A column on a Sturgeon-loyalist indy website that we read yesterday has been mildly annoying us ever since, and in the interests of open debate (but mainly because it’s cold and grey and rainy outside and we can’t go out and feed the swans) we thought it was worth taking half an hour to walk through it a little and explain just why it’s such a dangerous piece of fantasy nonsense.
But first here’s one of said swans. She’s about five months old and her adult feathers are just starting to come through. Isn’t she lovely?
In case things get a bit rough later we’ve got some squirrels and a really fat dachshund as emergency backup, so buckle in.
The comments from committee convener and SNP MP Linda Fabiani (we guess she must be another of those MI5 plants/secret Unionists) are really quite extraordinary. In terms of Parliamentary language they’re only a hair’s-breadth short of an invitation to step outside and settle things with an old-school dust-up in the car park.
The weekend just past saw a convulsion as big as any we can ever recall witnessing on Yes social media, triggered by a series of tweets by Nicola Sturgeon which caused an extraordinary negative reaction out of all proportion to their ostensible content.
The reason was that the First Minister – who had remained silent about countless episodes of hideous misogynistic abuse aimed from her own side at MPs and MSPs like Joan McAlpine and Joanna Cherry – had chosen to suddenly leap into action in defence of the toxically divisive horror that is Glasgow councillor Rhiannon Spear after Spear had been widely criticised for making blatantly false claims in a video promoting her attempt to be selected as the candidate for Argyll & Bute.
(Sturgeon had no such public condemnation for the torrents of abuse the SNP Twitler Youth then unleased on Kirsten Thornton, the female SNP activist and Generation Yes founder who’d pointed out Spear’s untruths.)
The move sent the party’s woke and sane factions into a frenzy of bloodletting which in itself will have little if any impact on the wider electorate, but nonetheless threw into sharp relief the life-and-death battle currently going on for the SNP’s soul.
And since that’s related to what we’ve been writing about on Wings for the bulk of this year, it seemed worthwhile to get some things down on the record once and for all.
Super-veteran readers may recall the story of Scorpion Software, the amateur games development collective I formed with a pal in the early 1980s to create largely rubbish games mostly written in BASIC for the ZX Spectrum and the Dragon 32.
If you read the 2008 retrospective linked in that paragraph, you’ll note that it offers a bit of constructive self-critique on some of the games we produced, and the other day I accidentally stumbled into following my own advice.
Just two days ago the Electoral Commission gave us a fourth supposed date for the publication of the SNP’s 2019 accounts: having first been due out in early August, they then told us to expect them in early September, and then last week, and then in “the next three weeks”, ie the middle of October.
But someone gave us a tipoff that we might be able to request them via Freedom Of Information, since ostensibly the only holdup was that the EC wanted to wait until ALL of the main parties’ accounts were ready and publish them all at once for tidiness.
So we sent one in, and we just got a very quick reply.
During a debate on the UK government’s recent decision to abandon the notion of gender self-ID, SNP MP Anne McLaughlin told the Commons chamber that it was still the Scottish Government’s “strong commitment” to go ahead with highly controversial reform of the law BEFORE next year’s Holyrood election.
But that isn’t what Scottish voters were told earlier this year.
The SNP have historically been swift to suspend any party members when there’s any hint of inappropriate conduct, never mind even a whiff of illegality. It’s been that way since 2015, with the axe falling on elected members as well as candidates in target seats and critical elections, and ordinary activists.
Not even a by-your-leave, let alone an explanation, is afforded – just suspension with immediate effect. And that’s all well and good, some might say. No hint of impropriety should attach to the party and making a virtue of acting swiftly can be both necessary and appropriate.
So why then no action against the Chief Executive?
The Electoral Commission appears to have missed yet another deadline for publishing the SNP’s 2019 accounts (we’re waiting on them to return our phone call), so we’ve got a moment to talk about something else relating to the party’s finances.
[EDIT 12.56pm: the Commission now “hopes” to have the accounts published “in the next three weeks” along with those of the other main Westminster parties.]
The Scottish press covered itself in as much disgrace over the publication of the will of lottery winner Colin Weir after his tragic death last year as it had done during his life. Pretty much every paper in the country ran lurid headlines about how he’d “blown” or “burned” (translation: spent) half of his £80m share of the 2011 jackpot in nine years.
Weirdly, the Scottish Sun and the Daily Mail stood out for (mainly) respectful coverage focused on the fact that Colin Weir had in fact used most of the money on good causes and generous support for friends, family and strangers.
(Also, both of the Weirs were fairly old and already in quite poor health when they won the money, so why wouldn’t they spend it? You famously can’t take it with you.)
But the Mail was almost unique in the fact that its headline mentioned something that seemed to stand out as the most obviously newsworthy aspect of the will.
Senator Claire Chandler is a Liberal Party member of the Australian Parliament. Some recent experiences she’s had send a very serious warning about the likely outcomes of the Scottish Government’s wildly unpopular new Hate Crime Bill. She’s graciously allowed us to publish this column she wrote on the subject.
Early this month I received a letter from Tasmania’s Anti-Discrimination Commissioner directing me to attend a compulsory “conciliation” conference with somebody offended by my comments about the need to protect women’s sport and women’s toilets and changerooms. You can watch them here:
Ironically, the complaint against me was about an opinion article I wrote about free speech. You can read it here and make up your own mind whether bureaucrats at the Anti-Discrimination Commission should be able to censor any Australian citizens for this kind of public policy discussion.
bobo bunny on The Longest Road: “Curiouser and curiouser” Feb 17, 16:18
bobo bunny on The Longest Road: “See how you feel 4 years from now when you are rolling around in aditch, fighting over the last mouldy…” Feb 17, 16:15
bobo bunny on The Longest Road: “Ok fine. Election. He isn’t doing this because he cares about Alex Salmonds’ legacy, or the cause of independence -…” Feb 17, 16:10
Alf Baird on The Longest Road: ““they clamp the blinkers on tightly” That seems an apt way to describe the effect of a ‘colonial mindset’ affecting…” Feb 17, 15:07
Cynicus on The Longest Road: “MaggieC says: “ So tremble false wigs in the midst of yer glee“ ========== Amen to your sentiment, Maggie. There…” Feb 17, 15:05
sam on The Longest Road: “Northcode I think this is why it happened. Frae the BBC. “The estate of former first minister Alex Salmond is…” Feb 17, 14:10
Hatey McHateface on The Longest Road: “It’s an interesting case, right enough. As already covered by Our Host, not that long ago, Mr Hirst lost his…” Feb 17, 14:05
Hatey McHateface on The Longest Road: “To paraphrase my dear departed Mammie: Fa “classified [ye] as an inferior subject rather than an equal citizen”, Alf? Haha,…” Feb 17, 13:40
sarah on The Longest Road: “@ 100%Yes: good man for posting this link to the Mark Hirst crowdfunder. What a wonderful day it will be…” Feb 17, 13:23
Hatey McHateface on The Longest Road: “Enough of that, Northy. I don’t want you subtly fooling me into thinking an interstellar Pict can ever be regarded…” Feb 17, 12:42
Alf Baird on The Longest Road: “Yes indeed, very interesting, including the definition of “modern colonialism” which: “depends first and foremost upon the declaration of sovereignty…” Feb 17, 12:38
Northcode on The Longest Road: “From the same article. “…colonialism depends first and foremost upon the declaration of sovereignty and/or territorial seizure by a core…” Feb 17, 12:34
willie on The Longest Road: “I think civil actions can effectively be be bought and sold, The classic example of this is no win,no fee…” Feb 17, 12:22
100%Yes on The Longest Road: “He was revealing a lot more than people took on.” Feb 17, 12:22
Northcode on The Longest Road: “I rarely feel the urge to respond to your stuff, but you actually made me laugh out loud… not bad…” Feb 17, 12:17
Hatey McHateface on The Longest Road: “Whoops! “For all their theoretical insights, neither postcolonial theory nor decolonial studies systematically demonstrate through sustained empirical investigation the means…” Feb 17, 12:07
Hatey McHateface on The Longest Road: “You choose to ignore the complications, Alf. Colonisation is like a set of those nested Orc dolls, with the additional…” Feb 17, 12:03
Northcode on The Longest Road: “I think there might be more to this story than just someone blowing their trumpet over their ‘funding’ of another’s…” Feb 17, 11:55
sam on The Longest Road: “Northcode, Alf, others. This is worth reading, I think. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/social-science-history/article/reverberations-of-empire-how-the-colonial-past-shapes-the-present/178FA24536F578B3EFE2434DFDB87846” Feb 17, 11:55
Hatey McHateface on The Longest Road: “Yum. Scotch on the rocks. But surely a bit too early in the day.” Feb 17, 11:40
100%Yes on The Longest Road: “No I don’t, anyone who supports the Labour party and I’ll remind you no other party has caused to much…” Feb 17, 11:35
Debatable Lands on The Longest Road: “A man does something decent out of his own pocket. For Scotland. In fact, doing something virtually every contributor to…” Feb 17, 10:53
100%Yes on The Longest Road: “Just donated to Mark Hirst legal fight, the link is below. https://civillibertyscotland.com/news/victory-is-close-but-fresh-appeal-needed https://civillibertyscotland.com/” Feb 17, 10:52
Northcode on The Longest Road: “The real ‘war’ facing the Scots isn’t material… it’s spiritual, psychological if preferred, and the field of battle is in…” Feb 17, 10:50
Alf Baird on The Longest Road: “Colonialism is not that complicated, Hatey. There are only two main protagonists in colonial theory – the colonizer and the…” Feb 17, 10:36
TURABDIN on The Longest Road: “The great matter is not AI itself but those with the funds to control and influence the technology. Sofar it…” Feb 17, 10:05
TURABDIN on The Longest Road: “THE CHALLENGE….a proactive «army»of liberation or another passive «party» of liberation?” Feb 17, 09:32
Northcode on The Longest Road: “Aye, Alf. I don’t believe Mr McAlpine has fully grasped the true nature of Scotland’s predicament, or understands the underlying…” Feb 17, 09:13
Hatey McHateface on The Longest Road: “An interesting article on what the author calls the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” – the wipe out of office based jobs…” Feb 17, 08:31
David Ferguson on The Longest Road: “I’ll do my best not try your patience Rev, but I’ll be posting this regularly on your threads up to…” Feb 17, 05:02