The entire Scottish media and professional-politician community is currently in a self-righteous froth about a campaign ad being run by Reform for the Hamilton by-election targeting Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar.
Obviously none of the acres of press coverage trusts voters to see the ad and decide for themselves, because that simply isn’t how journalism works nowadays. You’re told that a bad thing happened – whether it be a campaign ad, a comedian’s joke or the supposed terrible abuse sent to a celebrity – and how outraged various pundits or other celebrities are about it, with the clear implication that you should feel the same, but you almost never get shown or told what was actually said.
So to start with, as a basic journalistic principle, here’s the ad itself in its entirety.
Now let’s look at what you’re being ordered to think about it.
Because even although it’s part of a transparent attempt from the Record to deflect attention from the many shocking revelations of the last few days around the Salmond affair, it’s still unusual that a newspaper would make a front-page lead out of a claim it knows it can’t provide a single scrap of evidence for.
The Scottish Parliament’s inquiry into the disastrously botched investigation of false allegations against Alex Salmond, which has been paused for several weeks due to the Scottish Government’s repeated refusal to provide it with material it’s requested, resumes today and enters its final and critical phase.
In the next two months all the key players in the shambolic affair, including the current First Minister, her predecessor and both of their chiefs of staff, will give evidence. But today perhaps the most central figure of all will appear. Or rather, she won’t.
The apparent reason for this, according to a recent report in the Times, is Mackinnon’s being “targeted on social media”. No further details of this “targeting” are given.
And there’s one rather big problem with that claim.
The mainstream media is now, by our count, up to at least 13 sizeable articles on the Great Yes-Movement Schism Of 2017 – a minor online spat between a tiny handful of people who’ve never liked each other and most of whom the general public has never heard of – and shows no signs of tiring of gleefully revelling in the subject.
There’s nothing particularly surprising or even diabolical about that. As any reality-TV show viewer will tell you, viewers absolutely love to watch people fighting, and doubly so if it’s the summer silly season and there’s no real news. Most of the stories have attracted large responses and therefore lots of juicy and profitable clicks for tired hacks who long ago stopped having anything of any interest to say but still have to honk out 1000 words a week in order to get paid.
But the more sinister aspect of them is the way they’ve been weaponised to (further) demonise and silence the Yes movement. If someone attacks other Yes figures with a provocative, offensive and dishonest piece, the extra bonus for the media is that any legitimately angry response to it can be used as yet more proof of The Vileness Of The Cybernats: “Look! They even turn on their own if they dare disagree!”
For the Unionist press, that’s a win-win every way up, and there are some on the Yes side who seem only too willing to co-operate with the narrative.
“Colonel” Ruth Davidson took time out from her holidays yesterday to unleash an extraordinary (and unusually defensive) 35-part Twitter tirade about the reaction to her appointment as an honorary military commander. So barren is the summer political news desert that two newspapers put it on their front page today, giving the BBC an excuse to deem it the day’s biggest story.
Alert readers will of course be aware that one of this site’s most frequently-recurring themes is “phantom news”, whereby events or unpleasant opinions that newspapers or broadcasters really want to have happened are conveniently brought to life, either by some random nobody on the internet, or an unnamed “source” or “insider”.
So when Nicola Sturgeon did something today that nearly everyone in the Northern Hemisphere knew she was going to do sometime soon, but wasn’t expecting just yet, there wasn’t time to prepare actual real people with the required quotes.
In the modern media world, though, that isn’t a problem.
Alert readers will of course be aware that a recurring theme on this site is looking for the alleged abusive behaviour by supporters of independence which gets regularly reported in outraged terms by newspapers but is mysteriously almost never supported by any actual evidence of the supposed abuse.
In every case the papers and/or alleged recipients of all these dreadful separatist haranguings screamed “VILE ABUSE!”, swooning at the horror of it all, then suddenly turned deaf and dumb when asked to provide any examples.
So we were quite surprised yesterday when a previous complainant – brutal stickering victim and lonely Scottish Labour MP Ian Murray – actually came up with the proof.
For several years now this site has been drawing attention to the weird phenomenon of phantom news – stories presented by the media without even a shred of supporting evidence yet treated as unquestionable empirical fact. And recently there have been more phantoms around the Scottish press than an episode of Scooby Doo.
The thing Alan Roden – who prefers intimidating ordinary members of the public by doorstepping them and vilifying them in his paper – links to in that tweet is an article on the Herald website last night. And it’s a weird article, because it’s an extensive, quote-laden story about something that doesn’t appear to have happened at all.
Have you ever wondered how you try to poison and shut down a debate and a political environment that you fear you’ve found yourself on the losing side of, readers? Well, it’s funny you should ask, because as it happens we’ve got a visiting professor – an expert authority on the subject – with us today to give us a demonstration.
Make sure you’ve got your pens and notepads ready. He’s got a very busy schedule and we can’t afford to have him here for long.
We spent much of yesterday evening trying to actually track down the “vicious barrage” of vile cybernat abuse that Labour and “Better Together” activist Clare Lally says she was subjected to after being revealed to be rather less of an “ordinary” member of the public than the No camp presented her as at its recent Glasgow rally, and which has received wall-to-wall media coverage.
As yet, we’ve drawn a blank. We’ve made repeated requests, some to people who’ve contacted us angrily claiming to be her friends or family members, for evidence of any abusive comments at all. All have been met with an abrupt outbreak of silence.
Dan on Pick Your Poison: “George, your brother’s journey of vote choices is jist a product of the political paradigm Scotland endures within the Union.…” May 7, 17:11
Aidan on Pick Your Poison: “There is no “moral duty” in international law to launch a totally and completely unprovoked invasion of a neighbouring country…” May 7, 16:57
Mark Beggan on Pick Your Poison: “Geri you know that’s not true. No one spends as much time as you do ranting on here just to…” May 7, 16:56
Mark Beggan on Pick Your Poison: “For a complete slabbering idiot with a ridiculous name you certainly have a lot of demands. I bet you rant…” May 7, 16:53
Geri on Pick Your Poison: “It’ll be cause they’ll know they could be on the ropes so want backup of getting in on the list.…” May 7, 16:52
agentx on The value bet: “Just been to vote – the ballot boxes were quite full when I was putting my voting papers in. This…” May 7, 16:39
Dan on Pick Your Poison: “A teatime read from Grousebeater. (Not sure why his articles don’t always show on the voices for independence daily feed)…” May 7, 16:38
George Ferguson on Pick Your Poison: “My last attempt at humour in a post has been lost to moderation. So let’s be serious. How do any…” May 7, 16:21
Big Jock on Pick Your Poison: “Reform are an English national party. Any Scot voting for an English national party is deranged! Kelly is still spouting…” May 7, 16:03
robertkknight on Pick Your Poison: “Constituency paper duly spoiled… W.nkers, the lot of them! Pity about two separate pro-Indy parties on the regional list (I…” May 7, 15:37
Captain Caveman on The value bet: ““I couldn’t give a shiny shite what Mayor’s they vote for in another country today,” Er what? What are you…” May 7, 15:34
Hatey McHateface on Pick Your Poison: “Nice try, Alf. I doubt very much that anybody half-decent fears the kind of people who cheer on lassie torturers.” May 7, 15:29
Geri on Pick Your Poison: “That’s what happens when you agree terms, (Minsk1 & Minsk2) get the United Nations to rubber stamp it & then…” May 7, 15:25
Hatey McHateface on Pick Your Poison: ““Scotland has zero control over immigration” Bleeding obviously, if Scotland votes Reform at the next WM GE, Scotland has lots…” May 7, 15:24
Hatey McHateface on The value bet: ““a shiny shite what Mayor’s they vote” What Mayor’s what, Geri? Such a tiny little thing, yet completely and irrevocably…” May 7, 15:20
Hatey McHateface on The value bet: “Hae a haddie this time, Wally. And keep that free flipper still. Nae flapping doon below.” May 7, 15:15
Alf Baird on Pick Your Poison: ““who do we vote for to fix that?” Obviously, to end ‘that’ and the continued colonization of Scots we need…” May 7, 15:08
Geri on The value bet: “Aye James, Now that wouldn’t be deliberately interfering in another countries elections now would it? I couldn’t give a shiny…” May 7, 14:46
Captain Caveman on The value bet: ““Tick tock” Yeah, but that’s enough about your source material, eh pal. Tool.” May 7, 14:42
James on The value bet: “They bite every time. Bless. Comical.” May 7, 14:37
Hatey McHateface on Pick Your Poison: “I forgot about the autopsy. I’ve been thinking about the wake. Bet there will be SFA put behind the bar.” May 7, 14:37
Hatey McHateface on The value bet: ““Tick Tock”, Wally Walrus? That’s ane o the fragrant Geri’s signature lines. Just how many identities are you posting under?” May 7, 14:20
Aidan on The value bet: “Oh aye does he, and this information was provided with supporting evidence to the police who arrested and prosecuted the…” May 7, 14:14
James on The value bet: “The three yoon stooges are all oot the day eh? Funny, Phil Boswell has 2 or 3 returning officer contacts…” May 7, 14:02
Hatey McHateface on The value bet: “Loving your Pictish support for ATLS, Northy. OK if I gatecrash the wake on Saturday? (That’s a rhetorical question :)…” May 7, 13:43
Hatey McHateface on The value bet: “Are there 2 CM’s? The famous one is a cheerleader for the tunnel-skulking, lassie-torturing ham ass scum.” May 7, 13:40
Hatey McHateface on The value bet: “Here’s another fish fer ye, James. Enjoy, but mind, baith flippers above the table!” May 7, 13:35
Hatey McHateface on Pick Your Poison: “That’s a bit better, Confused. But I note you’re still being coy. Interesting that you believe it was US warmongering,…” May 7, 13:32
Hatey McHateface on Pick Your Poison: “Please revise and re-post, Confused. We need to know how to vote if we hate Dews.” May 7, 13:26
Captain Caveman on The value bet: “Yes that’s right James, it was … THEM!!! “ooo-oOOooOOO-ooOOHHH!!!”? Get the Bacofoil headgear ready, DEFCON1! (Alternatively, y’know maybe the source…” May 7, 13:14