Word reaches us from this afternoon’s meeting of the SNP NEC that three members of the Finance & Audit Committee (ie about half of it, we believe) have resigned on the basis that they’re responsible for the party’s finances but are unable to carry out their duties as chief executive Peter Murrell refuses to give them access to the books.
We don’t yet know if it’s specifically in relation to the missing £600,000 in “ringfenced” fundraiser money that was supposed to have been earmarked for use in a second independence referendum campaign but which cannot be identified in the records of a party whose last published accounts showed only £97,000 in the bank.
It’s a curious thing to say before either of the inquiries has delivered its report. The only people who are asserting that Sturgeon has been somehow cleared of involvement in a conspiracy are the SNP, and even their own voters are split down the middle on it.
But let’s just check on how big the SNP are winning right now.
This isn’t quite yet a smoking gun, more of a starter’s pistol. But it’s already more than we’d expected from the Holyrood inquiry – an unambiguous statement that the First Minister misled it (and therefore Parliament) under oath.
What’s still missing at this stage is the word “knowingly”, which would turn it from a serious but non-fatal misdemeanour into a resignation offence. But nor, yet, is there any sight of the word “inadvertently”.
When Nicola Sturgeon is finally held to account for the charred, twisted and shattered ruins that she’s made of Scottish political and civic society in her desperate attempts to save her own neck, the complete discrediting of ostensible support organisations for victims of rape will be near the very top of the charge sheet.
But before we talk about that you really need to read this.
Because if you live in Scotland you can only rationally be one of two things at this moment in history: (a) terrified, or (b) an idiot.
We’ve received information this afternoon with regard to Nicola Sturgeon’s statements at today’s FMQs, which appear to have been wholly and disturbingly dishonest.
The quote below is from an email sent today by SNP communications chief Murray Foote, briefing ministers and MSPs on the official Scottish Government line, which is what the First Minister told the chamber in response to a question from Ruth Davidson.
We enjoyed doing this site a lot more when it was the dishonesty of Unionists and the Unionist media, not the SNP, that represented the main threat to independence. So let’s make like it’s the old days, just this once.
The Dunlop Review into the Scottish Government’s conduct of an investigation of false harassment allegations against Alex Salmond was published today. It is an extremely damning report, which basically boils down to “You got absolutely everything possible wrong, never do anything that way again, you incompetent idiots”.
You can check out the whole 78-page document here, but we’ve included its 10 key recommendations as to how such investigations should be carried out in future, along with a note of whether these recommendations were followed in the Salmond case.
James on Faces In Sand: ““…Poor fuckwit main, even when he tries to “be clever” he just makes a fool of himself….” “….on a Scottish…” Oct 21, 22:12
sarah on Faces In Sand: “Thanks for the link, Fearghas.” Oct 21, 22:06
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““We do not protest, challenge or contest any action taken by WM” Ah, c’moan noo, Lorncal, you’re ignoring the tea…” Oct 21, 19:53
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Seemingly I’m here 24/7, Chas. Geri is only just back. If she went private for her treatment, I hope she…” Oct 21, 19:43
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Aw, partan, I didn’t ken ye cared. You’ll have been expecting this one and all. And yes, conscientious objectors do…” Oct 21, 19:28
Minceheid on Faces In Sand: “That dippy wifie is apparently Hannah Mary Goodlad, the MSP for Shetland. Here’s a link to her speech, should you…” Oct 21, 19:14
Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Hook, line, sinker. Knew you wouldn’t resist. Imagine being so sad as to be hanging about all day posting comments.…” Oct 21, 18:49
Chas on Faces In Sand: “I think it has been 4 or 5 weeks since I last visited the comments section on Wings. After all,…” Oct 21, 18:41
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “FFS Spartan. You said you were done. Why can’t you keep your word, you being so self-identified morally superior?” Oct 21, 18:33
Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Faces In Sand: “Available on ‘IndyScotNews’ site: www.youtube.com/@indyscotnews” Oct 21, 18:25
Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Oh, I have nothing but contempt for the Communist dictatorship that cooked it up, be assured of that. Our “leaders”,…” Oct 21, 18:16
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Nah. He’s just wanting the wealth fund to be banked in Sovereigns. Makes a lot of sense actually, price of…” Oct 21, 18:10
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Careful, Aidan. The servants of the Nephilim may have been summoned to this thread.” Oct 21, 18:07
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “C’moan noo, MH. Within a small number of years of being Independent, we’ll be rich beyond the wildest dreams of…” Oct 21, 18:02
James on Faces In Sand: “Where did they find you?” Oct 21, 17:02
Onlooker on Faces In Sand: “Who’s the idiot looking smug and pleased with herself as she babbles on about the name of Scotland being the…” Oct 21, 16:49
Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “Does it not dawn on you, Geri, that it IS possible to have a legitimate concern for, and indeed “a…” Oct 21, 16:26
Lorncal on Faces In Sand: “So, James Che, no Scottish Commissioners, no Scottish Jurists drafting the Scottish Treaty, no Queen Anne as titular head of…” Oct 21, 16:23
sarah on Faces In Sand: “Facts about: 1. the economic drain from Scotland because of the “Union”; 2. the legal proof that the “Union” is…” Oct 21, 16:07
factchecker on Faces In Sand: “John Swinney has today commented “Successive UK Governments have failed to establish a dedicated sovereign wealth fund using North Sea…” Oct 21, 15:37
Aidan on Faces In Sand: “Geri – I can’t imagine what demons you’re fighting (or actively embracing) which would cause you to write something like…” Oct 21, 15:16
Minceheid on Faces In Sand: “Hatey McHateface says: 21 October, 2026 at 1:47 pm I’ll tell you what’s likely within the next 30 years. You’ll…” Oct 21, 14:49
Confused on Faces In Sand: “without even doing the slightest research, there are any number of possible reasons why the albertans voted that way -…” Oct 21, 14:15
Southernbystander on Faces In Sand: “Sam was this case not related to holding slaves in Scotland i.e Knight himself who had been brought here by…” Oct 21, 14:00
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “I’ll tell you what’s likely within the next 30 years. You’ll be deid and forgotten. As for Canada being annexed…” Oct 21, 13:47
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Attaboy, James. Don’t you let Geri and Confused steal all the glory.” Oct 21, 13:37
Confused on Faces In Sand: “give us your insights about alberta then, arse-piece. Looking further ahead, due to climate change cold northern lands will become…” Oct 21, 13:20
Confused on Faces In Sand: “with the SNP in charge of “independence”, why would you need propaganda anymore – they are winding up the operation,…” Oct 21, 13:18
James Che on Faces In Sand: “Alf Baird, It is true that we are able to hold legal witness to the annexation of Scotland in 1707.…” Oct 21, 13:17