The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Battleships and bunkum 41

Posted on November 27, 2012 by

When the No campaign launched its website, the Unionist parties behind it helpfully included video clips of what they called “real Scots” giving their reasons for wanting to keep the UK together. The most repeated assertion in the series of testimonies was that shipbuilding would cease to exist in an independent Scotland.

First there was Tanya, who reckons we’re stronger as a “family unit”, that apprenticeships will vanish overnight somehow (or possibly be made illegal, we haven’t ascertained the logic of them just vanishing yet) and that we should stick together to build big warships to show the world what we can do.

Next up we had Robert, whose view is that there would be no shipbuilding in an independent Scotland. Presumably we’ll just be using strong language to keep enemies from our waters. (In fairness, Robert does admit that he hopes, rather than knows, that shipbuilding on the Clyde will have a future within the UK.)

Then there was Craig, proud to build UK warships and who believes there will be no work under independence. His argument takes a subtly different tack: “There’s no commercial shipping at all, it’s all MoD work, that’s all we get, that’s what sustains us, that’s what keeps these doors open here is MoD work, and Rosyth as well, so if we’re not going to build commercial ships and all we’re going to build is defence and frigates and aircraft carriers then that’s our livelihoods and that’s what keeps us alive”.

Finally we have Frank, who believes that shipbuilding is safe within the UK. “We build ships to the world and we’re fantastic at that!” is his view, though he offers no explanation as to why we would suddenly lose the ability to construct a seaworthy vessel if not ruled from Westminster.

So that’s four repetitions of the same argument – that an independent Scotland would have no shipbuilding as only the MoD uses the yards on the Clyde. But does any reality underpin the assertion? Let’s find out.

Read the rest of this entry →

Join our club 74

Posted on November 26, 2012 by

Crivvens. We were rooting around in Google Analytics (the thing that records website traffic) today. It’s a service we only signed up to at the start of March, which among other things means our cumulative lifetime pageviews statistic is probably understated by around 100,000. But the startling thing we discovered was something else.

Since we started tracking “unique visitors” in March (statspeak for the number of different identifiable people who’ve come to the site at least once), Wings Over Scotland has been read by just over 125,000 people. That’s… wow. That’s a lot.

Obviously many just pass through after following a link from somewhere and never come back, and a typical single month will only see about a fifth of that number, but around 80% of our readers each month are return visitors – increasingly, people who come here once come back again. (So once more, we’ll be making no apologies for publishing the occasional story about Rangers when merited…)

That’s not just down to the editorial contributors – we’re proud to have some of the most informed commenters in the blogosphere too, who not only tip us off to stories worth covering but also provide new angles and ways of thinking about stuff that hadn’t occurred to us. So if you’re one of the 99% who read but don’t comment, speak up. We, and an increasingly large number of other people, want to hear from you.

A dilemma for the Tories 51

Posted on November 26, 2012 by

Most newspapers today are reporting concerns over the future of the UK’s three remaining naval shipyards, located in Portsmouth on the south coast of England, and at Govan and Scotstoun on the Clyde. Owners BAE Systems have strongly hinted that at least one is likely to close, with a decision expected by the end of 2012, and the two Glasgow yards (which more or less face each other across the river) tend to be treated as a single unit.

The relevance of the outcome to the independence debate is obvious. Shipbuilding on the Clyde has long been a totemic feature of the argument for the Union, with Labour and Conservatives alike long having insisted that there would be no chance of the rUK commissioning warships from an independent Scotland – Labour MP Ian Davidson is quoted today saying that very thing:

“Obviously if Scotland were to separate from the United Kingdom, then the terms of business would preclude any orders for the Type 26 being placed on the Clyde.”

So the problem for the Westminster government is clear: shut the Clyde yards, handing the SNP and the Yes campaign huge propaganda victories, or shut Portsmouth, costing thousands of jobs in an almost entirely Tory area where only one of the seats currently held by the party (Gosport, a majority of 15,000) could be classed as “safe”.

It’s difficult to picture a world in which the Conservatives would sacrifice 5000 jobs in their own heartland in order to save 3000 in Glasgow, but to not do so would be to torpedo the “Better Together” campaign to devastating effect – an option which the party may find more tolerable if only because the explosion would also damage Labour in its biggest remaining Scottish stronghold.

Of course, the independence movement gets a big stick to beat the Union with in either case – were Portsmouth to be closed, the rUK would be left with no facilities for warship construction at all, making the threats of the likes of Ian Davidson sound even more hollow. Non-combat vessels are one thing, but would the rUK really commission its battleships, frigates and aircraft carriers from the other side of the world rather than a tried-and-trusted contractor a few miles across the border – particularly if it was seeking co-operation from its neighbour over the location of Trident submarines while London found somewhere in its own waters to base them?

Not only shipyard workers will be awaiting the decision with trepidation.

The turning tide 23

Posted on November 26, 2012 by

There’s a very good piece in the Scottish Sun today by Andrew Nicoll – entitled “Why promise more devolution when it will never happen?” – on the consequences of a “No” vote in the 2014 referendum. It’s well worth reading in full, but if you’re in a rush we’ll just quote the last line of it to give you the flavour:

“Independence has been a gun at Westminster’s head for decades. What do you think will happen when they find out there are no bullets in it?”

We are, as ever, pleased to see the mainstream Scottish media catching up with the stuff we’ve been saying for months, although the reality is in fact even worse than Nicoll suggests. Nonetheless, it’s good to see the analysis disseminated in Scotland’s biggest-selling paper, and by a proper senior staff journalist rather than the cop-out option of an opinion columnist. The Scottish Sun has almost ten times the circulation of the Scotsman, the country’s supposed “quality” broadsheet, and it’s worth remembering that pieces like this will therefore reach far more people than the likes of Michael Kelly, Brian Wilson or Magnus Gardham could ever dream of. Slowly but surely, the independence campaign is winning the argument, and the opposition’s panicked response tells the story. Stay out of the mud, folks.

The Scotland you wish to see 95

Posted on November 25, 2012 by

I sometimes worry about the leftward edge of the Yes Scotland coalition. My own politics are very much at that end of the spectrum, but a few times in recent months – most notably when the SNP changed its policy on NATO – I’ve been concerned about the campaign putting the cart before the horse. Some very angry commentary on the NATO issue appeared to imply that we might as well stay in the Union if an independent Scotland was going to sign up to the Alliance, petulantly throwing away all the other progress that independence would enable like a toddler in a huff.

The crucial thing to remember about the referendum is that the “downtrodden masses” are no longer the majority. The great triumph and great evil of Thatcherism, as practiced by both Tory and Labour governments over the last 30 years, was to deliberately and successfully marginalise the poor by bribing those just above them. Hard-pressed homeowners are understandably terrified of falling into the apocalyptic pit of misery that seethes just below them, and have been conditioned to view the poor below, not the rich above, as the greatest threat to their security.

Years and years of attack pieces in the right-wing press have created a culture where working-class people have been persuaded to hate “scroungers”, in the form of the unemployed, the sick, and the disabled rather than those who’ve actually bankrupted the country. The word “fairness” has been cynically inverted and perverted to depict the relatively well-off as victims and the poor as the greedy villains.

Poll after poll suggests support for independence is greatest among the poor, and weakest – rationally enough – among those who are doing best out of the status quo. But the poor alone are not great enough in number to win the referendum. If we unite around a “soak the rich” banner, and a vision of Scotland dictated by those who garner just a few percent of the vote between them in elections, we will enjoy a great feeling of moral superiority, and we will lose.

So I was a little nervous about the tenor and outcome of the “Radical Independence Conference” which took place in Glasgow this weekend.

Read the rest of this entry →

Better Together leaked posters #9 55

Posted on November 24, 2012 by

(From our spy in the No camp.)

Credible witnesses 54

Posted on November 23, 2012 by

As regular readers will know, we very rarely bother reporting opinion polls on this site, for a whole raft of reasons (the main one being that opinion polls two years out from any possible vote are basically meaningless). But today we were doing a little digging into one and came up with something modestly interesting.

Read the rest of this entry →

As I say, not as I do 12

Posted on November 23, 2012 by

This is Labour MSP Michael McMahon in today’s Daily Record:

“Now it seems the official record can be changed at the First Minister’s whim without anyone’s knowledge. Parliament should look to its rules.”

For once, we wholeheartedly agree with Mr McMahon. We can’t abide people quietly rewriting history to pretend they said something other than what they actuallly said.

All aboard the freedom train 59

Posted on November 23, 2012 by

There’s much merriment in the pro-independence community today at a campaign flyer the No campaign has apparently been handing out at train stations this morning:

We’ve examined whether independence would really be a journey with no return before, and even the head of the Better Together campaign himself can’t seem to get his story straight. But we love that Unionists have so little understanding of their opponents that they imagine we’d be going to all this trouble just to come back. And what we love even more is the reality spelled out at the top centre of the image.

The UK is currently undergoing the greatest process of division in the three centuries of its existence, with the super-wealthy enriching themselves to obscene levels even as the poor are cast aside, demonised and savagely assaulted at every turn by a government of Eton millionaires and an impotent opposition that has conceded all of its traditional values and offers no protection to the vulnerable. An independent Scotland will indeed take ALL adults and ALL children with it, not just the rich, and we don’t think the idea of that being a permanent trip is a frightening one.

Read the rest of this entry →

The scorched-earth chamber 107

Posted on November 22, 2012 by

On watching today’s FMQs, we’re more and more coming to the conclusion that the Holyrood opposition’s chief campaign strategy is to make people so utterly scunnered with all politicians that nobody will ever vote for anything or anyone again, and that that way the Unionist parties might get at least a turn at power on the drawing of lots. From the bottom of our heart, readers, we’re struggling to explain it any other way.

Big Tax Case verdict: the reality 132

Posted on November 21, 2012 by

There’s already been an avalanche of cobblers talked about yesterday’s surprise verdict of the First Tier Tribunal on alleged tax evasion by Rangers. RFC fans are triumphantly howling vindication for their claims that the whole thing was a giant conspiracy, insisting the verdict shows the club hadn’t been cheating for a decade and that it should still be playing in Scotland’s top division. The club’s former chairman even told Scotland Tonight that it wouldn’t have gone into administration at all, let alone liquidation, if not for the pressures caused by the infamous “Big Tax Case”.

The Scottish media, meanwhile, is mostly painting a picture of unadulterated victory for, and terrible injustice against, the Ibrox club. But let’s see if we can cut through the persisting fog, establish some solid facts and lay a couple of myths.

Read the rest of this entry →

Flog It! 64

Posted on November 21, 2012 by

Do you think the Scotsman is concerned that readers might miss the latest front-page attack piece on the Scottish media’s November target-of-the-month Mike Russell?

(Note that this isn’t just multiple links to the same page, the clever trick that the paper pulled last Friday in relation to essentially the same incident – this is the same story repeated word-for-word on two separate pages, as you can see by the fact that one has three comments while the other has 59 comments. It’ll be interesting to see which one gets pulled if and when they correct the error – our money’s on the one with 59.)

[EDIT 12.05pm: Sure enough, the 59-comment version of the page has now vanished, leaving only the three-comment version.]

  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,990 Posts, 1,252,917 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • James on Faces In Sand: “Where did they find you?” Oct 21, 17:02
    • Onlooker on Faces In Sand: “Who’s the idiot looking smug and pleased with herself as she babbles on about the name of Scotland being the…” Oct 21, 16:49
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “Does it not dawn on you, Geri, that it IS possible to have a legitimate concern for, and indeed “a…” Oct 21, 16:26
    • Lorncal on Faces In Sand: “So, James Che, no Scottish Commissioners, no Scottish Jurists drafting the Scottish Treaty, no Queen Anne as titular head of…” Oct 21, 16:23
    • sarah on Faces In Sand: “Facts about: 1. the economic drain from Scotland because of the “Union”; 2. the legal proof that the “Union” is…” Oct 21, 16:07
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: “John Swinney has today commented “Successive UK Governments have failed to establish a dedicated sovereign wealth fund using North Sea…” Oct 21, 15:37
    • Aidan on Faces In Sand: “Geri – I can’t imagine what demons you’re fighting (or actively embracing) which would cause you to write something like…” Oct 21, 15:16
    • Minceheid on Faces In Sand: “Hatey McHateface says: 21 October, 2026 at 1:47 pm I’ll tell you what’s likely within the next 30 years. You’ll…” Oct 21, 14:49
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “without even doing the slightest research, there are any number of possible reasons why the albertans voted that way -…” Oct 21, 14:15
    • Southernbystander on Faces In Sand: “Sam was this case not related to holding slaves in Scotland i.e Knight himself who had been brought here by…” Oct 21, 14:00
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “I’ll tell you what’s likely within the next 30 years. You’ll be deid and forgotten. As for Canada being annexed…” Oct 21, 13:47
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Attaboy, James. Don’t you let Geri and Confused steal all the glory.” Oct 21, 13:37
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “give us your insights about alberta then, arse-piece. Looking further ahead, due to climate change cold northern lands will become…” Oct 21, 13:20
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “with the SNP in charge of “independence”, why would you need propaganda anymore – they are winding up the operation,…” Oct 21, 13:18
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “Alf Baird, It is true that we are able to hold legal witness to the annexation of Scotland in 1707.…” Oct 21, 13:17
    • James on Faces In Sand: “Prick.” Oct 21, 13:16
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““shovelling yoon propaganda” Calm, mature reflection would lead one to consider that if that is true, and it is also…” Oct 21, 13:08
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “Both Scotland and England supposedly remain as the Sovereign Countries that lend to the foundation of the State of Great…” Oct 21, 13:04
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Nobody has much to say about Alberta’s thumping rejection of Indy. All that oil, King Charles on their banknotes, and…” Oct 21, 12:54
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “propaganda conduit, BBC Scotchland-shire, is being gutted – I hope all those journos have been made aware of their options…” Oct 21, 12:31
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “Our findings have already been confirmed by expert legal opinion too, James. Scotland’s unlawful annexation and takeover (i.e. colonization) by…” Oct 21, 12:27
    • sarah on Faces In Sand: “Legal establishment issues: see caltonjock’s piece today about Lady Dorrian.” Oct 21, 12:15
    • Aidan on Faces In Sand: “Thank you Northcode – that is exactly right!” Oct 21, 11:48
    • Oneliner on Faces In Sand: “No, it should read ‘United Kingdoms’ As in United States; United Arab Emirates etc.” Oct 21, 11:46
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “OK. If anything, I think my eyes are out on stalks. I have to go out now. I’ll keep my…” Oct 21, 11:37
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “North code. Scotland remains a sovereign country signed up to a voluntary union with and as does England if you…” Oct 21, 11:36
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Aha! So “with one bound, Scotland was free”, morphs into “with one (encumbered, hence smaller) bound, Scotland was away, laden…” Oct 21, 11:32
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “Scotland is no longer a minor player, it has become a Catalyst Country.” Oct 21, 11:23
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““Logically” There you go, Northy, I’ve pinpointed the flaw in your post. No other cant is prepared to use logic.…” Oct 21, 11:23
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “Hatey, Your eyes seem to be closed to what is happening with protests, riots and objections to the wrong direction…” Oct 21, 11:19
  • A tall tale



↑ Top