Like an old man getting up for the fourth time in the middle of the night, the Scottish Government has squeezed out another little dribble of its legal advice in respect of the conduct of its shambolic investigation into false allegations against Alex Salmond.
And to push that gross analogy to its outermost limit, it must have found releasing one of the documents in particular as painful as passing a rather large kidney stone.
What puzzles many about the Alex Salmond situation is motive. It’s incredibly difficult for some Yes supporters to imagine any motive that could justify the awfulness of what Alex Salmond has been put through by his successor, and so they reject the whole idea of any sinister goings-on out of hand.
However, it’s far easier to understand what went on when you look at the personality of Nicola Sturgeon and her historical pattern of behaviour.
Because the core fact is that Sturgeon simply cannot bear to lose. She’s very single-minded, and doesn’t really adapt or regroup in the face of adversity. When events and new information make problems for her ideas and plans, she just keeps going – often creating more problems as she tries to force the plan back on track.
Sturgeon’s main priority – in common with most politicians – is to stay in power and to boost her own image and profile. We can look at some hot topics and her behaviour around them, and gain clear insights into what happened to Alex Salmond and why.
We thought readers might like a look at the draft SNP manifesto introduction (written, we hear, by Mike Russell) that’s currently being passed around branches for comment.
Having once been a Scottish Labour MEP, I joined the SNP 10 years ago because I believed we needed the party to secure independence. I was warmly received by local and national members including Alex Salmond.
I became an active member in Edinburgh West and represented them at conference, became a member of the National Council and almost became the MP for Kilmarnock, losing narrowly to Alan Brown (now the MP) in the selection.
(I was incidentally almost blocked from running because I wasn’t “sufficiently loyal”. I was allowed to stand on appeal because Kenny MacAskill on the appeal panel said, “Well Hugh if you don’t agree with a vote in Parliament couldn’t you just go to the opera instead?” I agreed and was approved accordingly.)
My relations with the SNP have not admittedly always been plain sailing. I resigned once, when Nicola Sturgeon held up the front page of the Sun during the 2016 election after it tactically decided to back the SNP in Scotland (whilst supporting the Tories in England) because Murdoch always liked to back winners.
This raised serious questions about Nicola’s judgement and made me suspect she isn’t as smart as she thinks.
We’re only two-thirds of the way through Nicola Sturgeon’s evidence to the Fabiani inquiry, and there’s probably not much point in expressing our opinion on it because you could almost certainly have guessed what it was going to be. The First Minister has been disingenuous, evasive, defensive and at times outright dishonest.
But although we were expecting all of that, this truly shocked us:
That’s the First Minister flatly stating, under oath, that even now she doesn’t know who all the complainers are. And readers can make their own minds up about how credible a claim that is. But I can tell you this:
I know who they all are.
Craig Murray knows who they all are.
Every journalist who covered the trial knows who they all are.
(And we can reasonably assume their editors also know who they all are.)
In fact pretty much everyone who’s in any way connected to Scottish politics knows the identity of every single one of these women. If you’re willing to believe that we all do but Nicola Sturgeon doesn’t, well, fair enough. But also, I’m a Nigerian prince and I’d like to pass several million pounds through your bank account. Please get in touch.
Yesterday’s evidence session at the Fabiani inquiry had several standout moments, but by a narrow margin this was our favourite.
And just in case you were wondering, yes, that IS Scotland’s top prosecutor, the Lord Advocate, chief of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, James Wolffe QC, repeatedly refusing to tell an MSP whether or not it’s a criminal offence in Scotland to refuse to comply with a court-ordered search warrant.
So next time you’ve ramraided a load of iPads and the polis come knocking on your door asking if they can have a nosy around your attic for them, just tell them they can’t come in because it’s a matter of your motivations.
We just put up a post, readers, but we’ve pulled it again because this has happened:
Because of this:
More as we get it, but this would seem to be an extraordinary move from the Tories if they weren’t pretty confident they had the backing of the other opposition parties. At a minimum it’s quite the scene-setter for tomorrow’s appearance of the First Minister in front of the Fabiani committee. We presume we don’t need to tell you to stay tuned.
We’ll say one thing for Police Scotland – when it comes to Freedom Of Information requests, dealing with them compared to the Scottish Government or Crown Office is a breath of fresh air. Responses tend to be reasonably swift and you actually get some straight answers, like these.
And in this case they’re pretty remarkable answers.
I became an SNP member aged 15 on the back of the 2014 independence referendum – gutted that we had not taken the step but hoping that it was just a matter of time.
Every Yesser I knew was either in the SNP or had just joined it, so I did too. Like many others, I didn’t want to disappear into the shadows and be put back into our box. We weren’t going anywhere.
Thus Nicola Sturgeon became SNP leader and FM, and rightly so – nobody was more qualified or deserving of the post. I went to her tour of Scotland and began to think how lucky we were that there was one of us, a woman of the people, leading the country.
Someone who spoke honestly, candidly, and you could relate to. Someone who upon speaking everyone’s hearts would open and our smiles would never leave our faces. She reaffirmed my commitment to the SNP and there was no doubt that she was going to take Scotland to new heights.
Alex Salmond had resigned, and even though he was also my hero and without him I would not have joined the SNP nor became interested in politics, the FM was the most important figure. She was FM, he was not. Where Alex Salmond had not succeeded, she would.
We’re just watching today’s session of the Fabiani inquiry, featuring the Lord Advocate, the Crown Agent and the Principal Crown Counsel. There’s been an extremely long preamble from both Fabiani and James Wolffe mainly concerned with the anonymity order passed by Lady Dorrian during (not before) Alex Salmond’s trial, which is the foundation stone of everything crooked that’s happened around the Salmond case.
The order – and for clarity we make no suggestion whatsoever that this was its intent – is the basis for every piece of evidence that’s been suppressed in the inquiry, and for the prosecutions of Mark Hirst, Craig Murray and others, and also for the threats of prosecution issued to this site, The Spectator and to Alex Salmond himself, preventing him giving his evidence in full to the inquiry.
And we couldn’t help wondering how different things would have been, how much less damage would have been done to the integrity and credibility of the entire Scottish political and legal establishment, if it hadn’t been for this guy.
(Doleman was not prosecuted for actually naming one of the women, although Craig Murray still awaits a verdict, five weeks after his trial, which could see him imprisoned for up to two years for merely allegedly hinting at their identities.)
Without the order, it would have been perfectly lawful for people to discuss the names of the complainers – whose allegations the jury found to be false – after the trial. It would have been possible for people to know, and form an opinion based on, who they were and who they were connected to and what the “plan” they were “mulling” was.
But because it isn’t, Scotland has been turned into a laughing stock – a byword for ham-fisted corruption and malice – the independence movement has been torn in two, and the Scottish Government itself may yet collapse.
So, y’know, thanks for all of that, James. Great job.
Northcode on Spot The Problem: ““…In practice, the First Minister would likely remove the Lord Advocate themselves rather than risk the embarrassment of such a…” Aug 27, 17:06
Mark Beggan on Spot The Problem: “There’s more than one way to skin a cat! What goes around comes around! Just don’t blame someone else for…” Aug 27, 17:03
Rob on Spot The Problem: “Since it is now abundantly clear they is no “official route to getting this into court, when does the judicial…” Aug 27, 16:58
Spartan 117 on Spot The Problem: “Marking your own jotters is De Rigeur these days, it’s one of the central pillars of Big State Socialism.” Aug 27, 16:54
Spartan 117 on Spot The Problem: “Grrr, colonisers. There was me thinking that Two Tier Britain was entirely a creation of the Fabians based on favouring…” Aug 27, 16:51
am firinn on Spot The Problem: “That’s not entirely true. Private prosecution used to be relatively common in Scotland before the growth of police forces in…” Aug 27, 16:49
Hatey McHateface on You’ll Have Had Your Supper: “Perhaps you’re unaware of it, Jessie, but by putting that “battered” in there, you’re encouraging, or at least trivialising, sexual…” Aug 27, 16:46
Northcode on Spot The Problem: ““…Holyrood could never remove the Lord Advocate, but somehow the U.K. Parliament could?” Your reading comprehension appears to be somewhat…” Aug 27, 16:44
robertkknight on Spot The Problem: “Rev Stu… Can you encourage David Davis to raise this in the HoC that a bent FM and a bent…” Aug 27, 16:43
Hatey McHateface on Spot The Problem: ““Maybe David Davies should mention it in parliament” Maybe the Scots who care should take to the streets. And not…” Aug 27, 16:32
robertkknight on Spot The Problem: “You can mark your own homework? Damn! If only I’d known when I was at school. Still, I recon a…” Aug 27, 16:31
Hatey McHateface on Spot The Problem: ““most people outside of Scotland think the Scottish government is actually a Scottish government” FFS, James, the Scottish government levies…” Aug 27, 16:24
Hatey McHateface on Spot The Problem: “So if devolution had never happened, Alf, Scotland’s status as a colony could never have been confirmed. Crivens! And you…” Aug 27, 16:13
Hatey McHateface on Spot The Problem: “Oh give it a fucking rest, Northy. This has already been done to death. The Scottish Parliament can remove the…” Aug 27, 16:03
Aidan on Spot The Problem: “So what you’re saying is that because it’s politically explosive Holyrood could never remove the Lord Advocate, but somehow the…” Aug 27, 16:00
Andrea on Spot The Problem: “Reverend, is there going to be yet another letter from yourself or is this the end of the line? Maybe…” Aug 27, 15:52
panda paws on You’ll Have Had Your Supper: ““…raised which is funded by the U.K. taxpayer” Nope. The UK taxpayer can’t pay its own bills, far less subsidise…” Aug 27, 15:46
James Che on Spot The Problem: “The referral to the Supreme court is under the Crown of England under the The UK parliament which Scotland holds…” Aug 27, 15:20
Alf Baird on Spot The Problem: ““The crown applies only to England under the Westminsters parliament acts” This should seem obvious, James, but is taking time…” Aug 27, 15:17
Northcode on Spot The Problem: ““In the structure you have described “Westminster” plays no role at all.” Apart from the fact that the structure was…” Aug 27, 15:11
James Che on Spot The Problem: “Tommo, Well done for checking out Scots laws, seeing as the money spoke of is mainly Scots finances that were…” Aug 27, 15:10
Alf Baird on Spot The Problem: ““There a name for that” Prof Elkins refers to Anglo-imperial rule over annexed territories as ‘legalized lawlessness’. Westminster and its…” Aug 27, 15:06
James Che on Spot The Problem: “Aidan, Scotland has never throughout history made a treaty of union with the Great Britain parliament or with the parliament…” Aug 27, 14:59
James Che on Spot The Problem: “North code. Scotland has never entered into a treaty of union with the Great Britain parliament at any time in…” Aug 27, 14:35
Tommo on Spot The Problem: “The offences of ‘misfeasance/misconduct in public office’ do not, as I understand it, exist under Scots law; however ‘Scots law…” Aug 27, 14:32
James Che on Spot The Problem: “Stu, This is the complicated position you are having to deal with when it crown to the crown offices and…” Aug 27, 14:19
willie on Spot The Problem: “So let me get this right. The COPFS commits murder but the system is if it decides to do nothing…” Aug 27, 14:19
Spartan 117 on Spot The Problem: “If you believe any of that, you must be incredibly naive. Fabians have infiltrated every strata of the state apparatus…” Aug 27, 14:18
agentx on Spot The Problem: “additional information: ” The appeal announced today by the information commissioner relates to a judgment made by the Court of…” Aug 27, 14:15
Aidan on Spot The Problem: “In the structure you have described “Westminster” plays no role at all. It is the Scottish FM and the Scottish…” Aug 27, 14:13