The comments from committee convener and SNP MP Linda Fabiani (we guess she must be another of those MI5 plants/secret Unionists) are really quite extraordinary. In terms of Parliamentary language they’re only a hair’s-breadth short of an invitation to step outside and settle things with an old-school dust-up in the car park.
The weekend just past saw a convulsion as big as any we can ever recall witnessing on Yes social media, triggered by a series of tweets by Nicola Sturgeon which caused an extraordinary negative reaction out of all proportion to their ostensible content.
The reason was that the First Minister – who had remained silent about countless episodes of hideous misogynistic abuse aimed from her own side at MPs and MSPs like Joan McAlpine and Joanna Cherry – had chosen to suddenly leap into action in defence of the toxically divisive horror that is Glasgow councillor Rhiannon Spear after Spear had been widely criticised for making blatantly false claims in a video promoting her attempt to be selected as the candidate for Argyll & Bute.
(Sturgeon had no such public condemnation for the torrents of abuse the SNP Twitler Youth then unleased on Kirsten Thornton, the female SNP activist and Generation Yes founder who’d pointed out Spear’s untruths.)
The move sent the party’s woke and sane factions into a frenzy of bloodletting which in itself will have little if any impact on the wider electorate, but nonetheless threw into sharp relief the life-and-death battle currently going on for the SNP’s soul.
And since that’s related to what we’ve been writing about on Wings for the bulk of this year, it seemed worthwhile to get some things down on the record once and for all.
Super-veteran readers may recall the story of Scorpion Software, the amateur games development collective I formed with a pal in the early 1980s to create largely rubbish games mostly written in BASIC for the ZX Spectrum and the Dragon 32.
If you read the 2008 retrospective linked in that paragraph, you’ll note that it offers a bit of constructive self-critique on some of the games we produced, and the other day I accidentally stumbled into following my own advice.
Just two days ago the Electoral Commission gave us a fourth supposed date for the publication of the SNP’s 2019 accounts: having first been due out in early August, they then told us to expect them in early September, and then last week, and then in “the next three weeks”, ie the middle of October.
But someone gave us a tipoff that we might be able to request them via Freedom Of Information, since ostensibly the only holdup was that the EC wanted to wait until ALL of the main parties’ accounts were ready and publish them all at once for tidiness.
So we sent one in, and we just got a very quick reply.
During a debate on the UK government’s recent decision to abandon the notion of gender self-ID, SNP MP Anne McLaughlin told the Commons chamber that it was still the Scottish Government’s “strong commitment” to go ahead with highly controversial reform of the law BEFORE next year’s Holyrood election.
But that isn’t what Scottish voters were told earlier this year.
The SNP have historically been swift to suspend any party members when there’s any hint of inappropriate conduct, never mind even a whiff of illegality. It’s been that way since 2015, with the axe falling on elected members as well as candidates in target seats and critical elections, and ordinary activists.
Not even a by-your-leave, let alone an explanation, is afforded – just suspension with immediate effect. And that’s all well and good, some might say. No hint of impropriety should attach to the party and making a virtue of acting swiftly can be both necessary and appropriate.
So why then no action against the Chief Executive?
The Electoral Commission appears to have missed yet another deadline for publishing the SNP’s 2019 accounts (we’re waiting on them to return our phone call), so we’ve got a moment to talk about something else relating to the party’s finances.
[EDIT 12.56pm: the Commission now “hopes” to have the accounts published “in the next three weeks” along with those of the other main Westminster parties.]
The Scottish press covered itself in as much disgrace over the publication of the will of lottery winner Colin Weir after his tragic death last year as it had done during his life. Pretty much every paper in the country ran lurid headlines about how he’d “blown” or “burned” (translation: spent) half of his £80m share of the 2011 jackpot in nine years.
Weirdly, the Scottish Sun and the Daily Mail stood out for (mainly) respectful coverage focused on the fact that Colin Weir had in fact used most of the money on good causes and generous support for friends, family and strangers.
(Also, both of the Weirs were fairly old and already in quite poor health when they won the money, so why wouldn’t they spend it? You famously can’t take it with you.)
But the Mail was almost unique in the fact that its headline mentioned something that seemed to stand out as the most obviously newsworthy aspect of the will.
Senator Claire Chandler is a Liberal Party member of the Australian Parliament. Some recent experiences she’s had send a very serious warning about the likely outcomes of the Scottish Government’s wildly unpopular new Hate Crime Bill. She’s graciously allowed us to publish this column she wrote on the subject.
Early this month I received a letter from Tasmania’s Anti-Discrimination Commissioner directing me to attend a compulsory “conciliation” conference with somebody offended by my comments about the need to protect women’s sport and women’s toilets and changerooms. You can watch them here:
Ironically, the complaint against me was about an opinion article I wrote about free speech. You can read it here and make up your own mind whether bureaucrats at the Anti-Discrimination Commission should be able to censor any Australian citizens for this kind of public policy discussion.
Following up this morning’s article, we’ve been trawling through the Publications/FOI section of the Scottish Government website to see which other articles might be being hidden from its search function. We found quite a few, and you’re never going to guess what the common factor in all of them is.
We’ve given you a wee clue with that picture, though.
Mark Beggan on It just takes a beat: “A bad day for Leftyville and the Woke dogs.Permission to laugh out loud in a very annoying voice?” Jul 10, 19:41
100%Yes on It just takes a beat: “The SNP makes offer to refund Scots who donated to Indyref2, Its funny how the national has used a picture…” Jul 10, 18:51
100%Yes on It just takes a beat: “If he’s the one, thank you. I willing to be he won’t fork into his pocket to bail out SNP…” Jul 10, 18:42
Steve A on It just takes a beat: “Nice the see some media traction finally being gained. But…very naughty of several of the articles posted to call the…” Jul 10, 18:42
agentx on It just takes a beat: “You spent between £10,000 and £99,999 and you didn’t keep a record of it?” Jul 10, 18:31
Oliver on It just takes a beat: “Is it in the snp constitution that members’ subs can be used to repay embezzeled money? If the snp are…” Jul 10, 18:18
Young Lochinvar on The Only Notes That Really Count: “Well hold on there Bald Eagle. Now let me get this right, if you were having a go, as you…” Jul 10, 18:18
Lorncal on It just takes a beat: “As Mr Anderson says, and you suggest, Andy, they might well have to raid branch funds, raised by branch members,…” Jul 10, 17:53
BLMac on The Only Notes That Really Count: “Makes you wonder if the intention of raising the fund was actually to repay the Weirs. Wouldn’t that be intentional…” Jul 10, 17:50
Tartan Tory on It just takes a beat: “Having expended more than five figures in respect of the pursuit of independence (with both the SNP and YES Scotland),…” Jul 10, 17:44
Lee Floyd on It just takes a beat: “There’s no good answer to your question, Rev, because any answer exposes everyone involved beyond the point at which Joe…” Jul 10, 17:41
Young Lochinvar on The Only Notes That Really Count: “HMcH On the subject of ancestry and your curiously curtailed record going only as far back is 1850 despite the…” Jul 10, 17:39
Captain Caveman on The Only Notes That Really Count: “… He fires! He misses! Again 🙂 Missus full time housewife mate, and I get to choose my own hours.…” Jul 10, 17:21
agentx on It just takes a beat: “It is my understanding that legal proceeding have not yet been started. (just drafted and legal opinion published on here)” Jul 10, 17:16
Chas on The Only Notes That Really Count: “Lots of comments from the supposedly learned professor. Of course, nothing that we have not seen umpteen times before. What…” Jul 10, 17:03
Wally Jumblatt on It just takes a beat: “Perhaps we can help the police here -and maybe even COPFS: Mr Swinney stated in public that the money had…” Jul 10, 16:59
Xaracen on The Only Notes That Really Count: ““It’s all England’s fault.” Not entirely. Westminster can only govern the UK as a whole because its two sovereign members…” Jul 10, 16:59
Young Lochinvar on The Only Notes That Really Count: “CC @ 6.25 Well hold on there Bald Eagle. If you literally spring out of bed like the old 70s…” Jul 10, 16:48
Young Lochinvar on The Only Notes That Really Count: “HMcH Ehhhhhhhhh (thinking).. Nope. Wrong again “old boy”.. 🙂” Jul 10, 16:27
GB on It just takes a beat: “If a crime has been committed it MUST be pursued” Jul 10, 16:09
Hatey McHateface on It just takes a beat: “They could commission Sturgeon to write another best-seller. Plaster the cover with complements about her being the best Scottish writer…” Jul 10, 16:07
Hatey McHateface on The Only Notes That Really Count: “Haven’t seen the torture of colonial bilingualism for a wee while, Alf. Buy it a dram with my blessing. Can…” Jul 10, 16:00
Andy Ellis on It just takes a beat: “Jings, what a bùrach! It would be somewhat ironic if what does for the SNP is ultimately bankruptcy predicated on…” Jul 10, 15:53
Jay on It just takes a beat: “100%, the constitution of the SNP renders it an entirely unsuitable political organisation to pursue any reasonable purpose, let alone…” Jul 10, 15:39
Rev. Stuart Campbell on It just takes a beat: “You mean Alyn Smith?” Jul 10, 15:38
Sean Duffy on It just takes a beat: “It’s been fairly obvious for some time that the Chief Constable and the Lord Advocate no longer work in the…” Jul 10, 15:34
Jim Anderson on It just takes a beat: “If they are offering refunds how will they validate any claims, especially those back in 2017? The accounts have been…” Jul 10, 15:31
Lorncal on It just takes a beat: “Where will the money come from? They can’t have much in coffers after the election and all those lost cases,…” Jul 10, 15:22
Skip_NC on It just takes a beat: “The only mention of HMRC involvement I’ve seen is the improper VAT claims made in respect of Murrell’s purchases and…” Jul 10, 15:17
Captain Caveman on The Only Notes That Really Count: “You’re using your own material as supposed citation? Good grief. Woeful mindset, outlook and complete lack of credibility.” Jul 10, 15:08