The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Labour’s super-fun happy day 43

Posted on May 13, 2013 by

(And Finally… #36)

sharkjump

Five points if you get the joke.

(Tilt o’the topper to Dr. Morag Kerr.)

Quoted for truth #15 127

Posted on May 13, 2013 by

BBC News, 2.53pm today:

“Organisers of the ‘United With Labour’ campaign say they’re arguing for a fairer, better Scotland that stands strong within the United Kingdom. They’ll work with the ‘Better Together’ campaign run by the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats.”

Our emphasis, as ever. Poor old Alistair Darling. Where was he, anyway?

(Full package here.)

Strike a Poe’s 66

Posted on May 13, 2013 by

Sorry this post is a bit late, folks. We’ve been pretty stymied all morning trying to get a handle on the extraordinary, unmockable mendacity that’s being fed to the people of Scotland as we speak, which keeps crashing our powers of rational comprehension.

unsoc3

We quite often highlight the utterances of The Labour Party in Scotland (henceforth TLPiS) as examples of “blackwhite”, the Orwellian term for presenting the truth as the exact opposite of reality. But today must surely have set some sort of world record.

Read the rest of this entry →

Bad-karma chameleon 218

Posted on May 12, 2013 by

The Scottish media is full today of Gordon Brown’s latest attempted intervention in the independence debate. Scotland on Sunday and the Sunday Herald both report that the former Prime Minister will urge Scots to “ditch the Tories, not the Union” (as the original SoS headline put it before being changed online to the rather more sober “Brown urges Scots not to give up on UK”, presumably out of respect for the gentle sensibilities of the paper’s Conservative-leaning readership).

brownimmigration

(We’d like to take a brief moment here to appreciate a couple of beautifully acidic, deadpan lines from the Herald’s piece, written by Paul Hutcheon. Our emphasis.)

“Brown, who led his party to defeat at the last General Election, will be the special guest at an event in Glasgow. Although Labour has a dominant role in the cross-party Better Together campaign, senior party sources last year pushed for a separation to convey Labour’s distinctive message.”

The substance of Brown’s argument, in so far as it can be said to have any, is founded on a lie that was comprehensively disproved on this very website well over a year ago – namely that “if Scottish Labour supporters vote to leave the UK it would mean abandoning colleagues in England to years of Tory rule”.

That proposition is demonstrably untrue (not to mention a remarkably defeatist assertion that Labour can’t now defeat the Tories in England, despite having done so in 1997, 2001 and 2005). But even if it wasn’t, what then?

Read the rest of this entry →

Full marks for persistence 100

Posted on May 11, 2013 by

If there’s one area where you really have to hand it to “Better Together”, it’s sheer shamelessness. Despite having been humiliatingly exposed for inflating attendance figures at their events by at least 100% twice on this site alone, to the great merriment of Yes campaigners, they just keep right on going without a hint of embarrassment.

btaberdeen

We can’t help starting to wonder if this might all be one of those sort of “When I was going to St Ives…” trick riddle things. How many Darling Youth kids make 70?

Read the rest of this entry →

Call the fire brigade 35

Posted on May 11, 2013 by

ukiptrees

Let’s be careful out there 88

Posted on May 11, 2013 by

arthurseat2

A plague on all your houses 73

Posted on May 11, 2013 by

Yesterday we were reading an engrossing article by Peter Kellner, the president of YouGov. It’s only available in PDF form as far as we can tell, and in terms of formatting it’s a bit of a trial to get through, but the information within is fascinating.

stooges

It’s a study of the difficulties faced by Labour in their attempt to win the 2015 election, and without wanting to spoil it for you, Kellner’s conclusion is that it’s going to be extremely difficult. That won’t be news to Wings Over Scotland readers, of course, but the depth of detail is well worth getting into if you’ve a head for that sort of thing.

We gleaned something different from the piece, though.

Read the rest of this entry →

Some tweaking 90

Posted on May 10, 2013 by

We've been doing a little minor smartening-up around the place this afternoon, mostly (though not exclusively) for the benefit of people using the site via mobile phones or tablets. There's a new comment box that should work for both iOS and Android devices (and will enable you to italicise, bold or underline things, as well as embed images), and there are now a couple of little orange buttons at the bottom right of the screen that'll take you directly to the top or bottom of a page. (Replicating the effect of the Home and End buttons on a PC keyboard.)

Hopefully they'll make the site a little more user-friendly. If you have any problems with them, give us a shout and we'll see what we can do.

Why so worried? 91

Posted on May 10, 2013 by

We’re a little suspicious of yesterday’s Ipsos MORI poll on Scottish politics.

It’s not so much the numbers for independence, which are within normal fluctuations and error margins and may also reflect a recent tsunami of doom-laden, irrational and hyperbolic media coverage on the currency issue. No, what’s got us in sceptical mood are the frankly ridiculous Holyrood voting intentions figures, which appear to suggest a shift towards Labour of about 16 points in the space of two months during which the party did nothing but make a laughing-stock of itself.

hvi

Frankly, if we could find even a single Labour supporter who thought Johann Lamont was actually going to be Scotland’s next First Minister we’d be astonished, so we’re putting the poll down as a rogue until it’s corroborated by another one. But there was something even stranger about it.

Read the rest of this entry →

Don’t say you weren’t warned 146

Posted on May 09, 2013 by

Extracts from a piece last year on the highly influential Conservative Home:

“Drawn up more than three decades ago by now Lord Barnett the [Barnett] formula distributes taxpayers’ money across the UK. Even Lord Barnett now describes the formula as “unfair”. On both the Left (IPPR) and Right (TaxPayers’ Alliance) there is agreement that the formula is well past its sell-by date. Scotland and Northern Ireland receive a much greater share of UK taxpayers’ money than need in either country would require. The biggest losers are the poorer English regions and Wales.

This seems one of the great no-brainers of British politics. England is losing up to £4.5 billion every year because a Conservative-led government is sending that money to parts of the UK that stubbornly refuse to vote Conservative. So let a [2015] Conservative Prime Minister call for the phased ending of the Barnett formula.”

“Vote No, Get Nothing” is starting to look a little optimistic.

Standing up for your own side 144

Posted on May 09, 2013 by

Sir Alex Ferguson (no relation) resigned as manager of Manchester United this week. The resulting deluge of newspaper articles covered a wide range of opinions, both gushingly complimentary and rather less so, but one characteristic of the man was uniformly (and approvingly) agreed on – that he always defended his players.

fergusonalex

And it was hard not to contrast that unwavering loyalty (a trait described by Ferguson himself as “the anchor of my life”) with events in the independence debate last week.

Read the rest of this entry →

  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,990 Posts, 1,252,775 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • sarah on Faces In Sand: “Possible good news about John Swinney – according to Robin McAlpine, JS wants out of the leadership. Of course there…” Oct 19, 22:45
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Faces In Sand: “I have been appreciating the regular updates from the Francis Dearnley and Dominic Nicholls duo: www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CM6l79O3cQ&t=1080s” Oct 19, 21:45
    • sam on Faces In Sand: ““Who are the ‘they’?” If you are talking about “crimes against humanity” “they” could be the clan chiefs who harmed…” Oct 19, 19:20
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “One can often gauge the measure of a person by the company they keep. Flies are attracted to shite and…” Oct 19, 19:15
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Factchecker – as I said further up the thread, it’s pointless trying to apply logic to the hopelessly illogical. I…” Oct 19, 19:13
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: “Thank you for your polite and insightful comment, twathater. It was indeed sometimes brutish. And I didn’t blame anybody. People…” Oct 19, 18:42
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: “Fine, James, have it your way. All the Scots who colonised and exploited foreign lands all over the globe, often…” Oct 19, 18:31
    • twathater on Faces In Sand: “As usual yir wrang fuckchecker it was NOT the British empire it was and still is the BRUTISH empire ,…” Oct 19, 18:01
    • James on Faces In Sand: ““…the people of Scotland…” Which people would that be? Oh aye, the anglophone elite or ‘unionists’ if you prefer.” Oct 19, 17:58
    • sam on Faces In Sand: “Crimes against humanity? Plenty of those, historical and modern. Kincora boys home and the many r4pes (a crime against humanity)…” Oct 19, 17:25
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “It goes without saying, of course, my last comment above was directed at Alf, not Factchecker….” Oct 19, 17:04
    • Aidan on Faces In Sand: “Mr Lavrov is about as popular in the free world as the coronavirus. Quite why any political campaign would want…” Oct 19, 16:27
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: “Alf Baird says: 19 October, 2026 at 3:20 pm “The empire colonies you refer to were never ever ‘Scotland’s’ colonies…” Oct 19, 15:55
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “I wasn’t aware that it was “U” that kicked this whole thing off by bombing “R”, Alf. Anything else you’d…” Oct 19, 15:54
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Faces In Sand: “I find Bill Browder’s personal story rather compelling… www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlF0ZzH6C9s” Oct 19, 15:54
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “Nope, no get out of jail card for you I’m afraid. Historical facts are facts, deal with them.” Oct 19, 15:37
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “The empire colonies you refer to were never ever ‘Scotland’s’ colonies at all; many pre-dated the 1707 English annexation of…” Oct 19, 15:20
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Yeh but no but yeh but no but yeh it’s ok because we’re Scottish, which absolves us of anything apparently,…” Oct 19, 11:50
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “I do agree Alf, albeit with the almighty caveat that Ru**ia is currently the poster boy of imperialism and warmongering.…” Oct 19, 11:08
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: ““Life under the union Jack stinks and associates us with the crimes against humanity they have committed over many hundreds…” Oct 19, 11:05
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “”Most of the French thinks it’s a great thing, tearing down the system of centuries old colonialist racism and all…” Oct 19, 10:54
    • Southernbystander on Faces In Sand: “The French have a tradition of using street protest to get political change (I won’t comment on whether that is…” Oct 19, 10:25
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “Its you and your hypocritical imperialistic kind who aye advocate bombing other countries Hatey, for which there are always consequences,…” Oct 19, 10:14
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “If only Scotland could find a Scottish coke heid of his calibre to lead us. Not that you’ll agree. You…” Oct 19, 09:57
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “How odd that 20 million people would want to flee from the same people who are helping out Scotland at…” Oct 19, 08:44
    • Colin Dawson on Faces In Sand: “Collette Stevenson’s mistake is quite understandable, given the SNP’s total obsession with transgender issues over the past decade or so.…” Oct 19, 00:00
    • Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “Is this migration coming from that war torn country that was serving conscription papers on beaches? That is just another…” Oct 18, 23:05
    • Elmac on Faces In Sand: “The title of Faces in Sand would be more appropriate as Faeces in Sand. How anyone with a brain, a…” Oct 18, 23:02
    • Willie on Faces In Sand: “Let’s try again to get through moderation. The potential for huge white immigration from a European country looms large. They…” Oct 18, 21:41
    • Willie on Faces In Sand: “20 million Ukr##nans are wanting to leave. With Britain in lockstep political alignment, if not blood brothers, the UK might…” Oct 18, 21:35
  • A tall tale



↑ Top