News reaches Wings this evening that Humza Yousaf has called an emergency meeting of the Scottish Cabinet at 10 o’clock tomorrow morning, just a couple of hours before FMQs. (This information has been confirmed directly to us by a source very close to a member of said Cabinet.)
An emergency Cabinet meeting is an extraordinarily rare event. As far as we’re able to establish there have only been two during the SNP’s time in power – when the budget failed to pass in 2009 and Alex Salmond’s administration had to decide whether or not to trigger a general election, and one the day after the Brexit vote to supposedly plan a second indyref (LOL). But in any case they’re extremely unusual.
The subject of the meeting has not been disclosed to us. It could, for example, concern imminent developments in Operation Branchform, or it could relate to the Bute House Agreement between the SNP and the Scottish Greens. The men in grey kilts may have come for the FM. Or Scotland could be about to declare war on Morocco or something. But we are told that the fact of the meeting taking place is a 100% certainty.
So no sleeping in tomorrow, readers. It’s probably going to be big.
More than three months have passed since Alex Salmond launched a lawsuit against the Scottish Government for its grotesquely botched handling of false allegations of sexual misconduct against him.
With Scottish politics currently in a completely moribund state, as the party of government disintegrates shambolically and the main opposition party keeps its mouth shut and its head down in an attempt to not destroy its newfound and extremely fragile status as a credible alternative, one might imagine that the political media would be desperate for the case to get under way and provide them with some juicy content.
So it’s slightly surprising that none of them has noticed the latest development.
But we’ve subsequently noticed a number of attempts by various people to muddy the story by talking about a “draft” warrant request, implying that there was no improper delay. So we checked up, and thought you might like to know how the process works.
The SNP has of course denied them, but they also denied our recent leak from the party’s draft manifesto and we know for sure that that was real. The trouble with lying all the time is that nobody believes you even if you occasionally tell the the truth.
Of course, there would be an easy way to prove the numbers were a fake – release the real ones, which is in any case the most fundamental element of transparency in a democratic election. And whatever they are could hardly be any more embarrassing than the rumours, which have candidates topping the list (and likely to get seats) on a shocking 2.4% of the vote.
We thought readers might like a look at the draft SNP manifesto introduction (written, we hear, by Mike Russell) that’s currently being passed around branches for comment.
Alert readers will undoubtedly have noticed a number of, to put it mildly, explosive-sounding developments this evening regarding the ongoing inquiries into the Scottish Government’s misconduct over false allegations against Alex Salmond.
Several reports have quoted extracts from the former First Minister’s submission to James Hamilton, who’s investigating the current First Minister over possible breaches of the Ministerial Code relating to the investigation of the allegations.
The submission – delivered on Mr Salmond’s birthday – has been widely leaked to the media but only selectively reported, and like others Wings has obtained a full copy.
We are advised that its contents do not contain anything which breaches or potentially breaches Lady Dorrian’s court order protecting the identities of the complainers against Mr Salmond, and as such there are no barriers to us publishing the entire document in the public interest, because its contents make some extremely grave and disturbing allegations against the current First Minister.
One of them, of course, is who leaked the story to Davie Clegg of the Daily Record in August of that year, when the whole thing should have been confidential and passing it to the press was an unambiguously malicious and criminal act.
Over the last year or so, this site’s commentary on matters surrounding the attempted imprisonment of Alex Salmond over false allegations of sexual abuse has attracted a considerable amount of ire from a section of the readership, demanding “proof” of the involvement of the current First Minister.
Such proof has been impossible to provide for legal reasons. But it’s always been the case that the truth could only be suppressed for so long, and events in recent days have brought the first chinks of light through the wall of smoke and mirrors the Scottish Government has been attempting to surround the matter with.
So in our very lightest and softest shoes, let’s tiptoe through what is both a labyrinth and a minefield and see if we can make some of it a little easier to understand.
Mark Beggan on Progressing To Oblivion: “Angus Robertson is epitome of what a greedy self-righteous prick, who gets away with stealing from the school tuck shop…” Jul 19, 16:06
Andrew F on These Words Are My Own: “Hatey, that’s one of your worst efforts ever. We’ll see, but Sturgeon can’t keep running from this one. She’s already…” Jul 19, 15:52
Nicky T Naquetti on Progressing To Oblivion: “Let’s be fair here…. Translating “Boku No Piku” into Indonesian isn’t cheap.” Jul 19, 15:40
Dan on These Words Are My Own: “Franchise Fanny jist loves taking the divisive cheap shots, and knocking Scots for not having the moral and political cojones*,…” Jul 19, 15:33
sam on These Words Are My Own: “Andy, “to face such a veto down”. How do you envisage doing that?. Scotland is of strategic importance to England.…” Jul 19, 14:17
DavidT on These Words Are My Own: “Perhaps the £58,735 worth of items were dropped from the indictment as part of a deal where he agreed not…” Jul 19, 14:00
Alf Baird on These Words Are My Own: “You seem to be getting closer to the realisation (always delayed for the native intellectuals and bourgeoisie, according to Fanon)…” Jul 19, 13:58
Northcode on These Words Are My Own: “The issue here isn’t sentiment, passion or the level of frustration people feel. It’s the constitutional architecture. A majority can’t…” Jul 19, 13:27
Aidan on These Words Are My Own: “@Northcode – I am not NOW saying that, I’ve pointed that out from the beginning. There is no formal hierarchy…” Jul 19, 13:19
Mark Beggan on These Words Are My Own: ““If wishes were horses, beggars would ride” wise words my Granny used to say.” Jul 19, 12:50
Andy Ellis on These Words Are My Own: “What if the constitutional structure itself prevents a majority from being actionable? They always refuse to engage with that question……” Jul 19, 12:40
Mark Beggan on These Words Are My Own: ““If the political will were truly manifest” “native Scottish perceptual matter” “worldview in the particular is perversely constrained” “Turn on,…” Jul 19, 12:17
Andy Ellis on These Words Are My Own: “@Alf Where is this “plebiscitary election policy”, Andy? You sound like Believe in Scotland who in 2024 promised such an…” Jul 19, 11:56
Mark Beggan on These Words Are My Own: “There is nothing as sad as a stupid Scot who refuses to accept defeat. They turn on their own, blaming…” Jul 19, 11:54
Hatey McHateface on These Words Are My Own: “Some Scots got confused when asked if Scotland should leave a non-existent union.” Jul 19, 11:49
TURABDIN on These Words Are My Own: “@AndyEllis If the political will were truly manifest nothing could seriously prevent the restoration of national sovereignty & independence. The…” Jul 19, 11:46
Mark Beggan on These Words Are My Own: “It wasn’t just the referendum some Scots lost over ten years ago.” Jul 19, 11:38
Alf Baird on These Words Are My Own: ““Hence we come back to the required democratic mandate for Indy, and the best way to get that – a…” Jul 19, 11:25
Hatey McHateface on These Words Are My Own: ““Westminster would have simply shrugged its shoulders and handed the Scots the ‘deeds to Scotland’?” Why would it? It’s not…” Jul 19, 11:21
crazycat on These Words Are My Own: “At the time of his sentencing, when there was discussion about how he managed to qualify for legal aid despite…” Jul 19, 11:14
Hatey McHateface on These Words Are My Own: “And, they’re off. Sun’s shining outside. That won’t last forever. This pointless argument will. Andy already has the win on…” Jul 19, 11:02
paul on These Words Are My Own: “I would be delighted to see the documentation of this transaction. If you’re spending that much money on pens, hairdryers…” Jul 19, 10:53
paul on These Words Are My Own: “…which doesn’t go that far these days in that london. The portugese property looks like one of her husband’s more…” Jul 19, 10:33
paul on These Words Are My Own: “…and its cherished legal system is viewed as an opt in option by the colonialists” Jul 19, 10:26
Tenruh on These Words Are My Own: “See Nicola managed to attend the Glasgow Gay March yesterday. Wonder what stopped her attending any Independence marches when she…” Jul 19, 10:26
Northcode on These Words Are My Own: “AI Dan. You’re now saying geographic separation is the “most important” criterion, but Resolution 1541 doesn’t describe any hierarchy of…” Jul 19, 10:14
Northcode on These Words Are My Own: “Unionists (colonialists if preferred… same thing) frequently tell us in this place that: “There is no route to independence that…” Jul 19, 10:03
paul on These Words Are My Own: “Scotland is not a country, it is a colony. It cannot develop outside its colonialists’ interest. The deeds to its…” Jul 19, 10:03
Captain Caveman on These Words Are My Own: “Bronze medal in theory, but in reality, yes, “first loser”. Ach. Great game of footy tho, and awesome to see…” Jul 19, 10:01
Aidan on These Words Are My Own: “I never said that geographic separation is the ONLY criteria, but that it is the most restrictive and most important…” Jul 19, 09:52