News reaches Wings this evening that Humza Yousaf has called an emergency meeting of the Scottish Cabinet at 10 o’clock tomorrow morning, just a couple of hours before FMQs. (This information has been confirmed directly to us by a source very close to a member of said Cabinet.)
An emergency Cabinet meeting is an extraordinarily rare event. As far as we’re able to establish there have only been two during the SNP’s time in power – when the budget failed to pass in 2009 and Alex Salmond’s administration had to decide whether or not to trigger a general election, and one the day after the Brexit vote to supposedly plan a second indyref (LOL). But in any case they’re extremely unusual.
The subject of the meeting has not been disclosed to us. It could, for example, concern imminent developments in Operation Branchform, or it could relate to the Bute House Agreement between the SNP and the Scottish Greens. The men in grey kilts may have come for the FM. Or Scotland could be about to declare war on Morocco or something. But we are told that the fact of the meeting taking place is a 100% certainty.
So no sleeping in tomorrow, readers. It’s probably going to be big.
More than three months have passed since Alex Salmond launched a lawsuit against the Scottish Government for its grotesquely botched handling of false allegations of sexual misconduct against him.
With Scottish politics currently in a completely moribund state, as the party of government disintegrates shambolically and the main opposition party keeps its mouth shut and its head down in an attempt to not destroy its newfound and extremely fragile status as a credible alternative, one might imagine that the political media would be desperate for the case to get under way and provide them with some juicy content.
So it’s slightly surprising that none of them has noticed the latest development.
But we’ve subsequently noticed a number of attempts by various people to muddy the story by talking about a “draft” warrant request, implying that there was no improper delay. So we checked up, and thought you might like to know how the process works.
The SNP has of course denied them, but they also denied our recent leak from the party’s draft manifesto and we know for sure that that was real. The trouble with lying all the time is that nobody believes you even if you occasionally tell the the truth.
Of course, there would be an easy way to prove the numbers were a fake – release the real ones, which is in any case the most fundamental element of transparency in a democratic election. And whatever they are could hardly be any more embarrassing than the rumours, which have candidates topping the list (and likely to get seats) on a shocking 2.4% of the vote.
We thought readers might like a look at the draft SNP manifesto introduction (written, we hear, by Mike Russell) that’s currently being passed around branches for comment.
Alert readers will undoubtedly have noticed a number of, to put it mildly, explosive-sounding developments this evening regarding the ongoing inquiries into the Scottish Government’s misconduct over false allegations against Alex Salmond.
Several reports have quoted extracts from the former First Minister’s submission to James Hamilton, who’s investigating the current First Minister over possible breaches of the Ministerial Code relating to the investigation of the allegations.
The submission – delivered on Mr Salmond’s birthday – has been widely leaked to the media but only selectively reported, and like others Wings has obtained a full copy.
We are advised that its contents do not contain anything which breaches or potentially breaches Lady Dorrian’s court order protecting the identities of the complainers against Mr Salmond, and as such there are no barriers to us publishing the entire document in the public interest, because its contents make some extremely grave and disturbing allegations against the current First Minister.
One of them, of course, is who leaked the story to Davie Clegg of the Daily Record in August of that year, when the whole thing should have been confidential and passing it to the press was an unambiguously malicious and criminal act.
Over the last year or so, this site’s commentary on matters surrounding the attempted imprisonment of Alex Salmond over false allegations of sexual abuse has attracted a considerable amount of ire from a section of the readership, demanding “proof” of the involvement of the current First Minister.
Such proof has been impossible to provide for legal reasons. But it’s always been the case that the truth could only be suppressed for so long, and events in recent days have brought the first chinks of light through the wall of smoke and mirrors the Scottish Government has been attempting to surround the matter with.
So in our very lightest and softest shoes, let’s tiptoe through what is both a labyrinth and a minefield and see if we can make some of it a little easier to understand.
Alf Baird on A matter of class: ““public spending to GDP % ratio in the U.K. is not dissimilar to Norway” Aye, which also explains why public…” Dec 29, 11:48
James Cheyne on A matter of class: “Mark beggan, You obviously did not read it, just made a silly derogative comment, I do not get payed for…” Dec 29, 11:45
Northcode on A matter of class: ““…someone who claims to be a slave…” I’m a house slave and have managed to figure out my English master’s…” Dec 29, 11:43
Mark Beggan on A matter of class: “It pays to feed the wee birds. Just seen a Great spotted woodpecker in the garden. That’s my day made.” Dec 29, 11:42
James Cheyne on A matter of class: “Here in the land of reality called Scotland , we are already dealing with the first White elephant we were…” Dec 29, 11:37
James Cheyne on A matter of class: “As a salesman for the new world of civic Society and Social Contracts you will have prove it works for…” Dec 29, 11:33
Tinto Chiel on Off-topic: “Hi, Ian and Marie. Yes, to absent friends, of whom there are now too many. Life is but a melon…” Dec 29, 11:28
Northcode on A matter of class: ““…it’s essential to compare oranges with oranges.” Agreed… although in AI Dan’s latest incomprehensible collection of internet generated word dribblings…” Dec 29, 11:26
Aidan on A matter of class: “For someone who claims to be a slave you seem to spend a disproportionate amount of time posting drivel on…” Dec 29, 11:24
Marie on A matter of class: “They want the blood of our children for their upcoming wars. Give them nothing.” Dec 29, 11:23
Aidan on A matter of class: “The other thing is that the public spending to GDP % ratio in the U.K. is not dissimilar to Norway/Sweden/Denmark…” Dec 29, 11:21
Mark Beggan on A matter of class: “@James Cheyne Do you get paid directly from Qatar or is there a middle man account. Please don’t tell me…” Dec 29, 11:14
Northcode on A matter of class: ““It was God who gave Pictavia to the Picts who in turn, in an act of great generosity pleasing to…” Dec 29, 11:13
Northcode on A matter of class: ““those nations joyfully celebrating their liberation are significantly worse off than Scotland by almost every metric…” Yes… the Scots might…” Dec 29, 11:04
James Cheyne on A matter of class: “So unable to retire with as I should be able to, I keep posting to let everyone know the errors,…” Dec 29, 11:03
Northcode on A matter of class: ““One of the biggest differences compared to the U.K. and continental Europe is that Scandinavia didn’t industrialise…” One of the…” Dec 29, 11:00
Captain Caveman on A matter of class: “Yes, very good points Aidan. Fundamentally, in any comparative discussion such as this, it’s essential to compare oranges with oranges.…” Dec 29, 10:57
Marie Clark on Off-topic: “Good to hear from you Ian. Time to raise a glass to missing friends indeed. Cheers” Dec 29, 10:51
Aidan on A matter of class: “Of course most of those nations joyfully celebrating their liberation are significantly worse off than Scotland by almost every metric,…” Dec 29, 10:42
Mark Beggan on A matter of class: “@ Andy Ellis “Social Democracy” Unless women are treated with the respect that they deserve and everyone takes responsibility for…” Dec 29, 10:40
James Cheyne on A matter of class: “Andy Ellis, You will have forgive for stating where you can stuff your believe in Social Contracts, £10,000 worse off…” Dec 29, 10:35
James Cheyne on A matter of class: “Social contracts? They appear to be selective and non binding nowadays, Listening to the debates in Westminster over women not…” Dec 29, 10:20
Aidan on A matter of class: “I also think there is a common and sometimes deliberate misrepresentation of how the Scandinavian countries function. They are very…” Dec 29, 10:12
Captain Caveman on A matter of class: “Well, here’s what a brief Google search has to say about comparing the UK’s (note: UK’s, not England’s) population densities:…” Dec 29, 09:15
Andy Ellis on A matter of class: “@ Mark Beggan It’s a misconception that social democracy means everyone earns the same money, that you can’t get rich…” Dec 29, 08:42
Mark Beggan on A matter of class: “How are some of the men on here coping with being banned from women’s spaces. Colonialism isn’t quite the same…” Dec 29, 08:22
Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on A matter of class: “Just came across this video. Essential viewing. Brings immediately to mind the statistics of catastrophic Scottish losses in WW1 provided…” Dec 29, 00:51
Confused on A matter of class: “trannyism bores me, I like geopolitics and history, and we need to think bigger if we want indy … but…” Dec 28, 23:36
GM on A matter of class: “All the best for 2026, when it comes” Dec 28, 22:16
GM on A matter of class: “Mainly pro-union troll accounts posting comments here now David.” Dec 28, 21:22