Deep in the summer news desert, the papers today are struggling for material again. The Sunday Herald has a shock-horror front-page exposé about some photos from an Orange Lodge party that turn out to be from 2010 and 2013, while the Scottish Mail On Sunday reaches all the way back to 1940 to fill a couple of pages.
Last week the walking monotone drone that is James Kelly MSP lodged a motion (an inescapably appropriate term for his output, it must be said) at the Scottish Parliament instigating his private members’ bill to repeal the Offensive Behaviour (Football) Act, having announced his intention to do so in February after putting together a ludicrously bogus “consultation” on the subject last year.
As ever, Kelly trotted out a mixture of baseless assertions and flat-out lies about the Act in support of his move, because apparently the most pressing issue currently facing Scotland, in the view of Scottish Labour, is that bigoted thugs must once again be free to sing about being up to their knees in Fenian blood, or lionise murderous terrorists, at sporting events without fear of prosecution.
Tremendous news for the rest of Scotland’s football clubs as Celtic manager Brendan Rodgers promises never to win the treble unbeaten again, even if his side score more goals than the other team in all their matches.
…is roughly how often Aberdeen get to the final of the Scottish Cup these days. The last time was 17 years ago – a tournament which started in the last century and ended the year Rangers started paying their players with EBTs – when SFA rules meant that they had to play almost the entire game without a recognised goalkeeper.
(A tackle in the third minute broke veteran custodian Jim Leighton’s jaw, and because you were only allowed three players on the subs bench the Dons had no backup No.1 and had to put striker Robbie Winters between the sticks, with a predictable outcome. Leighton never played professional football again.)
In politics, Labour were only one year into the first ever administration of the modern Scottish Parliament, and still in the first term of Tony Blair’s rule at Westminster. The idea of the SNP winning an election, let alone holding an independence referendum, was the preserve of mad fantasists.
And the last time the Pittodrie side actually won the trophy was 27 years back, which is so long ago that most of Hampden was still open to the elements.
Still, it would be weird if we got to the final again next year and some of the Aberdeen support refused to go on the grounds that the matter of who was the best cup football team in Scotland had been settled forever today.
Or if Celtic won but had fielded an ineligible player and the SFA ordered a replay, but the Dons declined to take part because they’d played too many finals recently.
The votes for “God Save The Queen” being driven by Tories, English-born residents and supporters of a particular football club probably won’t come as the biggest shock in the world to anyone.
(Alert viewers will of course have noticed that due to MI5 INTERFERENCE in the poll, there were actually two votes for Hoots Mon, which have been suspiciously rounded down to one. We are conducting an investigation, by which we mean brutal purge.)
Just over three and a half years ago, we ran an article about how being an opposition MP or MSP is the cushiest gig in politics. You get all the pay, benefits, holidays and status, but you don’t have to actually do very much except whinge about how rubbish the government is, which most people are happy to do for free as a hobby.
Most of the time you don’t even need to turn up at your workplace.
(Sure, there are all your constituents to deal with, but if you’re not in power all that really amounts to is forwarding their letters to the government and demanding action.)
Tomorrow, the Holyrood opposition will give us a virtuoso demonstration.
WARNING: this post isn’t about football, but it will refer to football for quite a while in order to illustrate its point. Get over it or go outside for some fresh air.
Today is the opening day of the SPFL Premiership season, and will see the top-flight debut of a four-year-old club which is legally entitled under company law to use the name and trademarks of a much older one which went into liquidation in 2012 owing creditors tens of millions of pounds.
The facts of that matter are beyond any empirical dispute, but human beings are adept at arguing things which are demonstrably not true and so the truth is hotly and furiously rejected by a substantial group of people, weirdly including the club itself (even as it insists that it can’t be held responsible for the old club’s debts because it’s not the same club).
We’re not going to attempt to settle that argument here, because (a) it’s already been settled, and (b) we have nothing new to say that would remotely convince the people who’ve already steadfastly refused to acknowledge any of the proven facts.
Instead, we’re going to talk – not for the first time, sadly – about why the “debate” around “Rangers” won’t die, and what it tells us about the Scottish media.
I was born to be a Rangers supporter. I had no real choice in the matter. My father was a Ger, as was his father and his father’s father. I was accepted that as soon as I was old enough to be lifted over a turnstile I would attend Ibrox, faithfully.
From 1964 (aged 5) I worshipped at the shrine of Rangers for almost three decades. Fortunately for me, my father was the least bigoted man you could wish to meet. His religions were the trade unions and Rangers. Because he wasn’t bigoted our next-door neighbour and dad’s friend used to take me to Parkhead to watch Celtic too, which I found thrilling as I was convinced the “Tims” could see right through me.
This caused me a bit of confusion at school, because some of my family were “Tims”. In fact my favourite aunty was a convert to Catholicism and was as devout and decent a Catholic as you will ever meet. The conflation of football and religion was as normal as the smog-filled air we breathed. It just was what it was. You were either Proddy Ranger or Timmy Celtic. It wasn’t to be questioned.
Except my dad questioned it, loudly and often. He tried to explain the wrongs of the situation to me many times. I remember asking him why he still was a Rangers man if he disliked the whole Proddy/Tim thing that went with it.
“They’re my team, son. The morons can’t change that”, he told me.
agentx on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg5pp2pee7go Sturgeon wearing a Murrell bought pendant. https://www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/politics/operation-branchform-cops-investigating-peter-31639222 Photo with Sturgeon and Jag on her drive.” May 26, 14:31
Cynicus on No Money Back, No Guarantee: ““The two fundraisers combined raised almost £700,000 but Murrell only copped a plea for misappropriating £400,000 of it, and the…” May 26, 14:22
Morgatron on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “Brilliant article again Stu. I hope every blogger, journo, MP, MSP, JK, David Davis and anyone with clout and a…” May 26, 14:20
TimePilot on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “A quick “Google” of Sturgeon signing offical documents fed into AI (see screenshot below) https://i.postimg.cc/jdZMh7yB/Pens.jpg Pen Analysis Images 1, 2,…” May 26, 13:57
Willie on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “At some stage, and not in the too distant future legal action will I suspect be raised against those who…” May 26, 13:45
Hobbit on The Final Robbery: “This thieving began while Alex was still the leader. More generally, how could the SNP system have let the thieving…” May 26, 13:43
Richard Renier on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “No public money was stolen. So who funded the police enquiry, which cost over £1m?” May 26, 13:31
J Robertson on The Final Robbery: “As so many have said on here your investigation and reporting on this has been nothing short of magnificent Stu.…” May 26, 13:12
Ian Smith on The Final Robbery: “Didn’t the court say something about living a lifestyle he couldn’t afford. Since he had been on a six figure…” May 26, 13:01
Bobo bunny on The Final Robbery: “Candidate for being killed by hammers.” May 26, 12:46
Northcode on The Final Robbery: “You are young, Sam, and hae little knowing in the ways of ‘The Empire’… I am old (189 years last…” May 26, 12:44
Effijy on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “Sturgeon says that Murrell claimed to have won the £125K Mobile Home on Bullseye. She should have been suspicious as…” May 26, 12:41
Patrician on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “I wish there was a way to upvote this comment. To paraphrase her statement: “The behaviour complained of was found…” May 26, 12:38
Rogueslr on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “Some SNP fan was saying St Nic was the queen of Scottish politics, the best Peter can aspire to is…” May 26, 12:30
Campbell Clansman on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “In Sturgeon, Murrell and Swinney, the Scottish people got what they voted for. The voters could have thrown the corrupt…” May 26, 12:16
agentx on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “Peter Murrell, the SNP’s chief executive, loaned the party £107,620 in June 2021. Is Sturgeon saying that she knew nothing…” May 26, 12:03
sam on The Final Robbery: “Naw, Northcode. The amount took is substantial. The impact on the community and wer pretendy pahlmint is substantial. Minimum 5…” May 26, 12:02
Xaracen on The Final Robbery: “That was a very interesting read, Alf, thanks. That site is now bookmarked, and its name has resonance for obvious…” May 26, 11:58
Northcode on No Money Back, No Guarantee: ““ever-degenerating capacities of imperialism” Aye, Alf, Orwell could already see it from the very heart of the empire he was…” May 26, 11:58
Charles Mackay on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “Great article brilliant insight to it all. Bet he gets three years and is out in six months-Scottish establishment right…” May 26, 11:42
CharlesMackay on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “Great article brilliant insight to it all. Bet he gets three years and is out in six months-Scottish establishment right…” May 26, 11:42
Luigi on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “Mmmm. Something doesn’t smell right in this case. A lot more to this than meets the eye, methinks. Anyone else…” May 26, 11:39
Ian on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “The sentence will indicate a lot about what happens next. Meanwhile Alex Salmond’s treatment and the SNP’s lead role in…” May 26, 11:39
Rev. Spooner on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “On R4’s Today programme this morning, the SNP mouthpiece was at pains to make the point – at least 3…” May 26, 11:30
Captain Caveman on The Final Robbery: “There is much that could be said in response to this long-running, tawdry affair – and much has been said…” May 26, 11:29
Northcode on The Final Robbery: “I might as well stick my tuppence worth of pointless verbiage intae this place alang wi the rest o ye…” May 26, 11:20
J Robertson on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “That “legal letter “ takes the ***ing biscuit “. What have they done to our once proud wee nation?” May 26, 11:16
Alf Baird on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “Let’s remember that co-opted national party elites are merely the coloniser’s tools. A colony’s “confidential agents pensioned off at high…” May 26, 11:15
Jay on The Final Robbery: “Frank, what are your reasons for thinking that Murrell expected to “get away with it.”? What better way to undermine…” May 26, 11:00
agentx on No Money Back, No Guarantee: “What Sturgeon said about Salmond in 2021: “The behaviour complained of was found by a jury not to constitute criminal…” May 26, 10:58