The entire Scottish media and professional-politician community is currently in a self-righteous froth about a campaign ad being run by Reform for the Hamilton by-election targeting Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar.
Obviously none of the acres of press coverage trusts voters to see the ad and decide for themselves, because that simply isn’t how journalism works nowadays. You’re told that a bad thing happened – whether it be a campaign ad, a comedian’s joke or the supposed terrible abuse sent to a celebrity – and how outraged various pundits or other celebrities are about it, with the clear implication that you should feel the same, but you almost never get shown or told what was actually said.
So to start with, as a basic journalistic principle, here’s the ad itself in its entirety.
Now let’s look at what you’re being ordered to think about it.
Because even although it’s part of a transparent attempt from the Record to deflect attention from the many shocking revelations of the last few days around the Salmond affair, it’s still unusual that a newspaper would make a front-page lead out of a claim it knows it can’t provide a single scrap of evidence for.
The Scottish Parliament’s inquiry into the disastrously botched investigation of false allegations against Alex Salmond, which has been paused for several weeks due to the Scottish Government’s repeated refusal to provide it with material it’s requested, resumes today and enters its final and critical phase.
In the next two months all the key players in the shambolic affair, including the current First Minister, her predecessor and both of their chiefs of staff, will give evidence. But today perhaps the most central figure of all will appear. Or rather, she won’t.
The apparent reason for this, according to a recent report in the Times, is Mackinnon’s being “targeted on social media”. No further details of this “targeting” are given.
And there’s one rather big problem with that claim.
The mainstream media is now, by our count, up to at least 13 sizeable articles on the Great Yes-Movement Schism Of 2017 – a minor online spat between a tiny handful of people who’ve never liked each other and most of whom the general public has never heard of – and shows no signs of tiring of gleefully revelling in the subject.
There’s nothing particularly surprising or even diabolical about that. As any reality-TV show viewer will tell you, viewers absolutely love to watch people fighting, and doubly so if it’s the summer silly season and there’s no real news. Most of the stories have attracted large responses and therefore lots of juicy and profitable clicks for tired hacks who long ago stopped having anything of any interest to say but still have to honk out 1000 words a week in order to get paid.
But the more sinister aspect of them is the way they’ve been weaponised to (further) demonise and silence the Yes movement. If someone attacks other Yes figures with a provocative, offensive and dishonest piece, the extra bonus for the media is that any legitimately angry response to it can be used as yet more proof of The Vileness Of The Cybernats: “Look! They even turn on their own if they dare disagree!”
For the Unionist press, that’s a win-win every way up, and there are some on the Yes side who seem only too willing to co-operate with the narrative.
“Colonel” Ruth Davidson took time out from her holidays yesterday to unleash an extraordinary (and unusually defensive) 35-part Twitter tirade about the reaction to her appointment as an honorary military commander. So barren is the summer political news desert that two newspapers put it on their front page today, giving the BBC an excuse to deem it the day’s biggest story.
Alert readers will of course be aware that one of this site’s most frequently-recurring themes is “phantom news”, whereby events or unpleasant opinions that newspapers or broadcasters really want to have happened are conveniently brought to life, either by some random nobody on the internet, or an unnamed “source” or “insider”.
So when Nicola Sturgeon did something today that nearly everyone in the Northern Hemisphere knew she was going to do sometime soon, but wasn’t expecting just yet, there wasn’t time to prepare actual real people with the required quotes.
In the modern media world, though, that isn’t a problem.
Alert readers will of course be aware that a recurring theme on this site is looking for the alleged abusive behaviour by supporters of independence which gets regularly reported in outraged terms by newspapers but is mysteriously almost never supported by any actual evidence of the supposed abuse.
In every case the papers and/or alleged recipients of all these dreadful separatist haranguings screamed “VILE ABUSE!”, swooning at the horror of it all, then suddenly turned deaf and dumb when asked to provide any examples.
So we were quite surprised yesterday when a previous complainant – brutal stickering victim and lonely Scottish Labour MP Ian Murray – actually came up with the proof.
For several years now this site has been drawing attention to the weird phenomenon of phantom news – stories presented by the media without even a shred of supporting evidence yet treated as unquestionable empirical fact. And recently there have been more phantoms around the Scottish press than an episode of Scooby Doo.
The thing Alan Roden – who prefers intimidating ordinary members of the public by doorstepping them and vilifying them in his paper – links to in that tweet is an article on the Herald website last night. And it’s a weird article, because it’s an extensive, quote-laden story about something that doesn’t appear to have happened at all.
Have you ever wondered how you try to poison and shut down a debate and a political environment that you fear you’ve found yourself on the losing side of, readers? Well, it’s funny you should ask, because as it happens we’ve got a visiting professor – an expert authority on the subject – with us today to give us a demonstration.
Make sure you’ve got your pens and notepads ready. He’s got a very busy schedule and we can’t afford to have him here for long.
We spent much of yesterday evening trying to actually track down the “vicious barrage” of vile cybernat abuse that Labour and “Better Together” activist Clare Lally says she was subjected to after being revealed to be rather less of an “ordinary” member of the public than the No camp presented her as at its recent Glasgow rally, and which has received wall-to-wall media coverage.
As yet, we’ve drawn a blank. We’ve made repeated requests, some to people who’ve contacted us angrily claiming to be her friends or family members, for evidence of any abusive comments at all. All have been met with an abrupt outbreak of silence.
Colin Dawson on Faces In Sand: “Collette Stevenson’s mistake is quite understandable, given the SNP’s total obsession with transgender issues over the past decade or so.…” Oct 19, 00:00
Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “Is this migration coming from that war torn country that was serving conscription papers on beaches? That is just another…” Oct 18, 23:05
Elmac on Faces In Sand: “The title of Faces in Sand would be more appropriate as Faeces in Sand. How anyone with a brain, a…” Oct 18, 23:02
Willie on Faces In Sand: “Let’s try again to get through moderation. The potential for huge white immigration from a European country looms large. They…” Oct 18, 21:41
Willie on Faces In Sand: “20 million Ukr##nans are wanting to leave. With Britain in lockstep political alignment, if not blood brothers, the UK might…” Oct 18, 21:35
Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “@ Hatey My comment was meant to be criticism as too many people have no critical thinking nowadays due to…” Oct 18, 21:17
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““colossally mishandled by the French state, of course” No “of course” about it here. You should back up your claim…” Oct 18, 21:04
Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “@ Spartan 117 This talk of certain demographics need to be taken in context. I haven’t been following the protests…” Oct 18, 20:49
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““Most of the French think it’s a great thing” Michty! My BS meter has shorted out again. But we can…” Oct 18, 20:49
WhoRattledYourCage on Faces In Sand: “I’ll write about what I feel like writing about. It’s not important, I did say that. I am bigoted against…” Oct 18, 20:48
Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “There y’are, Hatey. Woke before it was even a thing. Then there’s was that Scottish engineer fae Lithgae on the…” Oct 18, 20:48
Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “Found this article about Gen Z woman revisting classic British comedies where on one comedy they found The show’s physical…” Oct 18, 20:44
Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “I doubt there will be any white asylum seekers coming over on the channel in a dinghy. Most of the…” Oct 18, 20:34
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “@Spartan 117 There was a Scottish black bloke in Porridge. The mind boggles!” Oct 18, 20:31
Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “Rab C Nesbitt wouldn’t have been so popular south of the border if it wasn’t for the drunken Scotch stereotype.…” Oct 18, 20:30
agentx on Faces In Sand: “” John Swinney compared to dictator as bus plans branded ‘business confiscation’ John Swinney has been compared to dictators as…” Oct 18, 20:24
Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “It is indeed concerning as it appears to be spreading. The demographic *allegedly* driving the unrest, if true, is noteworthy…” Oct 18, 20:24
Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Right. So there is. Rab wisnae offensive then, or Pete The Jakey, cos it was Scottish. Best not mention Navid…” Oct 18, 20:12
Southernbystander on Faces In Sand: “Thing is the article spends the first half slagging off a panel of three women, white, brown and black for…” Oct 18, 19:56
WhoRattledYourCage on Faces In Sand: “Those programmes are all Scottish, and none of them was done out of pure hatred and bigotry and cheap laughs.…” Oct 18, 19:40
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “What’s going on in France right now is quite concerning. Just when it looked as if WM was making inroads…” Oct 18, 19:24
Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “To be fair to James, that was a pretty good post of his with good points, a by no means…” Oct 18, 19:20
Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Presumably you also take extreme offence to Rab C Nesbitt, Chewin’ The Fat and Still Game for their tropes.” Oct 18, 19:02
Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “I grew up in a rough as fuck area of SE Edinburgh in an ex-Cooncil Hoose during the Major/Blair years,…” Oct 18, 18:51
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Surely “pricks”, CC? James didn’t write that on his own. He lacks the attention span, even for a copy-and-paste that…” Oct 18, 18:45
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “I expected him to be deid, but he’s nae. Which rather spoils my post, because I was gonna say you’ll…” Oct 18, 18:37
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Odd, sarah. All the other countries in Europe, and indeed the west, who are maxed out on debt, at least…” Oct 18, 18:22
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““disrespecting us” Never! Surely not you, Confused?” Oct 18, 18:10
twathater on Faces In Sand: “Oh no confused now you’ve upset spartan 007, another one who knows what everyone in Scotland wants and thinks, does…” Oct 18, 18:07
Captain Caveman on Still Time To Save Her: ““Human dross” Is that right, Chief 😀 Dick.” Oct 18, 17:32