Alert readers will undoubtedly have noticed a number of, to put it mildly, explosive-sounding developments this evening regarding the ongoing inquiries into the Scottish Government’s misconduct over false allegations against Alex Salmond.
Several reports have quoted extracts from the former First Minister’s submission to James Hamilton, who’s investigating the current First Minister over possible breaches of the Ministerial Code relating to the investigation of the allegations.
The submission – delivered on Mr Salmond’s birthday – has been widely leaked to the media but only selectively reported, and like others Wings has obtained a full copy.
We are advised that its contents do not contain anything which breaches or potentially breaches Lady Dorrian’s court order protecting the identities of the complainers against Mr Salmond, and as such there are no barriers to us publishing the entire document in the public interest, because its contents make some extremely grave and disturbing allegations against the current First Minister.
TO: Douglas Chapman MP, National Treasurer, SNP DATE: 8 January 2021
Also sent by email
Dear Douglas,
Congratulations on your recent election as the SNP’s treasurer. You may or may not be aware that in October 2020 this site asked your predecessor in the role, Colin Beattie, some questions on the subject of the supposedly “ring-fenced” indyref fighting fund that was created by donations to two separate fundraisers in previous years – referred to collectively by the party as the Referendum Appeal Fund or RAF.
We did so on behalf of numerous SNP members and non-members who had donated to the two appeals and were concerned as to the whereabouts of the monies.
No meaningful reply was received either by Wings or several individual donors who also contacted Mr Beattie asking the same questions, and a number of those people (as well as some of your elected colleagues) have asked us to put the same questions to you publicly, now that you’ve had a few weeks to settle into your new position and are understood to be interested in finding the answers.
The former SNP, and now independent, MP Margaret Ferrier was today arrested and charged with culpable and reckless conduct, a crime carrying a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, for making a return train journey between Glasgow and London in September last year, two days after taking a coronavirus test.
This site has no comment to make on the charges, as it’s a live criminal matter, but a couple of troubling questions do arise from their existence.
So, for the historical record: I have no belief whatsoever, earnest or otherwise, that I can get rid of Nicola Sturgeon in the next four months.
I’m an idiot with a website. I have no power. I haven’t been elected to anything and I’m not the commander of an army. Information to which I’m privy would get me put in jail if I published it, and would in itself have no power to remove Nicola Sturgeon anyway. The only people who can bring that about between now and May are Sturgeon herself or, collectively, the Scottish Parliament.
This site has for some time called for Sturgeon to resign because it is our belief that she’s going to have to anyway, on account of events over which we have no control or influence. Because of that it would be the responsible and conscientious thing for her to quit early enough that the SNP/independence movement had a chance to deal with the issue of her succession and regroup in plenty of time for this May’s election.
The remaining window of opportunity for that to happen is now getting very narrow. And the enemies of independence will be beside themselves with delight about it.
Because 2020 is the maddest year in history, Ruth Davidson opened her contribution to Holyrood’s debate on the Brexit deal today with a lengthy quote from this website.
Dr Tim Rideout is one of the most serious and respected people in the Yes movement and the SNP. As convener of the Scottish Currency Group he’s presently engaged in trying to solve the party’s self-inflicted weakness over its lack of a coherent currency policy, and he’s sufficiently highly rated by SNP members that earlier this month he was elected to the party’s Policy Development Committee.
So you might think he was entitled to a view on, well, development of policy.
With precisely the grim level of cynicism we’ve now come to expect as standard, the Scottish Government has released a key document relating to the Salmond inquiry two days before Christmas, hoping it’ll be buried in the ongoing coronavirus-and-Brexit-related implosion of the UK.
The document, which contains legal advice relating to the judicial review brought by Salmond regarding the Scottish Government’s investigations into false allegations of misconduct against him, is extremely heavily redacted. But a few interesting passages remain, so let’s have some fun.
We woke up this morning intending to write about something else, readers, and then we saw perhaps the most horrifying thing we’ve ever seen in the two years since we first started taking an interest in transgender ideology.
It’s only tangentially related to this site’s purpose, but the truth is that as human beings we cannot stand by and watch this happening without at least trying to use whatever platform we have to raise awareness of it.
(The black bars on images in this article were added by us.)
Last week the High Court in England ruled that children under the age of 16 were not medically competent to consent to treatment with so-called “puberty blocker” drugs of the type that were used to “chemically castrate” the computing pioneer Alan Turing for being homosexual (a crime in the UK in the 1950s), which is believed to have led to his suicide by cyanide poisoning at the age of 41.
On 8 December this site ran an article about the Chief Executive Officer of the Scottish National Party, Peter Murrell. It has recently been drawn to our attention that the piece contained a serious inaccuracy, which we would like to remedy.
We’ve had plenty to say already this week about the amendment that will be debated at Holyrood this afternoon. So instead we’re going to present you today with the case for each side, as made by two Scottish women on Twitter in the last few hours, and let you decide for yourselves whose argument is the more compelling.
First up, in favour of the amendment, is Scotsman writer Gina Davidson.
This site and other gender-critical voices are regularly accused of being “obsessed” with trans issues, even though the subject has been mentioned in fewer than 0.7% of Wings posts. But this week the SNP’s transgender faction – when it hasn’t been STILL raging about its battering in the NEC elections – has been swamping social media with organised complaints about a tiny prospective legislative change that they themselves insist doesn’t actually matter at all.
Rape Crisis Scotland, who are almost entirely dependent on the Scottish Government for funding, have chosen this evening to wade into the debate over the wording of a new law which is intended to lessen the trauma of people (nearly all women) who’ve been raped. We can only speculate as to whether they were pressured to do so, but the intervention seems likely only to pour petrol on the fire.
Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “Loving it, sam. We need to improve benefits and free health care so we can draw even more millions of…” Jun 21, 16:23
Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “You’re missing that a male minus dangly bits isn’t a female. Quite a big miss. Maybe excuse yourself from framing…” Jun 21, 16:18
Nemisis Benn on The End Of Law: “Am I missing something? The blurb from Pollock doesn’t quite say that certain criminals are serving their sentences in establishments…” Jun 21, 15:20
Saffron Robe on The End Of Law: “The admissions practice has been deemed unlawful and yet it remains in place. The irony is, of course, that if…” Jun 21, 14:41
Alf Baird on The End Of Law: ““Wasn’t it psychology” Indeed so, for colonization ‘is based on psychology’ (Cesaire). Of course, colonization itself leads to many other…” Jun 21, 14:39
Jay on The End Of Law: “McHateful, interesting to read your riposte to my comment (11:37, 20th June). Your reply comes close to making me think…” Jun 21, 14:36
sam on The End Of Law: “Social Murder? Austerity and Life Expectancy in the UK Get access Arrow David Walsh, Gerry McCartney Published: 28 November 2024…” Jun 21, 14:32
sam on The End Of Law: “From “UK Poverty Guide 2026..”, Joseph Rowntree Foundation. “Every year, we see the same groups disproportionately trapped in poverty, with…” Jun 21, 14:23
Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “I’m almost certain that some of the “Scotland’s Mammie” Covid TV addresses were fronted by Murrell, not Sturgeon. Think about…” Jun 21, 13:56
Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “I haven’t read it. Don’t imagine I ever will. There’s some quite clever people plausibly arguing that AI is already…” Jun 21, 13:46
Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “Fuck Morocco an aw.” Jun 21, 13:36
Jay on The End Of Law: “Nicely made point,McHateful. On another topic, have you read ‘Rise and Kill First’ by Ronen Bergman? To avoid confusion, Ruth…” Jun 21, 13:08
Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “Not sure if I should level the “unclean” or the “fantasist” charge at you Tommo. Probably the latter, as it…” Jun 21, 13:03
Captain Caveman on The End Of Law: “Heh! Well, I guess I’ll just have to lick my wounds and enjoy the tennis here at Queens Club, [capital…” Jun 21, 13:00
Onlooker on The End Of Law: “I do wonder how many of the ‘people’ here are either bots or paid King’s shilling-graspers, I admit.” Jun 21, 12:57
Onlooker on The End Of Law: “I see. So anybody critical of English legal sovereignty on an ostensible Scottish independence site is in the SNP. The…” Jun 21, 12:54
Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “As always, sam leaves out demographics so that he can lie with his statistics. There’s something like 10 million immigrants…” Jun 21, 12:54
Jay on The End Of Law: “Is that self-parody from Caveman or is he merely a lout who boasts about how much money he has, so…” Jun 21, 12:48
Lorncal on The End Of Law: “I think it was a BBC2 Open doors discussion from 1973, not 1960s, Jay. Very enlightening for people today, but…” Jun 21, 12:12
sam on The End Of Law: “Do you people own anything? In 1961 poverty levels in the UK were 13%. Under Thatcher they rose to 25%.…” Jun 21, 12:02
Lorncal on The End Of Law: “Well said, H McH.” Jun 21, 12:00
Andy Wiltshire on The End Of Law: “Morning Rev. Do you have any inside info on whether the BBC programme coming up on Tuesday, ‘The Big Cases,…” Jun 21, 11:18
Mark Beggan on The End Of Law: “The Supreme court has to keep stepping in to stop the stupid, thieving perverts from committing offences against humanity. Just…” Jun 21, 11:13
TURABDIN on The End Of Law: “THIS may be of interest to those whose sense of ethnicity encompasses language as a cultural sign. https://archive.is/Qr9bX The dominance…” Jun 21, 11:11
Tommo on The End Of Law: “Surely the time is long past to abolish these devolution disasters; all they have enabled is the emergence of an…” Jun 21, 10:44
Captain Caveman on A Fishy Tale: “It’s more a case of I know what’s best for my hard-earned cash.” Jun 21, 10:43
Hatey McHateface on A Fishy Tale: “Not opposed to drill, drill, drill or charity beginning at home. But then I’m not living near current sea level.…” Jun 21, 10:04
Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “Does anybody know if any of our Scottish trannies have infiltrated the Tartan Army? How are they faring, barging into…” Jun 21, 09:10
Captain Caveman on A Fishy Tale: “Nope, still not buying it – on either count. Soz. We should drill, drill, drill and also remember that charity…” Jun 21, 09:09
Onlooker on The End Of Law: “Who cares what the ENGLISH so-called ‘Supreme Court’ says? It was set up in ye olde days of 2009 down…” Jun 21, 09:02
