Alert readers may have noticed that this site is once more under attack from Twitter. Following the suspension of the main Wings account last December, and one we set up for the prospective political party – suspensions which Twitter has never justified, because the Wings account did not break any of its rules – it has now suspended my personal account (@RevStu) and the account of old spinoff site The Sealand Gazette, both supposedly for evading the ban on the @WingsScotland account.
This allegation is clearly a nonsense, because the RevStu account predated the Wings one by years and was in constant use from its creation up until this morning, and the Gazette account was only used briefly as an emergency backup for the RevStu one when it was temporarily locked at the weekend for unspecified “suspicious activity”, which is a technical security issue rather than a suspension for supposed wrongdoing.
The actual reason for the suspension of all four accounts is this site’s opposition to controversial and massively unpopular transgender ideology, which Twitter supports and which is currently the subject of some hotly-contested and important lawmaking.
(It’s the same reason why Twitter has banned scores, probably hundreds of feminists for the most absurdly innocuous of tweets perceived as challenging trans ideology.)
In other words, these actions are direct censorship and deliberate interference in the political affairs of a country by an unaccountable and unelected foreign corporation serving the interests of a massive right-wing pharmacological lobby.
And even people who despise Wings Over Scotland should be alarmed by that.
There are now exactly two weeks remaining of the Scottish Government’s second fake “consultation” into its proposed reforms to gender law.
We say “fake” not out of cynicism or mad paranoia, but because the cabinet minister responsible for the reforms has already made it explicitly, publicly and repeatedly clear that she intends to press ahead with them regardless of the responses, and that the only purpose of the “consultation” is to try to persuade people to agree with them.
Shirley-Anne Somerville reiterated this position just days ago, telling Scotland Tonight that she was “absolutely determined” to enact the bill and only interested in silencing opposition and removing any “medicalisation” of the process of gender transition.
While the Scottish Government has met literally hundreds of times with transactivist groups with regard to the reforms, it has refused to meet women’s groups critical of them, and frequently lied about that refusal.
The consultation document and the draft bill leave enormous logical and legislative gaps which are likely to cause untold chaos if the reforms are implemented. The Scottish Government has apparently learned nothing from the shambolic fiascos around the Offensive Behaviour (Football) Act and Named Person legislation, both of which have collapsed despite widespread public support – something the proposed gender reforms emphatically do NOT enjoy.
We’re obliged for the sake of sanity to assume that at some point the First Minister, the Cabinet Secretary or both will have to undertake at least one proper interview on the subject of these extremely serious and potentially catastrophic proposals.
For the consideration of whoever may conduct these interviews, we submit below some questions which a very considerable number of people in Scotland – primarily but by no means exclusively women, and encompassing a majority of every political and social demographic – urgently want answered.
A few weeks ago when we said Wings was going to take a break for a bit, we also said “There may be posts now and then if something particularly significant happens”. Well, this week something particularly significant happened.
It was a development that we’d been predicting ever since Boris Johnson became UK Prime Minister, but it’s no less important for that. And it’s not an exaggeration to say that it could be the deciding factor in whether Scotland becomes independent.
Yesterday we posted an article noting that hardline trans-rights extremists, among whose number we must regretfully count the Scottish Government, were engaged in a determined and alarmingly successful attempt to abolish the scientific basis for reality.
We did not expect such a striking illustration of that assertion to arrive this soon.
It really is quite the remarkable feat of timing that concerted mass reporting by SNP activists managed to get the Wings Twitter account (and several others) closed down this week of all weeks, isn’t it?
They’re also trying to get my personal account banned, and reporting scores of others, in an open attempt to purge any sort of dissenting opinions from public dialogue at exactly the same time as opening a “consultation” whose outcome has already been predetermined, and which in another remarkable coincidence is due to close just a few days into the four weeks scheduled for the Alex Salmond trial.
As some alert readers have already noticed, our Twitter account has been suspended again, three and a bit years after the last time. The ban is supposedly permanent. To save a lot of repeated explaining in emails and direct messages, a brief record of the pertinent events follows.
One week out from a general election, the SNP are busy purging the “problematic”, as seen in this footage captured by a terrified bystander tonight somewhere in Fife.
The latest victim of the Waffen YSI, the party’s ultra-pious “woke” youth battalion, is Denise Findlay, a recently-elected member of the party’s Conduct Committee. She was targeted because she’s a gender-critical feminist opposed to the transgender cult which exerts a wildly disproportionate influence in the SNP upper echelons, supported enthusiastically by the First Minister.
She follows on the heels of Kirkcaldy & Cowdenbeath candidate Neale Hanvey, who last week was suspended from the party – without even a hearing – on a ludicrously trumped-up charge of “anti-Semitism” dredged up by SNP woke youth, namely that three-and-a-half years ago he shared an article (written by someone else) about billionaire financier George Soros and money-laundering, which at no point mentioned either Israel or Jewish people, even obliquely.
Hanvey, like Findlay, was brought down not by political opponents or the media but by members of his own party, as punishment for signing the SNP Women’s Pledge.
You probably haven’t heard of me. I’m a notoriously “vile” political blogger who’s said a few pretty mean things on social media about politicians in the last eight years. But perhaps that’s partly because I’m a grumpy old white guy who hasn’t had the benefit of your commendable programme aimed at “building the fairer, kinder & more tolerant world the late Jo Cox MP believed in”.
As we write this, voting has just ended to elect the membership of a number of key SNP internal bodies, including the Member Conduct Committee which has the power to discipline members and even expel them from the party.
This year has seen a concerted attempt by a small but active faction within the SNP, led by the Young Scots for Independence and Out For Indy groups, to flood the MCC (which in normal times struggles to fill its ranks) with officers aggressively committed to transgender ideology, with the openly-declared intent of purging “gender-critical” women from all party candidate lists and ensuring that anyone seeking to protect women’s sex-based rights can be expunged for “transphobia”.
(An attempt to deselect Joanna Cherry on such grounds failed earlier this year, but with control of the MCC the faction could pretty much dump anyone it wanted to.)
The matter has not escaped the attention of the independence-hostile media.
We avoided discussing the committee elections while voting was taking place because it’s not our business to interfere in the internal affairs of the SNP, and also because a certain element of the party has been having a massive tantrum over some poll results we published last week and it might have ended up being counter-productive.
But make no mistake – the outcome of these elections will have a huge impact on both the SNP’s electoral fortunes and the chances of securing independence. We’re about to find out, in other words, how screwed we are.
Our latest Panelbase poll, conducted exclusively among SNP voters, has proven to be the most controversial we’ve ever done. So let’s see if we can get things back onto some nice safe ground: the transgender debate. (“Oh no!” – everyone)
Pictured above, front right, at the recent Dundee Pride is Shirley-Anne Somerville, the cabinet minister in charge of the second public “consultation” being held on the Scottish Government’s transgender policy. Somerville told the event that regardless of the consultation’s outcome she planned to press ahead with the “self-ID” proposals anyway, and that “trans women are women and trans men are men”. She’s almost literally nailed her colours to the mast in advance of the results – she’s wearing a jumper in the blue, pink and white horizontal stripes of the transgender flag.
And the issue of whether people with penises should be allowed to declare themselves women purely on their own say-so and access all female-only spaces unchallenged is one that’s currently tearing the SNP in two.
I went for a very long walk before writing this post, because I wanted to make sure I wasn’t doing it in the heat of anger. But 8.5 miles and 18,753 steps later it still needs to be said and there’s no getting out of it, so batten down the hatches, folks.
Last night SNP MP Mhairi Black tweeted what may be the most ill-advised, destructive, offensive, repellent and just downright idiotic thing that I’ve ever seen an elected SNP member do. (Maybe not just the SNP.)
The video, bizarrely made for the amusement of readers of comedy lad-mag website Joe.co.uk, sees Black reading out a series of supposedly “transphobic” and “mean” tweets – almost all from women and only two of which were in any way rude – and reacting to them with a toxic mixture of arrogant condescension, mockery and insults, alongside a tirade of flatly wrong and endlessly-debunked myths.
It concludes with the smirking, sniggering suggestion that women, including survivors of male violence, who’ve expressed their serious concerns over reforms to the Gender Recognition Act – concerns shared by the overwhelming majority of women, and of the population as a whole – are “Jeremy Hunts”, a piece of rhyming slang that doesn’t need any translation.
The video pretty much speaks for itself, unfortunately, but let’s look at some highlights.
The modern world is an ideological minefield, readers, and is increasingly almost as dangerous as a real one. Having the wrong opinions about things can easily get you fired, ostracised from polite society, arrested or beaten up, and nowhere is this more the case than in the sphere of gender politics.
The extremely brave intersex woman Claire Graham (aka @MRKHvoice on Twitter, her latest account after a series of arbitrary bannings for upsetting the wrong people with statements of biological fact) recently compiled a list of things which are now deemed “transphobic” by trans activists, and given the transience and vulnerability of anything published on Twitter, we thought it was a good idea to preserve it here, with some additions of our own and from others.
[EDIT 9 Dec 2019: Claire has of course now been permanently banned and her original list deleted by Twitter.]
We’ve previously noted how alarmingly this sort of extremist, intolerant and openly violent male bullying in the guise of progressive political correctness has been used in recent months to silence all sorts of people (mainly but not exclusively feminists).
Politicians, police and numerous other authorities in both Scotland and the UK have been complicit – whether intentionally or not – in enabling a terrifying “woke” culture of censorship and intimidation in which the wishes of the vast majority of the public are about to be simply ridden roughshod over, resulting in the creation of laws which could have (and are already having) absolutely horrific consequences.
Anyone raising issues, however, is liable to find themselves at the centre of a vicious storm of outrage, abuse or worse. So if you’re concerned about the imminent abolition of sex but want to stay out of trouble, here’s the stuff you need to avoid.
Aidan on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “It is based on random figures because the figures you’ve provided are wrong, as I’ve pointed out before and as…” May 27, 14:42
prj on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “Has Peter Murrell’s mother been interviewed by the police? Just curious because she can disprove or prove Sturgeon’s story.” May 27, 14:37
Mark Beggan on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “The Sex Pistols song ‘Liar’ is a more precise artistic understanding of the situation and its only one word. No…” May 27, 14:34
paul on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “Nick, you clearly has never benn in loving,passionate wedlock” May 27, 14:32
paul on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “a slap on the wrist…and lot of dough, no mention of any recoveries.” May 27, 14:29
Mark Beggan on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “Well done Rev. The carrion are circling. The hounds smell blood. The game is afoot. The ‘English media’ are foaming…” May 27, 14:25
Nick on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “I feel like not enough is being made of Murrell loaning the SNP £107,000. Even then did it not occur…” May 27, 14:18
Alf Baird on No Money Back, No Guarantee: ““pick random figures out of thin air” That it can be demonstrated that a resource-rich Scotland controlled by a poorer…” May 27, 14:16
Rev. Stuart Campbell on No Money Back, No Guarantee: ““Murrell & Sturgeon, as in Burke & Hare.” Today’s article was nearly called “Shopping With Burke & Hare” after the…” May 27, 14:04
Socrates MacSporran on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “Peter Murrell and Nicola Sturgeon: the Fred Astaire and Jane Powell of Scottish politics. I call them this because of…” May 27, 14:03
Rev. Stuart Campbell on All The Dirt From My Eyes: ““Not her role as First Minister. Arguably, that is not the role of the First Minister and she may be…” May 27, 14:03
Roland Watson on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “This is making me wonder about all those whatsapp messages that Sturgeon and others illegally deleted en masse at the…” May 27, 13:55
paul on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “…or give her a little podium. Getting her out of the interview room would then become the problem.” May 27, 13:55
Sarah Johnson on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “The most infuriating thing about Sturgeon getting off Scot-free is that there is now no chance she will be forced…” May 27, 13:53
Karen on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “AA can’t be a very good lawyer if he doesn’t know /understand the companies act. Also, he has a conflict…” May 27, 13:44
Campbell Clansman on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “Murrell and Sturgeon looted Scotland. And (prediction) they’ll get away with nothing more than a slap on the wrist. Because…” May 27, 13:42
Ex President Xiden on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “Mr Anwar should try some stand up if he thinks his claim that she insisted she would provide a written…” May 27, 13:35
Roy on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “Not her role as First Minister. Arguably, that is not the role of the First Minister and she may be…” May 27, 13:35
Northcode on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “It looks like it’s time for a wee reminder… in Scots, tae. Ther scarce be a wird pit doun here…” May 27, 13:34
Dave Llewellyn on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “If the police wanted her to talk they should have put a TV cameraman behind the camera” May 27, 13:32
Bobo bunny on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “Get tore into her. Burn her whole world down. Don’t stop until she is behind bars.” May 27, 13:32
paul on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “replace ambivalence with hostility and I’ll go right along” May 27, 13:31
Craig P on All The Dirt From My Eyes: ““it was not the role of the First Minister to sign off accounts that was for the party treasurer.” Classic…” May 27, 13:25
Sven on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “Whilst Ms Sturgeon will have been formally cautioned, I doubt that it will have been under the provisions of Pace,…” May 27, 13:20
AlMac on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “As has been said elsewhere, all this illustrates Sturgeon’s ambivalence to Independence. Large amounts of money that could have been…” May 27, 13:18
Al-Stuart on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “. Hi Stuart, It is a huge comfort knowing all of those hours and all of the corrupt efforts to…” May 27, 12:58
paul on All The Dirt From My Eyes: “I think you are being to cruel. As far as I can tell, her wedding night was her first encounter…” May 27, 12:50
SilentMajority on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “To those who professed to have ‘held their nose’ whilst reluctantly voting for ‘them’ again….has the stink broke through yet?” May 27, 12:25
Frank Gillougley on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “Murrell & Sturgeon, as in Burke & Hare. Definitely has a ring to it.” May 27, 12:19
Aidan on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “Oh aye definitely- it’s a huge purchase to make for someone on that salary. Are we really to believe that…” May 27, 11:57