One of them, of course, is who leaked the story to Davie Clegg of the Daily Record in August of that year, when the whole thing should have been confidential and passing it to the press was an unambiguously malicious and criminal act.
No explanation is given for why “writer at large”Neil Mackay has suddenly conducted a “wide-ranging, exclusive interview” with “one of Britain’s most senior spy chiefs” for today’s Herald On Sunday.
As far as we’re aware absolutely nothing has happened in respect of the UK’s nuclear “deterrent” to make the subject topical. Maybe Mackay just coincidentally bumped into Sir David Omand down the pub or something.
(It’s also passingly ironic that if Biden does win – as he still may well do arithmetically, although we wouldn’t necessarily want to put a lot of money on him living long enough to ever actually reach the Oval Office after all the legal wrangling/civil war is over – it’ll be on the votes of white men overturning those of women and people of colour, who all counter-intuitively and inexplicably swung to Trump.)
In a world where almost every vote seems to be on a knife-edge, it seems the woke left still hasn’t learned how criminally, recklessly, suicidally stupid it is to alienate 70% of the population to feed the endless, insatiable narcissism of 0.7% of the population.
Quite aside from anything else, that’s because the only votes you secure by doing so are the votes of people who’d never have voted for Donald Trump in a million years anyway. The only votes you’re gambling with are those of the natural left. And even if only a tiny fraction of the alienated actually turn, it can be enough to change the world.
When we first saw this video on Twitter through bleary half-asleep eyes this morning, we thought it was a well-done satire. But no. He actually put it out himself.
There can surely in history have never been anything that demeaned both the office of President and the USA as a nation more than the image halfway through that video of him prancing around in front of Air Force One.
Today America decides its future. And dear lord, what a choice it has.
Senator Claire Chandler is a Liberal Party member of the Australian Parliament. Some recent experiences she’s had send a very serious warning about the likely outcomes of the Scottish Government’s wildly unpopular new Hate Crime Bill. She’s graciously allowed us to publish this column she wrote on the subject.
Early this month I received a letter from Tasmania’s Anti-Discrimination Commissioner directing me to attend a compulsory “conciliation” conference with somebody offended by my comments about the need to protect women’s sport and women’s toilets and changerooms. You can watch them here:
Ironically, the complaint against me was about an opinion article I wrote about free speech. You can read it here and make up your own mind whether bureaucrats at the Anti-Discrimination Commission should be able to censor any Australian citizens for this kind of public policy discussion.
The BBC ran a completely insane story this week about a transman (ie a mentally ill woman) who almost died of kidney failure because she didn’t tell her doctors what sex she really was. The standout paragraph was probably the one pictured below, in which the atom-brained narcissist imbecile explained to a startled nation that apparently having a mental disorder also changes your physical biology:
(Also, y’know, “cute and awesome!” is definitely how men talk.)
But anyway. When we commission opinion polls, we’ve often noted that in any given poll you can expect around 5-10% of respondents to vote for even the most seemingly ridiculous options – either as a “joke”, or because they’re too dim to have understood the question, or whatever.
And last week we thought we’d put that to the test.
This week saw publication of the long-awaited Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) report on alleged Russian interference in British affairs. Despite media hysteria, the report contained no new revelations, just all-too-familiar catastrophising about Moscow’s ill-defined “disinformation” efforts and warnings of the undue influence rich Russians (most of whom are actually Kremlin opponents) have bought themselves.
The most salient point for supporters of Scottish independence to consider was the allegation that Moscow’s interference efforts extended to the 2014 indyref. As Wings pointed out earlier this week, however, the “evidence” to support this sensational claim amounted to nothing more than a heavily-redacted single paragraph, citing “credible open source commentary” as its sole source.
A look at the paragraph’s accompanying footnote reveals the “credible open source” commentator was Ben Nimmo of the Atlantic Council. For those in the fortunate position of being unfamiliar with his work, Nimmo is known for, among other things, falsely identifying a Syrian-Australian blogger and a British pensioner as Russian bots – so clearly someone whose expertise should be relied upon to determine the extent of Russian infiltration into Scottish politics.
I mention this not simply to reveal the transparently amateurish nature of the ISC’s report but rather to offer a commentary on the SNP’s (predictably) disappointing response to its allegations.
The rapid regression of civilisation continues apace, readers.
Because it ought to be noted that it’s not the concept of homosexuality that’s being deemed offensive there, nor the word itself, but specifically the definition of it.
In other words, a dictionary just said “some people are offended by facts”.
Alert readers may have noticed that this site is once more under attack from Twitter. Following the suspension of the main Wings account last December, and one we set up for the prospective political party – suspensions which Twitter has never justified, because the Wings account did not break any of its rules – it has now suspended my personal account (@RevStu) and the account of old spinoff site The Sealand Gazette, both supposedly for evading the ban on the @WingsScotland account.
This allegation is clearly a nonsense, because the RevStu account predated the Wings one by years and was in constant use from its creation up until this morning, and the Gazette account was only used briefly as an emergency backup for the RevStu one when it was temporarily locked at the weekend for unspecified “suspicious activity”, which is a technical security issue rather than a suspension for supposed wrongdoing.
The actual reason for the suspension of all four accounts is this site’s opposition to controversial and massively unpopular transgender ideology, which Twitter supports and which is currently the subject of some hotly-contested and important lawmaking.
(It’s the same reason why Twitter has banned scores, probably hundreds of feminists for the most absurdly innocuous of tweets perceived as challenging trans ideology.)
In other words, these actions are direct censorship and deliberate interference in the political affairs of a country by an unaccountable and unelected foreign corporation serving the interests of a massive right-wing pharmacological lobby.
And even people who despise Wings Over Scotland should be alarmed by that.
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““We do not protest, challenge or contest any action taken by WM” Ah, c’moan noo, Lorncal, you’re ignoring the tea…” Oct 21, 19:53
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Seemingly I’m here 24/7, Chas. Geri is only just back. If she went private for her treatment, I hope she…” Oct 21, 19:43
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Aw, partan, I didn’t ken ye cared. You’ll have been expecting this one and all. And yes, conscientious objectors do…” Oct 21, 19:28
Minceheid on Faces In Sand: “That dippy wifie is apparently Hannah Mary Goodlad, the MSP for Shetland. Here’s a link to her speech, should you…” Oct 21, 19:14
Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Hook, line, sinker. Knew you wouldn’t resist. Imagine being so sad as to be hanging about all day posting comments.…” Oct 21, 18:49
Chas on Faces In Sand: “I think it has been 4 or 5 weeks since I last visited the comments section on Wings. After all,…” Oct 21, 18:41
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “FFS Spartan. You said you were done. Why can’t you keep your word, you being so self-identified morally superior?” Oct 21, 18:33
Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Faces In Sand: “Available on ‘IndyScotNews’ site: www.youtube.com/@indyscotnews” Oct 21, 18:25
Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Oh, I have nothing but contempt for the Communist dictatorship that cooked it up, be assured of that. Our “leaders”,…” Oct 21, 18:16
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Nah. He’s just wanting the wealth fund to be banked in Sovereigns. Makes a lot of sense actually, price of…” Oct 21, 18:10
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Careful, Aidan. The servants of the Nephilim may have been summoned to this thread.” Oct 21, 18:07
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “C’moan noo, MH. Within a small number of years of being Independent, we’ll be rich beyond the wildest dreams of…” Oct 21, 18:02
James on Faces In Sand: “Where did they find you?” Oct 21, 17:02
Onlooker on Faces In Sand: “Who’s the idiot looking smug and pleased with herself as she babbles on about the name of Scotland being the…” Oct 21, 16:49
Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “Does it not dawn on you, Geri, that it IS possible to have a legitimate concern for, and indeed “a…” Oct 21, 16:26
Lorncal on Faces In Sand: “So, James Che, no Scottish Commissioners, no Scottish Jurists drafting the Scottish Treaty, no Queen Anne as titular head of…” Oct 21, 16:23
sarah on Faces In Sand: “Facts about: 1. the economic drain from Scotland because of the “Union”; 2. the legal proof that the “Union” is…” Oct 21, 16:07
factchecker on Faces In Sand: “John Swinney has today commented “Successive UK Governments have failed to establish a dedicated sovereign wealth fund using North Sea…” Oct 21, 15:37
Aidan on Faces In Sand: “Geri – I can’t imagine what demons you’re fighting (or actively embracing) which would cause you to write something like…” Oct 21, 15:16
Minceheid on Faces In Sand: “Hatey McHateface says: 21 October, 2026 at 1:47 pm I’ll tell you what’s likely within the next 30 years. You’ll…” Oct 21, 14:49
Confused on Faces In Sand: “without even doing the slightest research, there are any number of possible reasons why the albertans voted that way -…” Oct 21, 14:15
Southernbystander on Faces In Sand: “Sam was this case not related to holding slaves in Scotland i.e Knight himself who had been brought here by…” Oct 21, 14:00
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “I’ll tell you what’s likely within the next 30 years. You’ll be deid and forgotten. As for Canada being annexed…” Oct 21, 13:47
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Attaboy, James. Don’t you let Geri and Confused steal all the glory.” Oct 21, 13:37
Confused on Faces In Sand: “give us your insights about alberta then, arse-piece. Looking further ahead, due to climate change cold northern lands will become…” Oct 21, 13:20
Confused on Faces In Sand: “with the SNP in charge of “independence”, why would you need propaganda anymore – they are winding up the operation,…” Oct 21, 13:18
James Che on Faces In Sand: “Alf Baird, It is true that we are able to hold legal witness to the annexation of Scotland in 1707.…” Oct 21, 13:17
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““shovelling yoon propaganda” Calm, mature reflection would lead one to consider that if that is true, and it is also…” Oct 21, 13:08
James Che on Faces In Sand: “Both Scotland and England supposedly remain as the Sovereign Countries that lend to the foundation of the State of Great…” Oct 21, 13:04