News reaches Wings this evening that Humza Yousaf has called an emergency meeting of the Scottish Cabinet at 10 o’clock tomorrow morning, just a couple of hours before FMQs. (This information has been confirmed directly to us by a source very close to a member of said Cabinet.)
An emergency Cabinet meeting is an extraordinarily rare event. As far as we’re able to establish there have only been two during the SNP’s time in power – when the budget failed to pass in 2009 and Alex Salmond’s administration had to decide whether or not to trigger a general election, and one the day after the Brexit vote to supposedly plan a second indyref (LOL). But in any case they’re extremely unusual.
The subject of the meeting has not been disclosed to us. It could, for example, concern imminent developments in Operation Branchform, or it could relate to the Bute House Agreement between the SNP and the Scottish Greens. The men in grey kilts may have come for the FM. Or Scotland could be about to declare war on Morocco or something. But we are told that the fact of the meeting taking place is a 100% certainty.
So no sleeping in tomorrow, readers. It’s probably going to be big.
More than three months have passed since Alex Salmond launched a lawsuit against the Scottish Government for its grotesquely botched handling of false allegations of sexual misconduct against him.
With Scottish politics currently in a completely moribund state, as the party of government disintegrates shambolically and the main opposition party keeps its mouth shut and its head down in an attempt to not destroy its newfound and extremely fragile status as a credible alternative, one might imagine that the political media would be desperate for the case to get under way and provide them with some juicy content.
So it’s slightly surprising that none of them has noticed the latest development.
But we’ve subsequently noticed a number of attempts by various people to muddy the story by talking about a “draft” warrant request, implying that there was no improper delay. So we checked up, and thought you might like to know how the process works.
The SNP has of course denied them, but they also denied our recent leak from the party’s draft manifesto and we know for sure that that was real. The trouble with lying all the time is that nobody believes you even if you occasionally tell the the truth.
Of course, there would be an easy way to prove the numbers were a fake – release the real ones, which is in any case the most fundamental element of transparency in a democratic election. And whatever they are could hardly be any more embarrassing than the rumours, which have candidates topping the list (and likely to get seats) on a shocking 2.4% of the vote.
We thought readers might like a look at the draft SNP manifesto introduction (written, we hear, by Mike Russell) that’s currently being passed around branches for comment.
Alert readers will undoubtedly have noticed a number of, to put it mildly, explosive-sounding developments this evening regarding the ongoing inquiries into the Scottish Government’s misconduct over false allegations against Alex Salmond.
Several reports have quoted extracts from the former First Minister’s submission to James Hamilton, who’s investigating the current First Minister over possible breaches of the Ministerial Code relating to the investigation of the allegations.
The submission – delivered on Mr Salmond’s birthday – has been widely leaked to the media but only selectively reported, and like others Wings has obtained a full copy.
We are advised that its contents do not contain anything which breaches or potentially breaches Lady Dorrian’s court order protecting the identities of the complainers against Mr Salmond, and as such there are no barriers to us publishing the entire document in the public interest, because its contents make some extremely grave and disturbing allegations against the current First Minister.
One of them, of course, is who leaked the story to Davie Clegg of the Daily Record in August of that year, when the whole thing should have been confidential and passing it to the press was an unambiguously malicious and criminal act.
Over the last year or so, this site’s commentary on matters surrounding the attempted imprisonment of Alex Salmond over false allegations of sexual abuse has attracted a considerable amount of ire from a section of the readership, demanding “proof” of the involvement of the current First Minister.
Such proof has been impossible to provide for legal reasons. But it’s always been the case that the truth could only be suppressed for so long, and events in recent days have brought the first chinks of light through the wall of smoke and mirrors the Scottish Government has been attempting to surround the matter with.
So in our very lightest and softest shoes, let’s tiptoe through what is both a labyrinth and a minefield and see if we can make some of it a little easier to understand.
Dick Wall on In pursuit of clarity: “Interested in the Judicial Review bit. Can you elaborate please. Police Aye COPFS naw. Also you are right to suggest…” Jun 7, 02:20
gm on In pursuit of clarity: “Murrell singing like a canary would be perfection on earth. If only.” Jun 6, 23:46
Hatey McHateface on The Interesting Words Round: “It’s quite a jump from the SNP splurging the ring-fenced Indy Ref fund on themselves to it becoming a rallying…” Jun 6, 22:52
I. Despair on In pursuit of clarity: “Sorry if this has been noticed and queried already but if so, I missed it. ACC Houston’s statement: “…the Operation…” Jun 6, 22:38
James Barr Gardner on The Interesting Words Round: “It would not surprise me if the Brit State spend more money and time infiltrating and fucking up anything that…” Jun 6, 22:06
sarah on In pursuit of clarity: “Thanks for this link. It is great to see the Rev and Roddy Dunlop’s work getting the MSM attention and…” Jun 6, 21:54
Hatey McHateface on In pursuit of clarity: “Even so, don’t jump to any conclusions. Ask each one for their preferred pronouns. You can’t be too careful in…” Jun 6, 21:49
Hatey McHateface on The Interesting Words Round: “What really grinds my gears, Northy, is that the huge neon sign is illuminated by electricity stolen from Scotland. That…” Jun 6, 21:46
Hatey McHateface on The Interesting Words Round: “Sorry, Mark, I don’t know. I do know who was UK Prime Minister of Britain, if that helps.” Jun 6, 21:39
Andy Wiltshire on In pursuit of clarity: “Keep going Rev – the idea that the credibility of Scotland might somehow be saved is largely relying on you…” Jun 6, 21:37
katielass42 on The Interesting Words Round: “Thank you for the links, Fearghas! I had missed this so I am, even now, listening to the interview. It’s…” Jun 6, 20:32
James Barr Gardner on In pursuit of clarity: “Wan guid turn deserves anither…” Jun 6, 20:21
Bilbo on In pursuit of clarity: “It’s doubtful that any money could be recouped using those ways but I’m sure it would raise some eyebrows in…” Jun 6, 19:02
crazycat on In pursuit of clarity: “I’m delighted you got your money back, James, but I don’t think you owe me anything in relation to that!” Jun 6, 18:57
James Barr Gardner on In pursuit of clarity: “I am bemused by the claims of the professionalism of the Police team carrying the investigation of the Missing £660K.…” Jun 6, 18:42
Lothianlad on In pursuit of clarity: “Tgey are nithing more than enforcers of tge SNP cabal.” Jun 6, 17:59
crazycat on In pursuit of clarity: “It looks as if the chargeback time limit is 120 days, though if the purchase is a pre-payment for eg…” Jun 6, 17:55
agentx on In pursuit of clarity: “A whole article about you Stu Police Scotland warned it faces judicial review over flat-out refusal to reinvestigate missing SNP…” Jun 6, 17:41
Skip_NC on In pursuit of clarity: “The oversight should be from the judiciary. The problem we have is that the College of Justice contains 34 (?)…” Jun 6, 17:36
Ian McCubbin on The Lord Of The Rings: “My worst fears coming to fruition. Swinney as corrupt as Sturgeon and both assets of Englidh state. Our police system…” Jun 6, 17:35
Bilbo on In pursuit of clarity: “Just to clarify, there are two routes that people can take to get their donations back. First is contacting your…” Jun 6, 17:12
agentx on In pursuit of clarity: “This is interesting https://www.copfs.gov.uk/services/victim-services/victims-right-to-review/ Victims’ Right to Review This guide explains how the victim of a crime can ask COPFS…” Jun 6, 17:06
Alf Baird on In pursuit of clarity: “A colonised “country will always struggle to prosper”, not least given ‘the objective of colonialism is to widen inequality’ (Memmi).…” Jun 6, 17:04
Andrea on In pursuit of clarity: “Thanks Sven and Cynicus. I confess, i too thought it was Homer Simpson, although that would have not really gone…” Jun 6, 17:01
Sian Laidlaw on In pursuit of clarity: “I am amazed Mr. Campbell that having addressed and sent your email to The Chief Constable of Police Scotland it…” Jun 6, 16:55
Richard on In pursuit of clarity: “Appropriate song in the context of such good work. I guess that makes it 2 Honest Men. www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKQBUqrzN1Q” Jun 6, 16:35
Mark Beggan on In pursuit of clarity: “Even Police Scotland sometimes have to stand naked.” Jun 6, 16:27
twathater on In pursuit of clarity: “I agree wholeheartedly that the misuse and misappropriation of the ring fenced referendum DONATIONS are MORE important if not as…” Jun 6, 16:19
McDuff on In pursuit of clarity: “An exceptional letter rev and one that needed to be sent.” Jun 6, 16:12