The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


A peek behind the curtain

Posted on June 24, 2012 by

After last weekend’s bizarre time-travelling “exclusive”, this weekend’s Sunday Herald has thrown up another little curiosity. A story in the lead section of the paper’s website today trumpets the latest positive argument from the Unionist camp – that mortgage rates will soar in an independent Scotland, as alleged by Danny Alexander.

The piece, penned by Tom Gordon, is headlined accordingly – “Alexander claims: yes to independence could mean mortgage rise”. What’s interesting, though, is a little piece of text that seems to have been left in by accident at the bottom of the page.

It appears to be a discarded alternative headline for the same article, given that the fourth paragraph cites “the SNP Government” dismissing Alexander’s claims as scare stories. (We did check by Googling to see if the headline had appeared on a completely different Herald piece, but turned up nothing.)

It’s quite instructive to see the paper’s thought processes laid bare. “Scottish Government Slam Scare Tactics” is a positive message from the SNP’s point of view, as it would portray them standing up against Unionist fearmongering.

The headline used instead is the complete opposite – it actually IS Unionist fearmongering, designed to produce an instinctively frightened reaction in the reader, by planting in his/her mind the image of a crippling rise in the cost of living and associating it with a Yes vote (no matter what the feature then goes on to say).

We just thought we’d point it out.

7 to “A peek behind the curtain”

  1. andrew_haddow says:

    I posted a reference to this on Herald website – wonder if it’ll get past moderators.

    Reply
  2. andrew_haddow says:

    Whoops! ‘Alternative’ headline has disappeared and no sign o my comment. Looks like yer no allowed tae criticise the Herald!

    Reply
  3. McHaggis says:

    Amazingly, contributors on the Herald site have begun to debate the position!

    How that is possible when the most important part of the (non)story is highlighted in bold below –
    “Alexander Claims yes to independence could mean mortgage rise”

    So what they are leading on is an unsubstantiated claim of something that may or may not happen. Wow! our so-called quality newspapers are hardly better than the red-tops these days.

    Reply
  4. Arbroath1320 says:

    Guys, isn’t it obvious?
     
    Firstly, the Dependence Brigade consider we Scots ARE “Too wee. Too poor, Too stupid”. Therefore they feel all they have to do is spread RUMOUR and SUSPICION about something, the MSM will pick up on it and run the story. Now because, according to the D.B., we are all too stupid we will all believe the story as FACT!
     
    Secondly, this piece proves, yet again, that the D.B. have absolutely NOTHING in their armoury which they can use that will provide POSITIVE proof that the union is good for Scotland.
     
    Thirdly, it is interesting that this piece is “alleged” news about something which may or more likely may NOT happen whilst the story about the Cameroon Bar attacking under 25’s is not even mentioned int this great paper of wisdom and truth!
     
    link to telegraph.co.uk

    Reply
  5. Morag says:

    Maybe I can at least clarify the headline thing.  I have the dead-tree paper in front of me.  The layout has the main “Alexander claims….” headline first, then there is a picture of Alexander with his mouth open and looking slightly glaiket, then underneath that in a smaller point size but bold capitals is the sub-heading “Scottish government slam ‘scare tactics'”.  Under that, in the same type face but in red, it reads “by Tom Gordon”.
     
    Hope that helps.

    Reply
  6. Peninsula says:

    The Herald are just as bad as all the others, from what I’ve found. Worse in some ways.

    I’ve found they will not post perfectly reasonable comments – especially responses questioning the validity of the statistics of anti-independence supporters such as Michael Mckeown

    I’ve also written legitimate comments about unionists politicians possibly being motivated by personal gain (or loss) in the event of a Yes vote.

    i.e whether their career ambitions in London are fuelling their drive against independence. These never get published by the Herald.

    e.g I posted a comment here link to heraldscotland.com on whether Darling might be thinking about a seat in the House of Lords.  

    It was never published. This happens a lot.

    Reply
  7. Morag says:

    Yes, Peninsula, that’s happened to me a lot too.  I’ve given up bothering posting there, because it’s so often just a waste of typing.
     
    The sub-headline thing seems pretty unsuspicious though.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,990 Posts, 1,253,097 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Dan on Faces In Sand: ““The same people with a flourishing space program and credible plans to exploit the Moon.” Oh aye, have they fired…” Oct 24, 22:52
    • robertkknight on Faces In Sand: “Posted without comment… Religion: CofE: 80.6% No, 19.4% Yes” Oct 24, 22:12
    • Geri on Faces In Sand: “See Shit face, there exists this little thing called international treaties. Those treaties carry international clout. They’re, supposedly, upheld by…” Oct 24, 22:11
    • Lorncal on Faces In Sand: “Hmmmmm… You may be right, H McH. I did read somewhere that some of the masks for medical staff were…” Oct 24, 21:36
    • robertkknight on Faces In Sand: “2014 Referendum Study Demographics Birth place: oUK: 57.1% No, 42.9% Yes rUK: 72.1% No, 27.9% Yes SCO: 47.3% No, 52.7%…” Oct 24, 21:35
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““the real nations are the tribes and the country boundaries reflect nothing of this” Check out the big brain on…” Oct 24, 20:14
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Having made the bulk of the transition to renewables (which I believe Norway has), it’s foolhardy to pull up the…” Oct 24, 19:49
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““But guess what???” Hmmm, let’s see. I guess that EU Citizens, in addition to those of the Republic of Ireland,…” Oct 24, 19:32
    • robertkknight on Faces In Sand: “Our learned misnomer talks about democracy. LOL. If all were fair, equal, democratic and meaningful, then EU Citizens, in addition…” Oct 24, 18:35
    • Luigi on Faces In Sand: “Sigh. Is it too much to ask for our aspiring politicians to take an IQ test? No need to raise…” Oct 24, 18:34
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““you can’t go swimming until you can swim” Let’s see now. That thing you’re doing when you’re out of your…” Oct 24, 18:23
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““the same ppl who love a Jenny” I think I get what you’re on about there, Geri. You’re insisting that…” Oct 24, 18:13
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““Thankfully – colonialism is over” Ah, c’moan noo, Geri, ye ken that’s a fib. The coloniser in the east, the…” Oct 24, 18:02
    • sam on Faces In Sand: “You might read this? https://justiceactionmaribyrnong.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Contemporary-Anti-Colonial-Self-Determination-Claims-and-the-Decolonisation-of-International-Law.pdf” Oct 24, 16:37
    • TURABDIN on Faces In Sand: “Referenda & elections are only as good as the data fed into them, rather like AI training. Corrupted or biased…” Oct 24, 15:45
    • Dan on Faces In Sand: “Interesting… #Ohm’sLaw content. Noticed that Norway is currently exporting 1.45GW to UK, but UK is currently exporting 1.35GW to Denmark.…” Oct 24, 15:44
    • robertkknight on Faces In Sand: “Hey, Mr Misnomer… Just for you: https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/politics/independence-referendum-figures-revealed-majority-5408163.amp” Oct 24, 14:53
    • Dan on Faces In Sand: “Yay, for post responding to Hatey’s brake hack released from moderation. To add a bit more info. Brake fluid has…” Oct 24, 14:26
    • DaveL on Faces In Sand: “‘They need to see that the institutions will function, the economy will stabilise, and the transition will be orderly.’ In…” Oct 24, 14:14
    • Geri on Faces In Sand: “Do they really? So a slogan on a bus & parroting ‘take back control ‘ didn’t work for Brexshit? Who…” Oct 24, 13:30
    • factcjecker on Faces In Sand: “Geri, I note the impeccable logic of your position. When it refers to England: “They’re hard wired racists. If “foreigners”…” Oct 24, 12:37
    • Geri on Faces In Sand: “That rewinding prick should be forced onto the first bus out of here. Why isn’t he? He’ll be receiving government…” Oct 24, 12:34
    • Northcode on Faces In Sand: “A forward-looking, inclusive case for independence can only persuade if it feels real. That means it must be grounded in…” Oct 24, 12:32
    • Dan on Faces In Sand: “fc says: “Thanks for the kind and polite words, Dan. That’s the way to formulate an argument.” Nae bother, treat…” Oct 24, 12:10
    • Northcode on Faces In Sand: “Across the world, when territories recognised by the UN as non-self-governing (NSGTs) have voted on independence, the results follow a…” Oct 24, 12:02
    • Geri on Faces In Sand: “15 year + is the acceptable measure by our colonising overlords. Personally I’d make it much more because they’ve already…” Oct 24, 12:00
    • Geri on Faces In Sand: “Dan, It’s pure projection on their part. It always is. They’re hard wired racists. If “foreigners” were allowed a vote…” Oct 24, 11:43
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: ““Dan says: 24 October, 2026 at 11:02 am @ “factchecker” You can go fuck yourself with that assertion ya word…” Oct 24, 11:29
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “RUPERT LOWE is out-faraging the farage – farage will deport them all, but lowe will now deport the “second generation”…” Oct 24, 11:19
    • Geri on Faces In Sand: “They weren’t qualified to vote. They were blow-ins, seasonal workers & second home owners & every other waif & stray…” Oct 24, 11:15
  • A tall tale



↑ Top