(The largest number that said No, around 118,000, didn’t tick the boxes of either transwoman, transman or non-binary, nor wrote in their own. An unknown number of these may have been rejecting “gender” altogether. 30,000 ticked “non-binary” and 18,000 wrote in a gender because they were REALLY special.)
But, as we’ve been told times out of number, we must accept what people say about themselves. So 48,000 transwomen it is. So few. So vulnerable. And that number got me thinking.
Alert readers of Wings will know that I have a fondness for sweet and fruity things, and a particular favourite of mine are Tropical Vibes still lemonades. (NB Other drinks are available, this site is in no way sponsored by or financially affiliated to Tropical Vibes.)
I especially like their Ocean Blue variety, a deliciously sharp and tangy refresher which contains real blueberry juice.
(Although we’re not sure how “new followers” is being calculated there. We actually have more than 500 extra followers since 8pm – we can only assume that it’s only counting those who right-clicked and followed from that specific tweet.)
And part of the reason is that it’s plain that almost nobody knew about the report, even though it came out three months ago (when Wings was still in retirement). We had to dig deep to find any media coverage of it at all, and what there was was cursory at best, and sometimes a lot worse.
As a journalist, readers, sometimes you want to pep a story up a bit. From time to time, it’s perfectly legitimate to sensationalise a relatively minor aspect of something in order to draw attention to a worthwhile but intrinsically dull subject.
At other times, you find yourself in the strange position of having to talk a subject down as much as you can, because if you simply report the facts calmly and neutrally it’ll sound so outrageous and ridiculous and deranged that everyone will think you’ve gone full-on, tinfoil-hat, pencils-up-the-nose insane.
It was already quite bold/crass to equate “letting rapists change their legal sex so their victim has to refer to them as ‘she’ in court” with the life’s work of Nelson Mandela.
But the punchline was still a chef’s kiss to treasure.
I’ll be honest, readers, I’m so exhausted from despising the sickening nonce-panderers of the SNP this week that I can’t summon the energy to write any more about them. So I’m going to hand over to some other people.
All pics are links so that you can read full threads, see context and access any linked articles, and all these people are worth following.
The newest Panelbase poll, which shows a narrow lead for independence, was an “omnibus” one with questions provided by multiple clients, including Wings and the Sunday Times. The questions we’re about to show you were asked by the ST rather than ourselves, but their results are deeply disturbing on multiple levels.
The first one is perhaps predictable but still unsettling. (Click all pics to enlarge.)
A huge 2:1 majority of Scots believe the Scottish Government’s proposed new “gender recognition” laws pose a safety risk to women. Tory voters think so by almost 9:1, Lib Dem voters by almost 6:1, and Labour voters by nearly 2:1.
That can only partly be explained away by partisan party loyalty – Labour and the Liberal Democrats both support the bill, but their own voters are still strongly against. More noteworthy is the fact that (excluding Don’t Knows) even slavishly loyal SNP voters agree with the statement by a smaller but still clear 12-point margin, 56 to 44.
So let’s say it unambiguously: most SNP voters think the SNP’s gender reforms pose a danger to women’s safety.
To its eternal disgrace, the University Of Edinburgh is trying to prevent this excellent film from being shown in Scotland, as part of a systematic campaign of suppression and censorship that starts from the highest offices of the Scottish Government and works its way down through academia, the arts and the civic sector.
It remains to be seen whether the figures represent a short blip of anger over the Supreme Court decision, a more sustained but still temporary period of Yes support like that of summer 2020 – spring 2021, or a permanent shift in public opinion.
So as such they’re actually relatively uninteresting, although the SNP’s plan to do absolutely nothing to take advantage of any momentum that might exist, and to wait several months before even having a strategy conference, remains disturbing.
But what actually caught our eye about the poll were a couple of questions nobody else has reported on.
It’s more than two years now since we published this article, but it’s worth quickly going over it again, because there’s nothing on Earth more tedious than boneheads on social media going “Oh, you slag off the SNP but what’s YOUR plan if you’re so clever?”, who haven’t bothered to read any of the dozen times we’ve already answered that question since 25 months ago.
This is it. This is our plan. Try listening this time, thickos.
Willie on Still Time To Save Her: “Destroy the language,the culture, the history and you destroy the people. The UK needs Scotland’s resources and so that is…” Oct 14, 02:27
Bilbo on Still Time To Save Her: “Funny how there are sections of our society that has called on the Supreme court ruling about women to be…” Oct 13, 21:29
Bilbo on Still Time To Save Her: “These constant constitutional conversations are interesting when they are done on a civil basis but the reality is that they…” Oct 13, 21:11
Aidan on Still Time To Save Her: “As you know Alf – the Supreme Court is a superior court to the inner house (before we get into…” Oct 13, 20:09
Alf Baird on Still Time To Save Her: ““on ending the sovereignty of the Parliament of the United Kingdom over Scotland” Ignorance and wishful thinking on the part…” Oct 13, 19:56
Aidan on Still Time To Save Her: “Agreed Northcode – happy to let others decide, we’ve put our respective cases forward” Oct 13, 19:08
Northcode on Still Time To Save Her: “Thanks for the exchange. I think we’re reading the judgment differently, and that’s fine — the Supreme Court’s reasoning is…” Oct 13, 16:21
Aidan on Still Time To Save Her: “Sorry Northcode – you need to go back and read the case again in detail. What you are saying there…” Oct 13, 15:49
Northcode on Still Time To Save Her: “I think there’s a misunderstanding here about what the Supreme Court actually decided. The Court did describe a referendum as…” Oct 13, 15:15
Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “sarah, have you tried using the “Contact” button at top of page?” Oct 13, 14:58
Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “Frightening that people still have belief in the criminal justice system, isn’t it. Commit a serious sexual assault on a…” Oct 13, 14:52
sarah on Still Time To Save Her: “Rev, please re-post on here your article of 13th October 2024, “The Giant”. It will be a comfort to true…” Oct 13, 14:42
Anthem on Still Time To Save Her: “I hope you’re including Reform in that H.” Oct 13, 14:39
Aidan on Still Time To Save Her: “@Northcode – again that is objectively untrue, the Supreme Court did not say that the proposed referendum could not be…” Oct 13, 13:54
Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: ““curtailing them as the foreigners in their own Countries” There’s only one political party in with a shout of being…” Oct 13, 13:40
Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “Always amusing to see Confused praising the Norwegians whilst simultaneously lambasting those who believe defense is a key government priority.…” Oct 13, 13:22
Northcode on Still Time To Save Her: “For clarity. Holyrood cannot legislate a binding referendum. But Holyrood can hold a consultative referendum — the Supreme Court did…” Oct 13, 13:17
Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: ““most people don’t … think the boat crossings bear any meaningful comparison to the actual Norman invasion; because it is…” Oct 13, 13:05
Captain Caveman on Still Time To Save Her: “Oh do shut up Alf. Your wishful thinking isn’t reality (again). Yeah, must’ve imagined all those crowds in London and…” Oct 13, 13:04
Alf Baird on Still Time To Save Her: “Turabdin makes a valid point, that “The Union is not «celebrated» in any way”. An wha but yersels wad want…” Oct 13, 12:49
Confused on Still Time To Save Her: “THE TELEGRAPH RUNS THE SAME STORY about 3 times a week – a budget “black hole” which means we should…” Oct 13, 12:39
Captain Caveman on Still Time To Save Her: “”because it is fucking stupid. Nicely summed up. TURABDIN gives Sixth Formers a bad name, and is attempting to write…” Oct 13, 12:28
Southernbystander on Still Time To Save Her: “It is with posts like this that you reveal your profound ignorance of the people of these islands Turabdin, how…” Oct 13, 12:15
Captain Caveman on Still Time To Save Her: “@Dan As I have said to you before, disagreeing with someone or pointing at the paucity of their outlandish/inaccurate claims…” Oct 13, 12:02
Captain Caveman on Still Time To Save Her: ““You said you’ve paid millions in taxes yet you spend a lot of your time posting on a blog about…” Oct 13, 11:51
willie on Still Time To Save Her: “I see Neale Hanvey ex SNP and Alba MP has made a tweet about a period of up to seven…” Oct 13, 11:32
James Che on Still Time To Save Her: “Hatey, It needs all the peoples to not recognise the legality of the SNP and the devolved parliament from Westminster.…” Oct 13, 10:52
James Che on Still Time To Save Her: “It is not Scotland protecting Nicola Sturgeon or John Swinney, Englands Westminster parliament [ Scotland Act ] is under the…” Oct 13, 10:17
TURABDIN on Still Time To Save Her: “My last on the soi disant Bayeux Tapestry, not technically a tapestry but a refined piece of needlework by anglosaxon…” Oct 13, 10:16
Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “Then again, James, might is right. If you believe that the SNP government is illegal, then you should really live…” Oct 13, 09:51