It can be very hard to follow the arguments of people trying to convince you to vote for the SNP on the regional list at next year’s election. Here’s one just a month ago:
So that’s clear – indy supporters MUST IGNORE the “siren voices” telling them to vote for smaller indy parties, because they can’t win any seats and therefore to vote for them is to “throw away” your list vote.
And this was them just two weeks ago, strenuously insisting that the small parties were a busted flush and there was no chance of a “non-SNP route to independence”:
So it was a bit confusing to read this yesterday:
Because all of a sudden, it seems that you CAN vote for the smaller indy parties, regardless of whether they win seats or not, because the list vote will actually be a de-facto referendum and the votes will still count. And indeed, apparently you SHOULD do so, because an SNP-only route – the thing which was the only hope a fortnight ago – is now “totally unachievable” and ONLY working in concert with the smaller indy parties can succeed.
Heavens, what huge transformative event did we miss?
That got us to thinking about which leaders in the Scottish Parliament era have made a significant difference (in either direction) to the fortunes of their parties, and from there it was pretty short work to illustrate it in the form of a graph.
For the combatants in the gender wars, it’s been quite a spring and summer here in the TERF Island theatre of battle.
In February, polling company YouGov revealed the vast extent to which public opinion has shifted around the issue (significantly though not entirely in the wake of the Cass Review last April), which we reported on via a snazzy Stalingrad metaphor. But just as with Stalingrad, it was only the precursor to the recapture of territory on an epic scale.
It seems like almost every time somebody gets accused of rape, sexual harassment or any kind of horrible creepy sex-based sleaze in Scotland these days, the same face is always lurking around grinning in the background somewhere.
Back in the 1980s and 1990s, before the internet, scammers used to have to work a bit harder to cheat people than they do now.
A popular method was to advertise a “clearance sale” in the press. You’d see an ad in the Daily Record or a local paper for an event in a High Street location – typically a vacant shop – promising brand-new TVs for £20, microwaves for a fiver, toasters for £2.50 or whatever. So you’d show up on the day and it always worked the same.
There’d be the ringmaster on a raised platform, surrounded by loads of unmarked white boxes, and he’d start off by picking some “random” punter from the crowd and bestowing gifts upon him. This guy would walk away with armfuls of swag for £25 or something (doubtless just going straight round the back with them), and the real show would begin.
Next the ringmaster would say “Now, before we get properly started, who’ll give me £10 for what’s on my mind?” (that phrase, “what’s on my mind”, was always the same). And basically they were flogging a mystery box, invariably containing a few trashy trinkets worth a fraction of the cost.
Any chump who bought one would then be escorted out of the shop before opening it, on the pretence that the bargains on offer in these sales were so great that they were limited to one per person. (There was always security on the door, sometimes even cops. There’s nothing intrinsically illegal about selling mystery boxes, even mainstream chainstores still do it today.)
And that was basically it. The ringmaster would delay and delay, punting more mystery boxes and never actually getting to the bit where you could buy a specific item at a specific price, and after a couple of hours the event would close down and the would-be customers would disperse in disgruntlement.
robertkknight on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “The SNP has never been Republican in its outlook, despite the feelings amongst a sizeable minority of members. The popularity…” Sep 20, 16:22
Colin Alexander on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Did Alex Salmond ever give a credible explanation for swearing fealty to King Charles, despite the King’s UK Govt refusing…” Sep 20, 15:59
Alf Baird on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “I think we will find that in a colonial society, and based on the hoax of ‘union’, it is a…” Sep 20, 15:51
robertkknight on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Ah, quite possibly an acolyte of the Esoteric Order of Saint Nicla of Thames House and no doubt a fully…” Sep 20, 15:26
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “If Indy is a matter of great urgency, Alf, why don’t you apply your efforts to doing something useful and…” Sep 20, 15:14
James Che on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “All backed by the Westminster governance sent to Scotland to govern Scotland perchance,” Sep 20, 14:04
Oneliner on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “There are some of the mindset that a pejorative is only valid if it comes from HQ.” Sep 20, 13:47
Alf Baird on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: ““politicians are now starting to wake up to another aspect of this rotten Scottish Government” It is a great hope…” Sep 20, 13:45
David Blake on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “The more they come up with desperate stuff like this, the more it feels there must be something really nasty…” Sep 20, 13:40
Alf Baird on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: ““Scotland’s national situation” Returning to postcolonial theory (Fanon etc), as we must, reveals that a colonised people: – are ‘out…” Sep 20, 13:38
Spartan 117 on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “@Hatey, there’s a lot to unpack there. Firstly, the term “warmonger” was used as a statement of fact rather than…” Sep 20, 12:56
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “@DaveL says: 20 September, 2026 at 12:25 pm “I must admit his reply at 8.54am is a step up and…” Sep 20, 12:39
sarah on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Douglas Chapman: I suggested in a previous comment that perhaps the reason why the SNP-run Scottish executive had made so…” Sep 20, 12:38
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Then again, Spartan, Scotland’s a wee place shortly to be Independent and walking alone on the world stage. Free to…” Sep 20, 12:35
Spartan 117 on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “The implosion of the M25 omniclusterfuckpermashambles quickens. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16145111/Andy-Burnham-early-election-mandate-income-tax.html The Fabian tax junkies are so desperate to fund their warmongering and…” Sep 20, 12:26
DaveL on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “@Spartan 117, I really don’t expect anything more than the drivel he usually posts, but I must admit his reply…” Sep 20, 12:25
James Che on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Factchecker, I knew you would find an excuse, The facts I Quote are from Westminster parliament site and are also…” Sep 20, 12:08
willie on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “And to change the dial a tad again this Sunday morning a most interesting article breaking out into the popular…” Sep 20, 12:04
Spartan 117 on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “@DaveL, don’t expect any intelligible answer from warmongers. You’re trying to find reason and logic amongst the unreasonable and illogical.…” Sep 20, 11:25
James Che on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Janet, Surely it i s entirely reasonable on the pat of the police, For What reason if the police police…” Sep 20, 11:24
Spartan 117 on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Spot the Sturgeonista. And no, it’s not reasonable at all, nor has the law been correctly applied.” Sep 20, 11:18
Spartan 117 on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “@Hatey. Who’s suggesting we “sacrifice” anyone? My view is it’s naff all to do with us so we should keep…” Sep 20, 11:16
factchecker on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “James Che says: 20 September, 2026 at 8:49 am Factchecker never checks all facts Guilty as charged. I have not…” Sep 20, 10:42
robertkknight on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Hmmm… it’d not be unreasonable to assume “Janet” works for Police Scotland/COPFS. Did you pen any of the previous responses…” Sep 20, 10:29
DaveL on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Try again, defeated isolated and skint or winning and going to attack the rest of the world?” Sep 20, 10:14
Janet on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Entirely reasonable on the part of the police. You don’t like it, but tough. FoI law has been correctly applied.” Sep 20, 09:43
James Che on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Hatey, I know your’e being kind to factchecker, by giving him hints and clues, but perhaps it is better to…” Sep 20, 09:42
James Che on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Xaracen, The old Scottish parliament was dissolved in England by the monarch of England declaration on the 28th April 1706.…” Sep 20, 09:31
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “By linking aspects of Scotland’s political and economic situation to institutionalised slavery, demonstrating the cretinous ignorance and self pitying grievance…” Sep 20, 09:18