The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Priorities in order

Posted on March 21, 2014 by

Rob Shorthouse is the Head of Communications for “Better Together”. This week he took part in a debate in Dunoon. The paper’s account of the event, published today, is fascinating and unusually candid, but this bit stood out for us in particular.

dunoon

We think that’s his coded way of saying he’ll be voting Yes. Would explain a lot.

53 to “Priorities in order”

  1. galamcennalath says:

    “pays my mortgage” is all that Head of Communications for BT can offer on the subject! A defeatist, a realist, or a separatist?

    Reply
  2. Morag says:

    Jings, I hope I’m never that hard up.

    Reply
  3. Jim T says:

    Another Yes then …

    Well done Dunoon 🙂

    Reply
  4. stonefree says:

    “We can’t help wondering if that’s Blair McDougall’s view too.”….judging by the look of him , he’s got a hell of a shortfall

    Reply
  5. Murray McCallum says:

    Wow, better together have a “Head of Communications”.

    Where has all their money gone?

    Reply
  6. Jeannie says:

    Oh,the irony! He’s Head of Communications and nobody can figure out what he meant by what he said.

    Reply
  7. Scott Douglas says:

    Do parents always provide ‘security’?

    Reply
  8. desimond says:

    Maybe he just didnt want to upset any of his football going mates?

    Reply
  9. Michael says:

    Interesting that Yes was ahead at the start and further ahead at the end but that because some people didn’t vote the result was considered to be uncertain. Oh well, good to see No getting another beating in a week when they have been on the losing side so many times.

    Reply
  10. Juteman says:

    I actually find his statement very shallow. At least others have claimed in the past they were ‘only following orders’.
    He is saying he will do anything for money.
    I don’t want to sound melodramatic, but I would give up more than money if it helped to secure my children, and my grandchildren, a better future.

    Reply
  11. Dick Gaughan says:

    Jeannie says:
    Oh,the irony! He’s Head of Communications and nobody can figure out what he meant by what he said.

    Allow me to translate his words of wisdom:

    “I know what I’m peddling is pure pish but they’re paying me a small fortune for doing it and anyway when this is all over I’ll be off to a well-paid job as a marketing consultant in London so I couldn’t really give a thimbleful of midge’s effluent.”

    Don’t mention it, a pleasure.

    Reply
  12. Ian Brotherhood says:

    Good article – nae bawbaggery.

    But why no surname for the author? ‘Gordon’ deserves proper credit.

    Reply
  13. muttley79 says:

    Rob Shorthouse is I think a former member of the SNP. Does not sound as if his heart is in it, and who can blame him…

    Reply
  14. Alfresco Dent says:

    Juteman says:
    21 March, 2014 at 4:51 pm
    I actually find his statement very shallow. At least others have claimed in the past they were ‘only following orders’.
    He is saying he will do anything for money.
    I don’t want to sound melodramatic, but I would give up more than money if it helped to secure my children, and my grandchildren, a better future.

    You and me both brother. This is why we will win.

    Reply
  15. Jeannie says:

    @Dick Gaughan

    See – that must be why he gets paid all that money. He said what you said, but he said it in only 6 words. He must get paid in inverse proportion to the number of words he uses 🙂

    Reply
  16. Archie [not Erchie] says:

    This is normally the add-on you would give after moaning about your job.

    eg: I get daily abuse, I hate the boss. My skills are varied but nobody supports me. What can I do? At least it pays the mortgage. 🙁

    Well Mr Shorthouse, you could always apply to Wings for a loan to help out with power/food/fuel and a lubricant of your choice. To ease the pain of course.

    Reply
  17. Jamie Arriere says:

    I wonder how he would have got on if he’d had to crowdfund to justify his existence.

    Reply
  18. Big Red Machine says:

    Spoke to a friend who was present that night. She told me that one of the questions posed to him was about the Herald’s recent report about the MOD wanting to pollute the Clyde with radioactive waste. A member of the audience asked him that knowing this, with Dunoon on the banks of the Clyde, how could Rob honestly convince him to vote No in September. His comprehensive, convincing response to sway the voter?

    Rob: ‘The story isn’t true.’

    Reply
  19. mogabee says:

    The Gordon in question is Gordon Neish.

    Reply
  20. CameronB says:

    A rather buccaneer attitude towards Scots and their constitutional future, if you ask me.

    Reply
  21. john king says:

    I wonder if his vote was one that added to the increase in yes?

    please someone tell me this is caught on audio or better still video,
    the no’ers leaving with that admission ringing in their ears will cause them some sleepless nights no doubt.

    Reply
  22. M4rkyboy says:

    A child leaving home?Scotland isn’t a child with a parent ffs.Since when was England our daddy?We are in a supposed partnership.

    Reply
  23. gordoz says:

    @ Ian brotherhood

    Snippet is from the paper itself

    If anyone is looking for a great pairing of Yes Panellists to surgically expose Better Together, from Left / Right aspects, Younger / Older, Calculated / Passionate, Male / Female perspective, then you can do no better than

    Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp / Business for Scotland
    Sarah Collins / Scottish Youth STUC.

    Both very impressive and ‘cover all the bases’.

    Thought it was a big mistake of BT campaign to put up the local ‘Head Boy’ in a school uniform (a big ask), but fair credit where its due, the boy concerned was brave enough to have a go, (very brave), but big miscalculation from BT.

    People were not there to play games and asked some real hard hitting questions (of both sides), but we all know who won the day with truth and reason.

    Reply
  24. JLT says:

    Geee… that is one helluva strange answer. It’s deep and hard to fathom. Can be seen from quite a few angles. Is he happy with BT, is he being ironic, is he thinking of voting ‘Yes’, is he playing clever mind games, is he deflecting the question…

    Good answer. Got to give him a kudo for being quite honest though…

    Reply
  25. Schiehallion! Schiehallion! says:

    It sounds like Rob is the one who hasn’t quite left home.

    Reply
  26. Dan Watt says:

    Regardless of how he intends to vote, which I very much doubt is Yes, I find it absolutely deplorable that he had the audacity to answer in such a moronic way.

    But maybe my feelings about it are misplaced, seeing as nobody in the no camp could give a better or more meaningful answer to the same question.

    Reply
  27. gordoz says:

    Forgot to ask.

    Can someone explain (as suggested by the paper who thankfully never foresaw the result), how no matter how many people were there at the start – when Yes recorded a win via a prior show of hans by 15% at the start and 38% via the actual poll; (some people had left as it was so bloody cold), that it can not be taken as a ‘satisfactory scientific result’?

    Why is it when No win a poll then its just reported, but when its a YES win then they muddy the water with such guff as above.

    Either way its a clear YES win via fair questioning arguement fro the general public.

    Reply
  28. Pin says:

    OT but this is brilliant. Alex Massie’s take on Ed Miliband’s speech today:

    link to blogs.spectator.co.uk

    To their credit, the comments under it are funny too. They’re all discussing their special connection to Scotland. For one guy it’s when he bought a tin of shortbread and a Texas CD- hahahaha!!

    Reply
  29. Robert Peffers says:

    Last night I couldn’t sleep. I had the worst sore throat I have ever suffered. By morning it had developed into a nose running torrent. I was very depressed. I became further depressed by radio reports of the Labour conference. I asking myself why are these unionist parties who fought to remove devolution from the referendum paper now wasting everyone’s time talking about devolved powers. I asked myself, “Who would be stupid enough to even consider any form of devolution in a YES/NO referendum question”? Then, just by accident, I clicked a wrong link and ended up on a Daily Record comments forum. The first big batch of comments were withheld for review. The next few of actually printed comments were full of grammatical errors, spelling errors and utterly stupid claims. These answered my question. Now I know who those voters stupid enough to consider a referendum question already removed from the referendum paper by the people who support dependence upon the Westminster Government are. The same ones who imagine they are being asked to decide between Alex Salmond and David Cameron in the referendum.

    Reply
  30. gordoz says:

    O/T Rev : If there is no bounce from today for Labour, then can we please refer to their Party Leader as ..

    Ed Moribund ?

    “not progressing or advancing; stagnant: a moribund political party”

    “no longer active or effective : close to failure”

    Reply
  31. Calgacus MacAndrews says:

    Rob is a gun-for-hire.

    Reply
  32. Deepest Green says:

    Having spoken to several people who attended the meeting, Sarah Collins keeps being mentioned as the star of the night, gutted I missed it now.

    Reply
  33. That sounds like even he doesn’t believe the crap BT are spewing out and he’s head off communications, wow, Let the implosion begin 🙂

    Reply
  34. Rod Robertson says:

    This could explain a lot ,do we have a sleeper in the camp?

    Reply
  35. Juteman says:

    I wonder if there will be folk going into the voting booth expecting to see a ‘more powers’ option?

    Reply
  36. Stuart Black says:

    @ Big Red Machine, yes, I was very taken aback by that story, and I also found the lack of feedback disturbing. Arbroath 1320 linked to it on Munguin’s, I believe, but I have seen little else, and it was certainly not pursued on the Herald letters page. Below is an email I sent to my wife, and my pal, the same day.

    “Herald Headline: MoD wants to dump radioactive waste into Clyde.

    The headline is misleading: they are not applying for permission to dump liquid radioactive waste into the Gareloch, and by extension, the Clyde. They are already doing it. They want permission to dump MORE liquid radioactive waste into the Gareloch.

    They are also applying to eject more tritium gas into the atmosphere from Coulport than they are doing at present. Yes indeedy, they are releasing tritium into the atmosphere around the Central belt of Scotland. It’s perfectly safe, of course.

    Two questions leaped out at me (I knew nothing of this until 4 days ago).

    1. Who actually knows this is happening? In the general population I mean? 1 in every 10,000 if we’re lucky. Why do we not know? You don’t need to answer that, we don’t know because they want to keep doing it.

    2. Would Parliament agree to releasing tritium gas into the atmosphere within 25 miles of London? And sanction the dumping of liquid radioactive waste into the Thames? You don’t need to answer that either, I think we all know it already.

    We’re Better Together? Aye right!”

    A further point, the mendacious Ms Baillie has deep concerns for her constituents, and the 11,000 jobs (sic) that she claims will be lost on independence. In her capacity as Health spokesperson, has anyone heard her raising concerns about her constituents regarding this radioactive dumping? And if not, why not? Anyone who participates in a debate in which she is taking part would be well advised to ask her for an explanation. Though I can tell you the answer now, perm any one from two, the Bobby Bungalow approach, “No, it is not true”, or “these releases are within guidelines set out by” – add your own professional body here.

    Shorthouse is wrong, by the way, tritium is a common and standard by-product of work done on nuclear warheads, a less likeable form of hydrogen, and it has to go somewhere. It seems the MoD think it best that that be in Scotland though, eh?

    Reply
  37. X_Sticks says:

    O/T

    Word from twitter about the Aberdeen Council anti-independence letters. RIC to have a stall in St Nicolas Square. I believe they are starting a petition.

    link to t.co

    Reply
  38. Doug Daniel says:

    Sums up tge motivation of most No campaigners really.

    Reply
  39. Jim McIntosh says:

    O/T – just received my response to my complaint about last weeks Andrew Marrs show.

    “Andrew made it clear on air that he had not been intending to express a personal opinion or an opinion of the BBC. He was simply putting forward an argument from President Barroso who, as European Commission President, has an integral insight within the debate and had made his feelings on the matter of Scotland”.

    “He had not been intending” – well that’s allright then, and I’m sure he would have corrected himself if Alec hadn’t pulled him up on it.

    “has an inegral insight within the debate”. – sorry you lost me there.

    Reply
  40. Mick says:

    Rob Shorthouse the boy who got smashed at school with a silk cut spliff lol!!

    Reply
  41. Ian Sanderson says:

    Jim McIntosh – SNAP!! I got mine this morning – the same one as you by the sounds of it..

    We believe the BBC’s coverage of the Scottish Referendum debate has been fair and impartial and we will continue to strive to report on the story in this manner.

    “fair and impartial” – my a**e !

    We’d also like to assure you that we’ve registered your complaint on our Audience Log. This is a daily report of audience feedback that’s made available to all BBC staff, including members of the BBC Executive board, channel controllers and other senior managers.

    and I’m sure all the staff read every one of them…

    The Audience Logs are seen as important documents that can help shape decisions on future BBC programmes and content.

    See my first response above…!

    BTW Rev I tried to switch off the bold-face at the end of my individual comments but it disnae appear to be workin’

    Reply
  42. Abaron Nomore says:

    So, I’ve just spent a frustrating 20 minutes reading btl comments on the Herald’s article from yesterday re the Panelbase poll which degenerated completely once post after post rubbished the poll on the grounds that the Indy question was Q3. Over a few pages they convinced themselves that the unknown first two questions had conditioned responders to say Yes to Indy and the poll was therefore worthless.

    Guess what? Now the first 2 questions have been published and they are right!

    Q1: Gender
    Q2: Age

    Well I certainly had no doubt about saying Yes to the Independence Question after being subtly primed by these two seemingly innocuous questions. What dastardly tricks will these scheming nationalists at Panelbase come up with next?

    Reply
  43. HandandShrimp says:

    It is an incredibly frank statement even if said in jest. Having said that would a communications chap say things in jest at a public meeting?

    I am not sure what jives down at BT central.

    Reply
  44. Thepnr says:

    Good luck to Rob Shorthouse in trying to find a new job once Scotland says Yes. I wouldn’t like to have a stain so large as “Communications Director for Better Together” on my CV.

    Reply
  45. Mark says:

    Rob is actually a decent guy. He’s been communications director at the sfa and the police but he is a staunch unionist and rangers fan and definitely not in the Yes Camp. Went to school with him and don’t recall him ever having leanings to the Snp although I may be wrong. He used to put loads of stuff on fb from better together but as their argument has been considerably weakened and pretty much been noted to be a pile of cack then the posts have become fewer amd fewer. Rob is a clever guy and I think he now realises he’s backed the wrong horse however he does.have a lot of media contacts who he can count upon to plant some utter rubbish in the press. Hopefully now though the majority of people are seeing through the blatant lies and spin!!

    Reply
  46. scottish_skier says:

    Guess what? Now the first 2 questions have been published and they are right!

    Q1: Gender
    Q2: Age

    That’s funny as f**k.

    I read those comments and if there had been ‘leading’ Q’s ahead of ‘Q3’, Prof. C and A.W. @ UKPR would have been all over it like a rash before mere mortals had access to tables.

    Reply
  47. Dave McEwan Hill says:

    Mark at 7.31

    Rob was a member of the SNP on Dunoon at one point. He mentioned that early on at the meeting.

    We have many Rangers supporters in Dunoon who are voting YES however Rob’s remark may mean nothing other than that he is entirely dispirited by the amount of total cack he is supposed to communicate on behalf of Better Together.

    What was also remarkable at the meeting was the number of people on the NAW side who didn’t appear to know where Dunoon Burgh Hall was initially.

    Reply
  48. Seasick Dave says:

    Mark

    Rob is actually a decent guy.

    Aye, right.

    Reply
  49. Andy MacNicol says:

    “What was also remarkable at the meeting was the number of people on the NAW side who didn’t appear to know where Dunoon Burgh Hall was initially.”

    Parachutists!

    Reply
  50. JnrTick says:

    I was at this meeting/debate. Rob Shorthouse was accompanied by a Dunoon Grammar School boy as his partner in crime. Early on when the questions were coming in thick and fast one was directed at the NO duo and RS instead of taking the lead turned and looked to his sidekick in expectation of the boy answering. I thought this was cowardly but typical of representatives of the NO campaign. When faced with the sorts of questions we face daily they are left floundering.

    Tuesday night, another clear example of when the electorate are confronted with both sides of the debate on a level platform and when given good answers to their questions there is rarely any other direction they turn other than towards a ‘YES’.

    Reply
  51. vulpes says:

    So, basically, Rob Shorthouse is only in it for the money?

    Reply
  52. Endofdaze says:

    The problem for Better Together at the Dunoon Hustings was that there was nobody from the BBC or STV there to protect them as there normally is when they are questioned in front of the public, though the Chairman tried hard.
    It was difficult for Robert to handle the flack when he knew we knew what he really believed. That probably led to his slip, unless it was deliberate and he has fallen out with them.
    PS I was a yes at the start of the meeting and a yes squared afterwards but I didn’t get a vote before leaving.

    Reply
  53. James says:

    He is paid 100,000 GBP to run a hate campaign against his own country – there are some jobs just not worth any amount of money

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,745 Posts, 1,216,548 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • James Cheyne on Unhinged Malady: “MaryB, As far as I understand the Scottish Devolved government is not a Sovereign government within Scotland, So I am…Apr 25, 16:28
    • Alf Baird on Unhinged Malady: “Thanks Dan for reminding folks of Dr Mark McNaught’s comprehensive rejoinder to Mr Dunlop, which illustrated the significant gap in…Apr 25, 16:22
    • MaryB on Unhinged Malady: “Off topic, almost … but Leah Gunn Barrett has written today about the advance of Blackrock in Scotland under Nicola,…Apr 25, 16:01
    • Jim Bo on Unhinged Malady: “Just bumped into this very unhinged malady in Dundee 15mins ago- quite conveniently at a crossing so was able to…Apr 25, 15:59
    • Mark Beggan on Unhinged Malady: “I think the supreme court ruling has saved the Transvestites from themselves.Apr 25, 14:11
    • Sven on Unhinged Malady: “PacMan @ 13.17. The case of Nurses raising court actions against NHS Trusts would seem to be operating both ways…Apr 25, 14:09
    • Willie on Unhinged Malady: “That’s a braw comment. Rangers the 1690ers. You couldn’t make up a better quip. But here’s a thing. Anyone know…Apr 25, 14:09
    • PacMan on Unhinged Malady: “Found this article from 2016 which details how the Trans movement was born in America: https://archive.is/UP6Vw Some details of it…Apr 25, 13:21
    • PacMan on Unhinged Malady: “James Cheyne says: 25 April, 2025 at 10:54 am Who are the rich people funding all these ideologies working behind…Apr 25, 13:17
    • James Cheyne on Unhinged Malady: “Most of what is offered in Scotland is politically wrong. And most parties have affiliations through one background idealogical political…Apr 25, 12:21
    • Hatey McHateface on Unhinged Malady: “No real argument from me over that post. I would add that as paying swingeing taxes is defo contributing to…Apr 25, 11:48
    • robertkknight on Unhinged Malady: “O/T I hear that as part of any deal to take over Sevco, the soccer team formerly known as GRFC,…Apr 25, 11:45
    • James Cheyne on Unhinged Malady: “Who are the rich people funding all these ideologies working behind the government, And who is funding the attempt to…Apr 25, 10:54
    • Stevie on Unhinged Malady: “These Green lunatics are a disease in Scotland BUT so is the SNP. Imagine REFORM gets enough seats to form…Apr 25, 10:43
    • Dan on Unhinged Malady: “@ Aidan at 6.55am Linking to the shitfest that is twitter / x means many folk won’t be able to…Apr 25, 09:23
    • Hatey McHateface on Unhinged Malady: ““I haven’t a clue what you are talking about” I was making the points that people are generally sick and…Apr 25, 08:29
    • Willie on Unhinged Malady: “Just been reading that Wes Streeting has announced that the NHS needs to make provision to treat transgender people with…Apr 25, 08:20
    • PacMan on Unhinged Malady: “Hatey McHateface says: 24 April, 2025 at 12:12 pm Whether that “sickness” is justifiable, or compatible with a general reluctance…Apr 25, 07:25
    • PacMan on Unhinged Malady: “You don’t need to walk to far to see this is another Teletubby fantasy. In fact if you dare walk…Apr 25, 07:13
    • Aidan on Unhinged Malady: “I’d also direct you to Roddy Dunlop’s interesting response on the Claim of Right: https://x.com/RoddyQC/status/1555714099018973186/photo/1Apr 25, 06:55
    • Young Lochinvar on Unhinged Malady: “The media, advertising, politics and the infamous “3rd sector” are awash with them. That’s what comes with a joke further/…Apr 25, 03:12
    • Geri on Unhinged Malady: “Ach – it doesn’t matter…Apr 25, 02:31
    • JockMcT on Unhinged Malady: “Simply unfit for office and should be sacked forthwith!Apr 25, 02:24
    • Geri on Unhinged Malady: “Stu If you have a moment can you tell me why my post is in mod? Thanks..Apr 25, 01:12
    • Anthem on Unhinged Malady: “It really is outrageous how the BBC,STV & Sky News are still promoting the “poor vulnerable trans” story. Yet hardly…Apr 25, 00:52
    • Mark Beggan on Unhinged Malady: “” I am ahead. I am advanced. I am the first mammal to wear pants. I am at peace with…Apr 24, 20:08
    • Aidan on Unhinged Malady: “@Lorn – I’m afraid the Salvo case has no chance, there have been innumerable cases on the U.K. constitution in…Apr 24, 19:55
    • Hatey McHateface on Unhinged Malady: “Ah c’moan now, Mark. If they’re mostly called Navid, it’s all going to be grand. Never forget that for some…Apr 24, 19:51
    • Hatey McHateface on Unhinged Malady: ““the very establishment of a supreme court should have had our legal profession outraged and riotous as they have been…Apr 24, 19:35
    • Hatey McHateface on Some People Try To Fuck With You: ““tick numerous red flags – Histrionics, Narcissism, Authoritarian, Grandiose, Anti Social, obsessive & Compulsive. They think they’re the smartest person…Apr 24, 19:27
  • A tall tale



↑ Top