The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland



Joining the dots 242

Posted on November 23, 2013 by

So we’re pretty embarrassed that we’ve only just put these two things together. We’ve been spending a fair bit of time recently pointing out that there’s almost no chance of the Barnett Formula – in essence, a mechanism for returning to Scotland some of the excess money it sends to Westminster in the form of oil revenue and tax receipts – being retained after the next UK general election.

We’ve also spent a good six months highlighting that the possibility of Holyrood being given “more tax powers” after a No vote is actually a trap, not in reality offering more power at all, but more responsibility. (Because it does you no good to have to collect your own tax revenue – the power lies in deciding how your tax revenue is spent.)

dottodot

And duh, it’s taken us till now to see the connection. Boy, is our face red.

Read the rest of this entry →

Quoted for interest 95

Posted on November 21, 2013 by

Here’s the Labour First Minister of Wales, Carwyn Jones, one year ago:

“Asked if he could see Barnett reformed without touching the current generous allocation of funds to Scotland, Mr Jones said:

‘It would be difficult to envisage a situation where there would be widespread Barnett reform with an independence referendum pending in Scotland, and with a Scottish Chief Secretary to the Treasury I think that’s unlikely. The problem has been in years gone by that you can’t address the Barnett Formula unless you address the whole of it.’

The First Minister said it was difficult to predict a timescale because there was no timetable for the first step – Barnett reform. Asked whether he got a sense from Danny Alexander that he had an appetite for reform, Mr Jones said:

‘No, I don’t – and I can understand why. He’s a Scottish Chief Secretary to the Treasury. Reforming a system that wouldn’t help Scotland is not something that would be high on his agenda. I certainly can’t see it happening before 2014 and the Scottish referendum.‘”

Jones is all over the papers today with his bizarre delusions-of-influence assertion that he would have some sort of veto over a Sterling currency union between the rUK and an independent Scotland (“Wales could block efforts by an independent Scotland to join a pound-sharing pact”, reports the Scotsman).

For perspective, imagine Alex Salmond being given a veto over the result of a UK referendum to leave the EU. Stop laughing, the article’s not finished yet.

Read the rest of this entry →

It’s a trap! 106

Posted on November 01, 2013 by

Blair McDougall, director of “Better Together”, Dundee University, 30 October 2013:

“UK ministers are not going to fall into the trap of acting against Scotland until Scotland decides to leave the United Kingdom”

blairsdu

You heard it straight from the horse’s – well, let’s be kind and say “mouth”, folks.

Read the rest of this entry →

Quoted for proof 154

Posted on September 26, 2013 by

Because we keep telling you what a No vote really means:

“That is why I am talking quite passionately about getting English Labour MPs back up the road and for me, sitting down with Neil [Findlay] and Richard [Simpson] and Rhoda [Grant] and others and saying, let’s get health policies that can be consistent across England, Scotland and Wales.

Wouldn’t that be a good thing, pulling in the same direction as opposed to pulling our separate ways?

Devolution, in its early days, was about doing something different and it needs to enter a different phase where we start talking again more about a UK-wide policy because in the end, that helps everybody.”

That’s Labour’s shadow health secretary Andy Burnham talking to Holyrood Magazine this week, in comments strangely unpublicised in the rest of the Scottish media.

Read the rest of this entry →

Throwing mud in glass houses 114

Posted on September 24, 2013 by

There’s been a certain amount of hoo-haa within the independence camp this morning about a Telegraph piece reporting comments by Labour’s shadow Scottish Secretary Margaret Curran in which she appears to cast doubt on whether devolution has been a good thing for Scotland at all.

curran

We’re not sure why, because they’re nothing we weren’t telling you almost a year ago.

Read the rest of this entry →

The thieves of devolution 58

Posted on October 16, 2012 by

It’s probably fair to say that the opposition parties in the Scottish Parliament have reacted badly to the SNP’s victory in two consecutive Holyrood elections, especially the 2011 one in which the nationalists secured an unprecedented overall majority. Scottish Labour in particular has never really fully come to terms with its rejection by the electorate in a place where it has regarded power as a birthright for half a century, as can be seen by its constant demands to be consulted over legislation despite the voters unequivocally choosing to exclude the party from government and placing their trust in the SNP alone until at least 2016.

Despite enacting some highly controversial policies in its first 18 months as a majority (minimum pricing, the anti-sectarianism bill and equal-marriage legislation), polls consistently suggest that if anything, the gap in popularity between the SNP and Labour is growing as Johann Lamont’s party indulges in factional infighting and alienates its core voters by adopting neoliberal policies from its UK parent.

Meanwhile, the Tories continue to flatline in Scotland as they’ve done for most of a generation, and the Lib Dems suffer the consequences of a massively unpopular Westminster coalition and a third successive leader who seems more consumed by hatred of the SNP than any commitment to seeing his own party’s policies advanced.

So it shouldn’t come as a great surprise to any passing neutral observer that the Scottish opposition has all but given up on any hope of defeating Alex Salmond democratically at the ballot box, and quietly embarked instead on a new strategy: to steal power from the nationalists by bypassing Holyrood altogether.

Read the rest of this entry →

One nation under St George 60

Posted on October 03, 2012 by

We’d be getting a little nervous at the moment if we were citizens of Northern Ireland who wanted to stay part of the United Kingdom. Because over recent weeks and months, the concept of the UK has been increasingly pushed aside, in favour of that of Great Britain. (A construct which, of course, excludes the entire island of Ireland.)

The home team at the London Olympics, lavishly celebrated at the Labour conference yesterday, was branded “Team GB”, rather than “Team UK”, and although there are three devolved administrations and parliaments within the UK, only two of them were featured at the same conference’s “Better Together” session.

The situation in Northern Ireland is none of this site’s concern. But it’s not just the Unionists across the sea who ought to be worried. Because on the strength of what Ed Miliband said in his keynote speech yesterday afternoon, Scotland and Wales face a future of being absorbed, in every practical sense, into a Greater England.

Read the rest of this entry →

  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,933 Posts, 1,245,232 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “Loving it, sam. We need to improve benefits and free health care so we can draw even more millions of…Jun 21, 16:23
    • Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “You’re missing that a male minus dangly bits isn’t a female. Quite a big miss. Maybe excuse yourself from framing…Jun 21, 16:18
    • Nemisis Benn on The End Of Law: “Am I missing something? The blurb from Pollock doesn’t quite say that certain criminals are serving their sentences in establishments…Jun 21, 15:20
    • Saffron Robe on The End Of Law: “The admissions practice has been deemed unlawful and yet it remains in place. The irony is, of course, that if…Jun 21, 14:41
    • Alf Baird on The End Of Law: ““Wasn’t it psychology” Indeed so, for colonization ‘is based on psychology’ (Cesaire). Of course, colonization itself leads to many other…Jun 21, 14:39
    • Jay on The End Of Law: “McHateful, interesting to read your riposte to my comment (11:37, 20th June). Your reply comes close to making me think…Jun 21, 14:36
    • sam on The End Of Law: “Social Murder? Austerity and Life Expectancy in the UK Get access Arrow David Walsh, Gerry McCartney Published: 28 November 2024…Jun 21, 14:32
    • sam on The End Of Law: “From “UK Poverty Guide 2026..”, Joseph Rowntree Foundation. “Every year, we see the same groups disproportionately trapped in poverty, with…Jun 21, 14:23
    • Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “I’m almost certain that some of the “Scotland’s Mammie” Covid TV addresses were fronted by Murrell, not Sturgeon. Think about…Jun 21, 13:56
    • Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “I haven’t read it. Don’t imagine I ever will. There’s some quite clever people plausibly arguing that AI is already…Jun 21, 13:46
    • Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “Fuck Morocco an aw.Jun 21, 13:36
    • Jay on The End Of Law: “Nicely made point,McHateful. On another topic, have you read ‘Rise and Kill First’ by Ronen Bergman? To avoid confusion, Ruth…Jun 21, 13:08
    • Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “Not sure if I should level the “unclean” or the “fantasist” charge at you Tommo. Probably the latter, as it…Jun 21, 13:03
    • Captain Caveman on The End Of Law: “Heh! Well, I guess I’ll just have to lick my wounds and enjoy the tennis here at Queens Club, [capital…Jun 21, 13:00
    • Onlooker on The End Of Law: “I do wonder how many of the ‘people’ here are either bots or paid King’s shilling-graspers, I admit.Jun 21, 12:57
    • Onlooker on The End Of Law: “I see. So anybody critical of English legal sovereignty on an ostensible Scottish independence site is in the SNP. The…Jun 21, 12:54
    • Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “As always, sam leaves out demographics so that he can lie with his statistics. There’s something like 10 million immigrants…Jun 21, 12:54
    • Jay on The End Of Law: “Is that self-parody from Caveman or is he merely a lout who boasts about how much money he has, so…Jun 21, 12:48
    • Lorncal on The End Of Law: “I think it was a BBC2 Open doors discussion from 1973, not 1960s, Jay. Very enlightening for people today, but…Jun 21, 12:12
    • sam on The End Of Law: “Do you people own anything? In 1961 poverty levels in the UK were 13%. Under Thatcher they rose to 25%.…Jun 21, 12:02
    • Lorncal on The End Of Law: “Well said, H McH.Jun 21, 12:00
    • Andy Wiltshire on The End Of Law: “Morning Rev. Do you have any inside info on whether the BBC programme coming up on Tuesday, ‘The Big Cases,…Jun 21, 11:18
    • Mark Beggan on The End Of Law: “The Supreme court has to keep stepping in to stop the stupid, thieving perverts from committing offences against humanity. Just…Jun 21, 11:13
    • TURABDIN on The End Of Law: “THIS may be of interest to those whose sense of ethnicity encompasses language as a cultural sign. https://archive.is/Qr9bX The dominance…Jun 21, 11:11
    • Tommo on The End Of Law: “Surely the time is long past to abolish these devolution disasters; all they have enabled is the emergence of an…Jun 21, 10:44
    • Captain Caveman on A Fishy Tale: “It’s more a case of I know what’s best for my hard-earned cash.Jun 21, 10:43
    • Hatey McHateface on A Fishy Tale: “Not opposed to drill, drill, drill or charity beginning at home. But then I’m not living near current sea level.…Jun 21, 10:04
    • Hatey McHateface on The End Of Law: “Does anybody know if any of our Scottish trannies have infiltrated the Tartan Army? How are they faring, barging into…Jun 21, 09:10
    • Captain Caveman on A Fishy Tale: “Nope, still not buying it – on either count. Soz. We should drill, drill, drill and also remember that charity…Jun 21, 09:09
    • Onlooker on The End Of Law: “Who cares what the ENGLISH so-called ‘Supreme Court’ says? It was set up in ye olde days of 2009 down…Jun 21, 09:02
  • A tall tale



↑ Top