Yesterday we noted that rational people arrive at decisions about things based on the facts, not the personalities of who else might support or oppose those things. But in the interests of balance, allow us to present the counterpoint.
As it happens, we agree with McDonald on NATO membership. It would be a pointless folly and an exercise in self-destructive virtue-signalling to leave an organisation which is willing to defend Scotland militarily for free because of its strategic location, and it would be extremely unpopular with the Scottish public (including SNP voters), no matter how much those on the left might wish otherwise.
His reasoning above, however, is a wretched embarrassment.
With precisely the grim level of cynicism we’ve now come to expect as standard, the Scottish Government has released a key document relating to the Salmond inquiry two days before Christmas, hoping it’ll be buried in the ongoing coronavirus-and-Brexit-related implosion of the UK.
The document, which contains legal advice relating to the judicial review brought by Salmond regarding the Scottish Government’s investigations into false allegations of misconduct against him, is extremely heavily redacted. But a few interesting passages remain, so let’s have some fun.
He DOESN’T CARE WHAT YOU THINK. You can bleat at him for a thousand years and he won’t listen. You gave him his election and he has a majority and England has chosen its fate and there’s not a damn thing we can do to stop them dragging us down with them because you’ve wasted the last four years whining about it instead of doing the thing we elected you to do, which is put us in charge of our own future forever.
Now either get off your worthless coward’s arse and do the only thing that’s actually in your power – a plebiscitary election – instead of grandstanding around the world stage achieving absolutely sod-all except getting your face in the press again, or get out of our damn way and let someone who can do the job take over.
(PS that also includes the job of handling the pandemic, which you’re making a pig’s arse of too, but gosh, doesn’t everyone love how telegenically you’re presenting the thousands of needless deaths? New Zealand has had just TWENTY-FIVE with near enough the same population, because their leader had the courage to make the tough calls you failed to because the Selfie Queen can’t bear to be unpopular.)
And no, we haven’t been drinking. Not a drop. We’ve just had enough.
As it happened, it was fortuitous that this story intervened and stopped us writing the story we meant to run yesterday, because now we’ve got a two-for-the-price-of-one on the increasingly farcical insanity running riot in the offices of the Scottish Government.
Alert readers will have noticed the above piece from today’s Times, revealing that the Scottish Government just can’t seem to stop breaking the rules (and squandering huge vats of taxpayers’ money in the process) when it comes to Alex Salmond.
We woke up this morning intending to write about something else, readers, and then we saw perhaps the most horrifying thing we’ve ever seen in the two years since we first started taking an interest in transgender ideology.
It’s only tangentially related to this site’s purpose, but the truth is that as human beings we cannot stand by and watch this happening without at least trying to use whatever platform we have to raise awareness of it.
(The black bars on images in this article were added by us.)
Last week the High Court in England ruled that children under the age of 16 were not medically competent to consent to treatment with so-called “puberty blocker” drugs of the type that were used to “chemically castrate” the computing pioneer Alan Turing for being homosexual (a crime in the UK in the 1950s), which is believed to have led to his suicide by cyanide poisoning at the age of 41.
On 8 December this site ran an article about the Chief Executive Officer of the Scottish National Party, Peter Murrell. It has recently been drawn to our attention that the piece contained a serious inaccuracy, which we would like to remedy.
The list below is a much, much shorter one than we were expecting to run. In the end, just nine MSPs voted today against Johann Lamont’s amendment on forensic medical examinations, with one abstention. The amendment passed by a margin of 104 votes after SNP MSPs voted in favour, with only the Greens and Lib Dems opposed.
Every last one of them is a disgusting coward who doesn’t care about the feelings of rape victims and we’re ashamed to share a nationality with them.
We’ve had plenty to say already this week about the amendment that will be debated at Holyrood this afternoon. So instead we’re going to present you today with the case for each side, as made by two Scottish women on Twitter in the last few hours, and let you decide for yourselves whose argument is the more compelling.
First up, in favour of the amendment, is Scotsman writer Gina Davidson.
The media is focusing on Murrell’s continued evasion of the question of his WhatsApp usage (Murrell bizarrely states he has several messaging apps installed on his phone but uses none of them), but there’s a much more interesting revelation in the second of the letter’s two sections.
This is a direct, unambiguous and categorical statement from the First Minister that the investigation into the false allegations against Salmond was a Scottish Government matter that was absolutely nothing to do with the SNP.
In his evidence to a Holyrood inquiry today, having been asked about some troubling WhatsApp messages concerning the case from 2018 which appeared to suggest the possibility of a conspiracy against the former First Minister, Murrell told members of the committee “I’m not on WhatsApp, it’s not a social media platform I use”.
Alert readers will have noticed a very careful use of the present tense there.
We’ve now filed a formal complaint with the Scottish Information Commissioner about this, because what we’d forgotten last week was that our original request was actually sent in September and it’s now been almost 60 working days with no sign of a proper response, not the 20 it’s supposed to take.
Because for some reason the Scottish Government REALLY doesn’t want you to know what the First Minister and Geoff Aberdein talked about in March 2018, and we think that you probably should.
Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Yeh but no but yeh but no but yeh it’s ok because we’re Scottish, which absolves us of anything apparently,…” Oct 19, 11:50
Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “I do agree Alf, albeit with the almighty caveat that Ru**ia is currently the poster boy of imperialism and warmongering.…” Oct 19, 11:08
factchecker on Faces In Sand: ““Life under the union Jack stinks and associates us with the crimes against humanity they have committed over many hundreds…” Oct 19, 11:05
Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “”Most of the French thinks it’s a great thing, tearing down the system of centuries old colonialist racism and all…” Oct 19, 10:54
Southernbystander on Faces In Sand: “The French have a tradition of using street protest to get political change (I won’t comment on whether that is…” Oct 19, 10:25
Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “Its you and your hypocritical imperialistic kind who aye advocate bombing other countries Hatey, for which there are always consequences,…” Oct 19, 10:14
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “If only Scotland could find a Scottish coke heid of his calibre to lead us. Not that you’ll agree. You…” Oct 19, 09:57
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “How odd that 20 million people would want to flee from the same people who are helping out Scotland at…” Oct 19, 08:44
Colin Dawson on Faces In Sand: “Collette Stevenson’s mistake is quite understandable, given the SNP’s total obsession with transgender issues over the past decade or so.…” Oct 19, 00:00
Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “Is this migration coming from that war torn country that was serving conscription papers on beaches? That is just another…” Oct 18, 23:05
Elmac on Faces In Sand: “The title of Faces in Sand would be more appropriate as Faeces in Sand. How anyone with a brain, a…” Oct 18, 23:02
Willie on Faces In Sand: “Let’s try again to get through moderation. The potential for huge white immigration from a European country looms large. They…” Oct 18, 21:41
Willie on Faces In Sand: “20 million Ukr##nans are wanting to leave. With Britain in lockstep political alignment, if not blood brothers, the UK might…” Oct 18, 21:35
Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “@ Hatey My comment was meant to be criticism as too many people have no critical thinking nowadays due to…” Oct 18, 21:17
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““colossally mishandled by the French state, of course” No “of course” about it here. You should back up your claim…” Oct 18, 21:04
Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “@ Spartan 117 This talk of certain demographics need to be taken in context. I haven’t been following the protests…” Oct 18, 20:49
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““Most of the French think it’s a great thing” Michty! My BS meter has shorted out again. But we can…” Oct 18, 20:49
WhoRattledYourCage on Faces In Sand: “I’ll write about what I feel like writing about. It’s not important, I did say that. I am bigoted against…” Oct 18, 20:48
Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “There y’are, Hatey. Woke before it was even a thing. Then there’s was that Scottish engineer fae Lithgae on the…” Oct 18, 20:48
Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “Found this article about Gen Z woman revisting classic British comedies where on one comedy they found The show’s physical…” Oct 18, 20:44
Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “I doubt there will be any white asylum seekers coming over on the channel in a dinghy. Most of the…” Oct 18, 20:34
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “@Spartan 117 There was a Scottish black bloke in Porridge. The mind boggles!” Oct 18, 20:31
Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “Rab C Nesbitt wouldn’t have been so popular south of the border if it wasn’t for the drunken Scotch stereotype.…” Oct 18, 20:30
agentx on Faces In Sand: “” John Swinney compared to dictator as bus plans branded ‘business confiscation’ John Swinney has been compared to dictators as…” Oct 18, 20:24
Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “It is indeed concerning as it appears to be spreading. The demographic *allegedly* driving the unrest, if true, is noteworthy…” Oct 18, 20:24
Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Right. So there is. Rab wisnae offensive then, or Pete The Jakey, cos it was Scottish. Best not mention Navid…” Oct 18, 20:12
Southernbystander on Faces In Sand: “Thing is the article spends the first half slagging off a panel of three women, white, brown and black for…” Oct 18, 19:56
WhoRattledYourCage on Faces In Sand: “Those programmes are all Scottish, and none of them was done out of pure hatred and bigotry and cheap laughs.…” Oct 18, 19:40
Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “What’s going on in France right now is quite concerning. Just when it looked as if WM was making inroads…” Oct 18, 19:24
Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “To be fair to James, that was a pretty good post of his with good points, a by no means…” Oct 18, 19:20