MARGARET CURRAN: Well, what we are saying, and Ed will make his own speech tomorrow, and I don’t have foresight of that… What we are saying is when you get into government, and when we come in in 2015, we won’t be able to do all that we wanted to do… Will child benefit for the wealthiest people be our top priority? I’m not sure about that.
ED MILIBAND, 6-6-2013: When it comes to the decisions of the next Labour government it won’t be our biggest priority to overturn the decisions this government has made on taking child benefit away from families earning over £50,000 a year.
We must admit, for someone who hasn’t seen the speech it’s a heck of a guess. Does anyone want to ask Ms Curran if she’s got a score forecast for Croatia vs Scotland?
It seems worth updating this piece from last September, for the 40,000 of you who weren’t around then. Today, Labour leader Ed Miliband gave a speech on his party’s welfare plans should it win the 2015 UK general election. It contained the following line:
One of the odder quirks about the BBC iPlayer is that it’ll let you rewind live TV broadcasts for up to two hours, but not radio, despite radio using vastly less bandwidth. So at the moment we can’t bring you a verified quote that Liam Byrne really just told Radio 4’s Today programme that the idea of rent controls as a solution to the UK’s housing benefit bill was “going a bit too far”.
But there’s another new Labour welfare policy that’s missing a fairly vital chunk of information this morning, which is even more worrying than the shadow Secretary of State for Work and Pensions having less intelligence, insight, principle and moral courage than a starving weasel.
Heaven’s sent us an angel, folks. Alert reader Jack Deeth is stranded far from home shores (really very far indeed) and stuck for something to do in the long winter nights, he very generously offered us his transcribing services.
We leapt on the offer with undignified haste, and you can read the first results below, in the shape of today’s interview between Margaret Curran and Andrew Neil on the Daily Politics, in which the shadow Scottish Secretary clearly and unambiguously laid out a future Labour government’s spending and welfare plans.
Please don’t make us transcribe this nine-minute trainwreck of an interview with Margaret Curran on the subject of Labour’s welfare and spending plans, from this afternoon’s edition of BBC2’s Daily Politics. We don’t know if we could take it.
Click the image to listen, if you have a high pain threshold.
Along with more direct, overt scaremongering, it’s probably fair to say that the core theme of the “Better Together” anti-independence campaign to date has been “uncertainty”. Day after day sees the media and public assailed with neurotic demands for definitive answers about every conceivable aspect of an independent Scotland that in most cases couldn’t be answered by any nation on Earth, including the UK.
The No camp disastrously overplayed its hand with the “500 questions” fiasco, which saw it subjected to literally worldwide mockery, but it suffered an arguably even more wounding blow today with the release of some figures which blew gaping holes into pretty much everything it’s spent the last 18 months saying.
From the excellent Part 1 of STV’s new documentary “Road To Referendum” (based on the book by Iain Macwhirter, out this week), Labour PM Harold Wilson and Scottish Secretary Willie Ross punt a rather familiar line four decades before Ed Miliband.
We’re sure there’s nothing at all sinister in the fact that the show was unavailable to most viewers due to an unprecedented cross-media technical failure, which also wiped out the STV news at 6pm and this evening’s Scotland Tonight, incidentally.
This morning’s Daily Record carries a story about Ed Balls’ policy speech on welfare yesterday. Commendably, the Labour-supporting paper isn’t shy of pointing out the implications of Balls’ comments:
“Scots could get welfare benefits at lower rates than people in wealthy parts of England under plans being worked on by Labour. Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls yesterday raised the idea of a regional cap on welfare, opening the door to variations in a range of social security benefits.
Balls said the welfare cap of £25,000 a year per household should be higher in London but could be lower in parts of the UK where housing is cheaper.”
We’d have been even more impressed, though, if Wings Over Scotland hadn’t revealed the reality of what Labour’s future plans meant for Scotland almost three weeks ago.
Particularly alert readers may recall a shock-horror story from the Scottish media earlier this year relating to a sharp rise in the number of people waiting over four hours for treatment in hospital A&E departments, which came complete with some dramatic (and highly misleading) graphs.
Labour’s ironic Scottish health spokeswoman Jackie Baillie poured opprobrium on the Scottish Government both for the figures and for changing the treatment-within-four-hours target from 98% to 95%, with the Tories enthusiastically joining in as usual.
So we were naturally quite curious to see what the corresponding figures for the English NHS would be, and they were finally released today.
James on Stand By Your Posts: “London and the south-east of England are the most heavily subsidised parts of the “UK” as you well know, Charlatan…” Nov 11, 14:07
Xaracen on Stand By Your Posts: “London was never a sovereign nation, and that puts it well outside the colony envelope. It does not put it…” Nov 11, 13:26
Aidan on Stand By Your Posts: “Lol James – you can have a look at the funding and financing arrangements for those projects, London pays. I…” Nov 11, 13:22
Hatey McHateface on Vibecoding A Better World: “Always thought provoking to read an Indy Intellectual like James justifying the imperialist annexation of a former colony that had…” Nov 11, 12:11
Hatey McHateface on Stand By Your Posts: “Who’s teasing? I haven’t been more than an hour off the cludgie in the past week. Would cost me a…” Nov 11, 11:56
Aidan on Stand By Your Posts: “Once upon a time there was a huge centre of tech and finance, it produced unrivalled wealth which should have…” Nov 11, 11:55
Hatey McHateface on Stand By Your Posts: “Sun barely above the horizon and Confused is off, repeating his points to create a coherent world view in much…” Nov 11, 11:51
James on Stand By Your Posts: ““there’s new electric trains everywhere” central belt you mean? “new motorways (M8, M74)” central belt. “new railways opening (Alloa, Tweedbank)”…” Nov 11, 11:48
James on Stand By Your Posts: ““Colonised Londoners are forced to pay for all of those projects themselves.” Adrian, stop it! Oh, ma sides! One day…” Nov 11, 11:42
Aidan on Stand By Your Posts: “Colonised Londoners are forced to pay for all of those projects themselves. Meanwhile in the coloniser Scotland there’s new electric…” Nov 11, 11:35
James on Stand By Your Posts: “How’s the Scottish Sovereign Wealth Fund looking, ‘font of knowledge’ Adrian? Go on, tell us, tell us…. Once upon a…” Nov 11, 11:33
Aidan on Vibecoding A Better World: “I would lay off the chocolate ration if I were you James. All of your collection of various conspiracies have…” Nov 11, 11:26
James on Stand By Your Posts: “Sewer system replaced, Westminster completely refurbished, “Crossrail”, DLR Thamesmead extension, new line extensions and new fleets of trains for the…” Nov 11, 11:13
Confused on Stand By Your Posts: “let’s take this real slow for the special needs BTL demographic : “ENGLAND SUBSIDISES SCOTLAND” – so if it didn’t…” Nov 11, 11:10
Aidan on Stand By Your Posts: “I’m just applying post-colonial framework to the context of London so that Londoners can better understand their colonial condition and…” Nov 11, 11:09
James on Stand By Your Posts: “See that, folks? England subsidises Scotland! They’re not just giving us some of our own money back after all! John…” Nov 11, 10:51
James on Vibecoding A Better World: “That’s right, Adrian. And the UK state security services are friends to Scotland, Bush senior never said “not one inch…” Nov 11, 10:43
Aidan on Stand By Your Posts: “That of course ignores that many significant spending programmes (e.g. welfare, pensions) are funded in Scotland by the U.K. Government.…” Nov 11, 10:22
John McNab on Stand By Your Posts: ““Unaccountably, the news that the UN will soon declare Scotland Independent and that there’s a consequent nation-wide epidemic of Yoons…” Nov 11, 10:12
Rob on Stand By Your Posts: “I always take what AI says with a large pinch of salt and don’t use it anyway where it can…” Nov 11, 09:58
Alf Baird on Stand By Your Posts: “Aye Willie, nobody should be surprised at the antics of a colonial administration forced to work within a limited budget…” Nov 11, 09:39
Hatey McHateface on Stand By Your Posts: “The AI hasn’t noticed that Sandy Peggie lost her court case alleging discrimination against her union. I believe she intends…” Nov 11, 09:02
Hatey McHateface on Stand By Your Posts: “Interesting. I thought the promise of AI was that everybody would have access to it. Why would anybody want to…” Nov 11, 08:45
Hatey McHateface on Stand By Your Posts: “And then we have the Scots! Tribally programmed to return the SNP to power in the wee, pretendy parly, election…” Nov 11, 08:32
Hatey McHateface on Stand By Your Posts: “Phew! I thought I was the only one celebrating the bandy chorie diva. Any chance we could rename 30th November…” Nov 11, 08:21
ed mccabe on Stand By Your Posts: “New report: An AI Guide to Scottish Independence What happens when you ask an artificial intelligence to weigh up Scotland’s…” Nov 11, 08:11
Bilbo on Vibecoding A Better World: “Weren’t the British contingent of the SS during WW2 shoved off to the meat grinder of the Russ!an front once…” Nov 11, 07:49
Frank Gillougley on Stand By Your Posts: “All bureaucracies are self-serving. Wankers.” Nov 11, 07:22