Today the Scottish Parliament spent several hours heatedly debating a motion to call for a second Section 30 order to enable a new independence referendum (several more will follow tomorrow before the vote). We watched all of it so you didn’t have to, and are delighted to present you with a few clips that probably won’t make the news.
On such a momentous topic, this was the intervention that Scottish Labour list MSP Monica Lennon felt was the most pressing issue to raise, for example:
We’re very touched, obviously, and will add it to our file of other mentions in the chamber and elsewhere. But there were probably more important things to discuss.
It seems counter-intuitive – given Rupert Murdoch’s often-overstated (despite endless and fevered speculation, the Scottish Sun didn’t back a Yes vote) but still seemingly real support for Scottish independence – that Sky News should be seen as the most hostile of the nation’s broadcasters to the Yes movement.
Here’s the Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron, speaking to BBC News this morning and giving a striking illustration of the term “dancing on the head of a pin”.
Comically, his excuse for demanding another referendum on leaving the EU while opposing a second Scottish independence referendum is that his new EU vote would be a completely different question – he’d be asking voters if they wanted to accept the Brexit deal and exit from the EU (which one might reasonably summarise on the ballot paper as “Leave”), or to refuse to approve the deal and stay in the EU (or put another way, “Remain”).
Glad we cleared that up, then. But then it got weirder.
The announcement that the Scottish Government would seek the uncontested legal right to hold a second independence referendum met with an outpouring of rage and ignorance from the massed ranks of the UK media that was in one sense entirely predictable yet still startling in its fury and ferocity.
Most prominent was the assertion, stated as fact by every pundit and broadcaster – including those required by law to be fair and impartial – that a second referendum would be conducted in the environment of a significantly worse economic case.
And that’s a remarkable claim, because the indisputable fact is that nobody has the slightest clue what the economic case for No will be.
Judging by the first 24 hours, we’re in for a two-year festival of utter horror from the UK and Scottish media. Yesterday saw a never-ending parade of metrosplaining idiots dragged willingly in front of cameras and microphones to pontificate their clueless and mind-numbingly ignorant drivel about Scotland.
It wasn’t possible to keep track of it all, because it was frequently happening on five channels at once, and it was harder still to watch it for any extended period of time without hurling a brick through the screen in frustration at the offensive stupidity of it.
Feeding into that was a stream of Scottish politicians who actually did know better, but who are too catastrophically dim to adapt to changing circumstances and had no strategy other than to endlessly repeat the same cretinous soundbites over and over.
(Adam Tomkins in particular was ubiquitous, spending what felt like several hours on various airwaves reciting the same brainless 10-second schtick forever.)
The constitutional politics of the UK and Scotland are in flux, and many aspects of the situation are complicated. But quite a lot of them aren’t, and if we’re all going to make it through the next two years without stabbing each other in the throat, it’d be a lot better if everyone accepted the things that are definite, empirical, indisputable facts.
100%Yes on Shield Of The Phantom: “@robertkknight 27 January, 2026 at 11:55 pm “I think you’ll find they were Picts, or ethnically similar to them. As…” Jan 28, 10:20
Aidan on Shield Of The Phantom: “Firstly “acknowledged by the law to be separate entities” does not mean separate legal entities with legal personality. Secondly, and…” Jan 28, 08:59
Hatey McHateface on Shield Of The Phantom: ““untrustworthy wordsmiths” Not sure the evidence supports that, YL. Take Scotland’s greatest living half-son, for example, President Donald J Trump.…” Jan 28, 08:50
Hatey McHateface on Shield Of The Phantom: “Why’s that then, 100%Yes? Are they claiming the hostages are a’ still undergroond somewhere? Fit aboot the ham asses then?…” Jan 28, 08:37
Hatey McHateface on Shield Of The Phantom: ““You can’t be asking seriously” Wisnae me asking, Aidan, it wis Sooty. And he’s a verra serious glove puppet. At…” Jan 28, 08:24
Xaracen on Shield Of The Phantom: “Like I said! From APPENDIX 2 Case for the Lord Gray . . . 36 Firstly, its purpose so far…” Jan 28, 08:13
Young Lochinvar on Shield Of The Phantom: “Is this not just the way things are and we are ,mostly, now just finding out as we are now…” Jan 28, 06:28
Aidan on Shield Of The Phantom: “We’re talking about you not to you James, sit down.” Jan 28, 06:08
Aidan on Shield Of The Phantom: “Perhaps you’ll be able to provide us with the specific explicit text from the Lords Privileges Committee on which says…” Jan 28, 06:05
robertkknight on Shield Of The Phantom: “I think you’ll find they were Picts, or ethnically similar to them. As were the pre-Norse inhabitants of the Northern…” Jan 27, 23:55
Young Lochinvar on Yelling at the tide: “James Are you sure you spelt the last word correctly? 🙂” Jan 27, 23:38
James on Shield Of The Phantom: “Aw, “Aidan”, look in the mirror, petal.” Jan 27, 22:46
bobo bunny on Shield Of The Phantom: “I have flip flops, so I’m good to go…” Jan 27, 21:40
Xaracen on Shield Of The Phantom: “Aidan said; “Of course that isn’t true at all Xaracen, in any way shape or form, the Lords Privilege Committee…” Jan 27, 20:42
100%Yes on Shield Of The Phantom: “Didn’t they get there arse kicked more than once and sent packing. I fail to see the point of a…” Jan 27, 20:25
100%Yes on Shield Of The Phantom: “I wouldn’t believe everything you hear from the BBC and GB News there known for lying and distorting the truth.…” Jan 27, 20:14
Aidan on Shield Of The Phantom: “You can’t be asking seriously why James can’t engage with a subject of a post, I doubt he can even…” Jan 27, 20:03
Peter McAvoy on Shield Of The Phantom: “I forgot to mention earlier. Due to the removal of double jeopardy,I believe that some would have pursued Alex Salmond…” Jan 27, 20:01
Colin Alexander on Shield Of The Phantom: ““2 hours ago A judicial review of the ban on Palestine Action will be allowed to go ahead, a judge…” Jan 27, 19:18
Hatey McHateface on Shield Of The Phantom: “Guardian Online reporting that forces loyal to the ooya tollas may have slaughtered in excess of 30,000 of their own…” Jan 27, 19:01
Hatey McHateface on Shield Of The Phantom: “Fit’s that ye say, Sooty? Why do James and Dave find it impossible to engage with the facts in my…” Jan 27, 17:43
Peter McAvoy on Shield Of The Phantom: “I forgot to mention earlier that due to the scrapping of double jeopardy,some in the COPFS would have pursued Alex…” Jan 27, 17:34
David Holden on Shield Of The Phantom: “I take it the site troll is getting paid by the word as he knows a lot and is not…” Jan 27, 17:26
James Barr Gardner on Shield Of The Phantom: “Woolwich Crown Court was intended to serve as a high-security courtroom and became the preferred venue for terrorism trials. A…” Jan 27, 17:09
Aidan on Shield Of The Phantom: “Of course that isn’t true at all Xaracen, in any way shape or form, the Lords Privilege Committee never said…” Jan 27, 16:59
James on Shield Of The Phantom: “You’re on drugs, right? Or is this supposed to be some half-arsed parody? Keep posting, it’s comedy gold – the…” Jan 27, 16:24
Hatey McHateface on Shield Of The Phantom: ““Our gap in legal knowledge is very evident. Scots are sorely lacking in lawyers with competence in treaty making” Just…” Jan 27, 16:20