We’re feeling a bit stupid right now, readers. Earlier on today we sarcastically dubbed Scottish Labour “geniuses” over their plans to reintroduce alcohol (and sectarian singing) back to Scottish football at exactly the point when Scotland seemed to have finally turned the corner in its dysfunctional relationship with alcohol.
Indeed, for days now Labour have been carrying out a two-pronged stunt-photocall strategy, touring the country standing outside hospital casualty departments looking concerned about an almost entirely imaginary “A&E crisis”, while also leafleting every major football ground promising to let fans get smashed at games again.
Seeking a cheap laugh, we tweeted that we hoped they didn’t get confused and start handing out their “MOAR BOOZE!” literature outside the A&E wards, but then an alert reader pointed out that we were idiots and Jim Murphy was in fact an evil mastermind.
One of the compensations of living in England (from the perspective of editing a website about Scottish politics) is that you get a much clearer picture of how English people – who make up 85% of the UK electorate, and as such in practice determine who the government is – see the country’s political leaders.
For those of you who don’t, here’s Charlie Brooker – a man who’s no fan of the Tories by any stretch of the imagination – casting a weary and exasperated eye over Ed “these strikes are wrong” Miliband on last night’s Weekly Wipe.
In our experience it’s a pretty accurate snapshot of how the hapless Labour leader is regarded by most left-leaning people down on this side of the border. You’ll need to have seen the rest of the episode to get the “Schofield!” joke.
There’s a very strange article on the front page of the Herald website this morning. It’s an interview with Nigel Farage in which the UKIP leader insists that his party, not the SNP, will hold the balance of power in the UK parliament after May’s election.
It’s a bold assertion given that current projections put the SNP on anywhere from 30 to 56 seats with UKIP expected to struggle to get 5 to 10. But Farage’s rationale for the statement is an interesting one.
The abusive Facebook comments recently directed at Labour MP Margaret Curran and highlighted in a piece on the STV website today make us sigh. Not only are they horrible but they’re counter-productive, in every sense of the term – they’re not going to change Curran’s mind about anything by yelling at her, and they feed a narrative about “vile cybernats” that the media is all too eager to gleefully perpetuate.
So let’s make something clear from the off: shut up, idiots. You’re not helping.
Because a good satirist can sometimes make a point better in seven sentences than idiots like us can in a 1000-word article, and make it funny at the same time.
The very few readers who don’t immediately just snort and turn the page when they see the words “George Foulkes” may have noticed in yesterday’s Herald that the thirsty peer could be found gloating gleefully that had Scotland voted for independence last September it would now be “bankrupt” due to the decline in oil prices.
We can’t be bothered pointing out for the 500th time that a Yes vote wouldn’t have seen Scotland actually independent until March 2016, and that the oil price NOW is therefore about as relevant to anything as, well, Baron Foulkes himself.
But we couldn’t help noticing a couple of small arithmetical details.
There really isn’t very much of a news story in this morning’s Sun “exclusive” that some Labour MPs say they’d quit the party rather than work with the SNP should the electorate deliver such a result in May. One told the paper:
Those of us who remember the parade of furious Scottish Labour figures going on TV and openly threatening to scupper any “rainbow coalition” involving the Nats in 2010, thereby ensuring that David Cameron and George Osborne came to power, won’t be the least bit surprised at the sheer depth of hatred and jealous rage that consumes Labour’s branch office in North Britain when the SNP are mentioned.
And there’s nothing eyebrow-raisingly new in Scottish Labour’s spiteful determination that if Scots vote against the Conservatives – but not for Labour – they should be punished with Tory governments. It’s the standard policy of electoral blackmail that the party has deployed against the rise of rivals from the left for years, and which it’s now also turning against the Greens south of the border.
But there is a telling phrase in that short quote.
Independent website Political Compass has just released its 2015 graph charting the ideological positions of all the political parties of the UK. It’s a fairly predictable one.
On the image above, we’ve added, for parties active in Scotland only, striped circles indicating each party’s 2010 position. But what does it tell us about 2015?
It’s somehow fitting that the lead article on Labour Hame today is headed by a lie before it even starts – an offer to join the party for £1 that takes you to a page where it actually costs five times as much.
(We’d noticed days ago that the much-hyped £1 offer had been quietly dumped after just a month, but it appears that nobody in the Scottish branch office thought to keep poor hapless Labour Hame in the loop.)
The article below, though, is remarkably even more dishonest.
Oneliner on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “There are some of the mindset that a pejorative is only valid if it comes from HQ.” Sep 20, 13:47
Alf Baird on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: ““politicians are now starting to wake up to another aspect of this rotten Scottish Government” It is a great hope…” Sep 20, 13:45
David Blake on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “The more they come up with desperate stuff like this, the more it feels there must be something really nasty…” Sep 20, 13:40
Alf Baird on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: ““Scotland’s national situation” Returning to postcolonial theory (Fanon etc), as we must, reveals that a colonised people: – are ‘out…” Sep 20, 13:38
Spartan 117 on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “@Hatey, there’s a lot to unpack there. Firstly, the term “warmonger” was used as a statement of fact rather than…” Sep 20, 12:56
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “@DaveL says: 20 September, 2026 at 12:25 pm “I must admit his reply at 8.54am is a step up and…” Sep 20, 12:39
sarah on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Douglas Chapman: I suggested in a previous comment that perhaps the reason why the SNP-run Scottish executive had made so…” Sep 20, 12:38
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Then again, Spartan, Scotland’s a wee place shortly to be Independent and walking alone on the world stage. Free to…” Sep 20, 12:35
Spartan 117 on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “The implosion of the M25 omniclusterfuckpermashambles quickens. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16145111/Andy-Burnham-early-election-mandate-income-tax.html The Fabian tax junkies are so desperate to fund their warmongering and…” Sep 20, 12:26
DaveL on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “@Spartan 117, I really don’t expect anything more than the drivel he usually posts, but I must admit his reply…” Sep 20, 12:25
James Che on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Factchecker, I knew you would find an excuse, The facts I Quote are from Westminster parliament site and are also…” Sep 20, 12:08
willie on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “And to change the dial a tad again this Sunday morning a most interesting article breaking out into the popular…” Sep 20, 12:04
Spartan 117 on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “@DaveL, don’t expect any intelligible answer from warmongers. You’re trying to find reason and logic amongst the unreasonable and illogical.…” Sep 20, 11:25
James Che on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Janet, Surely it i s entirely reasonable on the pat of the police, For What reason if the police police…” Sep 20, 11:24
Spartan 117 on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Spot the Sturgeonista. And no, it’s not reasonable at all, nor has the law been correctly applied.” Sep 20, 11:18
Spartan 117 on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “@Hatey. Who’s suggesting we “sacrifice” anyone? My view is it’s naff all to do with us so we should keep…” Sep 20, 11:16
factchecker on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “James Che says: 20 September, 2026 at 8:49 am Factchecker never checks all facts Guilty as charged. I have not…” Sep 20, 10:42
robertkknight on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Hmmm… it’d not be unreasonable to assume “Janet” works for Police Scotland/COPFS. Did you pen any of the previous responses…” Sep 20, 10:29
DaveL on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Try again, defeated isolated and skint or winning and going to attack the rest of the world?” Sep 20, 10:14
Janet on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Entirely reasonable on the part of the police. You don’t like it, but tough. FoI law has been correctly applied.” Sep 20, 09:43
James Che on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Hatey, I know your’e being kind to factchecker, by giving him hints and clues, but perhaps it is better to…” Sep 20, 09:42
James Che on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Xaracen, The old Scottish parliament was dissolved in England by the monarch of England declaration on the 28th April 1706.…” Sep 20, 09:31
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “By linking aspects of Scotland’s political and economic situation to institutionalised slavery, demonstrating the cretinous ignorance and self pitying grievance…” Sep 20, 09:18
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “You’ve thrown down the gauntlet for FC to pick up, if he dares. Can we now look forwards to double…” Sep 20, 09:01
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Why are you so keen to get an answer that doesn’t make sense? When you go to the shop, do…” Sep 20, 08:54
James Che on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Factchecker never checks all facts but simply avoids those he cannot cope with when they do not fit his narrative,…” Sep 20, 08:49
James Che on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Well done Willie, We do not have politicians nowadays that carry out their employment with due diligence, simple actors maybe,…” Sep 20, 08:31
DaveL on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Oh and by the way Hatey, you didn’t answer my earlier question with anything substantial; I’ll ask again. Are the…” Sep 19, 23:55