Barely a week – indeed, barely a day – has gone by over the last year or so without some angry, confused and hurt-sounding Unionist pundit or politician churning out yet another article on the theme of “WHY AREN’T YOU GRATEFUL THAT WE SAVED YOU FROM INDEPENDENCE, YOU APPALLING PLEBS?”
As far as the No side are concerned, the oil-price slump is a slam-dunk game-ender which finally conclusively proves that Scotland is too wee and too poor to run its own affairs, and their uncomprehending bewilderment as support for a Yes vote not only fails to disintegrate but keeps increasing even as the oil price sinks lower and lower has been quite a phenomenon to behold.
So we were interested to see today’s Sunday Times report a YouGov poll done for the comedy grumpy-old-white-guys support group (and spectacularly unsuccessful tactical voting enthusiasts) Scotland In Union, and somewhat miss the point of the results.
There’s nothing unusual about reading something in the Scottish media that makes your eyes widen. But a piece we saw in the Courier earlier today stretched ours out to Clockwork Orange-like proportions.
Now that’s a pretty intriguing opening (as the bishop said to the actress). At first we took it to mean that an independent Scotland could effectively take over Britain’s EU membership in the event of a Leave vote, ending any debate about whether and when it would be admitted on its own.
The title of this article is a phrase that people use when publishing a transcript of someone’s intended speech, to signify that this is what they INTENDED to say, but that the reader should verify it with the actual speech to check whether they did, because sometimes there are last-minute changes or the person simply forgets bits.
There’s an interesting article in today’s Guardian about the clown-shoed fiasco of a position the Labour Party has contorted itself into over Trident. It correctly identifies the conflict between a party representing its actual membership and being controlled by its Parliamentarians who insist they know better than the people they’re supposed to speak for, but then right at the end veers off to an irrational conclusion.
Because the obsessive insistence of the vast majority of commentators that political parties – and they’re nearly always talking about Labour – must at all times pander to the centre ground leads inescapably to one logical endpoint: that all political parties should disband themselves immediately and forever.
A revealing moment from a meeting of the UK parliament’s Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee last Tuesday, featuring the former Secretary of State for Scotland, Lord Forsyth of Drumlean.
Scottish Labour’s announcement that it wants to increase tax for everyone earning over £20k (and therefore anyone on under that who fancies making a little bit more, or might do a wee bit of extra overtime), reflects its acceptance both that the far left is in charge now and that this year’s Holyrood race is virtually over already.
SNP party folk will “take nothing for granted”, of course, and some aficionados might find it fun to see which candidates slink into list seats after they’ve lost the votes which count, but I’m really much more interested in what will come after that.
STV have leaked the results of Scottish Labour’s list-candidate rankings. Alert readers will recall that Kezia Dugdale promised that her leadership would see an influx of “new talent and fresh faces” to the beleaguered branch office’s ranks.
Sometimes it’s the smallest, most trivial things that give you away. Graham Grant is the Home Affairs Editor of the Scottish Daily Mail, and earlier this morning he tweeted this snarky dig at prominent independence supporter and pundit Pat Kane, also of the primarily-1980s band Hue And Cry:
Ostensibly it’s a throwaway gag aimed at puncturing an opponent’s pomposity and over-inflated self-regard while portraying the journalist as an arch, wise cynic.
Lorncal on Do You Believe In The Westwood?: “The thing is, Heaver, that we just do not know for certain (although we can guess) why this is happening.…” Apr 12, 17:08
Lorncal on Do You Believe In The Westwood?: “The SNP has overseen a greater importation of people into our cultural and heritage, environmental and other nationally-important organizations than…” Apr 12, 16:48
Mark Beggan on Do You Believe In The Westwood?: “‘We send warships’ Is that right Vice admiral Loch and Load.” Apr 12, 16:15
Young Lochinvar on Do You Believe In The Westwood?: “Breaking! Von Trumphausen is going to block the Strait of Hormuz!! Operation “Cutting your nose to spite your face”.. So…” Apr 12, 15:52
Alf Baird on Do You Believe In The Westwood?: “A colonized people are ‘bystanders’in all regards, including when it comes to appointing a meritocratic elite from elsewhere to lead…” Apr 12, 15:16
Geri on Do You Believe In The Westwood?: “*under. I dunno why the gremlins decided to change that to understandable.” Apr 12, 14:05
Geri on Do You Believe In The Westwood?: “Yes James. Scotland has zero control over immigration. That’s understandable the control of the UK government along with all the…” Apr 12, 13:58
Geri on Not So Octopus: ““You’re deluded enough to think that the opinion of one KC is somehow conclusive or some slam dunk argument that…” Apr 12, 12:49
James on Not So Octopus: “Warmongering unionist agent; “…I DO actually represent mainstream opinion…” Big LOLZ. Distract, divide, derail. Rinse & repeat.” Apr 12, 12:31
Cynicus on Not So Octopus: “Andy Ellis says: 12 April, 2026 at 9:58 am “@Geri passim Flag shaggers are all alike” ========== Isn’t the same…” Apr 12, 11:55
Cynicus on Do You Believe In The Westwood?: “Hats off to Rev. Stu and to “ No LGBT YS in Schools” The ludicrous title, “Rt Hon. Lord Barony…” Apr 12, 10:52
joe on Do You Believe In The Westwood?: “is this Tim on a salaried position , if so who’s bank account is it going to .” Apr 12, 10:34
joe on Do You Believe In The Westwood?: “is this Tim on a salaried position , if so who’s bank account is it going to .” Apr 12, 10:34
Andy Ellis on Not So Octopus: “@Geri passim You’re deluded enough to think that the opinion of one KC is somehow conclusive or some slam dunk…” Apr 12, 09:58
Bilbo on Do You Believe In The Westwood?: “It reminds me of the current discussions on tech websites about the proposed change to add age verification checks on…” Apr 12, 09:31
Bilbo on Do You Believe In The Westwood?: “O/T I see that immigration is going to be part of the debate in the forthcoming Holyrood elections: https://archive.is/D4QIZ This…” Apr 12, 09:22
Sven on Do You Believe In The Westwood?: “Bilbo @ 08.36. Possibly one with his own reasons to remain unidentified ? Or am I being overly sceptical in…” Apr 12, 09:17
Captain Caveman on Not So Octopus: “…. Jeezo. Maybe lay off the meths, Rambo.” Apr 12, 08:38
Bilbo on Do You Believe In The Westwood?: “I’m sure it is Gen Z/Reddit thing to make AI generated images of yourself but what man would disguise their…” Apr 12, 08:36
Young Lochinvar on Not So Octopus: “Well Geri If Pastor Faggat was one of the founding fathers then he’s certainly developed a disturbing hate complex of…” Apr 12, 04:47
Geri on Not So Octopus: “He said he was one of the co-founders of Alba.” Apr 12, 02:15
Young Lochinvar on Not So Octopus: “Geri Pastor Faggat was rejected? Gaun! Spread the news! It’ll help ignoring/ putting in context Pastor Faggats sermons in future..” Apr 12, 01:24
Geri on Not So Octopus: ““Arguing with yoons in a “domestic setting” is pissing in the wind & so is domestic elections.” Forgot to add,…” Apr 11, 23:59