TO: Colin Beattie MSP, National Treasurer, SNP DATE: 28 October 2020
Dear Colin,
I note that today you’ve sent an email to SNP members on the contentious topic of the party’s supposedly “ring-fenced” referendum campaign fund, which we’ve learned for the first time today has a grand official name – the Referendum Appeal Fund (which from here on we’ll call the RAF for short).
The email also contains some rather offensive implied smears about my website and myself, but I’m quite used to being abused on the internet so I’ll let that slide. As we’re both on the side of Scottish independence, rather than getting involved in a tit-for-tat slanging match I thought I’d try to reach a constructive consensus.
I notice that in your email you invite people who have “any questions” on the subject to contact you without hesitation, and while I’m not a member of the party I believe I do speak for a considerable number of people who are, so it would likely also save you a lot of tedious copy-and-pasting if you replied publicly to me as their representative.
(And because, y’know, if you don’t then you’ll probably get about a thousand individual emails from members containing the text below anyway, which doesn’t seem like a productive use of anyone’s time.)
The Electoral Commission has finally published the SNP’s 2019 accounts.
As Wings has been warning for most of this year, something in the region of £700,000 in supposedly “ring-fenced” money raised by two crowdfunding campaigns has indeed vanished into the maw of the party machine, leaving just under £97,000 in the bank.
This has happened despite the party angrily and categorically insisting that the money would NOT be spent until there was a new independence referendum.
What all that means is that if the UK government were to unexpectedly turn round tomorrow and grant a Section 30 order for a second indyref, Wings Over Scotland would have considerably more money in the bank to fight it than the SNP does.
The SNP also has a Holyrood election to fight in six months’ time, which normally costs it somewhere in the region of £1.5m – far more than its current total net assets of £272,000. As we told you back in January, the party is simply in no financial position to fight a new referendum campaign, which is very likely part of the reason it’s been in no rush to secure one for the last few years and has no remotely credible plan to do so.
It’s a matter of debate whether obtaining such sums of money under false pretences is a criminal offence or not. We invite anyone concerned about this state of affairs to ask the SNP what happened to their donation. We wish you good luck getting an answer.
At the weekend we made a half-joke about who’d be counting the votes in the SNP’s candidate elections to determine who’d be standing for Holyrood next year.
The battle to save the soul of the SNP – formerly a party of Scottish independence but now a career vehicle for intolerant science-denying cultists solely interested in social engineering – is already almost lost.
By delaying its online pretend “conference” until the end of November, the party has ensured that the chronically dysfunctional current National Executive Committee (NEC) controls the selection of candidates for next year’s election, and it’s using that power every bit as crookedly as anyone who’s been paying attention recently might fear.
Following the stitch-up of Joanna Cherry, the latest victim of the SNP’s woke cabal is Caroline McAllister, a woman who the party considers quite fit to be a councillor – and indeed the Deputy Leader of its group on West Dunbartonshire council – but who has suddenly somehow become unacceptable when she tried to seek nomination for the MSP seat currently held by Jackie Baillie of Scottish Labour.
At the climax of a popular and multiple-Oscar-winning movie from 1995, the Scottish leader William Wallace is portrayed heroically roaring the word “FREEDOM!”
We’ve just received the most extraordinary Freedom Of Information response from the Scottish Government, readers. Trust us, you want to go and make yourselves a strong cup of tea before you read it. Or get this guy to bring you one.
It doesn’t take a master analyst to see that the Salmond inquiry committee is running out of patience with the Scottish Government’s endless attempts to obstruct its work.
This afternoon it issued a statement, with obvious irritation, making clear that it did not wish to see documents the Scottish Government was trying to submit to it, which the committee had not asked for, and which had previously been struck down as unlawful by Lord Pentland in the initial judicial inquiry.
The Scottish Government’s only purpose in doing so was to try to put the details of the discredited and disproven-in-court allegations into the public domain with the intention of smearing Mr Salmond yet again, and the committee has made its displeasure with the plan clear, telling the Scottish Government to abandon its intended legal action to release the documents and get on with producing the ones the inquiry HAS asked for.
But there’s a little bit more to the story than that.
We’re grumpy this morning, readers, because it’s Sunday and we were planning a long lie and then someone told us about this. It’s the First Minister appearing on the Sophy Ridge show on Sky News at around 8.45am and you need to see it.
In the light of yesterday’s revelations, we’ve sent the following Freedom Of Information request to the Central Enquiry Unit (CEU) of the Scottish Government.
twathater on Your Call Is Important To Us: “The ENDLESS mindless responses that all say the same thing “Fuck Off” we’re not interested in addressing your complaints, even…” Jul 9, 17:42
Hatey McHateface on Your Call Is Important To Us: ““Mallaidh” is a very nice Gaelic female name. So probably a real person, possibly a real woman, but according to…” Jul 9, 16:24
A2 on Your Call Is Important To Us: “Too be fair (as we say) You did complain about the rapidity of the previous. “If we twiddle our thumbs…” Jul 9, 16:14
100%Yes on Your Call Is Important To Us: “I would presume, you likely to hear from copfs after the SNP responds in 21 days to these summons.” Jul 9, 16:00
Andy Wiltshire on Your Call Is Important To Us: “Do we know who ‘Mallaidh’ is? A real person, I naively assume.” Jul 9, 15:59
Hatey McHateface on The Interests Of The Many: “WGF is a gust of fresh air compared with the disgraceful and disgusting poison perpetrated by the teatowel wearers and…” Jul 9, 15:42
Morgatron on Response Level Upgrade: “I just wonder if they would arrest you or take you up in front of a Judge in such a…” Jul 9, 15:41
Hatey McHateface on Your Call Is Important To Us: ““avenues of justice” In Scotland these tend to be more wynds than avenues. Unlit at night, deserted, twisting to and…” Jul 9, 15:35
100%Yes on Your Call Is Important To Us: “When your being asked to “Please Hold” from the previous letters I would consider that statement as progress.” Jul 9, 15:23
Captain Caveman on The Interests Of The Many: ““Try fucking off somewhere else.” Ooooh Fatso! 😀 I doubt you can even stand up straight unaided, let alone blow…” Jul 9, 14:18
Confused on The Interests Of The Many: “we know where you live now, main; the nonce-police won’t be able to protect you forever https://archive.ph/qVBBR – aren’t policeman…” Jul 9, 14:03
Confused on The Interests Of The Many: “one day, soon … www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpuDsFSd8YA wir aw jock tamsons bairns” Jul 9, 14:01
Hatey McHateface on The Interests Of The Many: “Seriously, TURABDIN? No mention of the events in Ir@n? How ethnically and religiously diverse are that lot?” Jul 9, 13:50
Oneliner on The Interests Of The Many: “Whilst there may be some dubiety attached to the political veracity of some of its contributors, each year The National…” Jul 9, 13:46
Hatey McHateface on The Interests Of The Many: “On the subject of ethnic diversity, I half watched near 20 minutes of the Canada-Morocco game before I twigged that…” Jul 9, 13:37
Hatey McHateface on The Interests Of The Many: “@ Alf Baird says: 9 July, 2026 at 12:40 pm I don’t do Facebook, Alf. How odd that you do.…” Jul 9, 13:33
TURABDIN on The Interests Of The Many: “i have an aversion to jingoistic idolatrous nationalism of the flag waving sort….i was born in a country where such…” Jul 9, 13:26
James on The Interests Of The Many: ““…try spellcheck….” Try fucking off somewhere else.” Jul 9, 13:24
Alf Baird on The Interests Of The Many: ““Tell us what happens next” There are only two possible outcomes with colonialism, Hatey, as stated at the end of…” Jul 9, 12:40
Marie on The Interests Of The Many: “I agree Turabdin. It’s not normal to have another country’s achievements thrown in your face via media. I’m thankful that…” Jul 9, 12:29
Captain Caveman on The Interests Of The Many: ““Ye wad shuirly fund gey mair ‘morons’ tae the poleetical richt, gied the condeetion o the Western libeal-imperial pouers!” Try…” Jul 9, 12:28
Hatey McHateface on The Interests Of The Many: ““finally, once the people figure out they have been duped, ‘the national party disintegrates’” “Finally”, Alf? No way can that…” Jul 9, 12:17
Hatey McHateface on The Interests Of The Many: “Can’t say I’ve noticed, TURABDIN, no. And then I also have little to compare it against. Although the scenes coming…” Jul 9, 12:14
Hatey McHateface on The Interests Of The Many: “@ Dick Wall says: 8 July, 2026 at 9:52 pm “I wonder what examples you might point out that show…” Jul 9, 12:05
Alf Baird on The Interests Of The Many: “““moron”” Ye wad shuirly fund gey mair ‘morons’ tae the poleetical richt, gied the condeetion o the Western libeal-imperial pouers!” Jul 9, 11:58
TURABDIN on The Interests Of The Many: “Anyone noticed how giddily nationalist the english media have become? You’d think they’d already won the world cup, wimbledon and…” Jul 9, 11:52
Captain Caveman on The Interests Of The Many: ““intellectuals on the left” Oxymoron. (The Left certainly does put the “moron” into oxymoron….)” Jul 9, 11:08
James on Search And Replace: “Still biting, then? lol Ah hear nothing but English accents round here as it is, Petal.” Jul 9, 10:56