SNP Members For Independence? What a ridiculous phrase – surely every member of the SNP is in favour of independence, right?
That’s mostly true of course, but the leadership and many elected representatives of the party appear to be intent on repeating the failed Section 30 route to independence, and also on restricting serious debate about alternative strategies.
It seems that a revised “Plan B” may be discussed at the party conference, still almost two months away, and for all Plan B’s merits it is seriously flawed and its inclusion at the expense of alternative and better plans at conference would merely pay lip service to the term “serious debate”
Something clearly needed to be done, which is why SNP Members For Indy has been set up. So what’s it for and what is it trying to do?
We’re very busy today writing more FOI requests and the like, so we’ll just take a brief moment here to note that hiring super-expensive lawyers to object to the questions you’re being asked DEFINITELY sounds like the behaviour of people who are keen to co-operate fully and in the most transparent way possible with an inquiry:
Having been privileged to serve as SNP National Treasurer, I’m aware of the duties that go with the post. Of course, it’s changed in some ways since then due to the scale of the party, the resources available and even technology. The days are long gone when Joan Knott, who has sadly since passed away, required to take a taxi down to my legal office to have cheques signed between court or clients.
But some things still remain fundamental, and in particular providing annual accounts for the party. That has been done for 2019, in the administrative sense, but what’s missing is their publication and provision either to the NEC or the party more widely.
For sure there’s been no conference but there are other bodies and other ways of making them available to party members. At NEC, conference and indeed anywhere else, members were entitled to see them and question me. It was their right to see them, and it remains so now. So why haven’t they seen them?
A column on a Sturgeon-loyalist indy website that we read yesterday has been mildly annoying us ever since, and in the interests of open debate (but mainly because it’s cold and grey and rainy outside and we can’t go out and feed the swans) we thought it was worth taking half an hour to walk through it a little and explain just why it’s such a dangerous piece of fantasy nonsense.
But first here’s one of said swans. She’s about five months old and her adult feathers are just starting to come through. Isn’t she lovely?
In case things get a bit rough later we’ve got some squirrels and a really fat dachshund as emergency backup, so buckle in.
The comments from committee convener and SNP MP Linda Fabiani (we guess she must be another of those MI5 plants/secret Unionists) are really quite extraordinary. In terms of Parliamentary language they’re only a hair’s-breadth short of an invitation to step outside and settle things with an old-school dust-up in the car park.
The weekend just past saw a convulsion as big as any we can ever recall witnessing on Yes social media, triggered by a series of tweets by Nicola Sturgeon which caused an extraordinary negative reaction out of all proportion to their ostensible content.
The reason was that the First Minister – who had remained silent about countless episodes of hideous misogynistic abuse aimed from her own side at MPs and MSPs like Joan McAlpine and Joanna Cherry – had chosen to suddenly leap into action in defence of the toxically divisive horror that is Glasgow councillor Rhiannon Spear after Spear had been widely criticised for making blatantly false claims in a video promoting her attempt to be selected as the candidate for Argyll & Bute.
(Sturgeon had no such public condemnation for the torrents of abuse the SNP Twitler Youth then unleased on Kirsten Thornton, the female SNP activist and Generation Yes founder who’d pointed out Spear’s untruths.)
The move sent the party’s woke and sane factions into a frenzy of bloodletting which in itself will have little if any impact on the wider electorate, but nonetheless threw into sharp relief the life-and-death battle currently going on for the SNP’s soul.
And since that’s related to what we’ve been writing about on Wings for the bulk of this year, it seemed worthwhile to get some things down on the record once and for all.
Just two days ago the Electoral Commission gave us a fourth supposed date for the publication of the SNP’s 2019 accounts: having first been due out in early August, they then told us to expect them in early September, and then last week, and then in “the next three weeks”, ie the middle of October.
But someone gave us a tipoff that we might be able to request them via Freedom Of Information, since ostensibly the only holdup was that the EC wanted to wait until ALL of the main parties’ accounts were ready and publish them all at once for tidiness.
So we sent one in, and we just got a very quick reply.
During a debate on the UK government’s recent decision to abandon the notion of gender self-ID, SNP MP Anne McLaughlin told the Commons chamber that it was still the Scottish Government’s “strong commitment” to go ahead with highly controversial reform of the law BEFORE next year’s Holyrood election.
But that isn’t what Scottish voters were told earlier this year.
The SNP have historically been swift to suspend any party members when there’s any hint of inappropriate conduct, never mind even a whiff of illegality. It’s been that way since 2015, with the axe falling on elected members as well as candidates in target seats and critical elections, and ordinary activists.
Not even a by-your-leave, let alone an explanation, is afforded – just suspension with immediate effect. And that’s all well and good, some might say. No hint of impropriety should attach to the party and making a virtue of acting swiftly can be both necessary and appropriate.
So why then no action against the Chief Executive?
Hatey McHateface on Spot The Problem: “Always the best way, James – Day Zero of Year Zero. As a Sovereign Scot, I hereby declare myself outside…” Aug 28, 11:27
James Che on Spot The Problem: “Hatey, I have never worried about the Crown of Scotland, In Case you have never noticed it is England that…” Aug 28, 11:22
James Che on Spot The Problem: “I forgot the SNP were a Company, Thanks for the reminder. So laws against a Company could differ considerable compared…” Aug 28, 11:13
Hatey McHateface on Spot The Problem: ““Scotlands Crown was not Sovereign over the parliament or people” If you put it like that, James, there’s absolutely no…” Aug 28, 11:06
James Che on Spot The Problem: “The SNP is Company first and foremost. Its a Company running Scotland, Where is that company registered? Can we use…” Aug 28, 11:01
James Che on Spot The Problem: “History from the past creates the present history, the present history creates future records and history, Disassociating one from the…” Aug 28, 10:40
James Che on Spot The Problem: “Your comments yesterday regards the Monarch of England “self declaring ” the position of king of Scotland It helps to…” Aug 28, 10:22
James Che on Spot The Problem: “am firinn. It really is a treat to find intelligent responses to some of the misleading information projected towards the…” Aug 28, 09:41
James Che on Spot The Problem: “Sparten 117, Thank you for your knowledgable intervention yesterday regards the Fabian Society infiltration into the position of governments advisors.…” Aug 28, 09:29
Hatey McHateface on Spot The Problem: “An interesting article “Canada-US trade war has exposed a Brexit double standard”: https://unherd.com/newsroom/canada-us-trade-war-has-exposed-a-brexit-double-standard/ The author is pointing out that Canadian…” Aug 28, 09:03
Chas on Spot The Problem: “You are not alone in your thoughts Rob. The ‘Wings’ comments section has evolved into a forum where bitter, twisted…” Aug 28, 09:02
Hatey McHateface on Spot The Problem: ““sick of the “colonists” are to blame for everything, the union was illegal, the UN will fix it and all…” Aug 28, 08:24
Hatey Mchateface on Spot The Problem: “It’s a verifiable fact that nobody’s fingers ever went through the bog roll while wiping a runny one until Thatcher.” Aug 28, 07:52
Hatey McHateface on Spot The Problem: “@ Dan says: 27 August, 2026 at 11:03 pm “prick” “cunts” Got something on your mind, Dan? Maybe your next…” Aug 28, 07:45
Aidan on Spot The Problem: “What’s even more amazing Chas, is that when this very question was being considered by the Supreme Court, which it…” Aug 28, 06:02
Aidan on Spot The Problem: “Well Northcode – a rare event has occurred, you are right and I am wrong. It is as you say,…” Aug 28, 05:58
Nicky T Naquetti on Spot The Problem: “Oh, fuck – I ran out of toilet paper… the 1707 treaty must be to blame…” Aug 28, 05:19
Mark Beggan on Spot The Problem: “Well for starters get your own patter. ” These people” who are these people? and more to the point what…” Aug 28, 02:27
Alan Scott on Spot The Problem: “It’s quite simple you vote them out. If you don’t then the responsibility is yours. Unfortunately the very clever system…” Aug 28, 00:38
Saffron Robe on Spot The Problem: “In the absence of any meaningful separation of powers, it would seem that only a constitutional crisis can bring about…” Aug 28, 00:26
Rob on Spot The Problem: “Do you know, I am pretty sick of the “colonists” are to blame for everything, the union was illegal, the…” Aug 27, 23:45
Dan on Spot The Problem: “Desperate stuff from the site prick there as he tries to deny, ignore and gloss over the massive influence and…” Aug 27, 23:03
robertkknight on Spot The Problem: “Red… “But surely there must be at least one Labour, Liberal, Reform or Tory MSP who isn’t part of the…” Aug 27, 22:24
Hatey McHateface on You’ll Have Had Your Supper: “Ah, James, how I envy you. You will go to your final rest blissfully convinced that one day, Scots will…” Aug 27, 22:11
100%Yes on Spot The Problem: “The National doesn’t make good reading for people wanting Independence or the SNP membership. It states “SNP members’ fury as…” Aug 27, 22:05
Hatey McHateface on Spot The Problem: ““there is no way the pro-union MSM or “Newspapers” will publish the kind of journalism you get on Wings” The…” Aug 27, 21:54
Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Spot The Problem: “LAWYERING WITHOUT LAW (1 May 2026) “What Does Legal Authoritarianism Look Like?” www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdG5J4saY3A” Aug 27, 21:53
James on You’ll Have Had Your Supper: “Jappy again; “Scotland’s real riches do lie in energy. The country exports 24% of its surplus electricity south of the…” Aug 27, 21:48
Spartan 117 on Spot The Problem: “Dan & Robert – I can’t disagree with anything in your posts. All good points.” Aug 27, 21:29