Readers, have you ever noticed how the letters pages of Scottish newspapers are full every day of the same names, a clutch of a couple of dozen super-hardcore frothing ultra-Yoons tirelessly and reflexively raging against independence, the SNP and pretty much anything without a Union Jack on it?
Have you ever found yourself thinking it must be some sort of co-ordinated group that gets together, plans topics in advance then writes in backing each other up, to create an illusion of speaking for a wide cross-section of society, before dismissing that idea as a daft paranoid conspiracy and getting on with your day?
Because we thought that too, until an alert reader infiltrated it.
Our very favourite bit is “we must not advertise the existence of the group. It can be mentioned verbally, in safe environment, that some people share letters/encourage each other, but anything more risks editors discriminating, nationalists reacting, and this diverse group being portrayed as a monolithic campaign”.
Probably don’t put it in an email, then. But your secret’s safe with us, lads.
He’s a fervent Tory, and the Secretary of Inverurie Community Council. He tweets as “ElginLoon59”, and as a busy pillar of the local community he’s got some pretty firm views on the sort of people who should and shouldn’t hold public office.
The efforts by the Scottish Tories to pull off some frankly ambitious shenanigans over today’s Budget continued overnight in increasingly bizarre fashion.
As with the Poppy Scotland funding, the party appears to be quite openly punting the line “We knew all along that this was possible and the right thing to do, but we deliberately punished Scotland for not electing enough Tory MPs”, in what can only be reasonably interpreted as an attempt at blackmailing future electorates.
The Scottish media, meanwhile, is doing its best to sell the issue as “a plague on both their houses”, holding the Scottish Government and UK government equally culpable for the mess. So let’s see what we know.
This documentary starts a little slowly, but becomes an eye-opening case study of how Labour steamrollered through crippling PFI contracts to build public infrastructure on the never-never when they ran the Scottish Executive from 1999-2007.
Mainstream and social media alike are now well into their second day of an absolutely epic meltdown at the news that Alex Salmond is to broadcast a chat show on RT, the Russian equivalent of the BBC.
It really is almost impossible to overstate the magnitude of the shrieking fit the decision has produced. Addled old Lords with criminal convictions for violently and drunkenly assaulting Her Majesty’s police have with an audacious lack of self-awareness decried the immorality of one of HM’s advisors going on TV to talk about stuff, and one Lib Dem MSP has even gone so far as to raise a Holyrood motion demanding that the state interferes with the lawful employment choices of a private citizen.
We imagine that RT will be beside itself with joy at the avalanche of publicity the UK press and political sphere is giving it. We’d be amazed if the hysterical brouhaha didn’t double or treble the audience figures that Salmond could otherwise have expected.
We’re not a Catalonian-politics website and we don’t even have an opinion on whether Catalonia should be independent, but sometimes it’s easier to understand the workings and failings of the media if you watch how it behaves on a subject you’re not directly and closely involved with. Last week was one of those weeks.
He was brought on to give voice to what has become the universal UK-media spin on events in Catalonia – that both sides are to blame, that the Catalan government was provocative and irresponsible to call an “illegal” referendum, and that the only way for the area to achieve independence is through the 1978 Spanish constitution, despite it expressly forbidding any such action and its cornerstone of existence (also known as the “Preliminary Title”) being “based on the indissoluble unity of the Spanish Nation”.
So in the striking absence of any useful information in the press, we thought we’d do a little digging and see how that might work.
Quite a few remarkable things were said on last night’s STV debate between the two prospective leaders of the Labour Party branch office in Scotland. This one, though, was especially striking.
That’s Anas Sarwar denying three times that he was a part of the “Better Together” campaign with the Tories. A startled Colin Mackay claims to have seen photographs of Sarwar campaigning with BT, at which point Sarwar insists no, he merely appeared on TV debates which happened to also have Tory guests.
Investigative site The Ferret this afternoon published a report into the Scottish Futures Trust, the SNP’s replacement for Labour’s cripplingly costly PFI projects.
The report was undertaken by Jim and Margaret Cuthbert, a pair of economists well regarded in nationalist circles, and makes some interesting if vague comments about downsides that MIGHT, in theory, exist in the SFT now or in the future.
The headline claims are all full of highly-qualified language (“may not deliver value for money”; “profits may be unduly high”; “could restrict growth”; “potentially has adverse implications”; “impossible to tell whether“), and it’s a long way down the page until you get to anything approaching a hard fact, or indeed the revelation that the report seems to have been paid for by Scottish Labour.
Readers, we’d like you to meet Steven MacGregor. He’s the chap on the right of this pic, taken last Monday while campaigning for the Tories in Ochil & South Perthshire with party leader Ruth Davidson, just a foot or so away from him.
Apologies in advance about this, folks, but it’s driving us mad. We got into a Twitter argument with some Tory balloon last night and this morning, and to cut a long story short it got us looking at the 1951 UK general election result.
History records it as a Tory majority, securing just over half of the Parliamentary seats (321 of 625) and forming the government under Winston Churchill despite narrowly losing the popular vote to Labour (48% to 48.8%).
But if you examine the result in the House Of Commons Library the numbers don’t add up, and we can’t figure out why.
We hadn’t been planning to talk any more about the curious case of Claire Austin, the suddenly publicity-shy Edinburgh nurse who – how can we put this? – seemed a rather ill-chosen figurehead for the good cause of getting more pay for a group of people who are rightly well-regarded by the public.
But yesterday, the release of a letter from Scottish Labour branch manager Kezia Dugdale re-opened political hostilities after last week’s hiatus for the Manchester terror attack by shoving the now-reticent Ms Austin right back into the spotlight.
Young Lochinvar on The Secondhand Amendment: “Timing as broadly predicted by many on here! They can’t even be subtle about their machinations..” Jan 20, 00:51
Michael on The Secondhand Amendment: “Or was it John Doe who was googling on behalf of the Judge?” Jan 20, 00:44
Young Lochinvar on Learning Insanity: “H McH No other incorrect accusations to throw about? Confused as you’ve been asking the wrong questions? You are so…” Jan 20, 00:39
Hatey McHateface on The Secondhand Amendment: “@Marie I think there is something odd when people living in a country that is so desperate for immigrants that…” Jan 19, 22:38
Marie on The Secondhand Amendment: “If you knew anything about how independence-minded Scots felt about their country you would know that a long-standing major concern…” Jan 19, 21:54
holymacmoses on The Secondhand Amendment: “It’s quite remarkable that Judge Walker (via Ms Muir) thinks that it’s OK to farm out work on an enquiry…” Jan 19, 21:24
Scot Finlayson on The Secondhand Amendment: “Man in wig looking out for man in wig. I wonder what % of `trans women` went to Scottish fee…” Jan 19, 21:21
100Yes on The Secondhand Amendment: “Peter Murrell, the former SNP chief executive, the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) confirmed a date has been…” Jan 19, 21:16
Mike on The Secondhand Amendment: “I see the separated Mrs Murrell was in a biker jacket and shorter hair cosying up to Ian McKellen, Graham…” Jan 19, 21:06
Marie on The Secondhand Amendment: “Judge Kemp blaming a colleague for HIS flawed judgement in the Peggie case. Kemp is incompetent, irresponsible and truly pathetic.” Jan 19, 20:45
Hatey McHateface on The Secondhand Amendment: ““Scotland has always been a place to get out of” Odd. You and the regulars who never tire of gurning…” Jan 19, 20:30
Bilbo on The Secondhand Amendment: “With another top Tory defecting to Reform, the Easdale brothers offering a six figure sum to Labour to defeat the…” Jan 19, 20:14
Bilbo on The Secondhand Amendment: “I see that Labour front benchers are calling Reform fascists and Swinney has called people who protest at migrant hotels…” Jan 19, 20:01
Hatey McHateface on The Secondhand Amendment: ““you Scots live in a colony and are the wretched colonised” Odd, Northy. You never tire of telling us how…” Jan 19, 19:43
100%Yes on The Secondhand Amendment: “https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/king-shares-dram-with-scotland-s-first-minister/ar-AA1UwlWT” Jan 19, 19:41
Marie on The Secondhand Amendment: “Don’t disagree with a word. Scots know all this of course – that’s why the ambitious leave – Scotland has…” Jan 19, 19:34
Peter McAvoy on The Secondhand Amendment: “While this transgender ideology still dictates the political agenda.BBC Scotland news website today that teachers were having difficulty finding permanent…” Jan 19, 19:30
Northcode on The Secondhand Amendment: “It isn’t difficult to understand. Scotland is a colony… its judiciary is a pantomime played out for the Scots to…” Jan 19, 19:04
Nae Need! on The Secondhand Amendment: “And what we get is a massively watered down version.” Jan 19, 19:04
ScotsRenewables on The Secondhand Amendment: “FIFA suck Trump’s cock. I would like to see Scotland pull out, with wholehearted support from the fans. Scotland have…” Jan 19, 19:00
Nae Need! on The Secondhand Amendment: “Well said. I love it when you wade right in. Their wits have never been addled, imo. Their wits are…” Jan 19, 18:38
Hatey McHateface on The Secondhand Amendment: “I’ll take your bet, Sven. Is £20 too rich for you? Even if a plea negotiation (the Scots Law term…” Jan 19, 18:35
Lorna Campbell on The Secondhand Amendment: “It is the baleful influence that the ‘trans’ issue/lobby is having, apparently, on so many people in positions of trust…” Jan 19, 18:08
Lorna Campbell on The Secondhand Amendment: “Very well said, sir. So many lies and delusions and half-truths surround the ‘trans’ issue that it needs to have…” Jan 19, 18:04
Sven on The Secondhand Amendment: “I doubt in this potential scenario that Mr Murrell would give evidence against any other defendant, as far as I’m…” Jan 19, 18:03
Nae Need! on The Secondhand Amendment: “I’ll say it, cos as far as I am aware no one else has passed comment on this: the USA…” Jan 19, 17:59
Lorna Campbell on The Secondhand Amendment: “Excellent piece again, Rev. Puts all the points that require to have light shone upon them. I never believed that…” Jan 19, 17:56
agentx on The Secondhand Amendment: “A plea bargain to give evidence against whom? I’m thinking about this: “The brother-in-law of Scotland’s former first minister Humza…” Jan 19, 17:53
Nae Need! on The Secondhand Amendment: “If that kinda thing is a legal possibility in Scotland, then yeah. And what we know of Scotland’s institutions is…” Jan 19, 17:47