According to a new poll, fewer than a third of SNP voters even think independence is in the top three priorities facing Scotland.
It’s only five points ahead of immigration in fourth place, and seven ahead of housing. So it’s hardly surprising that the SNP aren’t bothering themselves about it. Their own support, like the party, is very comfortable with the way things are.
We were going to write something today for the anniversary of Alex Salmond’s tragic death, but then we read Kevin McKenna’s piece in today’s Herald On Sunday and we can’t improve on it, so go and have a read of that before you do anything else.
Alex always believed in looking forward, not back, so we doubt he’d be overly fussed at the pathetic “tribute” paid to him at the SNP conference this morning. What would undoubtedly have exercised him a lot more would have been the wretched current state of the party he loved and built from almost nothing into the dominant force in Scottish politics.
And nothing typifies that wretched state better than the craven and gutless capitulation of a speech given by Tommy Sheppard yesterday, opposing the rebel amendments to John Swinney’s non-strategy on independence.
It said a lot more than he thought it did, but none of it good.
It’s really very hard to overstate what mendacious, duplicitous shite this is.
It did its job, though. As expected, the SNP conference comprehensively voted down the rebel amendments to Swinney’s motion on independence “strategy” and backed his grand plan of winning a majority, begging Keir Starmer for a second referendum – just like Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf had done before him with Theresa May, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak – and then scuttling obediently away with his tail between his legs when Starmer told him to get lost.
A little over two years ago, three SNP MSPs contested the leadership of the party in the wake of the sudden resignation of Nicola Sturgeon. All were full of grand plans and dreams for the future of the party, the nation and the independence movement.
None of the three is leader now, and in nine months’ time none of them will be SNP MSPs. Indeed, it’s overwhelmingly likely that none will be an MSP at all.
And that, readers, is not a sign of a party – or indeed a Parliament – in good health.
It can be very hard to follow the arguments of people trying to convince you to vote for the SNP on the regional list at next year’s election. Here’s one just a month ago:
So that’s clear – indy supporters MUST IGNORE the “siren voices” telling them to vote for smaller indy parties, because they can’t win any seats and therefore to vote for them is to “throw away” your list vote.
And this was them just two weeks ago, strenuously insisting that the small parties were a busted flush and there was no chance of a “non-SNP route to independence”:
So it was a bit confusing to read this yesterday:
Because all of a sudden, it seems that you CAN vote for the smaller indy parties, regardless of whether they win seats or not, because the list vote will actually be a de-facto referendum and the votes will still count. And indeed, apparently you SHOULD do so, because an SNP-only route – the thing which was the only hope a fortnight ago – is now “totally unachievable” and ONLY working in concert with the smaller indy parties can succeed.
Heavens, what huge transformative event did we miss?
Back in the 1980s and 1990s, before the internet, scammers used to have to work a bit harder to cheat people than they do now.
A popular method was to advertise a “clearance sale” in the press. You’d see an ad in the Daily Record or a local paper for an event in a High Street location – typically a vacant shop – promising brand-new TVs for £20, microwaves for a fiver, toasters for £2.50 or whatever. So you’d show up on the day and it always worked the same.
There’d be the ringmaster on a raised platform, surrounded by loads of unmarked white boxes, and he’d start off by picking some “random” punter from the crowd and bestowing gifts upon him. This guy would walk away with armfuls of swag for £25 or something (doubtless just going straight round the back with them), and the real show would begin.
Next the ringmaster would say “Now, before we get properly started, who’ll give me £10 for what’s on my mind?” (that phrase, “what’s on my mind”, was always the same). And basically they were flogging a mystery box, invariably containing a few trashy trinkets worth a fraction of the cost.
Any chump who bought one would then be escorted out of the shop before opening it, on the pretence that the bargains on offer in these sales were so great that they were limited to one per person. (There was always security on the door, sometimes even cops. There’s nothing intrinsically illegal about selling mystery boxes, even mainstream chainstores still do it today.)
And that was basically it. The ringmaster would delay and delay, punting more mystery boxes and never actually getting to the bit where you could buy a specific item at a specific price, and after a couple of hours the event would close down and the would-be customers would disperse in disgruntlement.
Seamus Logan, an SNP MP of whom it has often been said “Seamus who?”, has an article in The National today categorically ruling out Scotland achieving independence via a democratic vote in an event fully recognised by the UK government.
Logan’s stance that if begging Westminster for another Section 30 doesn’t work (which it doesn’t, hasn’t and never will) then it’s basically impossible and we should just give up has – to anyone paying the slightest bit of attention – been official SNP policy since at least the resignation of Nicola Sturgeon and in reality long before then, and we don’t think it’s a coincidence that the party has lost more than half of its members and over 40% of its voters over that period.
One of the very few phrases universally recognised in Scotland but which will draw blank looks anywhere else in the UK is the dry, dark “Well, ye ken noo”. Until recently it had no equivalent that we can bring to mind in the rest of the English-speaking world, although arguably that gap has now been at least partly filled by the acronym “FAFO”.
(We try not to swear on the site, so let’s say it stands for “Fool Around, Find Out”.)
So now the smoke has cleared, the troops have departed the battlefield and the winner is enjoying the spoils, what did we find out on Thursday night, and what didn’t we?
Young Lochinvar on The Secondhand Amendment: “Timing as broadly predicted by many on here! They can’t even be subtle about their machinations..” Jan 20, 00:51
Michael on The Secondhand Amendment: “Or was it John Doe who was googling on behalf of the Judge?” Jan 20, 00:44
Young Lochinvar on Learning Insanity: “H McH No other incorrect accusations to throw about? Confused as you’ve been asking the wrong questions? You are so…” Jan 20, 00:39
Hatey McHateface on The Secondhand Amendment: “@Marie I think there is something odd when people living in a country that is so desperate for immigrants that…” Jan 19, 22:38
Marie on The Secondhand Amendment: “If you knew anything about how independence-minded Scots felt about their country you would know that a long-standing major concern…” Jan 19, 21:54
holymacmoses on The Secondhand Amendment: “It’s quite remarkable that Judge Walker (via Ms Muir) thinks that it’s OK to farm out work on an enquiry…” Jan 19, 21:24
Scot Finlayson on The Secondhand Amendment: “Man in wig looking out for man in wig. I wonder what % of `trans women` went to Scottish fee…” Jan 19, 21:21
100Yes on The Secondhand Amendment: “Peter Murrell, the former SNP chief executive, the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) confirmed a date has been…” Jan 19, 21:16
Mike on The Secondhand Amendment: “I see the separated Mrs Murrell was in a biker jacket and shorter hair cosying up to Ian McKellen, Graham…” Jan 19, 21:06
Marie on The Secondhand Amendment: “Judge Kemp blaming a colleague for HIS flawed judgement in the Peggie case. Kemp is incompetent, irresponsible and truly pathetic.” Jan 19, 20:45
Hatey McHateface on The Secondhand Amendment: ““Scotland has always been a place to get out of” Odd. You and the regulars who never tire of gurning…” Jan 19, 20:30
Bilbo on The Secondhand Amendment: “With another top Tory defecting to Reform, the Easdale brothers offering a six figure sum to Labour to defeat the…” Jan 19, 20:14
Bilbo on The Secondhand Amendment: “I see that Labour front benchers are calling Reform fascists and Swinney has called people who protest at migrant hotels…” Jan 19, 20:01
Hatey McHateface on The Secondhand Amendment: ““you Scots live in a colony and are the wretched colonised” Odd, Northy. You never tire of telling us how…” Jan 19, 19:43
100%Yes on The Secondhand Amendment: “https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/king-shares-dram-with-scotland-s-first-minister/ar-AA1UwlWT” Jan 19, 19:41
Marie on The Secondhand Amendment: “Don’t disagree with a word. Scots know all this of course – that’s why the ambitious leave – Scotland has…” Jan 19, 19:34
Peter McAvoy on The Secondhand Amendment: “While this transgender ideology still dictates the political agenda.BBC Scotland news website today that teachers were having difficulty finding permanent…” Jan 19, 19:30
Northcode on The Secondhand Amendment: “It isn’t difficult to understand. Scotland is a colony… its judiciary is a pantomime played out for the Scots to…” Jan 19, 19:04
Nae Need! on The Secondhand Amendment: “And what we get is a massively watered down version.” Jan 19, 19:04
ScotsRenewables on The Secondhand Amendment: “FIFA suck Trump’s cock. I would like to see Scotland pull out, with wholehearted support from the fans. Scotland have…” Jan 19, 19:00
Nae Need! on The Secondhand Amendment: “Well said. I love it when you wade right in. Their wits have never been addled, imo. Their wits are…” Jan 19, 18:38
Hatey McHateface on The Secondhand Amendment: “I’ll take your bet, Sven. Is £20 too rich for you? Even if a plea negotiation (the Scots Law term…” Jan 19, 18:35
Lorna Campbell on The Secondhand Amendment: “It is the baleful influence that the ‘trans’ issue/lobby is having, apparently, on so many people in positions of trust…” Jan 19, 18:08
Lorna Campbell on The Secondhand Amendment: “Very well said, sir. So many lies and delusions and half-truths surround the ‘trans’ issue that it needs to have…” Jan 19, 18:04
Sven on The Secondhand Amendment: “I doubt in this potential scenario that Mr Murrell would give evidence against any other defendant, as far as I’m…” Jan 19, 18:03
Nae Need! on The Secondhand Amendment: “I’ll say it, cos as far as I am aware no one else has passed comment on this: the USA…” Jan 19, 17:59
Lorna Campbell on The Secondhand Amendment: “Excellent piece again, Rev. Puts all the points that require to have light shone upon them. I never believed that…” Jan 19, 17:56
agentx on The Secondhand Amendment: “A plea bargain to give evidence against whom? I’m thinking about this: “The brother-in-law of Scotland’s former first minister Humza…” Jan 19, 17:53
Nae Need! on The Secondhand Amendment: “If that kinda thing is a legal possibility in Scotland, then yeah. And what we know of Scotland’s institutions is…” Jan 19, 17:47