It’s both a comprehensive refresher of events surrounding the Scottish Government’s conspiracy to convict Alex Salmond on false charges, and a sharp reminder of why Scotland is, in truth, not yet a country in a fit administrative state for independence.
But one part in particular ought to be the headline news tonight.
Normally in cases like these, there’s an instant and concerted attempt to rubbish the judgement, both from amateurs and activist lawyers like Robin Moira “Barry” White, Jolyon Maugham, and the anonymous “Pissed Off Lawyer” tweeting as @legaltweetz. They’ll issue spurious “analyses” dismissing the findings with jargon terms like “obiter”, and either question their correctness or attempt to minimise their significance.
For some reason that didn’t happen this time. The hyper-antagonist online trans army has very conspicuously failed to rush to the defence of ERCC CEO Mridul Wadhwa, perhaps because Judge Ian McFatridge’s conclusions were so relentlessly, brutally and comprehensively excoriating of Wadhwa’s appalling behaviour that no amount of spin or disingenuity could disguise it.
But then, on white charger and with papoose, enter a hero.
Mridul Wadhwa, a man with whom Wings readers have been familiar for some years, was found by the tribunal judge to have been “the invisible hand behind everything that had taken place” as Roz Adams, a conscientious, caring and highly professional woman with a long history in the sector, was systematically and methodically hounded out of her job for holding, privately and sensitively, the belief that biological sex is real.
We were going to write a follow-up piece to this last week, until the SNP detonated a hand-grenade in its own trouser pocket. But with the coronation of John Swinney this afternoon after the only challenger sold out for some shiny beads and trinkets, we can get back to some serious news.
The controversial charity LGBT Youth Scotland, which has been involved in a number of serious child sexual abuse scandals, continues to exert considerable influence on Scotland’s education system, thanks to extremely lavish funding from taxpayers – well over a million pounds from hard-pressed councils in the last year alone to address unspecified issues whose urgency is difficult to identify.
After our last piece we sent LGBTYS a letter raising our concerns about their improper interference with primary schools, something we were obliged to do before we could file a formal complaint with Scotland’s charity regulator, the OSCR.
We received an automated reply on 24 April saying “We are currently experiencing staff shortages and it may take up to a week to respond to your email.”
That deadline expired five days ago, and we will now be writing to the OSCR. But in the meantime LGBTYS persists in exceeding its remit, with deeply alarming results.
News reaches Wings this evening that Humza Yousaf has called an emergency meeting of the Scottish Cabinet at 10 o’clock tomorrow morning, just a couple of hours before FMQs. (This information has been confirmed directly to us by a source very close to a member of said Cabinet.)
An emergency Cabinet meeting is an extraordinarily rare event. As far as we’re able to establish there have only been two during the SNP’s time in power – when the budget failed to pass in 2009 and Alex Salmond’s administration had to decide whether or not to trigger a general election, and one the day after the Brexit vote to supposedly plan a second indyref (LOL). But in any case they’re extremely unusual.
The subject of the meeting has not been disclosed to us. It could, for example, concern imminent developments in Operation Branchform, or it could relate to the Bute House Agreement between the SNP and the Scottish Greens. The men in grey kilts may have come for the FM. Or Scotland could be about to declare war on Morocco or something. But we are told that the fact of the meeting taking place is a 100% certainty.
So no sleeping in tomorrow, readers. It’s probably going to be big.
twathater on Too Tight To Mention: “Sara thanks for that link to the parliamentary petition, unfortunately it is coming back as server not found And Sarah…” Jul 6, 03:05
twathater on Too Tight To Mention: “Just like your fellow unionists, TOO stupid to realise that you are in the same lunatic asylum as the rest…” Jul 6, 02:59
twathater on Too Tight To Mention: “Thanks for that link Dan, apparently there are things happening in Scotland that may be relevant to independence supporters or…” Jul 6, 02:49
Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Very well said Ian! From apparently halcyon days they are now an incompetent “progressive” (in its worst sense) boil that…” Jul 6, 02:09
Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “I an energy rich country like Scotland,that is surely the most preposterous thing to say.. To look at it another…” Jul 6, 02:03
Andy Ellis on Too Tight To Mention: “@Alf So if (when?) the UN refuses to recognise cases like Scotland, Quebec and Catalonia as de-colonisation…..what then? Seems like…” Jul 5, 21:44
Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “@Andy – all valid points, but the thing that chopped it off at the knees is that the UNCDC has…” Jul 5, 21:13
Alf Baird on Too Tight To Mention: “Nobody said independence is easy, but it helps if you know what the word means. It means decolonization, according to…” Jul 5, 21:06
Andy Ellis on Too Tight To Mention: “@anthem 7.06pm I’m not the one on the losing side of the reference to the UN colonisation committee bud, so…” Jul 5, 20:56
Young Lochinvar on The Con Merchant: “Captain Caveman @ 6.48 Nope, wrong yet again r3tard.. Own your own crap, you have after all spouted it all…” Jul 5, 20:54
Andy Ellis on Too Tight To Mention: “@aidan 7.16pm Yes, I’m aware. Not unexpected. I never had any expectations the UN would accept that those making the…” Jul 5, 20:53
Anthem on Too Tight To Mention: “Sarah. This is the type of thing that should leafleted through every door in in Scotland! The SNP should be…” Jul 5, 20:39
Dan on Too Tight To Mention: “Stuff going on in Scotland… With a familiar name popping up again… https://www.isp.scot/june-28th-july-4th-2025/” Jul 5, 20:33
Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “@Andy – you might have missed that the Salvo petition has gone to the UN decolonisation committee, back in June.…” Jul 5, 19:16
Anthem on Too Tight To Mention: ““Far from indicating duplicity an bias, it simply indicates that not all of us are easily led by charlatans and…” Jul 5, 19:06
Captain Caveman on The Con Merchant: “Clingfilm…. Estrogen…. School toilets…. Sheesh. An awful lot of wishful thinking going on here… joining the dots etc. maybe Hatey’s…” Jul 5, 18:48
Ste fella on Too Tight To Mention: “Published on scotgoespop 18:33 050725 “I’ll bet you £20 James that SNP get zero list seats. Your sooky return to…” Jul 5, 18:33
Dan on Too Tight To Mention: “Andy Ellis says: at 4:57 pm “Surely the onus is on those who agree with something to make their case,…” Jul 5, 18:32
Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The Con Merchant: “Further to my previous comment, I have often thought that nothing unites the establishments of North and South Ireland more…” Jul 5, 18:22
agent x on Too Tight To Mention: “You must have missed Alf’s comment that in Scotland “half the population living in or close to poverty”. You expect…” Jul 5, 18:09
TURABDIN on Too Tight To Mention: “ERSKINE CHILDERS, A GREAT irish Nationalist who died in the gun sights of an Irish firing squad.” Jul 5, 18:04
sarah on Too Tight To Mention: “I thought that Wings readers will want to support this practical, explicit, way to leave the “Union”. If people don’t…” Jul 5, 18:02
agent x on Too Tight To Mention: “Signatures 638 Goal 100,000 Any day now!” Jul 5, 17:43
agent x on Too Tight To Mention: “It’s 50 pence too much for a 179 word “speech”!” Jul 5, 17:36
Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The Con Merchant: “@ Andy Ellis 3.18 « The Irish government spent decades promoting the Irish language with only limited success » For…” Jul 5, 17:30
Dan on Too Tight To Mention: “Hmm. As a practical person and an absolute demon on the hand tools that fixes and builds all manner of…” Jul 5, 17:16
Andy Ellis on Too Tight To Mention: “Surely the onus is on those who agree with something to make their case, and those who disagree to make…” Jul 5, 16:57