Over the last 30 days, Wings Over Scotland’s readership has soared to almost 42,000 unique users. Although in February our number of unique visitors eclipsed daily sales of the Scotsman for the first time (and has grown 25% since then), soon we’ll have no idea how we’re doing comparatively, because the once-proud newspaper has now joined the Herald in ducking out of monthly sales reporting. The Guardian reports:
“All four titles were pulled out of monthly reporting against the background of plunging print sales. In The Scotsman’s case, its sale in January was recorded as 32,435, only 21,806 of which were sold at the full cover price. That represented a year-on-year drop of 17.5%. Scotland of Sunday’s circulation fall, to a January average of 38,493, was worse. That was 24% fewer than in January 2012.”
Veteran readers of this site will know how hard it is to nail Scottish Labour down on a policy for just about anything. So when we suggested earlier today that the party DID have a (sort of) firm policy on something – namely calling on the Scottish Government to bring forward legislation to stop people being evicted over bedroom-tax arrears – we probably shouldn’t have been surprised to be contacted within minutes by a Scottish Labour press officer angrily insisting that it didn’t.
For the seasoned political analyst (and also for idiots like us), it can be hard to offer a rational explanation for why any thinking human being would ever believe a word the Labour Party says about anything any more.
It came to power 16 years ago promising to introduce electoral reform, then ditched it. (But still hilariously claims to be committed to the principle despite 100 years of failing to deliver it.) It also pledged not to introduce university tuition fees, then introduced them. It campaigned for re-election on a promise not to increase them, then increased them. It – well, we could go on all day, just about tuition fees alone.
But let’s cut to the chase and move up to the present day.
“Millions of Scots will lose out on an RBS share bonanza worth up to £800 if they choose independence, Business Secretary Vince Cable has warned.
The Treasury is considering giving every taxpayer in the UK shares in RBS as part of a give-away ahead of the next general election. Coalition sources calculate the windfall could be worth £400 to £800 per person.
Coalition Cabinet minister Mr Cable said his Liberal Democrat party backed the payout to ensure taxpayers benefit from 2008’s billion-pound bailout of the Edinburgh institution, although he cautioned the Coalition not to “rush” the process.
Asked if Scots would get a chance to benefit in an independent Scotland, he said: “No. It is at the moment vested in the British Government.”
Even leaving aside the astonishingly crude bribery/blackmail aspect, we’re still a bit confused. Unionists constantly tell us that RBS is “Scottish”, and that therefore an independent Scotland should take on all of its debt. But apparently the people of the rUK will still own the whole bank, so they’ll get all the shares and the profits.
Sometimes, readers, it really does seem like the No camp is devoting most of its anti-independence efforts to putting us out of a job.
A lot of independence supporters are getting excited today about this clip of Labour shadow-cabinet MP Helen Goodman telling the BBC that Labour would keep the bedroom tax. They’re right to highlight it, but most are doing so for the wrong reasons.
Goodman’s position is that Labour WOULD still implement the hated tax, but would only penalise people for over-occupying their housing if they’d been offered smaller accommodation and refused to move. Opponents of Labour are observing the hypocrisy of the party raging against the tax in public while admitting they’d retain it, which is fair enough, but also misses the real point.
As we’ve mentioned before, it really has been a revelation to discover that the Daily Record’s iPad app – which gives you the entire printed paper, not just the selection of stories that reach the Record website – is free on weekdays. Today, for example, it brought us a large not-online Page 2 piece on former Tory cabinet minister Liam Fox’s idiotic hardline policy suggestions for the party, which were expertly ridiculed by Conservative commentator Alex Massie yesterday.
Thanks to Mr Massie’s splendid work, there’s no need for us to bother with Fox’s comments. What we noticed instead was the Record’s analysis of them.
When the Daily Record lost Magnus Gardham to the Herald, they made sure to call on a like-for-like replacement. Torcuil Crichton, the newspaper’s self-styled “man in Westminster” (and who has never approved a single comment on his political blog in almost five years), is Gardham’s only rival as the most virulently and overtly Unionist staff reporter – as opposed to opinion columnist – in the Scottish media.
Power Of Scotland is a newspaper about the power industry, given away as a business supplement with The Times. An alert contributor pointed us to an intriguing article in the latest edition from regular Scotsman columnist Peter Jones, offering a more nuanced account of the industry’s view of independence than you might expect.
If you’re pressed for time we’ve pulled out a couple of the more interesting passages.
A creative reader writes in to notify us of these splendid-looking mugs, and to pledge that all profits (about 45% of the sale price) will be donated to our fundraiser.
Frankly we’re taking them at their word on the second part, but either way they seem a rather excellent thing to have in your home.
It’s weird watching the Sunday papers all decrying the media’s handling of Wednesday’s leaked Scottish Government document. Everyone seems to agree that the Cabinet paper wasn’t any kind of smoking gun – the consensus is that John Swinney’s comments were sensible, cautious and largely misrepresented in the press.
Eddie Barnes in Scotland on Sunday, for example, noted that “Few of the issues presented within the report were in any way revelatory” (though it didn’t stop him from referring to them as “revelations” later in the piece anyway), but then diffidently observed that they “produced a disastrous set of headlines”, as if his own publication hadn’t written any of them, and as if it wasn’t continuing to do so on the very same day Barnes’ piece hit the newsstands.
Young Lochinvar on Not So Octopus: “Beggars! But of course it has everything to do with you! I presume you utilised yer vote, so, it’s got…” Apr 10, 02:17
Young Lochinvar on Not So Octopus: “Geri @ 7.38 Hit the nail right on the head again. Yoof trendy is not necessarily “right trendy”.. C; And…” Apr 10, 01:09
Young Lochinvar on Not So Octopus: “AX Because we have been forcibly indoctrinated by persons “historical” such as yerself with agendas.. Who? 1. Royalty 2. Protestant…” Apr 10, 01:00
Cynicus on The quality of mercy: “Bilbo says: “Trump….. may be good at a certain type of business that has made him rich….” =========== NOT TRUE…” Apr 9, 23:48
Cynicus on The quality of mercy: “Bilbo says: “Trump….. may be good at a certain type of business that has made him rich….” =========== Not true.…” Apr 9, 23:26
Geri on Not So Octopus: “Gen Z Aptly named the zoomers. If it’s not on social media it didn’t happen/isnae real..lol” Apr 9, 23:19
Rev. Stuart Campbell on Not So Octopus: “You seem to have forgotten to name any of them, ironically.” Apr 9, 22:48
Colin Dawson on Not So Octopus: “Is there a way where the voters could choose the order of the regional list candidates rather than the parties?…” Apr 9, 22:21
Geri on Not So Octopus: “George, That is unfortunate but it shouldn’t be held against everyone else. There are individuals I’d think twice about now.…” Apr 9, 22:08
MaryB on Not So Octopus: “George Ferguson @ 7.22pm I can well understand why people are so tired and jaded with the independence movement, especially…” Apr 9, 22:03
Alf Baird on Not So Octopus: “There is nobody to be held higher than those who have lost or stand to lose their liberty fighting for…” Apr 9, 21:47
George Ferguson on Not So Octopus: “@Mark Beggan @9:09pm It was nothing to dae with me either. Self made situation for the Independence movement. We are…” Apr 9, 21:39
Mark Beggan on Not So Octopus: “I want a clean conscience after the 7th of May. When the whole shit house comes burning down I will…” Apr 9, 21:09
Bilbo on Not So Octopus: “There is quite a lot of comment saying that support for the Greens is generational where the majority of their…” Apr 9, 20:52
George Ferguson on Not So Octopus: “@Geri 7:45pm So I have ruined the Independence movement. The fact that I was defrauded twice is not relevant. Perhaps…” Apr 9, 20:38
Bilbo on Not So Octopus: “You are never going to get a party that is fully aligned with your own personal political views in normal…” Apr 9, 20:37
Bilbo on Not So Octopus: “I’m afraid the others are correct Socrates. If your grandson is involved in the Greens, he is either an ideologically…” Apr 9, 20:28
agentx on Not So Octopus: “Why is the name in English and not Scots?” Apr 9, 20:26
Bilbo on The quality of mercy: “Trump is touted by his supporters as a business President untouched by the grubbiness of the Washington political machine. The…” Apr 9, 20:25
Geri on Not So Octopus: “Eh? Wales belongs to England. Scotland is a country. Scotland is in a Union with England. Not with Wales or…” Apr 9, 20:03
Cuphook on Not So Octopus: “Here’s my idea: Non-voters are counted on the list just as political parties are and each time non-voters win a…” Apr 9, 19:58
Geri on Not So Octopus: “So basically you’re waiting on 5.5 million people agreeing with you before you’ll even consider if Scotland should be an…” Apr 9, 19:57
Geri on Not So Octopus: “You have that the wrong way around. It’s ppl like you that have ruined the Yes movement. You aren’t asked…” Apr 9, 19:45
Geri on Not So Octopus: “I have to agree with GM. They weren’t in Holyrood five minutes & immediately started reversing on indy with inventing…” Apr 9, 19:38
agentx on Not So Octopus: “Why is it “Alliance to Liberate Scotland Party” when the Wales Nationalist party is Plaid Cymru?” Apr 9, 19:30
George Ferguson on Not So Octopus: “@MaryB I am so glad I didn’t stand as an Independent Candidate seeking Scottish Independence. I couldn’t share a platform…” Apr 9, 19:22
diabloandco on The quality of mercy: “Thank you so much auld yin! Now some others may listen to it!” Apr 9, 19:01
Joan Hutcheson on Not So Octopus: “Well said, Lorna. Sane and intelligent as always!” Apr 9, 19:01
Lorncal on Not So Octopus: “Hi Alf. The problem with the Alliance, for me, is that some of the candidates are as batshit on some…” Apr 9, 18:52
Geri on Not So Octopus: “Exactly, Twathater. No voters voted for this shite & now they complain about it. It was evident this would always…” Apr 9, 18:46