“Bias” is a word we hate. Other than in the article you’re about to read, you’ll almost never find it used on this site, for a string of reasons. It’s one of those words that – regardless of context or literal justification – simply makes people switch off instantly and dismiss your arguments. (See also: “Zionist”, “Quisling”, “fascist”, “Liebore”.)
It’s also largely irrelevant, because there are very few people or organisations who have any duty NOT to be biased. When it comes to Scottish independence we’re as biased as all heck, and there’s no legitimate reason to expect the Daily Record or Scotsman or Daily Mail to be any more impartial than we are. They’re privately-owned businesses and entitled to take any position they like.
(The difference, of course, is that unlike them we’re committed to still telling the truth when we’re being biased, and to always providing linked original sources so you can judge our biased interpretation of facts and events for yourself.)
I was born to be a Rangers supporter. I had no real choice in the matter. My father was a Ger, as was his father and his father’s father. I was accepted that as soon as I was old enough to be lifted over a turnstile I would attend Ibrox, faithfully.
From 1964 (aged 5) I worshipped at the shrine of Rangers for almost three decades. Fortunately for me, my father was the least bigoted man you could wish to meet. His religions were the trade unions and Rangers. Because he wasn’t bigoted our next-door neighbour and dad’s friend used to take me to Parkhead to watch Celtic too, which I found thrilling as I was convinced the “Tims” could see right through me.
This caused me a bit of confusion at school, because some of my family were “Tims”. In fact my favourite aunty was a convert to Catholicism and was as devout and decent a Catholic as you will ever meet. The conflation of football and religion was as normal as the smog-filled air we breathed. It just was what it was. You were either Proddy Ranger or Timmy Celtic. It wasn’t to be questioned.
Except my dad questioned it, loudly and often. He tried to explain the wrongs of the situation to me many times. I remember asking him why he still was a Rangers man if he disliked the whole Proddy/Tim thing that went with it.
“They’re my team, son. The morons can’t change that”, he told me.
Weirdly, right after seeing this earlier this afternoon, we sat down to watch an episode of The Professionals on ITV4, which contained what seemed a rather apt segment.
We don’t think it’s a younger Iain Martin of the Telegraph (accompanied by colleagues Alan Cochrane and Tom Gallagher), but don’t make us swear to it.
In what may be a new all-time low for the broadsheet press in Scotland, this morning’s Scottish edition of the Telegraph makes a front-page lead story out of a petition with a pathetic 4500 signatures, put together by some extremist Yoon nutters to express their rage that there might be a peak-time news show actually made in Scotland.
The idea of a so-called “Scottish Six”, whereby the main six o’clock news bulletin would be a single programme made by BBC Scotland and covering Scottish, UK and world news – rather than the current half-hour London-centric UK programme followed by 30 minutes of regional murdur’n’fitba in Reporting Scotland – has been exercising the media (and pretty much nobody else) for the best part of 20 years.
But now it’s become a constitutional battleground, and the funny thing about it is that the two sides are fighting bitterly over something neither of them actually really wants.
Last night, MP Natalie McGarry made another heavily-qualified semi-apology to the popular abusive-tweeter enthusiast JK Rowling, because that’s how bullying works. (As far as we know McGarry has still refused Rowling’s demand that she make a sizeable donation to Rowling’s charity under threat of legal action.)
One of George Orwell’s most-quoted lines is “Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations.”
We wonder who was trying to silence the torrent of drivel below, then.
Sometimes it’s the smallest, most trivial things that give you away. Graham Grant is the Home Affairs Editor of the Scottish Daily Mail, and earlier this morning he tweeted this snarky dig at prominent independence supporter and pundit Pat Kane, also of the primarily-1980s band Hue And Cry:
Ostensibly it’s a throwaway gag aimed at puncturing an opponent’s pomposity and over-inflated self-regard while portraying the journalist as an arch, wise cynic.
We listened to an interesting chat on Good Morning Scotland earlier today (it’s right at the start, just after the news) featuring Gerry Hassan and the sharp New Statesman reporter Stephen Bush, which briefly discussed a curious political phenomenon of the 2000s where people said they liked certain policies until they were told they were Tory policies, at which point their opinions changed.
It put us rather in mind of a classic 2000AD comic strip called The Ballad Of Halo Jones, and in particular a short episode from it about a character called The Glyph, which seemed to us to sum up the current dilemma facing the Labour Party on both sides of the border – but especially in Scotland, as was rather strikingly illustrated by a revealing interview with Kezia Dugdale on Friday.
So we thought we’d share it with you, because sometimes pictures say a thousand words. Especially if there are several of them and they also have words on them.
Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “Our findings have already been confirmed by expert legal opinion too, James. Scotland’s unlawful annexation and takeover (i.e. colonization) by…” Oct 21, 12:27
sarah on Faces In Sand: “Legal establishment issues: see caltonjock’s piece today about Lady Dorrian.” Oct 21, 12:15
Aidan on Faces In Sand: “Thank you Northcode – that is exactly right!” Oct 21, 11:48
Oneliner on Faces In Sand: “No, it should read ‘United Kingdoms’ As in United States; United Arab Emirates etc.” Oct 21, 11:46
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “OK. If anything, I think my eyes are out on stalks. I have to go out now. I’ll keep my…” Oct 21, 11:37
James Che on Faces In Sand: “North code. Scotland remains a sovereign country signed up to a voluntary union with and as does England if you…” Oct 21, 11:36
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Aha! So “with one bound, Scotland was free”, morphs into “with one (encumbered, hence smaller) bound, Scotland was away, laden…” Oct 21, 11:32
James Che on Faces In Sand: “Scotland is no longer a minor player, it has become a Catalyst Country.” Oct 21, 11:23
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““Logically” There you go, Northy, I’ve pinpointed the flaw in your post. No other cant is prepared to use logic.…” Oct 21, 11:23
James Che on Faces In Sand: “Hatey, Your eyes seem to be closed to what is happening with protests, riots and objections to the wrong direction…” Oct 21, 11:19
Northcode on Faces In Sand: “Correction: “Untied Kingdom” Should read: “United Kingdom” A Freudian slip, perhaps.” Oct 21, 11:15
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Perhaps you could answer a question for me, Alf. If you take yourself off into an empty room with your…” Oct 21, 11:11
Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “Scotland’s treasury was of course dismantled by the England-as-UK parliament in another violation of the inoperable Treaty. Disregarding ‘shared national…” Oct 21, 11:06
James Che on Faces In Sand: “Hatey, It is very likely to do some heavy lifting, but I suspect as time goes forward in the near…” Oct 21, 11:06
Northcode on Faces In Sand: “The Myth They All Rely On The foundational myth in certain Scottish nationalist circles is: Scotland is a sovereign state…” Oct 21, 11:04
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““The English spread the clap. I rest my case, M’Lord.” Cheers, Geri. You’re off to a flying start today. Maybe…” Oct 21, 11:00
Geri on Faces In Sand: “I gave it up too. It’s a government mouth piece & state propaganda channel – & they’ve the cheek to…” Oct 21, 10:56
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Sorry, CC, I meant that ““eclectic”, “eccentric” and rather varied in nature…” = “nuts”. So it seems to me at…” Oct 21, 10:52
Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “There is no doubt that state documentation and (colonial) procedures support the cultural illusion, Hatey. Hundreds of millions of people…” Oct 21, 10:47
James Che on Faces In Sand: “Alf Baird, I have often wondered how Westminster parliament and Government would or could explain away, Why they have never…” Oct 21, 10:46
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Cheers, Spartan, a whole three paras to say you don’t care. And a new primary school playground insult too. Top…” Oct 21, 10:43
Geri on Faces In Sand: “You’d think that wouldn’t you, AI- dan. But you’d be wrong. Even out in deepest, darkest Puru there’d be an…” Oct 21, 10:38
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““raises reasonable questions over shared national debt in the future” Ah, James, that “reasonable” there is doing a lot of…” Oct 21, 10:30
Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Fud McFudface I really don’t care what some internet random like you thinks, to be honest. I come here now…” Oct 21, 10:20
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““Will never forget nor forgive what the bastards did to us” Zat right? As always, not a peep of blame…” Oct 21, 10:15
Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “Nope, you’ve lost me there I’m afraid. 😀” Oct 21, 10:12
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Check out the big brain on CC. “Nuts” covers them all.” Oct 21, 10:04
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “How do sane, rational people leave something that never existed, Alf? Why do sane, rational people carry around things like…” Oct 21, 10:01
James Che on Faces In Sand: “Alf Baird, Indeed alf, there never was a completed union between the two parliaments ofScotland and England, But then there…” Oct 21, 09:59
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Cheers, Spartan. I feel vindicated you’ve taken some time out from your blissful existence to demonstrate your own ignorance. What…” Oct 21, 09:46