The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


100% of nothing 60

Posted on May 22, 2013 by

The SNP has been assailed from all directions at once recently on the subject of Corporation Tax in an independent Scotland. Radical left-wingers say there’s no point in independence if we’re just going to ape neoliberal policy. The No camp insists both that a “race to the bottom” would be destructive and counter-productive and morally wrong, and that we wouldn’t be allowed to anyway.

(Even the Tories attack the idea, despite having just stolen it wholesale.)

coprtax

At the same time, the Scottish Government has been bombarded with criticism for giving grants to companies like Amazon, who received more money in the UK from government handouts than they paid in tax. (Despite the company’s tax avoidance being wholly in the remit of the Westminster government rather than the Holyrood one.)

We don’t mind telling you, readers, we’re a bit confused.

Read the rest of this entry →

The Armageddon Files 65

Posted on May 22, 2013 by

The debate about whether Scotland could survive and flourish outside the Union is uncannily similar to the one that filled the media a year ago about whether Scottish football could live without Rangers. (And which by a strange and almost inexplicable coincidence tends to feature many of the same people on the respective sides.)

ibroxjack

As the events of the spring and summer of 2012 unfolded, even the game’s own governing body insisted that separating the rest of the SPL from the Union Jack-loving Ibrox club would reap a disastrous whirlwind of destruction, with businesses (sponsors) fleeing in terror and clubs becoming impoverished without the generous subsidy of thousands of visiting Rangers fans.

In the end, despite the most strenuous efforts of the SFA, SPL and SFL to override the wishes of their customers with a campaign of relentless and increasingly-hysterical fearmongering, the new “Rangers” was denied both entry to the SPL and a “leapfrog” into SFL 1, and joined Scottish football at the lowest professional level.

So how did post-apocalypse life turn out in the people’s game?

Read the rest of this entry →

Knockout stages extended 155

Posted on May 21, 2013 by

A stunning piece in the Telegraph eventually ran away with the vote in our British Loony Of The Week poll at the weekend. But what we didn’t realise at the time was that we were in fact only conducting the first semi-final. We’ve got two more absolute crackers for you to enjoy today.

Read the rest of this entry →

While we’re on the subject 39

Posted on May 21, 2013 by

…of welfare reform, we thought you might like to hear this. It’s a short (four and a half minutes) interview with a doctor formerly employed by Atos Healthcare, broadcast on the Today show on Radio 4 last Thursday. Atos were hired to do this work by Labour, and retained by the Tories and Lib Dems. But you knew that already, right?

soundwave2

If you want to listen to the whole segment, it’s from 20 minutes.

Coincidental mistakes 41

Posted on May 21, 2013 by

Yesterday the Daily Record led with a front-page splash about Labour-controlled South Lanarkshire council threatening to evict a tenant over bedroom tax arrears. Today the paper carries a profuse apology from the council’s leader Eddie McAvoy insisting that the letters were sent in error, although the recipient was unconvinced:

“The council last night hand delivered a letter of apology to Angela. But she said: “I don’t believe a mistake was made in the first place and it is only because I appeared in the Record that the council have backed down.””

The Record was deeply sceptical too, issuing a sternly-worded rebuke to the council in an editorial leader column which also pointed out other unsightly goings-on in the “long-time Labour fiefdom”.

We must presume that rogue elements in Labour are at fault, then.

Read the rest of this entry →

Is it even worth bothering? 106

Posted on May 20, 2013 by

With the latest Westminster fearbomb, we mean. We’ve covered the pensions thing in considerable detail already, so the Treasury’s attack was outdated before it was even launched. It’s becoming increasingly plain with every passing day than an independent Scotland would be better off financially than the rest of the UK (unless we get “more powers” after a No vote, that is), so why would it have more difficulty paying pensions?

yesvan

After all, the UK government didn’t put the effort in to construct an even minimally coherent case, so frankly we don’t see why we should. We’re going for a pie.

Quoted for truth #16 66

Posted on May 20, 2013 by

The Sunday Mail, 19 May 2013:

“Labour are meant to be convincing Scots that we can trust them with our future. On this evidence, you would not trust them to go to the garage for chocolate.”

The Observer, 19 May 2013:

“The Scots are accustomed to having their views ignored in the British political system. Despite voting consistently for the left, Scotland has been governed by Labour for only 30 years out of 68. If England is set to elect the Conservatives, in other words, it’s hardly worth going out to vote in Scotland at all: we know what we’ll get.”

And today in QFT we’ve got three for the price of one.

Read the rest of this entry →

It’s not just us, then? 50

Posted on May 19, 2013 by

We’re not in the habit of just reprinting other publications’ stories wholesale here at Wings Over Scotland – we’ve done it maybe four or five times in a year-and-a-half, and two of those were yesterday – but we’ve got a lot on today and there isn’t much we can add to this piece in today’s eminently-worth-purchasing Sunday Post.

postmoralethumb

Click the image below to read the whole thing.

Read the rest of this entry →

Cake neither had nor eaten 58

Posted on May 19, 2013 by

This week’s Scotland on Sunday is full of the usual outpourings of fear and madness (our absolute favourite is a standout piece of howling-at-the-moon insanity from frothing Tory loonbag Gerald Warner, magnificently entitled “Feminism driving holocaust of abortion”), but one in particular caught our eye.

Headed “Independent Scotland at risk from bank crash“, the Tom Peterkin effort (based, in fairness, on an imminent UK government document) kicks straight off with an opening line that’s a top-shelf example of hysterical sub-Daily-Mail scaremongering. But it’s the second line that makes it special.

Read the rest of this entry →

Lies then and lies now 94

Posted on May 19, 2013 by

When supprters of Scottish independence cite the infamous McCrone Report – a UK government document suppressed by both Conservative and Labour administrations in the 1970s because of its explosive revelations about the potential wealth of an independent Scotland – Unionists have a standard tactic.

Mumbling that it’s all ancient history, water under the bridge, and things are different now, they attempt – quite understandably – to swiftly move the discussion away from the uncomfortable reality of how much trust Scots should place in the word of London governments on the subject of oil revenues.

posthealey

Today’s Sunday Post carries a front-page lead story which notes that in the 40 years since the original report was hidden from the Scottish people, nothing has fundamentally changed. As almost nothing of the Post is currently available online, we’ve included a hefty extract from the article below.

Read the rest of this entry →

Brit Nat Down 84

Posted on May 18, 2013 by

Thanks to the alert reader who pointed us at a Plymouth Herald story today about lovable UKIP candidate and teacher of British children, the charming Ron Northcott.

“Plymouth UKIP man quits after calling Scots ‘workshy addicts’ in Twitter rant

A UKIP politician has “fallen on his sword”, after abusing Scots people on the social media site Twitter. Ron Northcott, a former election candidate in Plymouth for the UK Independence Party, resigned from the party yesterday. David Salmon, UKIP’s Plymouth chairman, said:

“Ron is not talking to any member of the press. I can say that following the appalling behaviour of some Scots against Nigel Farage, Ron was involved in what he describes as banter with a Scot living in London.

His out-of-character remark was unacceptable and he has stood down with immediate effect as a potential candidate for next years elections. We in no way condone his language and the sentiments expressed. He has stepped down and will be leaving UKIP.”

Northcott’s “banter” came to light because this site highlighted it and posted it on Twitter, where at the time of writing it had been seen by over 8,000 people. You can read the now-deleted badinage below.

Read the rest of this entry →

Dispatches from foreign lands 77

Posted on May 18, 2013 by

As our Twitter followers will know, we’ve experimentally decided to reserve Saturdays for light-hearted comic banter, as a bit of relief from the serious business of politics.

Of course, this week politics has been so absurd – from “Better Together” deciding it was Better Apart to Gordon Brown promising Scots that if they vote No he’d increase their taxes and send the money to England, and the still-ongoing Faragemageddon – that it hardly seems necessary, but we’ll stick with the plan.

britloons

With that in mind, then, it’s time for… British Loony Of The Week!

Read the rest of this entry →

  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,990 Posts, 1,252,775 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • sarah on Faces In Sand: “Possible good news about John Swinney – according to Robin McAlpine, JS wants out of the leadership. Of course there…” Oct 19, 22:45
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Faces In Sand: “I have been appreciating the regular updates from the Francis Dearnley and Dominic Nicholls duo: www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CM6l79O3cQ&t=1080s” Oct 19, 21:45
    • sam on Faces In Sand: ““Who are the ‘they’?” If you are talking about “crimes against humanity” “they” could be the clan chiefs who harmed…” Oct 19, 19:20
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “One can often gauge the measure of a person by the company they keep. Flies are attracted to shite and…” Oct 19, 19:15
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Factchecker – as I said further up the thread, it’s pointless trying to apply logic to the hopelessly illogical. I…” Oct 19, 19:13
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: “Thank you for your polite and insightful comment, twathater. It was indeed sometimes brutish. And I didn’t blame anybody. People…” Oct 19, 18:42
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: “Fine, James, have it your way. All the Scots who colonised and exploited foreign lands all over the globe, often…” Oct 19, 18:31
    • twathater on Faces In Sand: “As usual yir wrang fuckchecker it was NOT the British empire it was and still is the BRUTISH empire ,…” Oct 19, 18:01
    • James on Faces In Sand: ““…the people of Scotland…” Which people would that be? Oh aye, the anglophone elite or ‘unionists’ if you prefer.” Oct 19, 17:58
    • sam on Faces In Sand: “Crimes against humanity? Plenty of those, historical and modern. Kincora boys home and the many r4pes (a crime against humanity)…” Oct 19, 17:25
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “It goes without saying, of course, my last comment above was directed at Alf, not Factchecker….” Oct 19, 17:04
    • Aidan on Faces In Sand: “Mr Lavrov is about as popular in the free world as the coronavirus. Quite why any political campaign would want…” Oct 19, 16:27
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: “Alf Baird says: 19 October, 2026 at 3:20 pm “The empire colonies you refer to were never ever ‘Scotland’s’ colonies…” Oct 19, 15:55
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “I wasn’t aware that it was “U” that kicked this whole thing off by bombing “R”, Alf. Anything else you’d…” Oct 19, 15:54
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Faces In Sand: “I find Bill Browder’s personal story rather compelling… www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlF0ZzH6C9s” Oct 19, 15:54
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “Nope, no get out of jail card for you I’m afraid. Historical facts are facts, deal with them.” Oct 19, 15:37
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “The empire colonies you refer to were never ever ‘Scotland’s’ colonies at all; many pre-dated the 1707 English annexation of…” Oct 19, 15:20
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Yeh but no but yeh but no but yeh it’s ok because we’re Scottish, which absolves us of anything apparently,…” Oct 19, 11:50
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “I do agree Alf, albeit with the almighty caveat that Ru**ia is currently the poster boy of imperialism and warmongering.…” Oct 19, 11:08
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: ““Life under the union Jack stinks and associates us with the crimes against humanity they have committed over many hundreds…” Oct 19, 11:05
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “”Most of the French thinks it’s a great thing, tearing down the system of centuries old colonialist racism and all…” Oct 19, 10:54
    • Southernbystander on Faces In Sand: “The French have a tradition of using street protest to get political change (I won’t comment on whether that is…” Oct 19, 10:25
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “Its you and your hypocritical imperialistic kind who aye advocate bombing other countries Hatey, for which there are always consequences,…” Oct 19, 10:14
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “If only Scotland could find a Scottish coke heid of his calibre to lead us. Not that you’ll agree. You…” Oct 19, 09:57
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “How odd that 20 million people would want to flee from the same people who are helping out Scotland at…” Oct 19, 08:44
    • Colin Dawson on Faces In Sand: “Collette Stevenson’s mistake is quite understandable, given the SNP’s total obsession with transgender issues over the past decade or so.…” Oct 19, 00:00
    • Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “Is this migration coming from that war torn country that was serving conscription papers on beaches? That is just another…” Oct 18, 23:05
    • Elmac on Faces In Sand: “The title of Faces in Sand would be more appropriate as Faeces in Sand. How anyone with a brain, a…” Oct 18, 23:02
    • Willie on Faces In Sand: “Let’s try again to get through moderation. The potential for huge white immigration from a European country looms large. They…” Oct 18, 21:41
    • Willie on Faces In Sand: “20 million Ukr##nans are wanting to leave. With Britain in lockstep political alignment, if not blood brothers, the UK might…” Oct 18, 21:35
  • A tall tale



↑ Top