This is a significant development. (Click to enlarge.)
Weirdly, we’re not actually sure how many members are on the Holyrood inquiry committee at the moment. There are normally nine – four SNP and five opposition – but with Andy Wightman having recently resigned from the Greens we don’t know if he’s still on the committee or not, since he was originally there as a Green nominee. If not, we don’t know whether, when or by who he’ll be replaced.
But the other four non-SNP members have tonight issued a formal request that James Hamilton, who’s conducting the other inquiry into Nicola Sturgeon’s actions relating to the Alex Salmond affair, be instructed officially to investigate the matter of whether she lied to Parliament.
This, of course, is a subject Wings has been covering for some time.
There are two articles on the Spectator website today relating to last night’s breaking story about Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon. One of them readers of this site have seen already, because the Spectator has literally just cut and pasted it in its entirety from Wings (without any attribution or acknowledgement).
It’s the text of Salmond’s submission to the Hamilton inquiry, and we know they copied it from us (rather than having been leaked it independently) because of this paragraph:
As we told readers last night, that redaction was made by us – not by Salmond – as an extra precaution to prevent the possibility of one of the complainers in the criminal trial from being identified. It didn’t appear in Salmond’s actual submission, and so Wings is the only possible source for it being in the Spectator.
Stealing our story lock, stock and barrel without a credit is rather poor form from the magazine, but it’s the other piece we’re more concerned about.
You know everything’s definitely going swimmingly for Nicola Sturgeon when the white knight riding heroically to her defence is… [checks notes twice] Duncan Hothersall.
We’re very excited to find out what our secret plan is.
(We must apologise to readers at this point for the late arrival of this week’s typically splendid Chris Cairns cartoon, which in fact arrived entirely on time from our hard-working crayonist but which we’ve put on hold for a bit while we cover last night’s major breaking story and its immediate aftermath. Now on with the show.)
Alert readers will undoubtedly have noticed a number of, to put it mildly, explosive-sounding developments this evening regarding the ongoing inquiries into the Scottish Government’s misconduct over false allegations against Alex Salmond.
Several reports have quoted extracts from the former First Minister’s submission to James Hamilton, who’s investigating the current First Minister over possible breaches of the Ministerial Code relating to the investigation of the allegations.
The submission – delivered on Mr Salmond’s birthday – has been widely leaked to the media but only selectively reported, and like others Wings has obtained a full copy.
We are advised that its contents do not contain anything which breaches or potentially breaches Lady Dorrian’s court order protecting the identities of the complainers against Mr Salmond, and as such there are no barriers to us publishing the entire document in the public interest, because its contents make some extremely grave and disturbing allegations against the current First Minister.
TO: Douglas Chapman MP, National Treasurer, SNP DATE: 8 January 2021
Also sent by email
Dear Douglas,
Congratulations on your recent election as the SNP’s treasurer. You may or may not be aware that in October 2020 this site asked your predecessor in the role, Colin Beattie, some questions on the subject of the supposedly “ring-fenced” indyref fighting fund that was created by donations to two separate fundraisers in previous years – referred to collectively by the party as the Referendum Appeal Fund or RAF.
We did so on behalf of numerous SNP members and non-members who had donated to the two appeals and were concerned as to the whereabouts of the monies.
No meaningful reply was received either by Wings or several individual donors who also contacted Mr Beattie asking the same questions, and a number of those people (as well as some of your elected colleagues) have asked us to put the same questions to you publicly, now that you’ve had a few weeks to settle into your new position and are understood to be interested in finding the answers.
The former SNP, and now independent, MP Margaret Ferrier was today arrested and charged with culpable and reckless conduct, a crime carrying a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, for making a return train journey between Glasgow and London in September last year, two days after taking a coronavirus test.
This site has no comment to make on the charges, as it’s a live criminal matter, but a couple of troubling questions do arise from their existence.
So, for the historical record: I have no belief whatsoever, earnest or otherwise, that I can get rid of Nicola Sturgeon in the next four months.
I’m an idiot with a website. I have no power. I haven’t been elected to anything and I’m not the commander of an army. Information to which I’m privy would get me put in jail if I published it, and would in itself have no power to remove Nicola Sturgeon anyway. The only people who can bring that about between now and May are Sturgeon herself or, collectively, the Scottish Parliament.
This site has for some time called for Sturgeon to resign because it is our belief that she’s going to have to anyway, on account of events over which we have no control or influence. Because of that it would be the responsible and conscientious thing for her to quit early enough that the SNP/independence movement had a chance to deal with the issue of her succession and regroup in plenty of time for this May’s election.
The remaining window of opportunity for that to happen is now getting very narrow. And the enemies of independence will be beside themselves with delight about it.
Because 2020 is the maddest year in history, Ruth Davidson opened her contribution to Holyrood’s debate on the Brexit deal today with a lengthy quote from this website.
Dr Tim Rideout is one of the most serious and respected people in the Yes movement and the SNP. As convener of the Scottish Currency Group he’s presently engaged in trying to solve the party’s self-inflicted weakness over its lack of a coherent currency policy, and he’s sufficiently highly rated by SNP members that earlier this month he was elected to the party’s Policy Development Committee.
So you might think he was entitled to a view on, well, development of policy.
With precisely the grim level of cynicism we’ve now come to expect as standard, the Scottish Government has released a key document relating to the Salmond inquiry two days before Christmas, hoping it’ll be buried in the ongoing coronavirus-and-Brexit-related implosion of the UK.
The document, which contains legal advice relating to the judicial review brought by Salmond regarding the Scottish Government’s investigations into false allegations of misconduct against him, is extremely heavily redacted. But a few interesting passages remain, so let’s have some fun.
We woke up this morning intending to write about something else, readers, and then we saw perhaps the most horrifying thing we’ve ever seen in the two years since we first started taking an interest in transgender ideology.
It’s only tangentially related to this site’s purpose, but the truth is that as human beings we cannot stand by and watch this happening without at least trying to use whatever platform we have to raise awareness of it.
(The black bars on images in this article were added by us.)
Last week the High Court in England ruled that children under the age of 16 were not medically competent to consent to treatment with so-called “puberty blocker” drugs of the type that were used to “chemically castrate” the computing pioneer Alan Turing for being homosexual (a crime in the UK in the 1950s), which is believed to have led to his suicide by cyanide poisoning at the age of 41.
On 8 December this site ran an article about the Chief Executive Officer of the Scottish National Party, Peter Murrell. It has recently been drawn to our attention that the piece contained a serious inaccuracy, which we would like to remedy.
BLMac on The fight about to come: “Looks like the SNP have dug out the Independence Carrot from under all those Stonewall Gender Manuals. Now they’re looking…” Oct 14, 16:52
Aidan on The fight about to come: “Oh yeah if Scotland achieved independence at the helm they’d definitely all just resign en-mass wouldn’t they, rather than say…” Oct 14, 16:38
sarah on The fight about to come: “It’s so obvious, isn’t it? Why don’t the members all see it? Perhaps they do but they see no alternative…” Oct 14, 16:25
sarah on The fight about to come: “@ Rob, these morons will probably stay in charge until we leave the Union. They will have no hold on…” Oct 14, 16:17
Lollysmum on The fight about to come: “Of course Indyref2 is looming or ahead according to Keith Brown & that’s where it will always remain “ahead” as…” Oct 14, 16:11
Dubh on The fight about to come: “Utterly frustrating and damning in equal measure. *sigh” Oct 14, 16:04
Rob on The fight about to come: “It will be a cold day in hell before I would vote yes a second time while these morons are…” Oct 14, 16:01
Nicky T Naquetti on The fight about to come: “Voting for “independence” (which would lead to us being being ruled by the globalist EU and IMF, the way things…” Oct 14, 15:43
barelybare on The fight about to come: “Will the SNP be fundraising for an indyref fund,? Surely they will need funds for it. If not, what was…” Oct 14, 15:38
Garrion on The fight about to come: “Boots and stamping and faces come to mind…” Oct 14, 15:36
Geoff Huijer on The fight about to come: “Nowadays, there’s more chance of me believing it if Gordon Brown said it.” Oct 14, 15:29
Stuart MacKay on Still Time To Save Her: “Teenagers can make their own health decisions at 16. Parents remain legally responsible for providing guidance until they are 18.…” Oct 14, 14:46
Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “According to The Guardian, oil refineries have morphed from liabilities into gold mines, due to the shortages and hence high…” Oct 14, 14:42
Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “Exactly as predicted by Fanon. Ordinary, apolitical Scots, struggling with the cost of living, and fretting about The War and…” Oct 14, 14:32
Aidan on Still Time To Save Her: “When you say “colonial law” what you mean is the law, the actual law, not the made up law which…” Oct 14, 14:08
Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Still Time To Save Her: “RADICAL ‘CONVERSION PRACTICES’ MOTION SET FOR SNP CONFERENCE VOTE SNP party members are set to vote on a pro-LGBT motion…” Oct 14, 13:58
TURABDIN on Still Time To Save Her: “And that is not just a western historic phenomenon, what happened thousands of years ago continues to influence the present,…” Oct 14, 11:43
Captain Caveman on Still Time To Save Her: “No “struck” nerves here, lad (FYI the correct expression is “touched (a raw) nerve”) You carry on making yourself look…” Oct 14, 11:17
Alf Baird on Still Time To Save Her: “Yes Turabdin, for the more privileged colonized native their oppression remains somewhat obscured via assimilation into the colonizer’s culture, an…” Oct 14, 11:08
TURABDIN on Still Time To Save Her: “@alf baird TRULY, it’s an affair of dont mention the Union, the giant union jack draped dinosaur occupying the comfy…” Oct 14, 10:45
Alf Baird on Still Time To Save Her: ““the Supreme Court is a superior court” Perhaps in regard to colonial law, but according to international law it is…” Oct 14, 10:38
TURABDIN on Still Time To Save Her: “southernbystander & captain caveman verily i may have struck your raw nerves on the matter…..invasion & conquest, the conquerors still…” Oct 14, 10:37
Alf Baird on Still Time To Save Her: “‘Cultural obliteration’ (Fanon) is a fundamental aspect of colonial rule, so why is Bella or anyone else all of a…” Oct 14, 10:34
Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “Autocorrect substituted “wanging” with “wanting”. Could have been worse.” Oct 14, 09:43
Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “It’s environmentally friendly, MH. Any temporary blip in carbon emissions is compensated for thousands of times over by the removal…” Oct 14, 09:29
Minceheid on Still Time To Save Her: “I’m trying to work out whether burning someone at the stake would be carbon-neutral or not. These things matter, you…” Oct 14, 09:06
Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “Burn the heretic at the stake! That’s always the way to silence an inconvenient truth teller.” Oct 14, 08:54