SNP Members For Independence? What a ridiculous phrase – surely every member of the SNP is in favour of independence, right?
That’s mostly true of course, but the leadership and many elected representatives of the party appear to be intent on repeating the failed Section 30 route to independence, and also on restricting serious debate about alternative strategies.
It seems that a revised “Plan B” may be discussed at the party conference, still almost two months away, and for all Plan B’s merits it is seriously flawed and its inclusion at the expense of alternative and better plans at conference would merely pay lip service to the term “serious debate”
Something clearly needed to be done, which is why SNP Members For Indy has been set up. So what’s it for and what is it trying to do?
We’re very busy today writing more FOI requests and the like, so we’ll just take a brief moment here to note that hiring super-expensive lawyers to object to the questions you’re being asked DEFINITELY sounds like the behaviour of people who are keen to co-operate fully and in the most transparent way possible with an inquiry:
Having been privileged to serve as SNP National Treasurer, I’m aware of the duties that go with the post. Of course, it’s changed in some ways since then due to the scale of the party, the resources available and even technology. The days are long gone when Joan Knott, who has sadly since passed away, required to take a taxi down to my legal office to have cheques signed between court or clients.
But some things still remain fundamental, and in particular providing annual accounts for the party. That has been done for 2019, in the administrative sense, but what’s missing is their publication and provision either to the NEC or the party more widely.
For sure there’s been no conference but there are other bodies and other ways of making them available to party members. At NEC, conference and indeed anywhere else, members were entitled to see them and question me. It was their right to see them, and it remains so now. So why haven’t they seen them?
A column on a Sturgeon-loyalist indy website that we read yesterday has been mildly annoying us ever since, and in the interests of open debate (but mainly because it’s cold and grey and rainy outside and we can’t go out and feed the swans) we thought it was worth taking half an hour to walk through it a little and explain just why it’s such a dangerous piece of fantasy nonsense.
But first here’s one of said swans. She’s about five months old and her adult feathers are just starting to come through. Isn’t she lovely?
In case things get a bit rough later we’ve got some squirrels and a really fat dachshund as emergency backup, so buckle in.
The comments from committee convener and SNP MP Linda Fabiani (we guess she must be another of those MI5 plants/secret Unionists) are really quite extraordinary. In terms of Parliamentary language they’re only a hair’s-breadth short of an invitation to step outside and settle things with an old-school dust-up in the car park.
The weekend just past saw a convulsion as big as any we can ever recall witnessing on Yes social media, triggered by a series of tweets by Nicola Sturgeon which caused an extraordinary negative reaction out of all proportion to their ostensible content.
The reason was that the First Minister – who had remained silent about countless episodes of hideous misogynistic abuse aimed from her own side at MPs and MSPs like Joan McAlpine and Joanna Cherry – had chosen to suddenly leap into action in defence of the toxically divisive horror that is Glasgow councillor Rhiannon Spear after Spear had been widely criticised for making blatantly false claims in a video promoting her attempt to be selected as the candidate for Argyll & Bute.
(Sturgeon had no such public condemnation for the torrents of abuse the SNP Twitler Youth then unleased on Kirsten Thornton, the female SNP activist and Generation Yes founder who’d pointed out Spear’s untruths.)
The move sent the party’s woke and sane factions into a frenzy of bloodletting which in itself will have little if any impact on the wider electorate, but nonetheless threw into sharp relief the life-and-death battle currently going on for the SNP’s soul.
And since that’s related to what we’ve been writing about on Wings for the bulk of this year, it seemed worthwhile to get some things down on the record once and for all.
Just two days ago the Electoral Commission gave us a fourth supposed date for the publication of the SNP’s 2019 accounts: having first been due out in early August, they then told us to expect them in early September, and then last week, and then in “the next three weeks”, ie the middle of October.
But someone gave us a tipoff that we might be able to request them via Freedom Of Information, since ostensibly the only holdup was that the EC wanted to wait until ALL of the main parties’ accounts were ready and publish them all at once for tidiness.
So we sent one in, and we just got a very quick reply.
During a debate on the UK government’s recent decision to abandon the notion of gender self-ID, SNP MP Anne McLaughlin told the Commons chamber that it was still the Scottish Government’s “strong commitment” to go ahead with highly controversial reform of the law BEFORE next year’s Holyrood election.
But that isn’t what Scottish voters were told earlier this year.
The SNP have historically been swift to suspend any party members when there’s any hint of inappropriate conduct, never mind even a whiff of illegality. It’s been that way since 2015, with the axe falling on elected members as well as candidates in target seats and critical elections, and ordinary activists.
Not even a by-your-leave, let alone an explanation, is afforded – just suspension with immediate effect. And that’s all well and good, some might say. No hint of impropriety should attach to the party and making a virtue of acting swiftly can be both necessary and appropriate.
So why then no action against the Chief Executive?
Mark Beggan on Two Men Unalike: “That needs changed. It’s being abused.” Mar 3, 18:25
agentx on Two Men Unalike: “” Voting by post If you know that you won’t be able to get to the polling station on polling…” Mar 3, 18:11
agentx on Two Men Unalike: “Earlier on Tuesday, it had been speculated that HMS Duncan might be deployed to the area, however Starmer confirmed on…” Mar 3, 18:04
Mark Beggan on Two Men Unalike: “Should the Scottish government issue Stab Vests to its citizens?” Mar 3, 17:39
Mark Beggan on Two Men Unalike: “With the Postal vote scandal now hitting the news it begs the question. How many postal votes are there in…” Mar 3, 17:29
Geri on Two Men Unalike: “It will become the currency. Do you think anyone in the ME will continue to trade in $ when the…” Mar 3, 17:23
Mark Beggan on Two Men Unalike: “We are already involved in the ‘big game of RISK’. In fact we are up to our necks in the…” Mar 3, 17:21
Hatey McHateface on Two Men Unalike: “I guess it’s a completely forlorn hope that even if the data is ever compiled and published, it will detail…” Mar 3, 16:55
Breastplate on Two Men Unalike: “Yes, John, I hadn’t noticed my ‘nd’ missing but I’m absolutely sure you understand what I have said. You are…” Mar 3, 16:50
Hatey McHateface on Two Men Unalike: “Informed and incisive analysis, Geri. I don’t know how you do it. How many billions will President Trump need to…” Mar 3, 16:48
Hatey McHateface on Two Men Unalike: “Fit happened there, Implants? Something seems tae hae hastened yer e [ Loving the economic illiteracy of your belief that…” Mar 3, 16:38
Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Two Men Unalike: “WES STREETING TO COMPEL GENDER CLINICS TO SHARE PUBERTY BLOCKER DATA NHS gender clinics must share data on children who…” Mar 3, 16:02
Breastplate on Two Men Unalike: “John Main, I’ve asked you a number of times to give us your definition of genocide to no avail. We…” Mar 3, 15:43
Geri on Two Men Unalike: “He’s as corrupt as feck & on the take. He has been since he took office with the idiot coin…” Mar 3, 15:21
Northcode on Two Men Unalike: “No worries, Cynicus… an easy mistake to make. Your apology is 100% accepted.” Mar 3, 15:13
Breastplate on Two Men Unalike: “Cynicus, Northcode’s post, AI generated or not is correct. The new Master of the Universe is China, whether the USA…” Mar 3, 15:00
Young Lochinvar on Two Men Unalike: “Starmers dithering over sending HMS Duncan to Cyprus to “provide additional air defence”/ present a tempting target.. We have only…” Mar 3, 14:55
Hatey McHateface on Two Men Unalike: “Might be something in what you say, Confused. Still though, belt and braces. Better dust off the “genocide” accusation. We…” Mar 3, 14:42
Northcode on Two Men Unalike: “By the way, in case it isn’t clear to folk, the percentages in front of the ‘(most) likely human’ lines…” Mar 3, 14:33
Hatey McHateface on Two Men Unalike: “An interesting article on life in another of the usual suspects’ poster boys for their aspirational Independent Scotland – the…” Mar 3, 14:29
Cynicus on Two Men Unalike: “An unconditional 100% apology! In my smart -arse haste I did not notice that the bulk of your post was…” Mar 3, 14:25
Confused on Two Men Unalike: “https://archive.ph/t8Egf war an shit … bored already I hope this blows over soon, there is no need for it. None…” Mar 3, 14:21
Hatey McHateface on Two Men Unalike: “24 carat blethers, Cynicus. President Donald Trump is no Anglosaxon. He’s half Scots and half German. I hope he sues…” Mar 3, 14:21
Hatey McHateface on Two Men Unalike: “Stick tae postin in Scots an nane o this bourach will happen, Northy.” Mar 3, 14:14
Cynicus on Two Men Unalike: “TURABDIN 3 March, 2026 at 12:54 pm “…..the lives of people like me are collateral to his anglosaxon great gaming.…” Mar 3, 13:54
Northcode on Two Men Unalike: “Northcode’s comment analysis report: 15% likely human Strong, personal voice with idiomatic phrases and cultural allusions (“Rick and Ilsa,” “Kiss…” Mar 3, 13:43
Hatey McHateface on Two Men Unalike: “Aye, Alf, Fanon made it to the good ol USA before the end, even if his stay was cut tragically…” Mar 3, 13:37
Hatey McHateface on Two Men Unalike: ““apologies if my suspicion that Northcode‘s post is largely AI is Unjustified” Do those suspicions extend to the plea for…” Mar 3, 13:25
Hatey McHateface on Two Men Unalike: “I asked Grok to prepare a stand-up comedy routine from your post, Geri: “Weapons that don’t work” “China , if…” Mar 3, 13:15
TURABDIN on Two Men Unalike: “TRUMP is the perfect racist, the lives of people like me are collateral to his anglosaxon great gaming. Oh, btw…” Mar 3, 12:54