individuals a go.
As for their campaigning finances; so what. That’s just grist to the mill for jolly boy Tories with their dodgy offshore donations to attempt to make something out of..
Yes that’s you Aidan..
You addressed the comment to me but I’ve no idea what it’s trying to say sorry.
Let me help you…
I think the jist of it is that Tory thieving barstewards have taken campaigning donations from everyone, including Jenny siding lunatics, evil dictators, war cr*minals & brutal regimes around the globe & have zero shame in doing so. They also declare fck all honestly.
They’re also as dodgy as fck at keeping within election spending. Dodgy as fck at declaring donations, dodgy as fck at expenses, dodgy as fck at recording interests & dodgy as fck at all the freebie gifts & grift. Every time a Tory enters the room they’re on the take for what they can fleece, scheming looking for an angle or to just dodge everything completely.
Ditto Labour.
Ditto Lie Dumbs.
Westminster is corrupt as fck with dodgy foreign cash.
So you’ve zero leg to stand on at questioning others donations & campaigns. Those in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones. You’ve a brass neck. Your nose poking fools no one, ya hypocrite. Go learn some self awareness & clean up yer own shit before you let yer gob run …
I could be wrong tho!
Oh so it’s complete deflection and distraction, got you.
Anyway I thought you liked dictators?
& what Western propaganda story teller told you they were dictators?
Both are democracies. With elections. I think they may even have invented it, y’know!
In fact, a J*wish minister, Homayoun Sameh Yah Najafabadi, went Tonto in the I*anin parliament the other day that a Je*ish synagogue was targeted & completely destroyed by Isr.
Imagine that! What say you about that?
You won’t read that on the BBC. You may believe fairy stories. Don’t expect the rest of us to play along with bullshit.
If no-one else is going to say it then I will.
Thankyou Police Scotland for protecting the Scottish people from Gangsta Terra incorporated.
If any of you know how to link the song Scotland the Free , sung by Eden Power to this site from youtube music could you do it please?
It’s an excellent song for Scotland and we should all be singing Scotland’s song!
link to youtube.com
Thank you so much auld yin!
Now some others may listen to it!
Trump is the bloated, unpleasant face of US neocolonialism… a face that often adopts expressions not unlike those of Winston Churchill.
Could it be that Trump deliberately seeks to mimic those Churchillian frowns and pouts?
Could it be that Trump admires the unabashed ambition of the failed and long gone British Empire in its quest for world domination?
Could it be that Trump sees himself as Rex Mundi… the King of the World?
The answer to these questions is, of course, yes.
Trump is the absurd, mad manifestation of an insane America.
From its very beginning that which became the United States was a creature born of conquest.
America was founded on squatter-colonialism, where the extermination of indigenous peoples was not an unfortunate side-effect, but a core feature of its expansion.
The idea of “manifest destiny” – an idea that justified the violent displacement of indigenous populations across the North American continent – reverberates in Trump’s imperial mindit diatribe theday.
God’s name is often recruited by tyrants in their vainglorious, despotic exploits… of course, those despots see themselves as God’s equal such is the bent-oot-o-shape nature of their twisted insanity.
The belief that the United States has a divine right to dominate territories – much as the English believed during their expansionist British Empire phase (and probably still do, but are now a people lacking God’s favour) – whether through military might or economic bullying, is not just a matter of historical interest – it’s an American mindset that never really went away.
Trump Derangement Syndrome.
I’m moving slowly to the conclusion that the SNP will be in opposition as Labour, Libs, Greens and Reform band together to put one of Brit parties into power. The SNP will spend 10-15 years in the doldrums, or it just dies.
Stevie @ 11.46.
If only.
Meantime, ” Both votes SNP”, the anthem echoes on from Mr Swiney and others.
Reform could conceivably combine forces with the Tories (the only other right wing party) but none of the others – most especially the Greens. To do so would be grass roots suicide.
If that happened Independence would be a certainty.
Scotland shouldn’t be forced into a coalition of fucking dregs & rejects.
Time to cheer – from midnight last night Sturgeon is no longer an MSP.
Bilbo says:
“Trump….. may be good at a certain type of business that has made him rich….”
===========
NOT TRUE
Before he got elected, Trump boasted of business success that made him rich. In truth, Trump was a business failure. He inherited $200 million from the estate of his father. By 2016 his net worth would have been double his actual fortune had he leftt that money in a passive investment fund.
Instead, his real estate, casinos and other business dealings were investment failures, relative to how his money would have grown with such a passive strategy.
Ironically, he has made a mega-fortune as a politician NOT a businessman. Being POTUS has given him access to billionaires’ honeypots in return for political favours. Only last week there were also reports of insider trading on markets ahead of political decisions that affected share and commodity prices.
And international operators are falling over each other to present him with gifts – in return , unspoken, for favours down the track.
As I mentioned Cynicus, Trump is good at a certain type of business, a sort of adversarial capitalism where he uses every trick available from the system, including bankruptcies and being involved in the political system to increase his wealth.
He might not have increased his wealth as much as others but he still has and he’s been able to work his influence using media to gain access to more wealth, which as you say has been done through politics.
I know there is a lot of TDS about his business dealings but that is deflection from the fact that the American capitalist system has allowed such a person like Trump to massively increase his wealth which a lot of his political detractors are at it themselves.
In America, Trump is viewed by some as a success story but if he lived anywhere else he would have been viewed as a grubby spiv and crook.