The entire Scottish media and professional-politician community is currently in a self-righteous froth about a campaign ad being run by Reform for the Hamilton by-election targeting Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar.
Obviously none of the acres of press coverage trusts voters to see the ad and decide for themselves, because that simply isn’t how journalism works nowadays. You’re told that a bad thing happened – whether it be a campaign ad, a comedian’s joke or the supposed terrible abuse sent to a celebrity – and how outraged various pundits or other celebrities are about it, with the clear implication that you should feel the same, but you almost never get shown or told what was actually said.
So to start with, as a basic journalistic principle, here’s the ad itself in its entirety.
Now let’s look at what you’re being ordered to think about it.
Because even although it’s part of a transparent attempt from the Record to deflect attention from the many shocking revelations of the last few days around the Salmond affair, it’s still unusual that a newspaper would make a front-page lead out of a claim it knows it can’t provide a single scrap of evidence for.
The Scottish Parliament’s inquiry into the disastrously botched investigation of false allegations against Alex Salmond, which has been paused for several weeks due to the Scottish Government’s repeated refusal to provide it with material it’s requested, resumes today and enters its final and critical phase.
In the next two months all the key players in the shambolic affair, including the current First Minister, her predecessor and both of their chiefs of staff, will give evidence. But today perhaps the most central figure of all will appear. Or rather, she won’t.
The apparent reason for this, according to a recent report in the Times, is Mackinnon’s being “targeted on social media”. No further details of this “targeting” are given.
And there’s one rather big problem with that claim.
The mainstream media is now, by our count, up to at least 13 sizeable articles on the Great Yes-Movement Schism Of 2017 – a minor online spat between a tiny handful of people who’ve never liked each other and most of whom the general public has never heard of – and shows no signs of tiring of gleefully revelling in the subject.
There’s nothing particularly surprising or even diabolical about that. As any reality-TV show viewer will tell you, viewers absolutely love to watch people fighting, and doubly so if it’s the summer silly season and there’s no real news. Most of the stories have attracted large responses and therefore lots of juicy and profitable clicks for tired hacks who long ago stopped having anything of any interest to say but still have to honk out 1000 words a week in order to get paid.
But the more sinister aspect of them is the way they’ve been weaponised to (further) demonise and silence the Yes movement. If someone attacks other Yes figures with a provocative, offensive and dishonest piece, the extra bonus for the media is that any legitimately angry response to it can be used as yet more proof of The Vileness Of The Cybernats: “Look! They even turn on their own if they dare disagree!”
For the Unionist press, that’s a win-win every way up, and there are some on the Yes side who seem only too willing to co-operate with the narrative.
“Colonel” Ruth Davidson took time out from her holidays yesterday to unleash an extraordinary (and unusually defensive) 35-part Twitter tirade about the reaction to her appointment as an honorary military commander. So barren is the summer political news desert that two newspapers put it on their front page today, giving the BBC an excuse to deem it the day’s biggest story.
Alert readers will of course be aware that one of this site’s most frequently-recurring themes is “phantom news”, whereby events or unpleasant opinions that newspapers or broadcasters really want to have happened are conveniently brought to life, either by some random nobody on the internet, or an unnamed “source” or “insider”.
So when Nicola Sturgeon did something today that nearly everyone in the Northern Hemisphere knew she was going to do sometime soon, but wasn’t expecting just yet, there wasn’t time to prepare actual real people with the required quotes.
In the modern media world, though, that isn’t a problem.
Alert readers will of course be aware that a recurring theme on this site is looking for the alleged abusive behaviour by supporters of independence which gets regularly reported in outraged terms by newspapers but is mysteriously almost never supported by any actual evidence of the supposed abuse.
In every case the papers and/or alleged recipients of all these dreadful separatist haranguings screamed “VILE ABUSE!”, swooning at the horror of it all, then suddenly turned deaf and dumb when asked to provide any examples.
So we were quite surprised yesterday when a previous complainant – brutal stickering victim and lonely Scottish Labour MP Ian Murray – actually came up with the proof.
For several years now this site has been drawing attention to the weird phenomenon of phantom news – stories presented by the media without even a shred of supporting evidence yet treated as unquestionable empirical fact. And recently there have been more phantoms around the Scottish press than an episode of Scooby Doo.
The thing Alan Roden – who prefers intimidating ordinary members of the public by doorstepping them and vilifying them in his paper – links to in that tweet is an article on the Herald website last night. And it’s a weird article, because it’s an extensive, quote-laden story about something that doesn’t appear to have happened at all.
Have you ever wondered how you try to poison and shut down a debate and a political environment that you fear you’ve found yourself on the losing side of, readers? Well, it’s funny you should ask, because as it happens we’ve got a visiting professor – an expert authority on the subject – with us today to give us a demonstration.
Make sure you’ve got your pens and notepads ready. He’s got a very busy schedule and we can’t afford to have him here for long.
We spent much of yesterday evening trying to actually track down the “vicious barrage” of vile cybernat abuse that Labour and “Better Together” activist Clare Lally says she was subjected to after being revealed to be rather less of an “ordinary” member of the public than the No camp presented her as at its recent Glasgow rally, and which has received wall-to-wall media coverage.
As yet, we’ve drawn a blank. We’ve made repeated requests, some to people who’ve contacted us angrily claiming to be her friends or family members, for evidence of any abusive comments at all. All have been met with an abrupt outbreak of silence.
Andy Ellis on List Voting For Cretins: “@ Cynicus It depends on the extent to which unionist voters are prepared to hold their noses and vote for…” Jan 3, 12:27
sarah on And every day was exactly the same: “Too true. So let’s change things. Confront the Stopping Nationhood Party wherever and whenever we can, tell them what they…” Jan 3, 12:22
Andy Ellis on And every day was exactly the same: “A welcome return for Chris’ works: particularly apposite this morning given events in Venezuela, as apparently nothing much has changed…” Jan 3, 11:53
James Cheyne on List Voting For Cretins: “House of lords privilege Committee, The lord Gray case. “Wether or not there is a treaty between Scotland and England,…” Jan 3, 11:36
Andy Ellis on List Voting For Cretins: “@Alf 10.53 am The proper definition of a “people” for the purposes of self determination is those resident in the…” Jan 3, 11:24
James Cheyne on List Voting For Cretins: “The comments that Scots not understand the voting system is very accurate. Because Scots do not need to be in…” Jan 3, 11:24
Jamie on And every day was exactly the same: “I am not ashamed to say I laughed out loud in the meadows on seeing this, great stuff.” Jan 3, 11:22
Andy Ellis on List Voting For Cretins: “Why would anyone sane vote for a candidate who didn’t actually want to be an MSP when in all likelihood…” Jan 3, 11:09
James Cheyne on List Voting For Cretins: “I can understand that those wanting Scotland to be in the 1707 old treaty they had dissolved was in the…” Jan 3, 11:09
James Cheyne on List Voting For Cretins: “With those two dates and States dividing the two British parliaments, Westminster could no longer drag Scotland around in a…” Jan 3, 10:59
Alf Baird on List Voting For Cretins: “The real issue here is that a proper definition of ‘the people of Scotland’ as with any people seeking decolonization…” Jan 3, 10:53
Hatey McHateface on List Voting For Cretins: “Wow. I make that 225 years ago. Haud oan. Maybe 226. Whatever. It’s still of immediate relevance to every Scot…” Jan 3, 10:51
Hatey McHateface on List Voting For Cretins: “Thanks for that list, Alf. That’s a comprehensive list of those regions of the administrative area called Scotland that I…” Jan 3, 10:47
Colin Alexander on List Voting For Cretins: “Liberate Scotland: “We will use every democratic election as a plebiscite on independence”. “Liberate Scotland, United for Independence seeking outcomes…” Jan 3, 10:43
Aidan on List Voting For Cretins: “To add of course, putting forward than Annex 2 of the Belfast Agreement describes the voter franchise when objectively it…” Jan 3, 10:35
James Cheyne on List Voting For Cretins: “The previous parliament of Great Britain ended in 1800.” Jan 3, 10:34
James Cheyne on List Voting For Cretins: “The Anglo – Irish parliament since 1800 is the British parliament, the parliament of the UK.” Jan 3, 10:31
Hatey McHateface on List Voting For Cretins: “An interesting post Twat H. I’m supremely confident there’s a vast cohort of Scots, call them the law abiding, silent…” Jan 3, 10:30
Hatey McHateface on List Voting For Cretins: “Seriously, Viv? You believe that if you ignore The War, The War will ignore you?” Jan 3, 10:16
Hatey McHateface on And every day was exactly the same: “But, but, we’re in the World Cup! C’moan noo, none of the rest of it matters compared with that.” Jan 3, 10:12
Captain Caveman on List Voting For Cretins: “5 sec Google search: [emphases added] ‘… Yes, The Guardian is widely considered a left-wing or centre-left newspaper, known for…” Jan 3, 09:49
Andy Ellis on List Voting For Cretins: “No Alf, because as has been pointed out to you before, the UK and Ireland are independent states which can…” Jan 3, 09:28
Andy Ellis on The Gulf War: “I’m not sure which bits you’re having trouble with: perhaps if I use words with fewer syllables, or draw you…” Jan 3, 09:21
sam on List Voting For Cretins: “https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-923X.13235 “Abstract The 2014 Scottish independence referendum settled little in terms of Scotland’s constitutional future. The after-effects of what was…” Jan 3, 08:40
sam on List Voting For Cretins: ““Scottish independence: what does the diaspora think?” https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14608944.2023.2288965 ABSTRACT Scottish independence is a matter for debate, not only in Scotland…” Jan 3, 08:31