Revised figures released 86
Posted on
July 15, 2015 by
Rev. Stuart Campbell
David Cameron, 16 September 2014 and 8 May 2015 respectively:
You get how it works now, right?
One nation united 125
Posted on
July 15, 2015 by
Rev. Stuart Campbell
Last night we highlighted the reaction from various right-wing columnists to the SNP’s torpedoing yesterday of Tory attempts to relax the laws on foxhunting in England and Wales. Today the same commentariat has turned its rage to thoughts of revenge, in the form of “English votes for English laws”.
And we’re confused, because we don’t know what this “England” they speak of is.
The filth and the fury 167
Posted on
July 14, 2015 by
Rev. Stuart Campbell
It seems safe to say that the SNP’s de facto defeat of the fox-torturing lobby today has riled the right-wing commentariat beyond their endurance. Unable to get their way and inflict a prolonged, agonising death on small animals for “sport”, Tory columnists have instead descended howling and bloodthirsty at pack strength on their readers.
Here’s just a small sample.
What a champion of Scotland looks like 204
Posted on
July 14, 2015 by
Rev. Stuart Campbell
Friendly help for the Daily Mail 119
Posted on
July 14, 2015 by
Rev. Stuart Campbell
As part of their tireless campaign against abuse and threats on the internet, the Mail’s ever-alert reporters will doubtless be wanting to run a major piece on the deputy leader of UKIP calling today on a widely-read website for Nicola Sturgeon to be killed.
No need to thank us for the tip-off, guys. All part of the service.
Fox Force 56 248
Posted on
July 13, 2015 by
Rev. Stuart Campbell
There’s little to gladden the heart of a left-wing Scot like a Tory squealing in outrage that he won’t be allowed to torture woodland creatures to death for “sport” any more.
So this site is thrilled by the announcement from the SNP that they will, after much speculation in the media, vote against (and therefore likely condemn to defeat) the UK government’s plans to relax England’s fox-hunting ban to a point at which it would be de facto repealed entirely.
And not just because foxes are a lot cuter than Tories.
A curious discrepancy 81
Posted on
July 13, 2015 by
Rev. Stuart Campbell
The Scottish Daily Mail today leads with a screaming banner headline announcing in its trademark style that, according to a poll it commissioned with Survation, Scots are massively opposed to any income tax rises when Holyrood eventually gets power over the rates under the new Scotland Bill.
And the reason that’s weird is that we commissioned a poll on the very same thing just days before, and got a dramatically different answer.
There goes another one 116
Posted on
July 13, 2015 by
Rev. Stuart Campbell
Yesterday we listed some of the nastier items from George Osborne’s horrifying 2015 budget that Labour had said they wouldn’t be opposing, including the public-sector payrise freeze, the reduction in the benefit cap and the slashing of child tax credit for families with more than two children.
On a BBC hustings debate today, Yvette Cooper extended the list.
Just leaving this here 169
Posted on
July 13, 2015 by
Rev. Stuart Campbell
Our latest Panelbase poll was conducted from 26 June-3 July, before this weekend’s astonishing events involving Greece, which are currently being documented on Twitter under the hashtag #ThisIsACoup.
We’re going to ask the exact same question again in our next one, so we can see if the EU’s actions have caused any significant change in public opinion. It should be pretty interesting either way.
They think we forget 56
Posted on
July 12, 2015 by
Rev. Stuart Campbell
The insulting thing is that they think it so soon.
Her Majesty’s Opposition 107
Posted on
July 12, 2015 by
Rev. Stuart Campbell
Meanwhile, in an alternative universe 42
Posted on
July 12, 2015 by
Rev. Stuart Campbell
The Economist:
“George Osborne’s political vision is brave, bold – and on many counts wrong.
Cutting benefits to the very poor while reducing inheritance tax for the wealthy is indefensible.”
The acting leader of the Labour Party:
Of course, it’s entirely natural that the Labour Party and The Economist should be on opposite sides. But somehow everything seems to be the wrong way round.
