The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


So long, and thanks for all the fish? 79

Posted on December 16, 2012 by

There’s been a lot of talk recently about the implications of independence for Scotland and its membership of the EU. As we’ve noted this week, the SNP has long acknowledged that the Scottish government would have to renegotiate terms of EU membership, but it’s highly unlikely that the EU would move to expel Scotland from the EU given the interaction between Scotland and the continent in goods, services, finances and people. As John Swinney recently noted:

“Scotland would not be applying for membership. Scotland is already a member of the European Union, our citizens are EU citizens today, we follow all of the EU relevant provisions that we are required to follow.

“So the key point is any negotiation would be taking place not to apply for membership, but for membership from within the European Union, which is the key distinction which has to be remembered in this debate.

“What we have always accepted is there has to be a negotiation about the detail and the terms of Scotland’s membership of the European Union, but crucially that will be taking place at a time when we are still part of the United Kingdom, still part of the European Union, of which we have been members for 40 years.

But if, just for the sake of argument Scotland was declared a new state and somehow cast out of this expansionist community, would it be the end? By being declared a brand-new nation Scotland would inherit all of the fixed assets and natural resources within our internationally-recognised borders, but none of the obligations of the old state – like a share of the national debt or being bound by international treaties.

Tempting, no? Sure, it would be awkward for a while, what with having to negotiate new treaties and being known as the only country in European history that the EU didn’t want in it, but there are alternatives to the EU.

Read the rest of this entry →

Lies piled on top of lies 99

Posted on December 15, 2012 by

Contrary to what might sometimes seem to be the case, we don’t much like attacking the Scottish media, particularly the self-styled “quality” end of the market. Any good democracy needs a free press to function, and with newspaper sales in freefall the economic model for proper investigative and analytical journalism faces the biggest challenge in its history. We criticise the press not because we want to destroy it, but because we want it to live, and more importantly to be worthy of that life.

There is much to cherish in the pages of the Herald and the Scotsman, even if some of it (including but not limited to Iain Macwhirter and Ian Bell in the Herald, and Ewan Crawford and George Kerevan in the Scotsman) is used to provide a figleaf of balance behind which the papers can hide their bias. But it’s impossible for the publications in question to credibly protest that bias in the light of weeks like the past one, when the Scottish and UK press has united around a campaign of what cannot be reasonably described as anything other than concerted, co-ordinated lying.

Read the rest of this entry →

Full text of the Deputy First Minister’s ministerial statement on EU membership 6

Posted on December 15, 2012 by

It’s possible to watch video footage of Nicola Sturgeon’s speech to the Holyrood chamber on Thursday (and the debate following it) online, but it’s rather difficult to find the text in searchable form. The only place we were able to locate it took some advanced-level Googling to find and was behind a paywall, so we’ve reprinted it below for reference, because we’re about to cite it in another article.

Read the rest of this entry →

Unionist of the day #2 39

Posted on December 14, 2012 by

We suppose we really ought to start saying “British nationalist”, but it’s a bit long.

We’ve found that “answering a different question to the one you were actually asked” is something of a Unionist specialist subject – Alistair Darling gave a masterclass in the strategy on today’s edition of the Daily Politics. Still, you heard it here first, folks.

Standing on one leg 8

Posted on December 13, 2012 by

The office is the coldest room in my house. Facing north it doesn't get a lot of sunlight, and the radiator is directly underneath the window, so much of what heat it generates disappears outside immediately. So I have a little halogen heater to keep the place cosy in winter, which also gives off a bright and pleasant firesidey glow and saves you having to turn the light on then wait 45 minutes for the useless "energy-saving" piece of shit to actually reach some sort of vaguely worthwhile level of illumination.

(Never mind about the Iraq war – I'd put Tony fucking Blair in prison for the rest of his life just for robbing us of proper lightbulbs, the wanker.)

The heater has three replaceable halogen elements. This is the process for replacing one of them (click to see the whole thing):

I have two questions for the manufacturers.

Read the rest of this entry →

The more things change 52

Posted on December 13, 2012 by

The anti-independence campaign and the Scottish media have been loudly affecting great triumph recently over a rather curious claim. Namely, they’ve been insisting the Scottish Government’s acknowledgement that it would be required to negotiate the terms of an independent Scotland’s membership of the European Union represents some manner of U-turn on an alleged previous assertion to the contrary.

(Ken MacIntosh, for example, tells the chamber at 21m that the SNP “has finally admitted that the terms of Scotland’s EU membership are a matter of negotiation”.)

Let’s examine the reality.

“Choosing Scotland’s Future” was the title of a Scottish Government document published in 2007 as part of what the SNP called the National Conversation. Clause 3.18 on page 22 reads as follows (our emphasis):

“Negotiations would also be required concerning the terms of Scotland’s (and the rest of the United Kingdom’s) continuing membership of the European Union and other international bodies to which Scotland currently belongs as a component nation of the United Kingdom.”

Clause 3.21 on the next page continues (our emphasis again):

“An independent Scotland would continue in the European Union and bear the burdens and fulfil the responsibilities of membership. Following negotiations on the detailed terms of membership, Scotland would be in a similar position to other European Union member states of a similar size.”

Well, that seems to wrap that up.

The Thursday Papers 28

Posted on December 13, 2012 by

We’re hoping to get a spot of Christmas shopping done today, assuming that we can un-freeze our front door, so here’s a few bits and bobs worth reading while we’re out.

Some sage advice for the First Minister from Iain Macwhirter

A sane analysis of the EU situation from Dr Daniel Kenealy

An informative but admirably concise assessment of the UK economy by Terry Smith

The baffling mystery of how City Parking manages to lose vast fortunes in Glasgow

Tavish Scott offers his view of independence campaign funding

Back soon, apocalypse permitting.

A letter from the European Commission 68

Posted on December 12, 2012 by

What with all the hoo-ha about what Jose Manuel Barroso did and didn’t say about membership of the EU this week, we decided – what with being proper journalists and everything – to take matters into our own hands in an attempt to get to the truth. Caroline Winchester is the European Commission’s Press & Policy Officer at its Scottish office in Edinburgh. We emailed her directly yesterday. (Emphasis added.)

Read the rest of this entry →

Britishness riots coming to Scotland? 51

Posted on December 12, 2012 by

Herald reporter Gerry Braiden posted these tweets last night:

We’ve contacted him asking if he has any more information, to which he replied “checking now”. It remains to be seen if the threatened protests will materialise, but in the meantime an alert reader uncovered a story from the Sunday Herald in 2001, in which the then-Grand Secretary of the Grand Orange Lodge in Scotland claimed that the British-nationalist organisation would turn itself into a paramilitary terrorist one if Scotland ever achieved independence.

You can read the full original story here. [Alternative link.]

Pornbot haikus 1

Posted on December 11, 2012 by

I always like to try to salvage something of value out of the most worthless commodity of the digital age: spam. Most of the cast of characters in Hell Yeah! are named after the "senders" of spam emails, and earlier today I was going through the followers on the Twitter account of my Scottish politics site blocking all the pornbots and noticed a slightly odd shared characteristic in the process.

Almost every one had a single-word biog, and as I went down the list it seemed to have a certain poetry. I had just enough syllables to make two haikus (plus titles), with four left over. If you can do better with the words, send 'em in.

Read the rest of this entry →

The devil’s advocates 76

Posted on December 11, 2012 by

The Irish Times, 26 November 2012:

“The DUP will campaign against Scotland voting for independence in 2014, party deputy leader Nigel Dodds told his party’s annual conference on Saturday. The North Belfast MP said that Unionists watched with sadness the attempt by Scottish nationalists to “undo the bonds of union which bound us through history”.

“But just as we have advocated the Union here in Northern Ireland, so we will be the advocates for the union in the midst of a Scottish referendum. Just as we have been proved right here, so, I believe, the people of Scotland will see that we are better together, better when we are united as one,” said Mr Dodds.

“This party believes strongly that, together, the United Kingdom has significant influence in the world. The break-up of the Union would be financially, culturally and politically devastating for all of the British people. As Unionists we oppose any action that would erode the shared cohesion of the constituent parts which make up this kingdom,” he said.”

Yes. We saw you “advocating the Union” last week.

Read the rest of this entry →

Civic nationalism vs British nationalism 27

Posted on December 11, 2012 by

The modern Scottish independence movement is 84 years old, dating back to the 1928 formation of the National Party of Scotland, forerunner to the SNP. It is a peaceful, inclusive, civic and democratic movement – to the best of our knowledge, and almost uniquely, not a single life has been lost in pursuit of Scottish independence.

Despite this, so-called “Unionists” (more properly described as British nationalists) still regularly try to portray independence campaigners as violent racists. As recently as a few days ago, one prominent Labour activist frequently employed as a commentator on BBC Scotland political shows attempted to perpetuate baseless (but oft-repeated by Unionists) 70-year-old smears that the former SNP leader Arthur Donaldson was a Nazi sympathiser engaged in attempts to collaborate with the Germans during WW2, sabotage the British war effort and set up a Vichy-style government in Scotland. These claims were cited, astonishingly, as evidence of “the SNP’s fascist past”.

Such attacks are all the more bizarre given the constant reminders on the news that the only nationalists attempting to secure their goals by violence in the United Kingdom are those who do so in the name of Britishness, waving the Union Jack.

Read the rest of this entry →

  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,990 Posts, 1,252,911 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Aidan on Faces In Sand: “Geri – I can’t imagine what demons you’re fighting (or actively embracing) which would cause you to write something like…” Oct 21, 15:16
    • Minceheid on Faces In Sand: “Hatey McHateface says: 21 October, 2026 at 1:47 pm I’ll tell you what’s likely within the next 30 years. You’ll…” Oct 21, 14:49
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “without even doing the slightest research, there are any number of possible reasons why the albertans voted that way -…” Oct 21, 14:15
    • Southernbystander on Faces In Sand: “Sam was this case not related to holding slaves in Scotland i.e Knight himself who had been brought here by…” Oct 21, 14:00
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “I’ll tell you what’s likely within the next 30 years. You’ll be deid and forgotten. As for Canada being annexed…” Oct 21, 13:47
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Attaboy, James. Don’t you let Geri and Confused steal all the glory.” Oct 21, 13:37
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “give us your insights about alberta then, arse-piece. Looking further ahead, due to climate change cold northern lands will become…” Oct 21, 13:20
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “with the SNP in charge of “independence”, why would you need propaganda anymore – they are winding up the operation,…” Oct 21, 13:18
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “Alf Baird, It is true that we are able to hold legal witness to the annexation of Scotland in 1707.…” Oct 21, 13:17
    • James on Faces In Sand: “Prick.” Oct 21, 13:16
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““shovelling yoon propaganda” Calm, mature reflection would lead one to consider that if that is true, and it is also…” Oct 21, 13:08
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “Both Scotland and England supposedly remain as the Sovereign Countries that lend to the foundation of the State of Great…” Oct 21, 13:04
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Nobody has much to say about Alberta’s thumping rejection of Indy. All that oil, King Charles on their banknotes, and…” Oct 21, 12:54
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “propaganda conduit, BBC Scotchland-shire, is being gutted – I hope all those journos have been made aware of their options…” Oct 21, 12:31
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “Our findings have already been confirmed by expert legal opinion too, James. Scotland’s unlawful annexation and takeover (i.e. colonization) by…” Oct 21, 12:27
    • sarah on Faces In Sand: “Legal establishment issues: see caltonjock’s piece today about Lady Dorrian.” Oct 21, 12:15
    • Aidan on Faces In Sand: “Thank you Northcode – that is exactly right!” Oct 21, 11:48
    • Oneliner on Faces In Sand: “No, it should read ‘United Kingdoms’ As in United States; United Arab Emirates etc.” Oct 21, 11:46
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “OK. If anything, I think my eyes are out on stalks. I have to go out now. I’ll keep my…” Oct 21, 11:37
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “North code. Scotland remains a sovereign country signed up to a voluntary union with and as does England if you…” Oct 21, 11:36
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Aha! So “with one bound, Scotland was free”, morphs into “with one (encumbered, hence smaller) bound, Scotland was away, laden…” Oct 21, 11:32
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “Scotland is no longer a minor player, it has become a Catalyst Country.” Oct 21, 11:23
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““Logically” There you go, Northy, I’ve pinpointed the flaw in your post. No other cant is prepared to use logic.…” Oct 21, 11:23
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “Hatey, Your eyes seem to be closed to what is happening with protests, riots and objections to the wrong direction…” Oct 21, 11:19
    • Northcode on Faces In Sand: “Correction: “Untied Kingdom” Should read: “United Kingdom” A Freudian slip, perhaps.” Oct 21, 11:15
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Perhaps you could answer a question for me, Alf. If you take yourself off into an empty room with your…” Oct 21, 11:11
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “Scotland’s treasury was of course dismantled by the England-as-UK parliament in another violation of the inoperable Treaty. Disregarding ‘shared national…” Oct 21, 11:06
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “Hatey, It is very likely to do some heavy lifting, but I suspect as time goes forward in the near…” Oct 21, 11:06
    • Northcode on Faces In Sand: “The Myth They All Rely On The foundational myth in certain Scottish nationalist circles is: Scotland is a sovereign state…” Oct 21, 11:04
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““The English spread the clap. I rest my case, M’Lord.” Cheers, Geri. You’re off to a flying start today. Maybe…” Oct 21, 11:00
  • A tall tale



↑ Top