The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Blankety blanks 47

Posted on June 06, 2013 by

One of the odder quirks about the BBC iPlayer is that it’ll let you rewind live TV broadcasts for up to two hours, but not radio, despite radio using vastly less bandwidth. So at the moment we can’t bring you a verified quote that Liam Byrne really just told Radio 4’s Today programme that the idea of rent controls as a solution to the UK’s housing benefit bill was “going a bit too far”.

liambyrne

But there’s another new Labour welfare policy that’s missing a fairly vital chunk of information this morning, which is even more worrying than the shadow Secretary of State for Work and Pensions having less intelligence, insight, principle and moral courage than a starving weasel.

Read the rest of this entry →

Always crashing in a different car 87

Posted on June 05, 2013 by

Heaven’s sent us an angel, folks. Alert reader Jack Deeth is stranded far from home shores (really very far indeed) and stuck for something to do in the long winter nights, he very generously offered us his transcribing services.

We leapt on the offer with undignified haste, and you can read the first results below, in the shape of today’s interview between Margaret Curran and Andrew Neil on the Daily Politics, in which the shadow Scottish Secretary clearly and unambiguously laid out a future Labour government’s spending and welfare plans.

Read the rest of this entry →

Have pity on us, readers 88

Posted on June 05, 2013 by

Please don’t make us transcribe this nine-minute trainwreck of an interview with Margaret Curran on the subject of Labour’s welfare and spending plans, from this afternoon’s edition of BBC2’s Daily Politics. We don’t know if we could take it.

margaretcurran1

Click the image to listen, if you have a high pain threshold.

Uncertainty uncertain (or is it?) 48

Posted on June 05, 2013 by

Along with more direct, overt scaremongering, it’s probably fair to say that the core theme of the “Better Together” anti-independence campaign to date has been “uncertainty”. Day after day sees the media and public assailed with neurotic demands for definitive answers about every conceivable aspect of an independent Scotland that in most cases couldn’t be answered by any nation on Earth, including the UK.

uncertainty

The No camp disastrously overplayed its hand with the “500 questions” fiasco, which saw it subjected to literally worldwide mockery, but it suffered an arguably even more wounding blow today with the release of some figures which blew gaping holes into pretty much everything it’s spent the last 18 months saying.

Read the rest of this entry →

Same as it ever was 77

Posted on June 04, 2013 by

From the excellent Part 1 of STV’s new documentary “Road To Referendum” (based on the book by Iain Macwhirter, out this week), Labour PM Harold Wilson and Scottish Secretary Willie Ross punt a rather familiar line four decades before Ed Miliband.

onenationwilson

We’re sure there’s nothing at all sinister in the fact that the show was unavailable to most viewers due to an unprecedented cross-media technical failure, which also wiped out the STV news at 6pm and this evening’s Scotland Tonight, incidentally.

An exile’s lament 43

Posted on June 04, 2013 by

Because we all of us do what we can, wherever we are.

Delayed transmission 41

Posted on June 04, 2013 by

This morning’s Daily Record carries a story about Ed Balls’ policy speech on welfare yesterday. Commendably, the Labour-supporting paper isn’t shy of pointing out the implications of Balls’ comments:

“Scots could get welfare benefits at lower rates than people in wealthy parts of England under plans being worked on by Labour. Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls yesterday raised the idea of a regional cap on welfare, opening the door to variations in a range of social security benefits.

Balls said the welfare cap of £25,000 a year per household should be higher in London but could be lower in parts of the UK where housing is cheaper.”

We’d have been even more impressed, though, if Wings Over Scotland hadn’t revealed the reality of what Labour’s future plans meant for Scotland almost three weeks ago.

Read the rest of this entry →

Health and efficiency 48

Posted on June 04, 2013 by

Particularly alert readers may recall a shock-horror story from the Scottish media earlier this year relating to a sharp rise in the number of people waiting over four hours for treatment in hospital A&E departments, which came complete with some dramatic (and highly misleading) graphs.

waitingtimes

Labour’s ironic Scottish health spokeswoman Jackie Baillie poured opprobrium on the Scottish Government both for the figures and for changing the treatment-within-four-hours target from 98% to 95%, with the Tories enthusiastically joining in as usual.

So we were naturally quite curious to see what the corresponding figures for the English NHS would be, and they were finally released today.

Read the rest of this entry →

Dictionary correction 105

Posted on June 03, 2013 by

We’re stuck with the old version, before “pledge” was officially redefined to mean “lie”.

bainfuel

But we’re sure the Eleventh Edition will be out any day now.

The dead walk again 122

Posted on June 03, 2013 by

The Scotsman usually makes at least a token effort at concealing its bias a little bit better than this. We’re not sure what’s happened this morning.

scotthumb

What we mean is that normally when you want to find out one of the paper’s headlines is a massive misrepresentation of the truth, you might not have to dig far, but it’s usually slightly deeper than the story’s own strapline.

Read the rest of this entry →

Punishing the guilty 40

Posted on June 02, 2013 by

So we read this earlier today from New Statesman journalist George Eaton:

fuel1

We don’t mind telling you we were on tenterhooks waiting for the first concrete policy commitment of Ed Miliband’s three-year Labour leadership. Then it arrived.

Read the rest of this entry →

Shoppers’ paradise 40

Posted on June 02, 2013 by

Wings Over Scotland undertook a research trip to London yesterday – mainly to check out the Propaganda: Power And Persuasion exhibition at the British Library, which we definitely recommend should you find yourself in the vicinity. Later in the day, though, we took a stroll down Oxford Street, and found ourselves horrified by the state of it.

oxfordst

The UK capital’s great retail showpiece looked like the aftermath of a Luftwaffe bombing raid on a run-down part of Burnley. Much of the south side of the street had been ripped to pieces by ongoing and seemingly endless work for the Crossrail project (sound familiar, Edinburgh residents?), but even where buildings were untouched by the builders there were boarded-up shops, tatty frontages and once-proud units now occupied by scores of scruffy tourist tat shifters.

And if even the great West End has now fallen into that sort of dilapidated, thoroughly depressing condition, despite three decades of all the country’s wealth being greedily sucked down to London, then what of the rest of the country?

Read the rest of this entry →

  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,990 Posts, 1,252,773 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • sam on Faces In Sand: ““Who are the ‘they’?” If you are talking about “crimes against humanity” “they” could be the clan chiefs who harmed…” Oct 19, 19:20
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “One can often gauge the measure of a person by the company they keep. Flies are attracted to shite and…” Oct 19, 19:15
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Factchecker – as I said further up the thread, it’s pointless trying to apply logic to the hopelessly illogical. I…” Oct 19, 19:13
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: “Thank you for your polite and insightful comment, twathater. It was indeed sometimes brutish. And I didn’t blame anybody. People…” Oct 19, 18:42
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: “Fine, James, have it your way. All the Scots who colonised and exploited foreign lands all over the globe, often…” Oct 19, 18:31
    • twathater on Faces In Sand: “As usual yir wrang fuckchecker it was NOT the British empire it was and still is the BRUTISH empire ,…” Oct 19, 18:01
    • James on Faces In Sand: ““…the people of Scotland…” Which people would that be? Oh aye, the anglophone elite or ‘unionists’ if you prefer.” Oct 19, 17:58
    • sam on Faces In Sand: “Crimes against humanity? Plenty of those, historical and modern. Kincora boys home and the many r4pes (a crime against humanity)…” Oct 19, 17:25
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “It goes without saying, of course, my last comment above was directed at Alf, not Factchecker….” Oct 19, 17:04
    • Aidan on Faces In Sand: “Mr Lavrov is about as popular in the free world as the coronavirus. Quite why any political campaign would want…” Oct 19, 16:27
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: “Alf Baird says: 19 October, 2026 at 3:20 pm “The empire colonies you refer to were never ever ‘Scotland’s’ colonies…” Oct 19, 15:55
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “I wasn’t aware that it was “U” that kicked this whole thing off by bombing “R”, Alf. Anything else you’d…” Oct 19, 15:54
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Faces In Sand: “I find Bill Browder’s personal story rather compelling… www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlF0ZzH6C9s” Oct 19, 15:54
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “Nope, no get out of jail card for you I’m afraid. Historical facts are facts, deal with them.” Oct 19, 15:37
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “The empire colonies you refer to were never ever ‘Scotland’s’ colonies at all; many pre-dated the 1707 English annexation of…” Oct 19, 15:20
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Yeh but no but yeh but no but yeh it’s ok because we’re Scottish, which absolves us of anything apparently,…” Oct 19, 11:50
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “I do agree Alf, albeit with the almighty caveat that Ru**ia is currently the poster boy of imperialism and warmongering.…” Oct 19, 11:08
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: ““Life under the union Jack stinks and associates us with the crimes against humanity they have committed over many hundreds…” Oct 19, 11:05
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “”Most of the French thinks it’s a great thing, tearing down the system of centuries old colonialist racism and all…” Oct 19, 10:54
    • Southernbystander on Faces In Sand: “The French have a tradition of using street protest to get political change (I won’t comment on whether that is…” Oct 19, 10:25
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “Its you and your hypocritical imperialistic kind who aye advocate bombing other countries Hatey, for which there are always consequences,…” Oct 19, 10:14
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “If only Scotland could find a Scottish coke heid of his calibre to lead us. Not that you’ll agree. You…” Oct 19, 09:57
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “How odd that 20 million people would want to flee from the same people who are helping out Scotland at…” Oct 19, 08:44
    • Colin Dawson on Faces In Sand: “Collette Stevenson’s mistake is quite understandable, given the SNP’s total obsession with transgender issues over the past decade or so.…” Oct 19, 00:00
    • Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “Is this migration coming from that war torn country that was serving conscription papers on beaches? That is just another…” Oct 18, 23:05
    • Elmac on Faces In Sand: “The title of Faces in Sand would be more appropriate as Faeces in Sand. How anyone with a brain, a…” Oct 18, 23:02
    • Willie on Faces In Sand: “Let’s try again to get through moderation. The potential for huge white immigration from a European country looms large. They…” Oct 18, 21:41
    • Willie on Faces In Sand: “20 million Ukr##nans are wanting to leave. With Britain in lockstep political alignment, if not blood brothers, the UK might…” Oct 18, 21:35
    • Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “@ Hatey My comment was meant to be criticism as too many people have no critical thinking nowadays due to…” Oct 18, 21:17
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““colossally mishandled by the French state, of course” No “of course” about it here. You should back up your claim…” Oct 18, 21:04
  • A tall tale



↑ Top