The reality-TV let’s say “personality” Kelly Given – who Wings readers previously met on a trip to New York for Tartan Week with a raft of SNP let’s say “celebrities” a couple of months ago – has been off on another nice holiday.
Last night she told both the viewers of BBC Scotland’s “Seven Days” that she’d just spent three weeks on an island in Greece, where apparently she was quite shocked to discover that the Mediterranean nation was hot in July.
When Humza Yousaf was campaigning to be elected leader of the SNP, he pledged that he would be not only the First Minister, but also the “First Activist”. It transpired that this in fact meant chapping a few doors in Dundee, just down the road from his home in Broughty Ferry (and on the way to his Glasgow constituency).
But what might a real “First Activist” have done with the position and power?
While idly browsing Twitter this morning, we made a startling discovery triggered by the SNP leadership election, and it was this: nobody in Scotland really knows what the nation’s law on abortion is.
It was prompted by these two tweets, both of which appear to be true:
The thing they agree on is that Humza Yousaf has just declared that he wants to change the law around abortion so that women can abort babies in Scotland solely on the grounds that they don’t like which sex they are. And that seems like something that should probably be bigger news.
The recently-restored Wings Twitter account has a little over 56,000 followers, the vast bulk of them accumulated at a time when this site had far less reason to criticise the SNP or the Scottish Government. So while this poll isn’t scientific, the indy-friendly nature of the respondent base makes it pretty interesting.
Those numbers closely mirror what every actual proper poll tells us about Scottish people’s opinion of the GRR itself – they oppose it by margins of between 3:1 and 4:1. So if the Scottish Government is counting on the UK’s intervention to increase support for independence, frankly it looks like they’re onto a massive loser.
…by which we mean “IQs in the history of the Scottish Parliament”.
Put a cushion on your desk before you start listening to this, gang, or you might hurt your jaw. Because surely nobody quite as paralysingly, catastrophically thick as this clueless, bumbling, deranged and dangerous imbecile has ever been allowed to make the laws of Scotland before. We wouldn’t let her make orange squash, to be honest.
And yes, we’re including Kezia Dugdale and Jamie Greene in that reckoning.
A few months ago, we all had a good chuckle at Pete Wishart’s screeching 180-degree turn on the subject of using a plebiscitary election for independence, a strategy which switched overnight from “suicidal, disastrous fringe lunacy with no hope of success” to “genius plan Nicola herself came up with”.
But after that crude ad-hoc field patch, we’re delighted to be able to report that Pete has submitted himself to SNP HQ for a full operating system update and is now fully compliant with the New Truth.
The newest Panelbase poll, which shows a narrow lead for independence, was an “omnibus” one with questions provided by multiple clients, including Wings and the Sunday Times. The questions we’re about to show you were asked by the ST rather than ourselves, but their results are deeply disturbing on multiple levels.
The first one is perhaps predictable but still unsettling. (Click all pics to enlarge.)
A huge 2:1 majority of Scots believe the Scottish Government’s proposed new “gender recognition” laws pose a safety risk to women. Tory voters think so by almost 9:1, Lib Dem voters by almost 6:1, and Labour voters by nearly 2:1.
That can only partly be explained away by partisan party loyalty – Labour and the Liberal Democrats both support the bill, but their own voters are still strongly against. More noteworthy is the fact that (excluding Don’t Knows) even slavishly loyal SNP voters agree with the statement by a smaller but still clear 12-point margin, 56 to 44.
So let’s say it unambiguously: most SNP voters think the SNP’s gender reforms pose a danger to women’s safety.
Yesterday we watched the first day’s proceedings of For Women Scotland taking the Scottish Government to court over its definition of what a woman is.
The topic is really very niche but will affect us all if the judge rules for the government (we won’t know the outcome for at least a month or two), so here’s the short version of what it’s all about.
I am greatly honoured to have been targeted for censorship in the same weekend as two great artists as rightly esteemed as Salman Rushdie and Jerry Sadowitz. (Though thankful to have not yet been violently physically attacked for my views, as both have.)
To be honest, I was amazed my most recent Twitter account lasted three months. I set it up in May for the sole purpose of a throwaway rude reply to Darren “Loki” McGarvey and Kenny Farquharson of The Times, expecting it to be banned within hours, then somehow it had thousands of followers and I figured I might as well have a bit of fun with it for however long it lasted against the barrage of shrieking outrage and mass organised complaints from the SNP Twitler Youth.
Which turned out to be until Saturday night.
Twitter has declined to identify who I supposedly incited the harassment of, or to offer any examples of the offending tweets. Obviously I did no such thing, but it’s good to know that “in order to ensure that people feel safe expressing diverse opinions and beliefs on our platform”, only some opinions and beliefs may be expressed.
Although we’re retired we already wrote this, so we may as well put it up for the 99.9% of Scots who don’t read the comments on David Leask‘s columns in the Herald.
It’s a claim he’s been banging on about since at least 2014, without ever providing a scrap of evidence to support it (his standard modus operandi), and yesterday was no exception. So let’s show Little Dave how proper big-boy journalists do it.
sam on Once more around: “Mia, I doubt if anyone will ever face manslaughter charges for austerity policies “Social murder is a concept used to…” Jan 2, 16:17
Campbell Clansman on Once more around: ““thieves cannot legitimise their theft of something by outvoting its owner…” “Theft by Democracy” describes Socialism very accurately.” Jan 2, 16:06
Mia on Once more around: “Actually, how much oil and gas has been extracted from the fields located in the chunk of Scottish territorial waters…” Jan 2, 16:02
Andy Ellis on Once more around: “Neither would take long as the Slovaks demonstrated when their currency union with the Czechs was abandoned in a matter…” Jan 2, 16:02
Mia on Once more around: “You have not answered any of the questions. How do you get to the 8.1% figure and what does that…” Jan 2, 15:55
Mia on Once more around: ““Scotland would have had to wait years to join the EU” That is questionable to say the least. At that…” Jan 2, 15:44
Andy Ellis on Once more around: “It’s a total red herring of an issue though. It has no practical impact and will signify nothing at the…” Jan 2, 15:37
factchecker on Once more around: “One of the requirements is that an aspirant state has had its own currency and a stable economy for several…” Jan 2, 15:32
Mia on Once more around: “The problem was never the figures, but rather his bottom of the barrel attempt to use those one-sided figures to…” Jan 2, 15:30
Andy Ellis on Once more around: “Finland joined the EU from ground zero in 24 months. It’s vanishingly unlikely an independent Scotland would take longer and…” Jan 2, 15:27
James Gardner on Once more around: “A hard border between England and Scotland would help prevent viruses flooding into Auld Scotia likewise drugs traffic, aye an’…” Jan 2, 15:24
Geri on Once more around: “Bottom right corner. You have to click the small wheel & wait for edit to show.” Jan 2, 15:20
factchecker on Once more around: “Scotland would have had to wait years to join the EU. By definition, there would have been no Scottish embassies…” Jan 2, 15:11
sarah on Once more around: “I read fairly recently on a Neale Hanvey comment [on Twitter?] that there was a Holyrood vote on the transfer…” Jan 2, 15:06
factchecker on Once more around: “Good information. Despite your use of neutral words such as “ridiculous” and “cretin” to describe Brown, his figures were apparently…” Jan 2, 15:06
Campbell Clansman on Once more around: “Right on cue, the fanatics reject statistics and facts. Thanks for confirming what I wrote!” Jan 2, 15:02
Michael Laing on Once more around: “When Scotland is independent, I think we should unilaterally realign the subsea border between Scotland and England so that it…” Jan 2, 15:00
Gordon on Once more around: “Yeah, from aggregated figures from the Treasury, based on geusstimates, assumptions and obfuscations. No raw data is provided to justify…” Jan 2, 14:53
Michael Laing on Once more around: “I think I’m right in saying that comments can now be edited and errors corrected after they’ve been posted. I…” Jan 2, 14:42
Geri on Once more around: “Send me yer address & I’ll send you some estimates to pay. I won’t show you how I arrived at…” Jan 2, 14:42
Young Lochinvar on Once more around: “Eratta: 2026” Jan 2, 14:31
Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Once more around: “In 1999, the very evening before the devolved Scottish Parliament first opened, the UK establishment reclassified 6,000 square miles of Scottish sea…” Jan 2, 14:25
Young Lochinvar on Once more around: “Loopy Lorna has let slip and the National has gone to print with it that the Khmer Vert are up…” Jan 2, 14:22
Geri on Once more around: “Yer kidding – right?! Aren’t you a fact checker? LMAO! That’s a FAIL right away eh?.. Lindsey Jarred – threatened…” Jan 2, 14:16
Mia on Once more around: ““Today former Prime Minister Gordon Brown resurrected claims that an independent Scotland would face cross-border problems if patients needed life…” Jan 2, 14:10
Campbell Clansman on Once more around: “You are correct about GERS being from the Scottish government. But the fanatics reject any fact that challenges their biases.” Jan 2, 14:01
Campbell Clansman on Once more around: ““Mia,” if you bothered to spend 10 seconds looking up the official statistics, you’d find that Scotland pays 8.1% of…” Jan 2, 13:57
factchecker on Once more around: “Evidence of threats of deportation, lack of donors for organ transplants, pensions stopped immediately, grannies & grandpas threatened on doorsteps,…” Jan 2, 13:44
Geri on Once more around: “Aye maybe Scotland should have it’s own authority for a change & play with wee charts & estimates all day…” Jan 2, 13:32
Xaracen on Once more around: “The same applies to Theft by Democracy. That is, thieves cannot legitimise their theft of something by outvoting its owner.…” Jan 2, 13:30