News reaches Wings this evening that Humza Yousaf has called an emergency meeting of the Scottish Cabinet at 10 o’clock tomorrow morning, just a couple of hours before FMQs. (This information has been confirmed directly to us by a source very close to a member of said Cabinet.)
An emergency Cabinet meeting is an extraordinarily rare event. As far as we’re able to establish there have only been two during the SNP’s time in power – when the budget failed to pass in 2009 and Alex Salmond’s administration had to decide whether or not to trigger a general election, and one the day after the Brexit vote to supposedly plan a second indyref (LOL). But in any case they’re extremely unusual.
The subject of the meeting has not been disclosed to us. It could, for example, concern imminent developments in Operation Branchform, or it could relate to the Bute House Agreement between the SNP and the Scottish Greens. The men in grey kilts may have come for the FM. Or Scotland could be about to declare war on Morocco or something. But we are told that the fact of the meeting taking place is a 100% certainty.
So no sleeping in tomorrow, readers. It’s probably going to be big.
More than three months have passed since Alex Salmond launched a lawsuit against the Scottish Government for its grotesquely botched handling of false allegations of sexual misconduct against him.
With Scottish politics currently in a completely moribund state, as the party of government disintegrates shambolically and the main opposition party keeps its mouth shut and its head down in an attempt to not destroy its newfound and extremely fragile status as a credible alternative, one might imagine that the political media would be desperate for the case to get under way and provide them with some juicy content.
So it’s slightly surprising that none of them has noticed the latest development.
But we’ve subsequently noticed a number of attempts by various people to muddy the story by talking about a “draft” warrant request, implying that there was no improper delay. So we checked up, and thought you might like to know how the process works.
The SNP has of course denied them, but they also denied our recent leak from the party’s draft manifesto and we know for sure that that was real. The trouble with lying all the time is that nobody believes you even if you occasionally tell the the truth.
Of course, there would be an easy way to prove the numbers were a fake – release the real ones, which is in any case the most fundamental element of transparency in a democratic election. And whatever they are could hardly be any more embarrassing than the rumours, which have candidates topping the list (and likely to get seats) on a shocking 2.4% of the vote.
We thought readers might like a look at the draft SNP manifesto introduction (written, we hear, by Mike Russell) that’s currently being passed around branches for comment.
Alert readers will undoubtedly have noticed a number of, to put it mildly, explosive-sounding developments this evening regarding the ongoing inquiries into the Scottish Government’s misconduct over false allegations against Alex Salmond.
Several reports have quoted extracts from the former First Minister’s submission to James Hamilton, who’s investigating the current First Minister over possible breaches of the Ministerial Code relating to the investigation of the allegations.
The submission – delivered on Mr Salmond’s birthday – has been widely leaked to the media but only selectively reported, and like others Wings has obtained a full copy.
We are advised that its contents do not contain anything which breaches or potentially breaches Lady Dorrian’s court order protecting the identities of the complainers against Mr Salmond, and as such there are no barriers to us publishing the entire document in the public interest, because its contents make some extremely grave and disturbing allegations against the current First Minister.
One of them, of course, is who leaked the story to Davie Clegg of the Daily Record in August of that year, when the whole thing should have been confidential and passing it to the press was an unambiguously malicious and criminal act.
Over the last year or so, this site’s commentary on matters surrounding the attempted imprisonment of Alex Salmond over false allegations of sexual abuse has attracted a considerable amount of ire from a section of the readership, demanding “proof” of the involvement of the current First Minister.
Such proof has been impossible to provide for legal reasons. But it’s always been the case that the truth could only be suppressed for so long, and events in recent days have brought the first chinks of light through the wall of smoke and mirrors the Scottish Government has been attempting to surround the matter with.
So in our very lightest and softest shoes, let’s tiptoe through what is both a labyrinth and a minefield and see if we can make some of it a little easier to understand.
Captain Caveman on The shifting sands of memory: “Scot Finlayson said: “England has always been a conquered country” Easily verifiable, pre-GCSE level historical facts say: “… At its…” May 23, 08:34
Tartanpigsy on The shifting sands of memory: “Wow! Wow! Wow! Makes me happy to have Scottish Independence being discussed in these pages Good discussion being had albeit…” May 23, 08:22
Scot Finlayson on The shifting sands of memory: “The Italian Romans conquered most of England in about 40 years, stayed there for 400 years then the German Saxons…” May 23, 08:08
Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “Craig Murray the ham ass supporter? That Craig Murray? Oh dear. That’s it fucked then. May as well cancel it…” May 23, 07:24
Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “@Aidan Thanks for the link. They’ve had “decades of genocide” an a’. Has anybody else noticed how genocide’s no what…” May 23, 07:22
Vivian O’Blivion on The shifting sands of memory: “Labour have thrown in the clout at Hamilton, Larkhall & Stonehouse. On Monday the bookies had the SNP at 64%…” May 23, 07:19
Aidan on The shifting sands of memory: “Well wouldn’t you look at that: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/30/west-papua-independence-petition-is-rebuffed-at-un” May 23, 05:58
Oneliner on The shifting sands of memory: “Does England have a Navy? Yep the MOD – such a cracking good employer that we have to bail them…” May 22, 22:58
Wullie B on The shifting sands of memory: “It was once said that the sun never set on the British empire, what they forgot to put was the…” May 22, 22:56
James on The shifting sands of memory: ““Aidan” Mind and take yer Big Book of Unionist Myths with you in case you get stuck.” May 22, 22:55
Wullie B on The shifting sands of memory: “You do realise that no note over £5 whether printed in Scotland or England is legal tender dont you” May 22, 22:29
Aidan on The shifting sands of memory: “Great news – I’ll be in Estonia, but can you link me to where I can watch the hearing online,…” May 22, 22:14
Alf Baird on The shifting sands of memory: “Thanks James, I recollect this aspect may be included in the ‘markers of colonialism’ but I will check to see…” May 22, 22:02
robertkknight on The shifting sands of memory: “So tell me, Agent X, how many battered (second) wives do you recon have been warned against leaving their abusive…” May 22, 21:46
sarah on The shifting sands of memory: “Well done, Salvo/Liberation.scot, and the SSRG team. Having a “big” legal eagle change his mind after 59 years will wake…” May 22, 21:42
Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: ““after they clearly lost Indyref” Of course, Barbie, the Yes campaign won the Indy Referendum. The behaviour of the SNP…” May 22, 21:05
Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “The Romans were all gone from Britain, not just Scotland, by 410. The Scots started coming over from Ireland to…” May 22, 20:39
Geri on The shifting sands of memory: “The massive fly in yer ointment is that the Union between Scotland & England wasn’t territorial. What Scotland entered the…” May 22, 20:38
agent x on The shifting sands of memory: “Ah so Scotland is responsible for the evil British Empire. “The British Empire, at its peak, encompassed a vast network…” May 22, 20:24
Scot Finlayson on The shifting sands of memory: “The English needed our soldiers to win themselves an Empire, the Scottish Highlander was known to be the greatest fighting…” May 22, 20:06
Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “Haud oan noo, Bob. The regulars on here don’t like “former states of the Soviet Union” “determining their own path”.…” May 22, 19:34
Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “According to that article, HMS Glasgow will be followed by another 7 Clyde-built ships of the same design. Looks like…” May 22, 19:27
Marie on The shifting sands of memory: “Yep – merely crumbs off the table – kept to placate elite Scots in the day and used to hoodwink…” May 22, 19:22
agent x on The shifting sands of memory: ““Did any of the above prevent the people of the Republic of Ireland determining their own path? I didn’t think…” May 22, 19:18
James Jones on Just a couple more shots: “‘In law, people are either male or female.’ Also in real life, in nature. You can choose to play-act like…” May 22, 19:04
Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: ““You have problems matey” Not as many or as serious as you have Barbie, if your post is anything to…” May 22, 19:03
robertkknight on The shifting sands of memory: “Did any of the above prevent the people of the Republic of Ireland determining their own path? I didn’t think…” May 22, 18:50