We’re not a Catalonian-politics website and we don’t even have an opinion on whether Catalonia should be independent, but sometimes it’s easier to understand the workings and failings of the media if you watch how it behaves on a subject you’re not directly and closely involved with. Last week was one of those weeks.
He was brought on to give voice to what has become the universal UK-media spin on events in Catalonia – that both sides are to blame, that the Catalan government was provocative and irresponsible to call an “illegal” referendum, and that the only way for the area to achieve independence is through the 1978 Spanish constitution, despite it expressly forbidding any such action and its cornerstone of existence (also known as the “Preliminary Title”) being “based on the indissoluble unity of the Spanish Nation”.
So in the striking absence of any useful information in the press, we thought we’d do a little digging and see how that might work.
Percentage of A&E patients in Scotland in 2017 to date seen within four hours (target 95%), described by Labour MSP Colin Smyth as a “deeply troubling” figure: 94%
Percentage of the vote on which Mr Smyth was elected as an MSP in 2016: 8.9%
There’s so little happening in Scottish politics news today that we had to read David Torrance’s column in the Herald, and we must say we ended up pretty confused.
Not by the fact that it was a free half-page advert for a new Unionist “thinktank” set up by an angry unsuccessful dogfood salesman readers may be familiar with – there were no surprises to be found there from either Torrance or the Herald – but by the thinktank itself, which doesn’t seem to know its Arsenal from its Devil’s Elbow.
Yesterday we noted the remarkable lack of coverage in the Scottish press about the workforce at BAE Systems in Govan being stabbed in the back yet again over UK government warship orders, with five Type 31 frigates promised to the yard (to replace five more expensive Type 26s) now going to Merseyside instead.
We claimed that newspapers including the Record had completely ignored the story in their print editions (and in most cases online as well), but an alert reader pointed out that it fact the Record HAD featured it, and we’re happy to correct our error.
So yesterday, when it was revealed that BAE systems definitely wouldn’t be building the five cheaper Type 31 frigates – which had replaced the originally-promised Type 26s – in Scotland, in a move which the shipbuilding unions described as a “betrayal”, we sat back and waited for the Scottish media’s outraged blanket coverage.
Quite a few remarkable things were said on last night’s STV debate between the two prospective leaders of the Labour Party branch office in Scotland. This one, though, was especially striking.
That’s Anas Sarwar denying three times that he was a part of the “Better Together” campaign with the Tories. A startled Colin Mackay claims to have seen photographs of Sarwar campaigning with BT, at which point Sarwar insists no, he merely appeared on TV debates which happened to also have Tory guests.
Readers will doubtless be startled to hear that today’s Scottish newspapers have taken a somewhat misleading approach to the facts on one of the day’s big stories.
Several of them report the findings of a commission looking into the idea of a Citizen’s (or Universal) Basic Income, a scheme which pays every adult in the country a fixed sum every year regardless of their own income, almost completely replacing the current benefits system.
The idea is that as well as reducing poverty, the administrative costs of social security are massively reduced, as is the problem of vulnerable people not taking up benefits because of the stigma often attached to them by the press.
The downside is that it’s generally more expensive. But have the Scottish press accurately reported the scale of that cost, or have they massively exaggerated it for shock value and to serve a right-wing agenda? Read on for a surprise!
Investigative site The Ferret this afternoon published a report into the Scottish Futures Trust, the SNP’s replacement for Labour’s cripplingly costly PFI projects.
The report was undertaken by Jim and Margaret Cuthbert, a pair of economists well regarded in nationalist circles, and makes some interesting if vague comments about downsides that MIGHT, in theory, exist in the SFT now or in the future.
The headline claims are all full of highly-qualified language (“may not deliver value for money”; “profits may be unduly high”; “could restrict growth”; “potentially has adverse implications”; “impossible to tell whether“), and it’s a long way down the page until you get to anything approaching a hard fact, or indeed the revelation that the report seems to have been paid for by Scottish Labour.
We long ago gave up expecting any sort of principled consistency from the Scottish Tories. Whether it was Ruth “line in the sand, no more powers” Davidson magically morphing into a champion of extended devolution, or suddenly reversing her position on free prescriptions, the party is now almost as fluid on policy as Scottish Labour.
The underlings, of course, dutifully follow their leader’s example. Readers familiar with Adam Tomkins’ remarkably rapid journey from fiery pro-independence republican to an ultra-Unionist ultra-Conservative monarchist will, we suspect, barely have batted an eyelid this morning as he unblinkingly performed a full 180-degree turn on the concept of universal basic income.
Aidan on A Matter Of Declinature: “Sorry Dan – are you really sticking up for “James” here?” Jul 17, 18:30
Hatey McHateface on A Matter Of Declinature: “Sure, sam. That’s why the Jacobite army marched on London, getting as far south as Derby before turning back. “Jacobites…” Jul 17, 18:27
Hatey McHateface on A Matter Of Declinature: “@Wee Wally Walrus W. Winky says: 17 July, 2026 at 4:05 pm “That right, aye, Prick?” Aye. That’s right. Scotch…” Jul 17, 18:19
Dan on A Matter Of Declinature: “TBH I don’t think many folk could blow the skin off a rice pudding… The phrase is usually: Couldn’t knock…” Jul 17, 18:05
Captain Caveman on A Matter Of Declinature: “Is that it, Fatso? 😀 My 5 year old granddaughter could do better (and could probably batter you too), if…” Jul 17, 18:04
James on A Matter Of Declinature: “Three unionist wankers together. Have fun, girls.” Jul 17, 17:50
Aidan on A Matter Of Declinature: “Well said CC, imagine being the biggest wanker WoS BTL.” Jul 17, 17:04
Captain Caveman on A Matter Of Declinature: “Well, I’m not so stupid as to default-dislike a particular group of people out of sheer prejudice and ignorance; I…” Jul 17, 16:28
sam on A Matter Of Declinature: “Stick to your own comfort zone, Main. Abuse. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/legislativescrutiny/act-of-union-1707/overview/the-1715-rebellion/ “The 1715 rebellion In the next few years, discontent with the…” Jul 17, 16:12
James on A Matter Of Declinature: “That right, aye, Prick? Don’t be coy, prick, ye ken fine well that ‘Scotch’ is what you and your Inglis…” Jul 17, 16:05
Southernbystander on A Matter Of Declinature: “Thanks Saffron Robe, that makes sense i.e. unarguable is ‘not able to be argued’ but inarguable is ‘true, and impossible…” Jul 17, 15:55
Hatey McHateface on A Matter Of Declinature: “‘“inarguable” is often seen as the stronger choice’ If that is the case, then unarguably, “unarguable” is often seen as…” Jul 17, 14:51
Hatey McHateface on A Matter Of Declinature: “Every one of “those millions of poor bastards” should be granted a posthumous transition by the state. I hope, trust…” Jul 17, 14:38
Hatey McHateface on A Matter Of Declinature: “@ Wally Walrus says: 17 July, 2026 at 12:21 pm Scotch is the name given to whisky distilled in Scotland.…” Jul 17, 14:30
Hatey McHateface on A Matter Of Declinature: “Cheers, Alf! I have a soft spot for the one about the moon being made of cheese. You’ve lifted my…” Jul 17, 14:19
Hatey McHateface on A Matter Of Declinature: ““The risings in 1715 and 1745 reflected discontent with the Union” Naw. They never. They were an attempt, across Scotland,…” Jul 17, 14:13
Hatey McHateface on A Matter Of Declinature: “@Northcode says: 17 July, 2026 at 10:41 am “you’re never done mentioning me in your posts, are you?” Guilty as…” Jul 17, 14:06
Young Lochinvar on A Matter Of Declinature: “HMcH Yawn. You’ve lost the plot “old boy”..” Jul 17, 14:03
sam on A Matter Of Declinature: ““Historical Misrepresentation: The annexation of Scotland is viewed by some as a result of coercion rather than a voluntary agreement.”…” Jul 17, 13:47
Aidan on A Matter Of Declinature: “@Alf – this is starting to sound more and more like the teaching of L Ron Hubbard every day.” Jul 17, 13:43
Aidan on A Matter Of Declinature: “The arguments above are highly relevant because they describe the recognised constitutional structure of the United Kingdom which sets out…” Jul 17, 13:42
Saffron Robe on A Matter Of Declinature: “Southernbystander, this is from Copilot: The terms “unarguable” and “inarguable” are often used interchangeably, but there are subtle differences. Inarguable…” Jul 17, 13:37
sam on A Matter Of Declinature: “It is, unarguably,unarguable. See also unwell, unable, undone.” Jul 17, 13:21
John H. on A Matter Of Declinature: “I think that Nicola Sturgeon can kiss goodbye to that peerage now.” Jul 17, 13:18
Xaracen on A Matter Of Declinature: “Even more damning, steps were unlawfully taken to actively prevent that highest authority in Scotland from being involved in the…” Jul 17, 13:09
John H. on A Matter Of Declinature: “The only good thing about this is that Sturgeon exposed the willingness of some people in high office in Scotland…” Jul 17, 13:07
James on A Matter Of Declinature: “Scotch don’t like Tories generally, Inglis. But how could you be expected to know that.” Jul 17, 12:21
Southernbystander on A Matter Of Declinature: “O/T (mostly) I liked the use of therefor in the letter, a word I am only vaguely aware of, meaning,…” Jul 17, 12:07
sam on A Matter Of Declinature: “I agree with the initial sentiment. Not with anything else. Scottish government funding is most affected by the block grant#.…” Jul 17, 11:44
Willie on A Matter Of Declinature: “The question David Davis is so very clearly raising is where do you go when your Police and prosecution service…” Jul 17, 11:35