Having solved cat hunger in Greece, the tireless Holiday Boy has now turned his hand to addressing Scotland’s crippling golfing shortage, so we’ve got a different sort of cartoon again for you this weekend.
The clip below is from a 1981 arcade videogame called Venture, by Exidy, in which you play a cheerful character called Winky on a mission to loot treasure from a series of monster-infested dungeons.
For the purposes of this article the treasure in the room above, which takes the form of a castle tower, represents Scottish politics. The room itself is the Union.
Back in the 1980s there was a hit game for the ZX Spectrum home computer called Worse Things Happen At Sea. In it you play a robot whose job is to get a heavily-laden cargo ship safely to port, except that more and more disasters keep befalling it.
It springs leaks, it veers off course, the engine overheats and the robot’s power runs down, until eventually the catalogue of catastrophes overwhelms the harassed metallic custodian and the boat slides down into the murky depths.
We wonder if that feels familiar to anyone at the moment.
(We suspect this might become a regular series.) We try not to take any notice of the often-ludicrous propaganda churned out by the official “Better Together” campaign, but today’s was too utterly ridiculous to ignore. We’re not going to deface our nice pages with the image, though you can see it here if you want to without giving them any hits.
The graphic claimed, mind-bogglingly, that the award of £2.3bn in grants to good causes in Scotland by the National Lottery since its advent in 1993 was “another reason we are better together”, as if the figure represented some great largesse towards Scotland on the part of the UK. This, as any reader with an IQ higher than the number on a lottery ball will immediately realise, is such a monumental and obvious misrepresentation of how the lottery works that we can only concur with the Twitter user who enquired “When will the glue-sniffing stop at BT strategy HQ?”
When watching the Olympics over the coming couple of weeks, it’s probably not likely that you’ll be pondering the massive spending that goes into the defence and security industry as a result of such events. Yet in both superficial and deeper senses, it now represents the primary purpose of the Games, with sport merely the disguise under which the true agenda is smuggled past the unsuspecting public.
The precedent for this phenomenon was set over 70 years ago, by the event which would go on to become the template on which all subsequent Games were based. We refer, of course, to the 1936 Berlin Olympics in Nazi Germany.
On the 13th of May 1931, the International Olympic Committee awarded the 1936 Summer Olympics to Berlin. The choice was intended to signal Germany’s return to the world community and its rehabilitation after the defeat and humiliation of World War I. However, two years after the award was made Adolf Hitler seized power, and spurred on by his Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels he set about making the games a showcase for Nazi Germany.
The intention was simple – set up the games to portray the new Germany in the best light possible. The Games were to be a place to play down plans for territorial expansion, and would be exploited to instead bedazzle foreign spectators and journalists with an image of a peaceful, tolerant Germany. The opportunity to portray an image of how the Nazis wanted to be seen, with the world watching and listening, was too good to pass up, and so political will was deployed behind the Games, with Hitler himself becoming an ardent supporter.
Plans to boycott the Games in response to the maltreatment of Jews and non-whites already apparent under the regime were discussed in the United Kingdom, France, Sweden, Czechoslovakia, and the Netherlands, but were short-lived. The outcry was more vociferous in America, but the President of the American Olympic Committee at the time, Avery Brundage, declined to back a boycott, on the now-familiar grounds that “The Olympic Games belong to the athletes and not to the politicians”. Little did he know what the Nazis had in store.
There seems to be a disconnect for many Scots between how they feel about the London Olympics and how they’ll act when the Games are on. Many will bemoan the cost, lost opportunities, lack of access or significant national legacy, but will simultaneously be cheering on the athletes in Team GB. Is it a form of Olympic schizophrenia that we should despise the Games and yet love them at the same time?
Schizophrenia isn’t, of course, really the correct term to use for this phenomenon. It’s a mental disorder characterised by a breakdown of thought processes and by poor emotional responsiveness. Despite the etymology of the term from the Greek roots, schizophrenia does not imply a “split mind” and it is not the same as Dissociative Identity Disorder – also known as “multiple personality disorder” or “split personality” – despite often being confused with it in the public’s perception.
So perhaps it’s more accurate to say that myself, and many others, suffer from a form of Olympic split personality disorder. But what is it that causes this affliction? In order to find out, we need to look at the history of London 2012.
Readers of a spiritual or elderly bent may be aware of the parable of the Deck Of Cards. (You can listen to a splendidly reverby take of Wink Martindale’s definitive version by clicking this convenient link here.)
But you don’t have to go back to the 1950s for a similarly instructive metaphor for the contemporary age. Because the iOS game Coin Dozer serves, if you don’t want to carry around a bulky copy of Das Kapital, as a bible of the modern capitalist world. Shut up, it’s not bollocks.
Young Lochinvar on The shifting sands of memory: “Well said Mia. People are slowly wising up and the current crop of troughers are at a loss as to…” May 25, 23:33
Breastplate on The shifting sands of memory: “I think you’ve just proved my point about how people debate from several conflicting standpoints. You say Scotland is a…” May 25, 21:32
Young Lochinvar on The shifting sands of memory: “Or, Fred Flintstone, more prosaically; The Empire in which the blood never dried.. It’s not called the “Butchers Apron” for…” May 25, 21:25
Lorn on The shifting sands of memory: “Xaracen: yes, the ToU is, indeed, an international treaty and may be challenged only inn international law. I am getting…” May 25, 21:02
Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The shifting sands of memory: “Wikipedia: « GEORGE BUCHANAN / SEÒRAS BOCHANAN (1506-1582), native Gaelic-speaker, was a Scottish historian and humanist scholar. « According to historian Keith…” May 25, 20:26
Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The shifting sands of memory: “HERMAN DOOYEWEERD (Professor of Law and Jurisprudence at the Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam 1926-1965) explained: «The Roman republic started with an…” May 25, 20:23
Mia on The shifting sands of memory: “That is indeed very interesting, Sarah. There are rumours as well about the ex PM of New Zealand. It is…” May 25, 19:38
Xaracen on The shifting sands of memory: ““The ToU does not create any rights or obligations in international law, it is domestic law, so outwith the remit…” May 25, 19:16
sam on The shifting sands of memory: “Andy, 3 years to complete negotiations. Sets a deadline. It can be done by seats won rather than votes cast.” May 25, 19:08
Young Lochinvar on The shifting sands of memory: “Aidan at 2.40pm It’s bad enough that it might be the case without you wishing it so..” May 25, 18:55
Young Lochinvar on The shifting sands of memory: “SM; Yup. Idle curiosity makes we wonder if SHE who’s name shall not be uttered is still shacked up for…” May 25, 18:46
sarah on The shifting sands of memory: “@ Mia at 5.16: “Starmer and the three male models/arsonists”. Phil Boswell has something to say about this on today’s…” May 25, 18:41
Northcode on The shifting sands of memory: ““a major cultural and legal difference lies between what they regarded as nations following the ‘Latin tradition’ compared with the…” May 25, 18:35
Andy Ellis on The shifting sands of memory: “@Sam 5.04 pm What’s with the 3 year thing? All that’s necessary is for all pro-independence parties who support the…” May 25, 18:18
Andy Ellis on The shifting sands of memory: “@Breastplate 3.19pm Other countries don’t care about the Treaties of Union or 300 year old history, any more than we…” May 25, 17:39
Mia on The shifting sands of memory: “What is this thing about Starmer and the three U male models? Why is it being said that the three…” May 25, 17:16
Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “What do you reckon, Marie, did they have a hand in the Dandy Dons victory yesterday? I mean, why not,…” May 25, 17:04
sam on The shifting sands of memory: “What’s the wording of a plebiscitary election to be? This is a tentative try. A majority vote by seats won…” May 25, 17:04
Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “Well, Mia, at least you managed to reply to Andy without blaming Da Dews. (I think. It’s next to impossible…” May 25, 16:55
Mia on The shifting sands of memory: ““The only plausible route likely to achieve results in any reasonable timescale is to gain a majority in plebiscitary elections,…” May 25, 16:27
Mark Beggan on The shifting sands of memory: “They are going to paragraph themselves into independence. Paragraph by paragraph.” May 25, 16:02
SilentMajority on The shifting sands of memory: ““N.. S… has argued the law on the definition of a woman may need to be changed to accommodate trans…” May 25, 16:01
Breastplate on The shifting sands of memory: “Andy, I agree with some of what you say and there’s room for manoeuvre on others. I think many people…” May 25, 15:19
Young Lochinvar on The shifting sands of memory: “Over in Tranny-land SHE whose name shall not be uttered is in out of control hose mode again, wanting laws…” May 25, 14:55
Andy Ellis on The shifting sands of memory: “Why is it “quixotic”? It’s quixotic in the usually accepted definition of the term in that it’s “extremely idealistic; unrealistic…” May 25, 14:21
Aidan on The shifting sands of memory: “If you’re pinning your hopes on the UN enforcing a vote where only Yes voters are allowed to participate then…” May 25, 14:14
Young Lochinvar on The shifting sands of memory: “Mia Maybe, maybe not. However it would be interesting to speculate if C3 and his progeny would show up in…” May 25, 14:09