We’re back in the archives again today, because there’s still no news. (The Herald is desperately trying to whip up outrage over trains arriving 61 seconds late, and David Torrance has finally turned up at the “OMG YES MOVEMENT SPLIT” party just as the last stragglers are heading home and the hosts are going to bed.)
And we’re particularly enjoying this one, for a whole list of reasons:
In the continuing summer absence of any sort of Scottish politics news (the Sunday papers consist of Michelle Thomson understandably taking a swipe at the SNP in the Sunday Post, the Sunday Times spluttering in impotent fury that Michelle Thomson wasn’t prosecuted, and the Sunday Herald giving a glowing write-up to idiot Tory MSP Annie Wells while savaging sections of the Yes movement yet again – this time “older white men”), we thought you might enjoy a piece from the archives.
Discovered by an alert reader, this 1976 Times article features Labour MP for Basildon Eric Moonman discussing the seemingly-imminent prospect of Scottish devolution, to which he was implacably opposed and instrumental in defeating, ultimately leading to the collapse of a Labour government and the election of Mrs Thatcher.
I went to “Dunkirk” at the cinema today. If you want to know what it’s like, just watch this trailer 40 times in a row and save yourself the £12.
It’s a poor movie, disjointed and aimless and curiously lacking in tension or narrative given the real-life subject matter. (It’s remarkably short on dialogue, which is lucky because you can barely make out any of what little script or story there is from behind the endlessly howling one-note airhorn of the soundtrack. It’s a bit like someone filmed an IKEA assembly manual in live action during a Formula 1 race.)
But I couldn’t help thinking that part of the reason it was so unengaging was because it felt akin to watching a boxing match between two fighters you don’t like. If Mike Tyson took on Tyson Fury, would you cheer for the rapist or the anti-Semitic homophobe?
Apologies in advance about this, folks, but it’s driving us mad. We got into a Twitter argument with some Tory balloon last night and this morning, and to cut a long story short it got us looking at the 1951 UK general election result.
History records it as a Tory majority, securing just over half of the Parliamentary seats (321 of 625) and forming the government under Winston Churchill despite narrowly losing the popular vote to Labour (48% to 48.8%).
But if you examine the result in the House Of Commons Library the numbers don’t add up, and we can’t figure out why.
There’s no particular reason to post this today, other than that it’s only come to light this week and today happens to be the 20th anniversary of the article below.
While it’s often said (mainly by nationalist types) that the Scottish Parliament and its electoral system were specifically designed to prevent the SNP from coming to power and holding an independence referendum, there’s been very little in the way of explicit evidence to back that statement up.
The 27 April 1997 issue of the Scottish Sun, though, had it in spades.
So we thought we should save it from Twitter’s fleeting attention span for posterity.
An alert reader got in touch with us this evening to tell us that they’d been clearing out an old hard drive and found an interesting web page they’d saved from several years ago. They asked if we’d like to see it.
“Sure”, we said. “Let’s have a look.”
It turned out that they’d had an exchange several years ago with Kezia Dugdale on her old (now deleted) blog, where she tended to be a bit more candid than she is now, and were so startled by an answer she’d given them that they’d felt the need to keep it.
The figure below is my own, but it’s also remarkably typical:
Click the pic to get yours.
(It actually feels like a lot more than that – quite possibly because I have, in fact, not for one minute of my entire life been represented by a government at Westminster – or anywhere else, come to that – that I voted for, unless you count the token presence of the Lib Dems in the 2010-15 coalition. Which I don’t, because they immediately betrayed every policy and principle for which I’d voted for them in the first place.)
For Scotland, democracy in the UK simply doesn’t work.
As the Prime Minister prepares to meet the First Minister and doggedly give her “now is not the time” mantra another few dozen run-throughs for the cameras, we thought that you might enjoy a little trip down Memory Lane.
holymacmoses on The Secondhand Amendment: “It’s quite remarkable that Judge Walker (via Ms Muir) thinks that it’s OK to farm out work on an enquiry…” Jan 19, 21:24
Scot Finlayson on The Secondhand Amendment: “Man in wig looking out for man in wig. I wonder what % of `trans women` went to Scottish fee…” Jan 19, 21:21
100Yes on The Secondhand Amendment: “Peter Murrell, the former SNP chief executive, the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) confirmed a date has been…” Jan 19, 21:16
Mike on The Secondhand Amendment: “I see the separated Mrs Murrell was in a biker jacket and shorter hair cosying up to Ian McKellen, Graham…” Jan 19, 21:06
Marie on The Secondhand Amendment: “Judge Kemp blaming a colleague for HIS flawed judgement in the Peggie case. Kemp is incompetent, irresponsible and truly pathetic.” Jan 19, 20:45
Hatey McHateface on The Secondhand Amendment: ““Scotland has always been a place to get out of” Odd. You and the regulars who never tire of gurning…” Jan 19, 20:30
Bilbo on The Secondhand Amendment: “With another top Tory defecting to Reform, the Easdale brothers offering a six figure sum to Labour to defeat the…” Jan 19, 20:14
Bilbo on The Secondhand Amendment: “I see that Labour front benchers are calling Reform fascists and Swinney has called people who protest at migrant hotels…” Jan 19, 20:01
Hatey McHateface on The Secondhand Amendment: ““you Scots live in a colony and are the wretched colonised” Odd, Northy. You never tire of telling us how…” Jan 19, 19:43
100%Yes on The Secondhand Amendment: “https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/king-shares-dram-with-scotland-s-first-minister/ar-AA1UwlWT” Jan 19, 19:41
Marie on The Secondhand Amendment: “Don’t disagree with a word. Scots know all this of course – that’s why the ambitious leave – Scotland has…” Jan 19, 19:34
Peter McAvoy on The Secondhand Amendment: “While this transgender ideology still dictates the political agenda.BBC Scotland news website today that teachers were having difficulty finding permanent…” Jan 19, 19:30
Northcode on The Secondhand Amendment: “It isn’t difficult to understand. Scotland is a colony… its judiciary is a pantomime played out for the Scots to…” Jan 19, 19:04
Nae Need! on The Secondhand Amendment: “And what we get is a massively watered down version.” Jan 19, 19:04
ScotsRenewables on The Secondhand Amendment: “FIFA suck Trump’s cock. I would like to see Scotland pull out, with wholehearted support from the fans. Scotland have…” Jan 19, 19:00
Nae Need! on The Secondhand Amendment: “Well said. I love it when you wade right in. Their wits have never been addled, imo. Their wits are…” Jan 19, 18:38
Hatey McHateface on The Secondhand Amendment: “I’ll take your bet, Sven. Is £20 too rich for you? Even if a plea negotiation (the Scots Law term…” Jan 19, 18:35
Lorna Campbell on The Secondhand Amendment: “It is the baleful influence that the ‘trans’ issue/lobby is having, apparently, on so many people in positions of trust…” Jan 19, 18:08
Lorna Campbell on The Secondhand Amendment: “Very well said, sir. So many lies and delusions and half-truths surround the ‘trans’ issue that it needs to have…” Jan 19, 18:04
Sven on The Secondhand Amendment: “I doubt in this potential scenario that Mr Murrell would give evidence against any other defendant, as far as I’m…” Jan 19, 18:03
Nae Need! on The Secondhand Amendment: “I’ll say it, cos as far as I am aware no one else has passed comment on this: the USA…” Jan 19, 17:59
Lorna Campbell on The Secondhand Amendment: “Excellent piece again, Rev. Puts all the points that require to have light shone upon them. I never believed that…” Jan 19, 17:56
agentx on The Secondhand Amendment: “A plea bargain to give evidence against whom? I’m thinking about this: “The brother-in-law of Scotland’s former first minister Humza…” Jan 19, 17:53
Nae Need! on The Secondhand Amendment: “If that kinda thing is a legal possibility in Scotland, then yeah. And what we know of Scotland’s institutions is…” Jan 19, 17:47
Nae Need! on The Secondhand Amendment: “Talking of Nigel, did you know he’s currently in DAVOS? Annual WEF Conference is currently underway. Is he there to…” Jan 19, 17:40
Sven on The Secondhand Amendment: “What is the betting that Mr Murrell takes a plea bargain in bar of trial and no details are ever…” Jan 19, 17:30
Lorna Campbell on Learning Insanity: “James, that is not what her speech to the newly-created British parliament states, and nor is it the majority view…” Jan 19, 17:17
Nae Need! on The Secondhand Amendment: “That’s why he already described it as ‘lazy’. Not that you are wrong in offering further detail.” Jan 19, 17:11
Hatey McHateface on The Secondhand Amendment: ““Murder is murder whether by axe or by guillotine or by a government’s austerity policy or a social security sanction…” Jan 19, 17:08