We’ve noted before that it’s flattering to see the grown-up media pinching this blog’s stories. Sometimes it’s possible to put it down to innocent coincidence, such as the Guardian’s report today on the sweatshop conditions of workers producing London Olympic mascots – something Wings Over Scotland readers were reading about almost a month ago. At other times, though, the plagiarism is rather more obvious.
As we’ve said before, we really don’t see much point in getting worked up about opinion polls when we’re still more than two years out from any public vote on anything. A new poll by Panelbase has some fairly standard results – the SNP well in front in Holyrood voting intentions (up 2% overall on the 2011 result, with Labour and the Greens both up 1%, and the Tories and Lib Dems down 1.5% each), independence trailing by 9% in a two-way vote with 20% undecided, and the three options (including greater devolution) neck-and-neck when set directly against each other (independence 30, devo-X 29, status quo 28).
While we’re encouraged by these numbers at the height of the Great 2012 Festival Of Britishness, they essentially mean nothing at this point, and don’t tell us anything we haven’t known for months or years already. But what IS mildly interesting is seeing how the Scottish print and online media handles them.
We’re a bit bemused by a story reported in the Herald this morning, which makes a fairly dramatic headline claim:
“Scottish voters are turning strongly against independence, according to the latest opinion poll, which shows the cross-party No camp charging ahead with a record 20-point lead.
The snapshot by TNS BMRB – taken after both campaign launches – puts those against independence on 50% and those in favour on 30%; the latter figure being the lowest received for independence in five years of surveys by the Edinburgh-based pollster.”
We were even more bemused when we went to the TNS BMRB site to examine the details and found no mention of it. Now, we’re sure the Herald hasn’t just made it up and that it’ll appear shortly, but the odd thing was that we DID find mention of some other polling by the same company on the subject, conducted just two weeks ago.
We should be grateful for the ongoing Rangers circus. With both the Scottish and UK Parliaments now off on their summer recesses, we’re entering what newspapers traditionally call the “silly season”, where there’s little for political reporters to cover and they’re reduced to fabricating copy out of nothing to fill their sections.
Even so, the Herald’s front-page splash today is a bit desperate. Watch in amazement as the dramatic headline (“Cameron under pressure to stage vote on independence“) crumbles to pieces before your very eyes in the space of a few short sentences:
“David Cameron faces a “crunch point” in the next few months, senior Coalition sources have indicated, when he may have to take the most difficult constitutional decision of his premiership – that Westminster and not Holyrood will stage a referendum on Scottish independence.
Frustration is growing in Whitehall that Alex Salmond is “dragging his feet” on sorting out key issues surrounding the 2014 poll, most notably on whether there should be one or two questions.
To be able to deliver the SNP Government’s preferred time-table, it is thought there is just a matter of months to pin down the technical details of the referendum. By next spring, if agreement has not been reached, then the Prime Minister faces a major political dilemma.
Asked if he might have to decide Westminster will legislate to hold an independence referendum in Scotland, a senior Coalition source told The Herald: “Potentially, this is a scenario he may have to face.””
So let’s break that down. “A few months” in fact means “almost a year”, while “Cameron under pressure” actually translates into “POTENTIALLY, Cameron MAY come under pressure, at some point in the fairly distant future, IF the Scottish Government’s consultation process hasn’t resolved itself in a manner everyone can live with, and IF Cameron then decides to commit electoral suicide by imposing a London-run referendum on Scotland”. Well, hold the front page.
We’re reminded of a popular Scottish phrase regarding the addition of certain physical appendages to the person of one’s grandmother in order that she might be denoted one’s grandfather. We commend the Herald on their powers of invention in a lean news period, and will now get back to our piece on what the constitutional implications will be if Michael Moore is unexpectedly revealed to be a Nazi from the moon.
It’s becoming impossible to keep track of all the lies, disinformation, smoke and mirrors surrounding the Rangers fiasco at the moment. We’ll try to update this page with at least the more egregious ones as they arise. Let’s get started.
An alert reader recently pointed us to a story we’d missed in last week’s Sun. Headed “SICK TAUNTS FOR ‘NO’ GIRL CEILIDH WATSON”, it describes the “vile internet abuse” suffered by the 2010 Miss Inverness after she appeared at the “Better Together” campaign launch. Oddly, the worst (in fact the only) example of these attacks the paper felt able to provide was one alleged “cybernat” saying “It’s amazing how low some will stoop for 15 minutes of fame”, which is a bit unfriendly but we’re not sure it quite reaches the level of “vile abuse”, particularly when directed at someone who’s voluntarily and actively involved themselves in a heated political campaign.
The piece also referred (we presume, being unaware of any other incident that fits the description) to this blog’s own brush with infamy last week, noting that we’d “posted sick images of a funeral cortege of dead squaddies passing through Royal Wooton [sic] Bassett”, apparently in response to Ms Watson speaking of her soldier boyfriend.
We still haven’t seen the launch event – there appears to be no footage of it available on the campaign’s website – so we had, and have, no idea what Ms Watson’s boyfriend does for a living. The image in question had absolutely nothing to do with him or her or anything she may or may not have said at the No campaign launch.
As for “sick images”, though, the picture we used in our mockup poster wasn’t edited in any way (except for blurring out the numberplates of the hearses in an attempt to protect the identities of the dead men, which were then spread across the internet anyway by Labour activists), so if it constitutes a “sick image” then pretty much every newspaper in Britain – including the Sun – is guilty of the same crime.
You can see the full story below, without having to visit the Sun’s website.
We were struck by a thought this morning. Between them, measured by average attendances, Rangers and Celtic between them command more support than the other 40 clubs in senior Scottish football put together. They pull in somewhere over 100,000 paying customers at a time to their home games, (and could probably attract considerably more had they the stadium capacity to accommodate them), while the other 10 SPL clubs struggle to get half that many combined.
It’s a massive dominance, and obviously is particularly the case in Glasgow, where the vast bulk of Scotland’s media is located. So it’s weird that offhand we can’t think of a single print or broadcast journalist anywhere in the entire Scottish media that admits* to supporting either one of them. If every writer in the country who claimed to support Queen Of The South or Albion Rovers actually turned up to either of those sides’ games at once, they’d pack their stadia to the rafters rather than having crowds you can count on fingers and toes.
The question arose in our minds when pondering a couple of pieces in today’s papers.
On the few occasions we’ve bothered reading Better Nation in recent times, it’s usually been as a result of something posted by Kirsty Connell. She’s penned several thoughtful, interesting blogs since joining the editorial team, and we’ve even tweeted a few of them before now. Today’s piece, in which she explains why she’s finally lapsing her membership of the Labour Party, is unmissable.
We won’t keep you from it, but there’s one enormously telling phrase in particular in the post. Connell dates many of her doubts about Labour back to a traumatic experience when campaigning in the famous Westminster by-election in Glasgow East, a deprived area whose troubles she attributes to “a Thatcherite government [which] strangled funds to a Labour-led council”. Perhaps it’s some last remnant of tribal loyalty which prevents Kirsty from coming out and saying it: the “Thatcherite” government strangling those funds went under the banner of the Labour Party.
The Glasgow East by-election took place in 2008. By then, the “Labour” government of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown had already been in power at Westminster for 11 years. Even as the party’s support reaches all-time lows in Scotland, a dogged hardcore of wilfully-blind loyalists continues to desperately gloss over the fact that Labour long ago abandoned most of the honourable socialist values and principles on which it was founded and surrendered to Thatcherite ideology in order to grab power. We rejoice that one more member, in a long and continuing line, has seen through the deception, and hope that the others will one day choose to open their eyes too.
The piece, penned by Tom Gordon, is headlined accordingly – “Alexander claims: yes to independence could mean mortgage rise”. What’s interesting, though, is a little piece of text that seems to have been left in by accident at the bottom of the page.
It appears to be a discarded alternative headline for the same article, given that the fourth paragraph cites “the SNP Government” dismissing Alexander’s claims as scare stories. (We did check by Googling to see if the headline had appeared on a completely different Herald piece, but turned up nothing.)
It’s quite instructive to see the paper’s thought processes laid bare. “Scottish Government Slam Scare Tactics” is a positive message from the SNP’s point of view, as it would portray them standing up against Unionist fearmongering.
The headline used instead is the complete opposite – it actually IS Unionist fearmongering, designed to produce an instinctively frightened reaction in the reader, by planting in his/her mind the image of a crippling rise in the cost of living and associating it with a Yes vote (no matter what the feature then goes on to say).
The current issue of Private Eye (which also features a fascinating full-page piece on Craig Whyte) relates news of another Labour dividend for the people of Glasgow – the decades-long neglect and imminent destruction of a much-loved green space. We’ve attached the story below for your convenience.
On the upside, though, we’re pretty sure we know where another large green space, which already comes with goalposts, is about to become available.
After all, we can’t blame a Unionist conspiracy for the borderline-criminal trousers that Alex Salmond inexplicably chose to wear to the world premiere of Brave, and also on the Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson the same evening.
But we couldn’t help noticing an odd quote in The Scotsman’s report of the event, which the paper happily let end its story, forgetting to close the quotation marks as it did so. According to Kelly MacDonald, voice of the central character:
“She [Merida] is an adventurous tomboy and very happy young woman. The spell is broken when her mother says she has to get married and take on adult responsibilities. That’s when she takes things into her own hands and makes a mess of everything.“
twathater on Still Time To Save Her: “Could I ask anyone who is on social media to post my comment on X or anywhere else as I…” Oct 12, 02:36
sarah on Still Time To Save Her: “I’ve shared the Open Letter to friends, all in the SNP still but who support Liberation/Salvo, and had it posted…” Oct 11, 21:37
Douglas on Still Time To Save Her: “I note the letter is from ‘police Scotland’ which suggests to me that police have been instructed on their reply…” Oct 11, 18:55
twathater on Still Time To Save Her: “Feeble Swinney the bald lying redactor has just exploded a hand grenade into any work that SALVO and SSRG are…” Oct 11, 18:04
agentx on Still Time To Save Her: “The Bayeux Tapestry exhibition has welcomed roughly 100,000 visitors within its first month on display. The exhibition launched on September…” Oct 11, 16:24
Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “The motor bike helmet is a litmus test of equal treatment under the law. It’s an offence to ride a…” Oct 11, 14:06
Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “It’s amazing how quickly you can make politicians bow to your will when you make it clear they’ll die if…” Oct 11, 13:59
Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “I’m guessing from your name, Marie, you’re both a kafir and a woman. That makes you fourth class. I can’t…” Oct 11, 13:46
TURABDIN on Still Time To Save Her: “Roll up,pay up, get your tickets, for the Bayeux tapestry expo. How England was subjugated and inventorized by the Normans.…” Oct 11, 13:10
Willie on Still Time To Save Her: “John Swinney is Thames House’s man in Scotland. Like Sturgeon his purpose is to undermine independence. And that is why,…” Oct 11, 12:59
James Che on Still Time To Save Her: “When the people of Scotland and England take notes on the bullet points that no union of two parliaments actually…” Oct 11, 12:19
Bilbo on Still Time To Save Her: “Marie, aren’t the books of Marx and suchlike made for good Goy as well?” Oct 11, 11:53
David Miller on Still Time To Save Her: “If you watched the choreographed interview with Kusseberg on this morning you must ask yourself why when she brought up…” Oct 11, 11:53
Bilbo on Still Time To Save Her: “This libertarian idea of doing what you want as long as it doesn’t infringe with the law sounds great but…” Oct 11, 11:52
David Miller on Still Time To Save Her: “If you watched the choreographed interview with Kusseberg on this morning you must ask yourself why when she brought up…” Oct 11, 11:52
willie on Still Time To Save Her: “Well it seems that attire is not the only thing that can attract officialdom’s attention. John Swinney may be committed…” Oct 11, 11:49
James Che on Still Time To Save Her: “There are multiple bullet points that explain why there is no Westminster parliament of all of Great Britain, That the…” Oct 11, 11:40
Lee Floyd on Still Time To Save Her: “Christ. Is there a country on this island that isn’t fucking corrupt?” Oct 11, 11:37
Bilbo on Still Time To Save Her: “The Burqa and similar attire is worn by SOME Muslim woman. Dresses that cover the whole face of a woman…” Oct 11, 11:32
Marie on Still Time To Save Her: “And then there are the “holy” books that make both men AND women second class aren’t there? Good Goy.” Oct 11, 11:29
James Che on Still Time To Save Her: “At what point do the English Westminster parliament laws become voided in Scotland, as Scotland remains a Country for the…” Oct 11, 11:15
TURABDIN on Still Time To Save Her: “The Scottish police outfit is a member of an ngo called CCA Global. https://www.cca-global.com/standards/ This is essentially a «consumer excellence»…” Oct 11, 09:58
Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: ““No easy answers” Naw? Maybe it’s just you that’s stumped. Other folk can quite clearly see that in a country,…” Oct 11, 09:18
Willie on Still Time To Save Her: “Stevie, As long a people abide by society’s contemporary laws then they should be free to do as they choose.…” Oct 11, 08:33
Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “Smart move from Swinney, there. Appeal to the only constituency that continues to increase – sometimes by as much as…” Oct 11, 08:25
Stevie on Still Time To Save Her: “I despise the SNP : of coursee they/them will agree John Swinney “Oct 8 My duty as First Minister is…” Oct 10, 23:30
sarah on Still Time To Save Her: “O/T: openletter.earth has An Open Letter Regarding the Principle of Popular Sovereignty and the Right of Self-determination. It was written…” Oct 10, 22:19
Dan on Still Time To Save Her: “Ooh, or maybe those taxpayer funded well renumerated folk in positions of power and influence near the top of organisations…” Oct 10, 18:14
Aidan on Still Time To Save Her: “Have you been on the bubbly this morning?” Oct 10, 16:07