You’ve had a few pretty gruelling pieces to get through in the last week or so, readers, so here’s something a little more light-hearted.
It’s from an episode of Broadcasting Scotland on 27 November 2020, a month after we confirmed our big story about the SNP accounts and the missing fundraiser money. In it, snug-toed SNP MP Pete Wishart opines that there really is nothing to worry about, and we should all just put our trust in the party.
We’ll leave you to judge whose opinion stood the test of time.
On Sunday, Nicola Sturgeon told Laura Kuenssberg that the SNP’s accounts “went up and down” as her excuse for not noticing that hundreds of thousands of pounds had suddenly vanished from them overnight.
Several things leap out immediately from that clip.
One, there absolutely very much WAS “something glaringly suspicious in the accounts that I should have seen” – the party she led had raised almost £700,000 in two “ring-fenced” fundraisers that wasn’t there any more, which ought to have made its leader at least mildly curious.
And two, attempting to fob responsibility off onto the independent auditors simply won’t wash. It’s not their job to determine whether the SNP has kept its political promises or not, their job is simply to match up money coming in against money going out and produce a set of numbers to show what it all adds up to. It makes no odds to them if it was spent on a party conference, a fancy motorhome or a 50-foot golden statue of Danny La Rue. All they can see is numbers.
But even leaving those things aside, if we’re going to learn anything about how The Great Indyref Swindle got to this calamitous point unchecked we need to examine just how hard Nicola Sturgeon had to look the other way to fail to see what was going on literally under her nose and literally in her own back yard.
To tell you the truth, readers, we’re suffering from a little bit of option paralysis at the moment, although happily not in the same way Peter Murrell is.
The endless torrent of revelations following on from Murrell’s conviction a week ago isn’t just fascinating in its own right – it also forces numerous historical issues to be seen in a new light. At any given second there are half-a-dozen different articles we could be writing, but also so many to read that it’s hard to find the time.
We suspect this matter is going to run and run all through the summer silly season because there are simply so many angles and so many unanswered questions.
Sadly, this turned out to be prescient this morning.
Laura Kuenssberg did give Nicola Sturgeon an uncomfortable time in their interview on her Sunday programme on BBC News, but when confronted with the one gaping open goal that Sturgeon has no answer for – and even when Sturgeon TWICE set it up on a plate for her – Kuenssberg failed to knock the ball into the empty net.
That doesn’t – by some distance – mean there was nothing of interest to note, though, so let’s take a walk through (the first instalment of) what was said.
Now that Nicola Sturgeon is finally free of her gruelling MSP workload, which could give her anything up to two extra hours of spare time a week, she might like to start making a proper dent in the contents of her fully-loaded bookshelves.
The multi-statement meltdown that has been the unravelling of Nicola Sturgeon this week has been quite something to behold. Last night, for example, we swear our Twitter feed presented these two tweets one after the other.
We’ll be honest with you, readers, if we were in a situation where a lawyer was issuing statements for us, this isn’t what we’d want to hear.
“If my client had been charged, she’d be in prison right now” is a worrying distance short of a vote of confidence in your client’s innocence.
But the statement Aamer Anwar put out for Nicola Sturgeon last night – her FOURTH in 48 hours, despite saying on Monday morning that she’d be making no further comment on the Peter Murrell case – had rather more wrong with it than even that.
So, having made a statement on Monday morning which asserted that she wouldn’t make any further statements, then making another statement on Monday afternoon, Nicola Sturgeon and her solicitor issued a third statement in 36 hours last night.
And while we acknowledge that this is a very high bar to clear, it contained one of the most troubling and blatant lies she’s ever told.
And as the Nicola Sturgeon Loyal, led by her most faithful of lieutenants, set out to try to take control of the post-conviction narrative, let’s take a look at just what a boatload of bare-faced bullshit the above is.
There will be no trial, no cross-examination, no explanation. The people of Scotland, the members and supporters of the SNP, the wider Yes movement, none of us will ever know what really happened. Ever get the feeling you’ve been cheated?
Despite what you or we might think, in the eyes of the Scottish Football Association this ISN’T a pitch invasion. This is simply what a football match in progress looks like.
Because according to the absolutely extraordinary statement they’ve released this evening, that was game time. The clock was still running, nothing was being added to account for the fact that there were thousands of thugs rampaging across the field, and the game was still happening in that moment, until it was ended four seconds later.
Oneliner on Search And Replace: “Sure, we can vote them out. Removal of London’s Civil Service, with all the attendant subversive paraphernalia, is not so…” Jul 6, 09:51
Lorncal on Search And Replace: “HMcH: I tend to agree. I have not read or heard anything that would indicate deliberate and prior intent to…” Jul 6, 09:30
Hatey McHateface on Search And Replace: “According to Cesaire (I think – somebody will correct me if needed), the moon IS made of green cheese.” Jul 6, 09:28
Hatey McHateface on Search And Replace: “Wow, TURABDIN. You’ve reached the age of “maturity” without ever learning that the Irish, Germans, Italians and Scots also reached…” Jul 6, 09:26
Lorncal on Search And Replace: “james: then tell us which law pertains to ‘ring-fenced’ party donations being used elsewhere?” Jul 6, 09:19
Lorncal on Search And Replace: “AdamH: so, Greens donated to another party for a referendum? Why? Why would anyone do that? If a referendum were…” Jul 6, 09:16
Hatey McHateface on Search And Replace: ““With this level of nonsense I hardly go online any more apart from a few sites like this one” That’s…” Jul 6, 08:57
Hatey McHateface on Search And Replace: “So we Scots can’t conclude the SNP are corrupt incompetents and vote them out while we are still in the…” Jul 6, 08:54
Hatey McHateface on Search And Replace: “A couple of thoughts about AI. We all see free AI-generated results when we use the internet, yet we are…” Jul 6, 08:48
TURABDIN on Search And Replace: “i think the ENGLISH & AMERICANS are just «lucky» history, events have been notably kind to them how do they…” Jul 6, 08:47
sarah on Search And Replace: “George, we will never improve our system UNTIL we leave the Union. From there it is a clean slate whereas…” Jul 6, 08:38
Spartan 117 on Search And Replace: “We think alike, Dan. Truth bombs in every paragraph, especially regarding AI.” Jul 6, 08:28
Hatey McHateface on Search And Replace: “Surely anybody holding serious, cast-iron doubts about the system and anything presented in court has a moral duty to attend…” Jul 6, 08:20
DaveL on Search And Replace: “You’ve answered your question in the last sentence of your post. Having no confidence in the system you cannot be…” Jul 6, 07:58
Hatey McHateface on Search And Replace: “Actually, Lorncal, I regard the fact that I appear to have more bank accounts than the SNP as sufficient evidence…” Jul 6, 07:48
Slim Jim on Search And Replace: “Maybe they just don’t want to investigate this crime and are determined not to because then it all gets a…” Jul 6, 07:45
Captain Caveman on Search And Replace: “Get in! 🙂 Reaching the QF was the “minimum acceptable” for me, so anything else is a bonus. Harland looking…” Jul 6, 07:04
agentx on Search And Replace: “What a game! Fabulous win 🙂” Jul 6, 04:13
james on Search And Replace: “Lorncal-Should those monies then be placed into an interest-bearing principal or can it be used for other purposes? Should the…” Jul 6, 03:43
DavidT on Search And Replace: “If the first version is embezzlement, is the second not fraud?” Jul 6, 02:33
crazycat on Search And Replace: “Yes, exactly. The website for the 2017 fund-raiser had the URL ref.scot, not snp.org, though that appeared on receipts for…” Jul 6, 00:41
crazycat on Search And Replace: “John Logue explains that in another part of his interview: And so when the police carry out a complex investigation…” Jul 6, 00:37
George Ferguson on Search And Replace: “I no longer believe in an Independent Scotland and Ross Greer has just told you why. We live in a…” Jul 5, 23:55
Angus on Search And Replace: “The fobbing off by the utterly politically corrupt Police Scotland and the Crown Office will continue for ever. How much…” Jul 5, 23:17
Stuart Swanston on Search And Replace: “The NEC of the SNP is the legal body of the Party. Members of the National Executive Council of the…” Jul 5, 22:47
Bilbo on Search And Replace: “Dan, you’ve hit the nail on the head with your last paragraph. Case in point the hysteria about the recent…” Jul 5, 22:42
robertkknight on Search And Replace: “Likely spoil my ballot again. I don’t vote for unionist parties, including the SNP.” Jul 5, 22:20
Bilbo on Search And Replace: “@ Main The same was said about Brexit, the same was said about Boris Johnson becoming Prime Minister. What difference…” Jul 5, 21:39
Jay on Search And Replace: “Dan, whether you are ‘leftist’ or ‘rightist’ depends on who wants to insult you. Likely that some who use the…” Jul 5, 21:33